ie8 fix
madison

Office 2010 makes a splashy (but incomplete) public debut

By | July 13, 2009, 5:20am PDT

Summary: Can Microsoft hit back-to-back home runs? The Office team has to be feeling some heat as they hang around the on-deck circle waiting for Windows 7 to release to manufacturing later this month. With today’s announcement of a Technical Preview release of Office 2010 at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans, it’s pretty clear that Microsoft is taking a mighty cut. But only time will tell whether they’ve crushed it.

Can Microsoft hit back-to-back home runs?

The Office team has to be feeling some heat as they hang around the on-deck circle waiting for Windows 7 to release to manufacturing (in “late July,” according to a press release last week). With today’s announcement of a Technical Preview release of Office 2010 at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans, it’s pretty clear that Microsoft is taking a mighty cut. But only time will tell whether they’ve crushed it.

My colleague Mary-Jo Foley has a good overview of today’s announcement. I’ve had a copy of the Technical Preview release of Office 2010 running here for about a week, so I can offer some very tentative first impressions (and an image gallery) based on my hands-on experience.

See Office 2010 in action in this screenshot gallery.

But before I get to those details, here’s the view from the top of the stands:

  • This is not a public release. According to Microsoft, “tens of thousands of people will be invited to test Office and Visio as part of the Technical Preview program.” It’s already widely available via the usual unofficial file-sharing sites, but you won’t be able to download the code from Microsoft unless you’ve been accepted into the testing ranks.
  • This release is a milestone, but it’s far from feature complete. In a briefing last week, Office Group Product Manager Chris Bryant candidly acknowledged, “Some things don’t work as expected at this point.” This release, he told me, is “primarily designed for the engineering team to get lots of feedback.”
  • It’s not ready for prime time yet. I can confirm, from personal experience, that this is not code you’ll want to run on a production machine. If you’ve grown accustomed to running the Windows 7 Beta and you’re tempted to try this on a production machine, think twice. And then think again. I like what I’ve seen so far, but it’s staying on a test box until the official beta appears in a few months.
  • The most interesting pieces aren’t out yet. I had a chance to see a demo of the new suite of Web-based Office applications (using Firefox and Safari, just to emphasize their compatibility). The demo was impressive, with Word, PowerPoint, and Excel behaving in a browser just as they do in a stand-alone app. (OneNote support is due in the final release as well.) However, none of those pieces are available for review yet, so I have no hands-on experience to report.

One smart decision the Office team made is to trim the number of Office editions. Currently, Office 2007 is available in a mind-boggling eight editions. For Office 2010, Microsoft plans to cut the Ultimate and Enterprise editions as well as the OEM-only Basic edition. That will reduce the total number of Office editions to five, two for enterprise customers and three for home and small business users. The new Office lineup, from bottom to top, goes like this:

  • Office Home and Student edition includes Word, PowerPoint, Excel and OneNote.
  • Office Home and Business edition replaces the previous Office Small Business edition. It includes all the programs from the Home and Student edition and adds Outlook.
  • Office Standard is the entry-level enterprise edition; it includes the programs from the Home and Business edition and adds Publisher
  • Office Professional continues to be the high-end package for consumers and small businesses. It includes the programs in Standard edition and adds the Access database management program.
  • Office Professional Plus is the high-end enterprise offering, adding SharePoint Workspace (formerly Groove Workspace) and InfoPath.

What can you expect from Office 2010? Based on my limited testing so far, I can point to three major areas of improvement:

A lot of what’s new is aimed at enhancing usability. The Ribbon interface is now part of every Office program, including Outlook, Publisher, and OneNote, which used the old-style menu/toolbar combos in Office 2007. The Ribbon is far more customizable in Office 2010 as well, offering the capability to add and remove buttons and even create your own custom tabs. And a new feaqtuer called Backstage mode is designed to replace many previously complex dialog boxes.

Speaking of OneNote, it gets elevated to a starring role in this release—and it’s about time. In Office 2007, OneNote was part of the entry-level $150 Home and Student edition and the $680 Ultimate edition but was left out of every edition in between. For 2010, Microsoft is bullish enough on OneNote to make it a part of every edition. As Microsoft’s Bryant told me, “We think people will have OneNote open all the time just like they do with Outlook.”

And finally, there’s a slew of new collaboration features I couldn’t test easily. Word, PowerPoint, and OneNote all offer co-authoring features where two or more people can work on a project simultaneously and see their changes in real-time. There are also some slick-looking mail management features in Outlook, including the capability to trim repetitive message text from long e-mail threads and to “ignore” threads where you’re on the CC list but not really involved.

Microsoft has previously announced that a public beta release of Office 2010 will be available later this year, with the final release due in the first half of 2010.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

94
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Office 2010 makes a splashy (but incomplete) public debut
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Who's going to test this?
Ed Bott 13th Jul 2009
Are you planning to be part of the initial test program? What are you looking forward to?
0 Votes
+ -
I'll probably have to
beoz 15th Jul 2009
in the offical capacity...so I don't know if 'looking forward' is the right feeling =D

I'll probably have to dig into OneNote -- especially for application compatibility issues/security concerns.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm planning on testing
LiquidLearner 13th Jul 2009
but the office apps I use the most are OneNote, Outlook and Visio. I'm happy to see the return of Visio to the higher end versions of Office and I'm really interesed to see some of the new features there. The web-based apps running in any browser certainly have to have Google worried. If MS can reproduce 50%+ of the functionality of office in a browser then there is nothing on the market that could currently compete with that. Not OOo, not GApps, nada.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey, Ed - I've got a spreadsheet that got mildly
broken with the change to 2007 Excel.

I would LOVE to have someone run it through its paces
in Office 2010, and check for certain annoyances/use
it to give feedback to Microsoft about how to improve
things.

If you're interested, we should work out a way to get
it to you.

In particular, I'm noticing:

1) A significant slowdown on volatile Excel functions.
2) Sometimes, it refuses to update relative references
on large cut and paste operations
3) They do not have a 'paste-formats-overwrite' versus
a 'paste-formats-concatenate' option for pasting
conditional formatting.

Number 3 is the real killer, because my users cut and
paste a lot of cells with conditional formats on
them...and then discover that Excel grinds to a halt,
because they've put 400 conditions on a set of cells
inadvertantly.

0 Votes
+ -
wow...
condelirios 13th Jul 2009
Fun with Excel.

Why do people keep pushing the envelope of Excel instead of building applications in relational databases to handle all that manipulation?

Excel = tool for end users, without IT help and guidance, to poke themselves in the eye with.
0 Votes
+ -
Spreadsheet of Doom
Ad Astra 13th Jul 2009
It started out as a quick mockup; then it sort
of grew from there, with parts of it being
rewritten as I learned more of what Excel could
do, then rewritten again as I learned what
Excel not only can do but SHOULD do, then
rewritten again as I figured out ways to
performance optimize.

My users are all customers, not employees that
I'm forcing this on; this is a spreadsheet I
provide to them so that they can design things
for a boardgame I publish; my company has two
business partners and one part time employee -
we can't just shunt this off to an IT
department to do.

And for my users, Excel 2003 and Open Office
Calc are effectively a widely deployed
environment where they can use this tool
natively.

To be fair to 2007, it doesn't suck. I'm
pretty sure that nobody inside Microsoft ever
contemplated someone using Excel in the fashion
I have. All the changes they made to
conditional formatting are good changes for
people using Excel for its intended purpose.
They merely have unintended consequences when
used in the way I've used them.
0 Votes
+ -
Because . . .
Hubbity Bubba 13th Jul 2009
We push Excel and Access because IT resources are extremely scarce, and it's just not possible to build a relational database application for every need.
Further, the business community does not always know in advance which applications are going to prove valuable, and grow in complexity over time.
Excel and Access provide an environment where an application can grow and change so that by the time it is apparent that it should be rewritten as a more sophisticated application, the requirements have been tested and fine-tuned.
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly and thanks...
Lithius 13th Jul 2009
Common sense...
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Sure, send me an e-mail
Ed Bott 13th Jul 2009
There's a link at the bottom of the post. Send me an e-mail and I'll coordinate with you.
0 Votes
+ -
no way!
googlewatcher 13th Jul 2009
that cannot be the case? upgrading office
caused something to break and you had to back-
out? that doesn't sound right... I thought the
whole point of upgrades was to improve the core
product and maybe add a couple of new 'nice to
have' features. your telling me that they
charged you last time for something new that
was inferior? gee. this must be an isolated
case. you should ring their support line and I
am sure that they will sort you out in a
moment. perhaps you pressed the wrong buttons
when you ran the installer? well no need to
worry. Office2010 is out and lightening cannot
strike twice for you. Push it out to all your
users and you will be fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Excel Performance
chadrothschiller 16th Jul 2009
Ad - feel free to mail your spreadsheet to xlfiles@microsoft.com along with steps to reproduce the issues you're seeing (performance slowdown, buggy behavior, whatever). We'll take a look and see what can be done.

Thanks!

--Chad
Microsoft . take note - who cares ! I am just totally over it all. I absolutely loathe ribbon interfaces , hate it in fact so you have no hope of getting my dollars.2003 is going to last me for the rest of my working life .. these so called changes are just not useful or working for me.

Ken
IT Director
Melbourne
0 Votes
+ -
Look out
gnesterenko 13th Jul 2009
Maybe they aren't useful for you, Ken, but I can guarantee you that there are 17 year olds out there who've mastered the ribbon interface and the efficiencies that come from doing so, and are now able to do your job in about half the time, for 1/3 the salary you are getting paid.

Now granted there is zero reason for you to refresh since you are already runnin 2003, however I simply cannot understand the attitude esp in an IT prof to willfully ignore shifts in the industry upon which your livelyhood depends. I may not like the software I have to deal with, but you better believe I learn to use it because I know someone out there will use it as an advantage against me if I don't.

But to each his own I guess... btw... where do you work again?

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
Ribbons are OK but . . .
Hubbity Bubba Updated - 13th Jul 2009
I've finally become proficient with ribbons, and while I still find the old menus and button bars easier to use, I've found ways to make the ribbon interface work for me and don't whine about it much anymore. However, there are some "improvements" in 2007 that simply don't work as well as the 2003 counterparts by any objective standard, and I hope an option to revert is provided in 2010.
For example, the database window in Access is sorely missed, and I think the 2007 "sorting and grouping" interface for Access reports is an absolute monstrosity compared to the 2003 equivalent. I'm OK with trying new things and moving forward, but MS needs to admit when it made a bad change, and at least allow an option to revert.
0 Votes
+ -
Ken, really?
Lithius 13th Jul 2009
What IT Business are you really in?

I can't believe hearing this from someone that claims they're into IT as a business...

Sorry...
Ed, I definitely want to see the new office and will be testing it. I haven't seen much on InfoPath or SharePoint - any idea what's going on with those?

Thanks for the info, good stuff. Contrary to what you see on most of the forums, there are tons of people who love office, especially '07, and look forward to the features of 2010. Keep up posted!
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
More on SharePoint to come later
Ed Bott 13th Jul 2009
I had a briefing on it last week but haven't done any hands-on yet.
0 Votes
+ -
Sneek Peek
Bondswa 14th Jul 2009
There's a SharePoint 2010 sneek peek with some
videos over at microsoft.com

http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/2010/Sneak_Peek/Pa
ges/Overview-Video.aspx

0 Votes
+ -
Vaporware in response to Google
davidr69 13th Jul 2009
Isn't the timing a bit suspicious? Google finally pulls their apps out of beta, announces Chrome OS, and then MS has an announcement.

Why exactly do we need Office 2010? I'm still hooked on Office 97.
0 Votes
+ -
Features?
crazydanr@... 13th Jul 2009
Want more than 36 colors for formatting?
Want to be able to use data sources to pull live information into documents?
Want more than 32k rows in Excel?
Want conditional formatting?
Want to save to PDF easily?
Want a backend to store all your docs so users can collaborate better?
Want better support for creating macros and custom scripts?
Want better security for your office suite?

There's quite a few others, but if none of these apply, I wouldn't spend money on an upgrade right now. Some of those features may make your life easier, your work look better, or you more productive though. That's why they let you beta it free and see if you get value out of it. If you don't, you know what you're missing and don't care to have it. Nothing wrong with that.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't need those features
davidr69 13th Jul 2009
32k rows in Excel? Sometimes you just need a database.

36 colors for formatting? Is this the Crayola edition?

Save to PDF? OpenOffice does it great; if not, use PDFCreator.

Collaborate? We're stuck with Sharepoint; that should do it.

There's nothing new that doesn't already exist somewhere else; I don't need this junk.
0 Votes
+ -
Timing Suspicious?
NameRedacted 13th Jul 2009
Microsoft has been planning to push out this release for months, as it coincides with the Worldwide Partner Conference that kicked off today in New Orleans.

If anyone's timing is suspicious, it's Google's.

And as far as vaporware is concerned, I'd like to download the Chrome OS; where's the URL for that?
0 Votes
+ -
Really ... "Vaporware"?
Yensi717 13th Jul 2009
Vaporware means it doesn't exist at all and probably never will. This is under active development, and WILL be released. Hardly vaporware. If you still use Office 97 and are totally satisfied, congrats to you. No one is forcing you to upgrade - why complain?
0 Votes
+ -
DOn't bother
gnesterenko 13th Jul 2009
feeding the troll. Fact: people don't like change. That fact will never change, despite how little sense it makes. I know how you feel, but really, there is no use trying to convince some people.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
Why not complain?
davidr69 13th Jul 2009
Why add "features" that we really don't need? Is there anything that it does that we can't already do today? Has the world collapsed because until now office software has been unable to meet business demands?
Why add "features" that we really don't need? Is there anything that it does that we can't already do today?

Did I miss the election where you were voted official spokesperson for the entire population of Microsoft Office users? Like the previous poster said, if you're happy with 97, stick with it. You don't have to pay anymore to stay on the version you're using. How's that for a feature, eh?
0 Votes
+ -
Nonsense
JelMin 14th Jul 2009
The reason you can't stick with it is because the OS it runs under is completely insecure. As a result, earlier packages have to be continuously bug-fixed, 95% of the time for security breaches, and MS eventually pulls the plug on such support, to force you to upgrade thereby supporting its cashflow. That's a big part of why Europe's so narked with them, sell rubbish, and then force people to pay for yet more rubbish which is supposedly less rubbish than it was. There's a principle in European consumer Law, if you sell something that's not fit for purpose, then you replace it gratis with the fix.
It's the fruit of the initial mistake, launching a machine without an OS. The QDOS cludge was a minimal back-of-an-envelope core which did the minimum possible - if they had kept with it, we wouldn't be in quite such a mess now, as security was originally an add-in, but has now become an integral part of the schitzophrenic mess of a secure open system. The result is that we have a spaghetti-and-meatballs solution which is fast running out of credibility.
0 Votes
+ -
Really?
Wolfie2K3 14th Jul 2009
What would you say if I told you I could install Office 97 on Windows 7 RC?

Funny thing about Windows 7. It's got great backward compatability - especially with other Microsoft software...
0 Votes
+ -
A fool and his money ...
davidr69 15th Jul 2009
you know the rest
0 Votes
+ -
Please do me a favor... Seriously...
Wolfie2K3 14th Jul 2009
Why add "features" that we really don't need? Is there anything that it does that we can't already do today? Has the world collapsed because until now office software has been unable to meet business demands?

Don't presume to speak for anyone but yourself. Everyone has different needs. Just because you personally don't need feature X, Y or Z doesn't mean EVERYONE else doesn't. Microsoft tends to listen to customers. They add features to Office mainly because people ASK for them. LOTS of people. If you're happy with Office 97 - great. Have a good time. But YOUR needs are not the same as mine, nor anyone elses.

OK?
0 Votes
+ -
Let's try those questions again:

1. Is there anything that it does that we can't already do today?
2. Has the world collapsed because until now office software has been unable to meet business demands?

Be honest, you know MS does this because it's a cash cow, not because we need it.

Our company (and a rather large one - 300,000+ employees) has not benefited one bit from newer releases of Office. Ok, auto-filters in Excel are useful, but can anyone name any features that have changed the way the world does business?

Don't reply unless you can answer these questions.
0 Votes
+ -
Here's your answer.
crazydanr@... 15th Jul 2009
Manage your tasks and projects better

Collaborate with multiple people working on the same document at the same time

Map and streamline business processes
Draw diagrams that can pull live information, real time

Build dashboards and reports to get the right information to make good decisions

Create a flexible and powerful CRM with versioning, workflows, and built in metadata entry right on the office product

Use enterprise search to access the intranet, email, and file shares from a single place

Take notes that can be shared and synchronized on the web from around the world

Create powerful XML based forms with validation, branching, and conditional formatting for data collection

Use data mashups and visio services to visualize and interact with complex diagrams or processes

Pull information from disparate systems to analyze it

Presence and enhanced communication across an organization

There's hundreds more, if a business cares to invest in the time and resources to improve operations.

Or you could just write spreadsheets and word documents all day. Then you don't need a new version of office. But companies taking advantage of these benefits are going to be more competitive and effective, and your company could become irrelevant.
0 Votes
+ -
Humbug
prof123 17th Jul 2009
Smart people come up with simple solutions (i.e. Google)
and MS doesn't know what a simple solution is. When
you collaborate with other people on a defective over
complex design or draw a lot of diagrams, that doesn't
necessarily solve the problem. They usually spend half
the time figuring out the tools necessary to "collaborate"
and "visualize" simple concepts which have been made
overly complex.
0 Votes
+ -
But then, I am guessing even you knew that much.
0 Votes
+ -
Duke Nukem Forever?
nizuse 13th Jul 2009
That's vaporware. ChromeOS will come before Duke comes. Trust me.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Ummm, Axey?
JLHenry 13th Jul 2009
It ain't Vaporware until it MISSES it's announced release time.

That having been said, if Google makes this an "Internet only" OS, i.e., it's useless without an Internet connection, it'll be a nonstarter.

0 Votes
+ -
Office 2010 x64: As real as a GAO audit
pghammer21@... 30th Jul 2009
I'm running the Professional 64-bit version of Office 2010's Technical Preview right now, and it's *incomplete* because the various third-parties that have grown up supporting Office have not released their targeted add-ons and plug-ins yet. However, if you run a vanilla (other than Service Packs) version of Office 2007 or earlier, then 2010 merits serious consideration, especially if you're running a 64-bit version of Windows. 64-bit Pro 2010's applications are *all* faster, on the same hardware, than their 32-bit Office 2007 counterparts. Even the two (supposedly) least-expected applications to show an improvement (Word and Outlook) have shown surprising gains, especially when dealing with large documents (Word) or big mailboxes (Outlook). (And I'm referring to POP or IMAP mailboxes, not Exchange, which has historically been Outlook's strength.)
Let's face facts, folks. There is no such thing as software that is perfect for everyone. Those software companies that rest on their laurels get overtaken by events (and the competition) and rendered O-B-S-O-L-E-T-E. (That is precisely what happened to Netscape Communicator. By the time Netscape realized what happened, they pretty much were forced to start from scratch. That is why Mozilla and Firefox were born.)

I've been using Office since Office 95, and came to Office because the word-processing and spreadsheet software (WordPerfect and Lotus 1-2-3) I had been using got soft/lazy/complacent, while Word/Excel (and later, PowerPoint and Outlook) were fired up and quite capable of replacing the two products I had been using *without* requiring me to lose everything I had already learned, or even changing file formats. (I can *still* save documents edited in Word 2010 in WordPerfect for DOS format, and Excel spreadsheets in 1-2-3 format.) One big change (and overdue, thank you very much) with Office 2010 is a 64-bit version every bit as solid as (and mostly faster than) the 32-bit version (either of it or Office 2007).

If you're still using a twelve-year-old productivity suite, ask yourself why.
I'm looking forward to testing Access and seeing what they improved. I loved 2007 but haven't convinced management to upgrade. I love the ribbon but hated the difficulty in modifying them, definitely want to see what they have done in this regard. I'm supposed to be signed up for the CTP via TechEd. Hope to hear soon.
0 Votes
+ -
2nd that
gnesterenko 13th Jul 2009
Definitely very interested to see what has been done with Access for this revision.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
This sounds similar to what Microsoft was testing last year with their office live suite. I wonder if that is what they were testing for, or if the two will be separate.
0 Votes
+ -
for a mature product...
vmirchan 13th Jul 2009
Ed, we are in 2nd, 3rd, 4th decade of most of this functionality. In most product cycles, that means some enhancements and lots of price discounting. You drool over the new features, but there is not one mention of price points?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
It's a technical preview
Ed Bott 13th Jul 2009
Not a product announcement. Pricnig will come later. FWIW, I expect prices will be lower across the board, but that's just a WAG.
I spent many years as a technical writer, and still stay in touch with many others. Among these power users, those who are forced to use Office by their companies have a nearly uniform hatred for the ribbon interface--it greatly slows down people working at a professional level with Word.

Furthermore, there are "features" of Office that have not worked properly--*ever*--that Microsoft still seems not to be interested in fixing--I wonder if they have finally done it this time?

For example, autonumbering is severely broken for complex documents, and the "master document" feature has never worked properly, either--to the extent that experienced folks generally won't risk their work to it. The use of styles, too, is insane in Word from a professional perspective.

Compared with FrameMaker, for example, Word simply lacks capabilities and reliability when it comes to writing long, complex documents.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed, but...
crazydanr@... 13th Jul 2009
Seems to be two products that are just different enough they can't be compared.

I think the idea was that MS Publisher would compete with Quark / Indesign / FrameMaker, but that product _really_ isn't there yet.

I'll admit, I would _love_ for Word to have much better Tech doc creation capabilities. Post it on their site, contact a sales rep, let them know. The Office team is receptive to feedback, from what I've gathered.
0 Votes
+ -
Next Review
Zonny 13th Jul 2009
...be sure to address some of the behind-the-scenes features, such as code, security, 32-bit versus 64 bit.

Many times when a new version of software is released, reviewers fail to go beyond the GUI.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
This isn't a review
Ed Bott 13th Jul 2009
Just to be clear, this is a very preliminary first look at a technical preview. When the beta comes out (in a month or two) I'll have much more complete coverage, for sure.
"It?s not ready for prime time yet."
FWIW, neither is Office 2007, yet.
0 Votes
+ -
Excel/PowerPoint MDI finally?
JoeMama_z 13th Jul 2009
have they finally made these apps MDI? I hate only having a single window for Excel!
0 Votes
+ -
Work-around
Regulator1956 Updated - 13th Jul 2009
Open another session of Excel and then open the document. You'll have 2 windows.

Double-clicking on a document and then double-clicking on the 2nd old only loads the 2nd one into the first one's window.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix