ie8 fix
madison

Microsoft sticker shock: Anytime Upgrade, Family Pack details

By | July 31, 2009, 8:58am PDT

Summary: Earlier today, Microsoft announced pricing and delivery details for a pair of eagerly awaited products in the Windows 7 family. If you were hoping for a Windows Anytime Upgrade bargain or a long-term commitment to multi-PC upgrade pricing with the new Home Premium Family Pack, think again. I’ve got all the disappointing details.

With its upcoming launch of Windows 7, Microsoft is trying to walk a fine line on pricing. Maintaining a high average selling price for Windows is crucial to the company’s bottom line, but in a deep recession, PC buyers are more concerned with their own bottom line. That’s especially true of consumers, who are likely to be put off by the high price of upgrading multiple PCs from XP or Vista.

Earlier today, Microsoft announced pricing and delivery details for a pair of eagerly awaited products in the Windows 7 family. If you were hoping for upgrade bargains or a long-term commitment to multi-PC upgrade pricing, prepare to be disappointed.

I first reported on Microsoft’s plans to release a Windows 7 Family Pack about a month ago and saw hints of pricing and packaging a week later. Those details are now confirmed. Estimated retail price in the United States will be $150 for a package that includes Windows 7 Home Premium installation media and a license key that can be activated on three PCs in a single household. The price in Canada will be $200. Expect to see retailers offering discounts of roughly 10% on these prices. There’s no official word on availability of the Family Pack offer in other markets.

The unpleasant surprise in the Family Pack announcement is the detail that it will be available beginning October 22 “while supplies last.” In a briefing yesterday, Microsoft Product Manager Michelle Haven confirmed that the Family Pack is “intended to be a limited-quantity offer” but added that Microsoft plans to listen to customer feedback to “find out if customers love it.” (If you want the Family Pack to be a permanent part of the Windows 7 lineup, you can leave me your feedback in the Talkback section below and I’ll pass it along.)

The second half of today’s announcement involves Microsoft’s Windows Anytime Upgrade program, which allows Windows users to buy a new PC with one edition of Windows 7 installed and move up to a higher edition later. As I reported a few months ago, the upgrade process truly is easy, completing in 15 minutes or less without requiring a reinstallation or tampering with existing programs and data files. (See Microsoft prepares Anytime Upgrade, v2 for a hands-on look at the upgrade process.) So what’s it going to cost for those upgrades? I’ve put together this matrix from Microsoft’s price sheet; find your edition of Windows 7 in the first column and then read across to see how much an upgrade to a higher edition will cost:

Upgrade to ->

Home Premium

Professional

Ultimate

Starter

$80

$115

$165

Home Basic

$80

$165

Home Premium

$90

$140

Professional

$130

So, if you buy a netbook that includes Windows 7 Starter, you can unlock the Aero interface and enable Media Center by paying $80 for the Windows Anytime Upgrade to Home Premium. That price is similar to what Microsoft charged for upgrading Vista Home Basic to Home Premium. Similarly, you can upgrade a consumer PC from Home Premium to Professional for $90; an equivalent option was not available with Windows Vista. These two upgrade options in particular will set de facto upgrade prices for OEMs to offer with new PCs; they’ll have a powerful incentive to offer upsells for significantly less than the Anytime Upgrade price.

Online Anytime Upgrade options will be available online from Microsoft in 13 markets, including the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, the UK, and much of Western Europe. A more limited selection of shrink-wrapped Anytime Upgrade packages will be available in retail stores worldwide at similar pricing. These upgrade packs are limited to the following scenarios: Starter or Home Basic to Home Premium; Home Premium to Professional; and Home Premium to Ultimate.

The one price in that matrix that makes no sense whatsoever is the obscenely high cost of moving from Windows 7 Professional to Ultimate. If you’re considering the Anytime Upgrade option from Starter or Home Premium edition, that difference is $50. But if you’re thinking of moving up from Professional to Ultimate, you’ll be gouged for $130. Here’s a graphic example of how stupid that pricing decision is: If you bought a Windows 7 Home Premium upgrade in the U.S. at the limited-time price of $50 last month, you can move up to Ultimate for $140, making your total upgrade cost $190. But if you took the $100 Professional offer instead, you’ll have to pay an extra $130 for the Ultimate upgrade, making your total cost $230, or $40 extra for the exact same end result.

Microsoft’s pricing decisions are often difficult to understand, but this one is shockingly wrong. Why the disparity? I suspect that Microsoft is trying to protect its volume license business and discourage enterprise customers from using the Anytime Upgrade option rather than pay for an Enterprise license that has the same features. But that’s not going to go down well for a small business owner who buys a new PC with Windows 7 Professional installed and then discovers that adding BitLocker encryption is going to cost another $130.

Would-be upgraders in the EU and the UK are in for some sticker shock as well, as the table below illustrates. Again, the pricing decisions are difficult to understand. Why does it cost essentially the same to upgrade from Starter or Home Premium to Professional, for example? And again, the price to move from Professional to Ultimate seems ludicrously high when the effect for non-Enterprise customers is to simply unlock support for BitLocker encryption and additional language packs.

Upgrade to ->

Home Premium

Professional

Ultimate

Starter

€75/£70

€185/£120

€205/£140

Home Premium

€180/£120

€190/£125

Professional

€135/£85

Overall, I think Microsoft has blown a couple of excellent opportunities with today’s announcements. The Family Pack offer is an excellent deal and reflects today’s consumer landscape: people have multiple PCs in their households. So why make this a limited-quantity offer? The Family Pack should be a permanent addition to the Windows consumer lineup.

Similarly, the Anytime Upgrade pricing is a disappointment and another missed opportunity. As I wrote a few months ago:

The devil, as always, is in the details. In this case, the most important missing detail is price. If Microsoft can offer easy upgrades from Starter to Home Premium and from Home Premium to Professional for $49 or less, this is a great way for Microsoft to boost the average selling price of Windows (a metric that adds directly to the bottom line) and give customers value. On the other hand, if those upgrades are priced too high, as in $99 or more, then fuggedaboutit.

The upgrade prices from consumer editions are reasonable; the prices for Ultimate edition are not.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
354
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft sticker shock: Anytime Upgrade, Family Pack details
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
What do you think of Microsoft's decision to make the Family Pack a limited-quantity offer? Are the upgrade prices fair?

Leave your comments here.
0 Votes
+ -
Just Another Ripoff
itanalyst2@... 31st Jul 2009
Thank goodness for MSDN, I won't have to pay for mine.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL...
Hallowed are the Ori 31st Jul 2009
So you or your employer paid for MSDN, right?
0 Votes
+ -
You Kidding? Employer Dude!
itanalyst2@... 31st Jul 2009
You think I'd shell out for a license unless it's included with the purchase of the PC?

Scandalous!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Please forgive me, I wasn't thinking clearly. (nt)
Hallowed are the Ori 31st Jul 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah...but you perpetuate the idea that Microsoft is a want or need! (NT)
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 31st Jul 2009
NT
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
It's More Of An Employer Requirement
itanalyst2@... 31st Jul 2009
If my employer didn't use exchange or Office then I would most likely do my business from Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
What...is Linux unable to do what OS X can?
0 Votes
+ -
Your Kidding Right?
kjgslg@... 2nd Aug 2009
Linux is the OS I use at work
Open Office Handles .doc
Exchange: Use Evolution "Exchange addon" or Wine
to run Outlook

Sounds like excuses to me
times over, over time, like any great software.

Unlike your software, it's not an obsession or a love affair or a fanatical radical religion.


It's just software. It's been for sale for decades. People buy it just like they do books and toasters and other things they can use.

Enough of your radical BS. We know who you are, enough of the multiple nic thing too
.

Oh, and when was the last time you heard of a master carpenter getting his equipment for free? Do you know how much money it takes to buy or lease the space, the overhead, the raw material, and the massive collection of equipment used by modern master craftsmen?

I feel lucky I can pay one fifty for something I'll use for 10 years and make many master crafted usable and elegant solutinos for people that need them and will make their business work better, or their life better.

Just grow up. If you don't use Microsoft, then why come here and bother those of us that do.

  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
I use MS--but not 7
warnerpeter@... 1st Aug 2009
You seem to be missing the point with your rant. The article is about the Pricing of the new MS Windows 7 OS. The people that purchased Vista Ultimate were royally shafted by MS--and they are very, very angry. MS will concede nothing to these people who purchased Vista Ultimate and this has been a thorn in MS's image for a long time. MS doesn't care. They want a minimum on $180.00 just to get Bit-Locker and Languages. I've already got Bit-Locker and Languages with my Vista Ultimate 64 and I dual-boot with XP Pro/Sp3. There is nothing that Windows 7 has that I am willing to open my wallet to MS for. And, YES---I am in the IT Industry and have been for many, many years. A considerable number of friends and associates are learning alternative OS's and a few have put them to use exclusively. I have news for you---no one NEEDS Windows 7. They may WANT it, but if they already have Vista---they don't NEED it.
0 Votes
+ -
Even though my personal experience has been that Windows, including Vista, is the right choice for most businesses, I clearly said it is a "want" and that is my opinion, not a rant.

As for the rant part, I was replying to someone that comes to MS related blogs just to post what he did above. He was telling the prior poster that he did bad even suggesting a WANT or need for Microsoft, and his nic is NO MORE MICROSOFT EVER! and it's just one nic of many of a poster that uses several nics here.

I'm truely sorry if you were traumatized by my "rant" but I play fairly. I have one nic, the one I'm posting with, I don't go to ever Linux and Apple blog on zdnet.com just to bash everyone that even mentions the use of either of those platforms and I feel it's important to expose those who ruin these blogs for those of us who may care about the subject at hand.

I am writing this on a Vista Ultimate x64 machine. I am upset that the "Ultimate extras" turned out to be 2 new sets of dream scenes and a game called Tinker (which is pretty cool and fun to play, although a bit too easy but I'm not hopping mad. It's not a life altering deal for me. I make my living on Windows machines and mainly working as a consultant for area hospitals. I still do enough of my own coding on the side and I could write just for Vista only and still have more work than I can handle.


Now if to you I've sold out my soul to Microsoft, that is fine. I am not that emotionally attached....I am only attached at the same level a landscaper would be when he buys a new crop of mowers. Maybe the pricing when through the roof on mowers, but he knows which company makes the best ones and he looks at the long term, not the cost you pay in one day, that's what the linux ABMers want people to believe, you pay a sh*tload for crap and that's it. You're done.

Well the story doesn't end there for a professional. Over time I've never taken a loss on any Microsoft purchase, ever. And I've been responsible for some very large purchases at my sites.
0 Votes
+ -
I never went to Vista but....
DarnellH 3rd Aug 2009
I may go to 7. Only because I don't know how long XP Pro will be supported. I dual boot with Linux but have some MS specific software. The family pack pricing is the attraction. I refused to shell out the $ for Vista - that was absolutely ridiculous pricing. I began investigating Linux at that time.
0 Votes
+ -
Not me!
Sagax- 31st Jul 2009
I have been through the "upgrades" beginning with Win 95. Then there was Win98 then Win98SE, then WinME then Win2k each at $70 to $120 a pop. With my old PC, I quit after Win2k. I switched to Linux. There was a bit of a learning curve back then, but in a couple of weeks everything was OK. In a couple of months more, it was way better (no crashes, freezes or blue screens). The next PC I bought came with WinXP. It now runs Mepis Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux Please Help!!!!!!!!
Thomas Rippley 31st Jul 2009
I will have to wait for Linux to be even more main stream to challendge my pocketbook. That means you Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
Main stream?
kjgslg@... 2nd Aug 2009
I think you have been mis-informed. I have been
using Linux since 1996 and its as savy and
sofisticatied as Windows.
MS Office - Openoffice.org
DVD - VCL DVD Player

If you are waiting on everyone else then you are
an ID10T
0 Votes
+ -
Linux is not mainstream ...
mckenzl 3rd Aug 2009
Don't kid yourself. Usable? Yes. Capable? Certainly! Mainstream? Heck NO!
0 Votes
+ -
Foolish choices
cornpie 1st Aug 2009
If you did 5 upgrades between 95 and 2K you were just being foolish. Just because a new version comes out doesnt mean you have to buy it.
0 Votes
+ -
So, what is your point?
xuniL_z Updated - 2nd Aug 2009
You said you switched to Linux years ago, yet here you are in a Windows blog still telling the same old story.
I've not "purchased" Windows since around 2001 when I got my XP laptop.
When I bouth my Vista machine, which has grown on me and more and more over time and is extremely solid and has been for a long time, I didn't pay for the OS I got. It was a free upgrade with the deal. I mean I paid the home premium price, which is a good price via an OEM machine, and got Vista Ultimate x64, but after using the coupon for 300.00 on top of the low price, it's really no different that getting the OS for free with extra savings left over on the hardware.


I'm guessing you still have a love for Windows...you can't seem to let it go and move on.


I used *n*x for 10 years and when I found how much better windows is, when all metrics are considered, it was an easy decision to move everything to Microsoft and start to give users what they want, not what the IT dept says they need. By that I mean, they used to ask for on demand data and with *n*x it was nigh impossible to deliver that to them in a cost effective way.
Now with Windows that is pretty much an out of the box proposition.


devil
0 Votes
+ -
my times more valuable
marks055@... 3rd Aug 2009
than a few bucks for an operating system.
No time to waste on substandard apps found on Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
It's too confusing for consumers
j.m.galvin 31st Jul 2009
Your average consumer has no idea about all
these levels and what they include. He could
buy a new computer and be very disappointed
when he finds out that it doesn't do something
he wants. Then he'll get angry when asked for
another 80 bucks to get the machine to do what
he wants.

This can backfire with decreased buyer
satisfaction and even buyer remorse. MS
suffered this with the release of Vista on
machines that were not capable enough, forever
tarring that OS's reputation.

Say what you will about Apple, but at least they
only have one version of OSX for everybody.
That leads to improved buyer satisfaction.
Whether you buy a Mac Mini or Macpro
workstation, the software is the same and will
do everything.
0 Votes
+ -
Too confusing for *consumers*?
wolf_z 31st Jul 2009
How? They get Win 7 Home. If they run a business from home they get Pro.

How's that confusing again?

A family pack (3 computers) is Win 7 Home. How is this confusing again?

I think you want it to be confusing. It really isn't.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Too confusing for *consumers*?
mrnaturl1@... 31st Jul 2009
You're too high and mighty to think like an every day consumer. Too many do NOT know the difference between various flavors of a program. Why do you think we're here?? To answers those questions for them ...
0 Votes
+ -
Home Premium
trance2tec 31st Jul 2009
Since we are talking every day consumer- it's extremely unlikely any "every day consumer" would need anything above Home Premium.

That's what they'll most likely get on just about any PC purchased, and they'll be happy with it.

If you read the boxes at the store or view the MS website, it's also pretty clear what the differences are and if you want or need them.
0 Votes
+ -
Vista, 7 same problem for me
jmorgus@... 31st Jul 2009
Had Vista Home Premium, it didn't have the language support I needed. I could have had Eastern European languages, but not Japanese (my spouse's native language). Under XP, this was easily added. Under Vista Home Premium, not so much. I had a choice of Business or Ultimate. I chose Ultimate for the media features. Sounds like 7 will be the same, so I'll need either Professional or Ultimate.

Any guess on the price for that change?
0 Votes
+ -
What part of...
wolf_z 31st Jul 2009
..."Windows 7 Home" and "Windows 7 Professional" do you think the consumer is not likely to understand?

Calling me too high and mighty to think like a consumer means you believe the average consumer is too stupid to know that "Windows 7 Home" is intended for home use.

Jeez. Talk about arrogant...
0 Votes
+ -
Previous post
jmorgus@... 31st Jul 2009
I use the Vista system at home, for personal use (our main vendors don't support Vista, IE8, etc).

Because of my needs (spouse's, really) I need Business (7 Pro) or Ultimate for the language support. I didn't find out until AFTER installing home premium which, according to what you wrote, was the appropriate version for HOME USE.

Some people have different needs than marketing thinks they should. Without clear delineation, end users WILL get confused. That said, most users can use your guidelines to base their decisions on, but the information MUST be available for those whose needs exceed the marketing specifications.
0 Votes
+ -
Your situation is very rare
wolf_z 1st Aug 2009
And nobody can predict things like that for a mass marketed product.

You will need Ultimate, from what I can see. I imagine if this becomes a widespread problem they'll change it. Bi-lingual usage shouldn't be a major change--and I doubt they'd charge for it either.

I can half-see why they do put the 35 pack in Ultimate, who really needs 35 languages other than a multi-national corporation?
0 Votes
+ -
You must have been using XP Professional Volume license before because there are no language packs for the Home edition and there never were language packs available for the general public, even for Pro, as far as I am aware. Only for volume licensed clients.

So you really are in no different a situation as you still need a premium version of Windows for your needs, just as you did before.
0 Votes
+ -
Not arrogant
plumnilly 1st Aug 2009
You are judging the average consumer by yourselves. This is, like it or not, a techie blog. The average consumer just doesn't care about this stuff, or have much knowledge about it. People in that group will not know or understand the subtlies of MS pricing. They will get upset when their particular flavor of OS doesn't do what they want it to.
BobJ
0 Votes
+ -
You're wrong
wolf_z 1st Aug 2009
The average consumer is going to buy home because it *says* home! happy

The business version of Win 7 contains things like active domain joining, control of the desktop via group policy, fine-grained control of security and so forth. All things that a business would use and the consumer won't.

All the multimedia stuff is in Win 7 Home, it isn't like Vista or XP.

So no, the average consumer will see "home", buy "home", and have it do everything they're used to doing.

The edge cases like bilingual households aren't the average consumer. Nor are the ones who want to use their home computer from a different computer over the net (RDP).

This time MS got the mix pretty much right for the average consumer.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: flavors vs bait and switch
AlterGeek 31st Jul 2009
Customers easily grasp flavors along a single dimension, for example Baskin & Robins. Where MS is involved, "flavors" have evolved to resemble a fractal universe. Want a different "flavor"? You'll just have to step into a StarGate, and have your molecules go screaming through a wormhole, and hope they all choose to regroup on the other side.

To a typical customer, what could be a deal-breaker is if they can squeeze $150 into the budget for a Family Pack, but they find out it was only a bait-and-switch offer, to get people in the door...
0 Votes
+ -
You're even overestimating most business users. I'm constantly surprised how easily people are confused about computer issues and this one is going to be a dozy. Worst than Vista in that regard even if the product is better received.

The biggest friction points will be software that runs on XP but not Windows 7. MSFT better spend a lot of time on that issue. For many small business and small enterprise users, the upgrade price tag is going to include a lot of unpleasant surprises.

If the home version update package doesn't include networking and home network file serving, you can expect push-back on that issue alone. If home users have to mod up Windows 7 to get features, they're going to be really unhappy. So a lot depends on where MSFT draws those arbitrary lines about what works and what doesn't.
0 Votes
+ -
Tempted by some, but...
CarlS 31st Jul 2009
...glad I didn't buy Professional during the presale.

Sheesh, the Starter -> Ultimate and Professional -> Ultimate prices are nearly the same--which has got to be galling when you consider the fact that you paid about $150 more to get Pro in the first place!
0 Votes
+ -
No you didn't...
TheWerewolf 31st Jul 2009
You can't buy Starter.

But your point is still valid. The Premium -> Ultimate price is only $10 less than Pro -> Ultimate, which makes literally no sense.
0 Votes
+ -
No rush to upgrade.
stewarth@... 31st Jul 2009
I am in no rush to upgrade. My wife is fine on Vista and I am having pretty good luck with Linux. If my old XP box becomes useless for gaming then I'll just buy an Xbox or something like that and keep playing. Ubuntu, Firefox, and Open Office are taking care of my work needs nicely. Let's see... Unbuntu $0.00. Firefox $0.00. Open Office $0.00. Hmmmm. I like Windows but it is getting tougher and tougher to justify the cost.
0 Votes
+ -
At least if you want to stay legal or use your companies Dev license (NT)
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 31st Jul 2009
NT
0 Votes
+ -
What does Win7 Provide?
tigerg2002us@... 2nd Aug 2009
I have installed the Win7 Release Candidate. The UI looks really good; very pretty. But I have not found one thing that it does better than my WinXP install. Is performance better? NO! Are there new gee whiz apps? NO! Does it do more than Ubuntu or my "old" WinXP? NO! Did it support my old modem/fax card. NO! Is it going to cost me money if I want to keep the fax capabiltiy? YES! How much is it going to cost people with incompatible hardware? LOTS!

Do I feel a need to go to Windows 7? NO! Someone tell me what I missed that makes this something I want to do. It looks like something I will be forced to do because as I upgrade hardware there will not be WinXP support.
0 Votes
+ -
and they wonder why there is piracy!
irajiii@... 31st Jul 2009
If they would sell all of the editions at REASONABLE price, it would almost eliminate piracy on it's own. They constantly rip people off and expect no consequences. They need to remember that not everyone has a lot of disposable income. If you can sell it in China for $30.00 then sell it to us for the same!
0 Votes
+ -
Well then maybe...
LeeC 31st Jul 2009
... those people without disposable income should be considering the more important things in life, other than PC's and OS upgrades.

If you can't afford the fuel to run a car, you don't buy a car, so why should a PC be any different?

Those people would be better off with the Linux freeloader brigade, if they want something for nothing.
0 Votes
+ -
People pay to learn. That's why they go to college.
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 31st Jul 2009
But Microsoft is a single course with a single wisdom and a SINGLE projected outcome. NOT what a college does.

Microsoft - the dealer behind the OS drugs!
0 Votes
+ -
Freeloader brigade...
linuxer 31st Jul 2009
I resent that comment, I grew up with windows, enjoyed XP SP2 but then stepped down off the horse called Windows and tried Linux and I'm sorry but I will never look back at MS. Perhaps you too should do the same, everything is so much faster here.
0 Votes
+ -
Join the Linux Brigade. Geez, and I thought Vista was going to be the biggest promoter of Linux. Bing...bing..bing, WE HAVE A NEW WINNER!

I can't leagally run Mac OSX on my PCs so I'll continue to run it on my MacBook and I am so looking forward to the upcoming $29 upgrade (normally $129).

But for the PCs, after WinXP support ends it is definitely going to be Linux time, no two ways about it.

Sure I'll still support it at Work and maybe use one of their licenses at home just to work from home but this pricing is just ridiculous.

MS, I will continue to make my living off of your products but even as an Analyst I can't afford to feed 5 PCs with this kind of pricing versus functionality.

One more thing, as an IT Analyst it will be very difficult for me to recommend you over Apple now for the average consumer that wants my opinion. I don't want to have to support them under Linux and under Apple they will be in good hands, NOT YOURS!

Fred Dunn
IT Analyst
Enterprise Management
Major University System in Texas

PS - Our incoming students (required to purchase a laptop) are already wise to your "issues" as they don't fall under our SELECT license they have to choose a laptop with either Vista or Mac OSX. 5 years ago it was about 90% MS vs 10% Apple, these last two years it has been 70% Apple vs 30% MS. So it looks as though Apple is getting the schools back.
0 Votes
+ -
Like I do. No need for a local Windows (unless don't have a fast internet connection).
0 Votes
+ -
"Well then maybe...
"... those people without disposable income should be considering the more important things in life, other than PC's and OS upgrades.

"If you can't afford the fuel to run a car, you don't buy a car, so why should a PC be any different?

"Those people would be better off with the Linux freeloader brigade, if they want something for nothing."



LeeC--

You're unjustly disparaging the Linux community. Believe it or not, there are people who take pride in helping others out without compensation. It's called volunteering, and it's honorable work.

Oh, and one more thing: Your analogy is a bit faulty. Mass transit throughout the U.S. (and yes, I realize that I'm assuming that you're a U.S. citizen; if you're not, then I apologize) plainly sucks; there's no denying it. For the vast majority of people, going without a car is not a realistic choice.

Looking over this posting, it occurs to me it might be interpreted as being unduly harsh. That is not my intent. It's just that I disagree with what you have written.
0 Votes
+ -
because its Easier to install on anything?
JABBER_WOLF 31st Jul 2009
I mean its not like its illegally tied down to an EFI chip right?

and not like Im charged 100 bucks every year or year and half for a service pack install which adds up to more.
0 Votes
+ -
Here's my feedback Microsoft....
BillDem 31st Jul 2009
I won't buy it for these reasons.
1. It's crippleware. It isn't W7 Ultimate. I won't settle for anything less and once you add in the upgrade cost for each of those three licenses, it jumps right back into the insane price range.
2. Three licenses are not enough. Five makes more sense for the people like me who would actually upgrade their OS without buying a new computer. If you were offering 3 Ultimate licenses for $150, I might simply buy two packs, but it isn't, so I won't be buying any.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm with you in spirit
Chad_z 3rd Aug 2009
And, being a Ubuntu user, it's easy to laugh at the MSFT fanboy and astroturf consultant posts breathlessly wrapping themselves around the latest product.

But I'll still have to support this bloatware at some point. So might as well figure on setting up at least one Windows 7 machine just to tinker with it.

Whether the family pack is worth the money will depend on what capability it gives you. If it supports home networking and media functions, it might be a good move. But forcing it early will be an issue for home users. MS better have driver follies under control this time, unlike Vista, or home users are going to be confronted with a lot of software and peripherals that suddenly stop working. There will be some of that under ideal circumstances.
0 Votes
+ -
Turned off
mrnaturl1@... 31st Jul 2009
I was tempted by early mention of the Family Pack .... but we know Microsoft's reputation. Therefore I pre-ordered the copies I wanted weeks ago at the risk of possible, but unknown, cost savings. In the end, the FP "might" have saves me what? $15? Wow, geee, how would I ever live with myself??
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix