Moving beyond Microsoft
Summary: This site gets a slight makeover today, one so subtle you might not notice it at first. Its title is no longer Ed Bott's Microsoft Report. Instead, it's called simply The Ed Bott Report. Here's why.
Look up. No, not all the way up, just a little bit. There, to the right of my picture.
Notice anything different?
This site gets a slight makeover today, one so subtle you might not notice it at first. Its title is no longer Ed Bott’s Microsoft Report. Instead, it’s called simply The Ed Bott Report.
If you’re a regular reader of my work here at ZDNet, you’re probably saying, “It’s about time.” In fact, the title change reflects how my interests have expanded in the five-plus years I’ve been publishing here. I still talk a lot about Windows, and I write reviews and do hands-on articles about other Microsoft technologies, too. But these days you’re equally likely to find stories about products and services from companies like Google, Apple, and Amazon.
In part, this change is a reflection of how Microsoft’s competitive position has changed in the past decade and especially in the last five years. The lines between companies and markets are increasingly blurred. Once, not that long ago, Microsoft had a DOJ-certified monopoly on personal computers. Today, Microsoft is still hugely successful in the enterprise, but the company’s share in the PC segment is slowly eroding. In other essential tech categories (especially mobile) Microsoft is struggling just to become a serious player.
It’s no accident that Apple’s phenomenal success coincided with their decision to remove the word Computer from the company name. And Google, which started out as a search company, is now in the operating system business and competing with a vengeance against both Apple and Microsoft. You can’t understand any one of those companies or talk about its future prospects without looking carefully at its competitors.
If your budget is tight—at work or at home—all this competition is a mixed blessing. It creates interoperability headaches, adds complexity, and opens opportunities for bad actors to exploit security flaws. It also makes the stakes higher for adopting new technologies—there will be winners and losers, and if you back a loser the costs can be painful.
For me, this new competitive landscape is exhilarating. I’m happy to have a broader mandate to write about tech topics that matter, without being constrained by old labels.
A big thanks to all of you who have read my work and sent me questions, comments, feedback, and suggestions. Your input is what makes this all so rewarding.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Moving beyond MS is smart
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
iOS unfortunately doesn't help in any shape or form "to get stuff done" if you really talk about an enterprise. It's a toy OS and nothing more.
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/The-iPad-Just-Ate-11-Of-The-siliconalley-2854115658.html?x=0&.v=1
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
Aaaah get stuff done - that's why Mac users install Windows
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
What are you both talking about
"Getting away from MS is a start in the right direction."
how exactly is that?
any proof any statistics anything to back up that argument ???
I find the above statement pointless
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
Hitching your infrastructure to 1 vendor is not a good thing.
People are finding that MS is a hindrance to getting the job done and are moving away.
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
Again, please provide EVIDENCE
For the record i am not an MS fan boy nor am i an apple hater.
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
Not opinion, statement!
"People are finding that MS is a hindrance to getting the job done and are moving away."
I don't think that's an opinion as much as a statement
Sry if im sounding rude or anything but i cant wrap my head around posting blind STATEMENTS!
;)
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
He can, but now he won't have to deal with all the calls
for his head as he brings up problems and issues associated with Apple products, as his blog had the word "Microsoft" in it.
'Ed Bott's Apple trojan report and customer service review'
Ed, how's your car doing? Did you ever figure out how to build an AutoPC to play your library of .wma files?
One bone to pick: "If your budget is tight?at work or at home?all this competition is a mixed blessing. It creates interoperability headaches, adds complexity, and opens opportunities for bad actors to exploit security flaws."
Actually, computing monoculture - especially one built on a rube-goldberg closed-source inherently poor security model OS - opened opportunities for bad actors to exploit security flaws.
For the last decade, I've happily used Macs without any antivirus software on them, largely comfortable that I would be safe from security threats - and I have been.
The more OS's, the harder it will be for bad actors to develop exploits that can broadly attack.
RE: Moving beyond Microsoft
[i]For the last decade, I've happily used Macs without any antivirus software on them, largely comfortable that I would be safe from security threats [/i]
So if you've not used any sort of protection, how do you [i][b]know[/b][/i] you don't have a bug?
Probably in the same way