ie8 fix
madison

The 'black screen of death': fact, fiction, or FUD?

By | December 7, 2009, 4:00am PST

Summary: Worried about the Black Screen of Death? Don’t. Startup problems are not new to PC hardware and operating systems, and the phenomenon definitely isn’t limited to the Windows operating system. Blank or black screens can strike Macs, Linux, and Windows. Fortunately, they’re relatively rare. Here’s what to look for and how to troubleshoot a black screen if you encounter one.

Here’s what you need to know about the so-called Black Screen of Death: There’s no such thing.

Yes, yes, I know: The mainstream and tech press published hundreds of stories last week using that term to describe a supposedly new phenomenon affecting Windows PCs. Virtually all of those stories were rehashes of sloppy reporting based on a blog post from a minor security company that later admitted it was wrong and apologized for the story. But as I explain in this post, startup problems are not new to PC hardware and operating systems, and the phenomenon definitely isn’t limited to the Windows operating system.

Editors at tech sites love to write “Black screen of death,” because it echoes the well-known “Blue Screen of Death,” or BSOD—a dreaded event in any Windows user’s workday, to be sure. But it’s not a fair comparison: that distinctive blue screen is not a bug, it’s a feature, more properly known as a STOP error. STOP errors allow Windows to respond to a catastrophic hardware or software failure that prevents the system from continuing to operate. A STOP error captures diagnostic information about the source of the failure and displays it as white text on a blue background. If you see a BSOD, there are debugging tools and well-documented troubleshooting techniques you can use to resolve it.

By contrast, when your PC or Mac torments you with a black screen (or, more accurately, a blank screen), all you know for sure is that the startup process failed at some point. Unlike with a BSOD, there’s no crash file to analyze, no tools you can use to figure out the root cause. The first step in the troubleshooting process involves figuring out where the problem lies, which can be anywhere in the chain of events that begins when you push the power button. It might be a bad system configuration, faulty hardware, defective third-party software, a buggy driver, a race condition or hang in a system service, corruption in the file system or registry, or malware.

So what does it mean if you start your PC or Mac and end up staring at a blank screen instead of seeing your familiar user environment? If you’re using Windows Vista or Windows 7, there are some known causes that I’ll list later in this post. But first, I want to dispel the myth that this sort of trouble is widespread, new, or unique to Windows.

Next page: Black screens on Windows, OS X, and Linux –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

126
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

slight correction
gnesterenko Updated - 11th Jan 2010
"You can say it's the hardware, but the purpose of the OS is to handle the hardware, [when the proper drivers are installed]"

there. fixed.

Also, the OS can only do so much if your BIOS isn't able to handle low-level control of the hardware. A BIOS update from the mobo makers website will, at the least, eliminate that as a source of problems.

Finally, if you've installed once and had to restore twice, its possible that your first install went astray, and thus restoring to a bad install won't really fix any issues. Something to consider.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
Off Topic
Alan Smithie 7th Dec 2009
Hey Ed,

any idea why MS seems to be canning the W7 family pack 3 license ?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
"Limited time offer"
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
That's the official statement anyway:

http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2699
0 Votes
+ -
Just another reason for consumers to look
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 7th Dec 2009
into alternatives. $120 to upgrade one home machine is ridiculous. Of course if you look at the anytime upgrade prices, should be an indication of the greed going on in the MS house. $120 difference between Professional to Ultimate, when the retail price difference is only $20. Not that there is any real good reason for that upgrade, just pointing out the obvious.
0 Votes
+ -
My limit is $200 for an unlimited, single location family pack, on a mix of XP and Vista machines. I currently have 7 computers plus a couple of virtual machines. If MS wants to keep me, that is my limit. If not, I will just wait and probably switch to Linux when XP is no longer supported.

It is MY money and I set the terms.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Here's the original exchange, for those who want to read it:

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66513&messageID=1255420

Personally, I think the idea of an unlimited Windows upgrade license is ludicrous. It won't work with Microsoft's business model, which requires activation on a per-PC basis.

If you have 7 PCs in a home, I think you qualify as a hobbyist and should consider TechNet, which gives you 10 licenses for each Windows edition.
0 Votes
+ -
You didn't agree with him...i.e. and argument - nt
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 7th Dec 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
To make sense, you would have to
Economister Updated - 7th Dec 2009
start at the root. I do not feel it worth revisiting/rehashing that "discussion" however, although I appreciate the link.

"Ludicrous" is probably WAY too strong. There may be practical issues in implementing it, but that is not MY problem. In addition, there are market realities out there. Linux is becoming a more and more viable option. Do not forget the comment attributed to Gates, where he allegedly said that he'd rather people pirated Windows than use someone else's OS. In this case, they can have $200 (which is a LOT more than the pirated or Linux "price") or have me use someone else's OS. Their call.

I know MS is trying to squeeze as much as they can out of each customer. With me, they have a choice. Give me a deal that I am happy about or risk losing me forever. There is nothing ludicrous about that. That is my (and in this case also their) market reality.

And regarding the Technet, I briefly looked into that if my memory serves me correctly, but it turned out to be much more expensive over any reasonable OS life. Please correct me if I am wrong on this point.
0 Votes
+ -
Goodbye
martin.77084@... 8th Dec 2009
They are not giving you the deal.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Technet does not give you 10 licenses,
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 7th Dec 2009
It gives you 10 activations. If you reload a single PC 10 times you have used up your activations. You could activate on 10 machines, but if you need to reinstall Windows on 1 you are buying a new license. At least this is what I read on one MVP blog. If I am wrong feel free to correct me.

Now I have never been a technet subscriber, Unless those activations can be reset every year after paid renewal, it may or may not be worth paying the money. I have been kicking around the idea, trying to weigh the benefit of the subscription to the recurring renewal cost.
0 Votes
+ -
You are both incorrect.
cornpie 7th Dec 2009
It gives you 10 separate product keys. To confirm this I just looked at my technet page for my Windows 7 Ultimate x64. I've installed on three machines so far and it lists three separate product codes and in the Claimed/Maximum column it says 3/10 . Every time I click the "get another key" link it gives me one more product ID and incrments the claimed/maximum colum - i.e. next time I get a new product key it will change to 4/10. And this goes by version as well. For example for Windows 7 professional I'm still at 0/10 because I haven't claimed any keys yet, but I could get 10 of those in addition to my 10 ultimate keys.

However...that does not mean that everyone should just go out and buy a technet subscription. Although technet copies of Microsoft software are full versions with no expiration, they are still not intended for production use. They are basically for trial and evaluation purposes. For example I'm currently experimenting with configurations that will be eventually deployed in our office under our volume license product keys. But while I'm going through that process I can use technet copies and product keys even if I don't have any actual licenses. Comes in handy when you are trying to decide if you will be upgrading in the first place.
It gives you 10 activations. If you reload a single PC 10 times you have used up your activations.

To my knowledge you can reactivate the same PC any number of times.

Product Activation works by generating a unique identifier for a PC based on its hardware profile. This unique ID is combined with the product key and then forwarded to the activation servers. Based on this the activation servers do the following:

1. If the product key has not been activated the activation succeeds and the hardware profile becomes associated with the hardware profile included with the activation request.

2. If the product key has already been activated then the hardware profile on record (with the activation servers) is compared to the hardware profile in the activation request.

2a. If they match the activation succeeds.

2b. If they do not match the activation fails.

Using this method you are able to reactivate the same PC any number of times.

The process is more involved as it does allow for the hardware profile to change slightly. But this should give you a general idea. Since the details of activation are unknown the above is subject to error.

It would be nice if Microsoft provided a means to deactivate Windows so the software can be transferred to a new system without having to manually reactivate.
0 Votes
+ -
Ed You Haven't Used Linux Recently!
i2fun@... Updated - 7th Dec 2009
Referring to one single distro publishing "Black Screen of Death" issues, only represents how well documented Ubuntu is!

If you ran a survey on Linux users in general, I doubt seriously that you'd find more than 1% actually experiencing the problem. Near none if the install used is from a Live DVD OS image transfer install. On say a distro like Sabayon (highly successful distro based on Gentoo Linux). This OS install comes with Adobe Flash, Java, and most every codec in the world pre-installed even on 64bit Hardware that M$ has failed to get Adobe to co-operate on!

Then here you have, your true blue, green, orange, yellow loyalties crying about BKSOD common on all OSes... haha.. Or perhaps you are on a commission basis with Microsoft sales?

BTW.. You and your cronies are way off on your Linux actual installs. The truth is far greater Linux installs exist, than you'd care to expose. Sabayon is a relative newcomer but boasts Downloads: 22,774,956

Now I know being it's just 3yrs old OS, it's only a 10th of what Ubuntu has out there now. If you consider all Linux distros, that at least half of the downloads are indeed installed or at least running in virtual machines somewhere(as our own Director of FBI concluded, is the most secure way to do your banking and online purchases), then you might realize that the numbers put out by M$ and Apple are for Factory Installed Systems Only!

When I can take a 64bit PC, boot to a fully running Live version of Linux with all drivers installed and enough applications to keep me working for ages, the myth is busted. That on an out of box install, that M$ and Apple proprietary powerhouse numbers bubble, has been busted wide open for what it is. A marketing farce and ploy to discredit Linux, in spite of it powering nearly every Super Computer in the top 100. Including IBM's DOE Roadrunner at Los Alamos. Greater than 90% of all HPC (high performance computers) run Linux. Apache powers the web you use and Google owns the most popular Search Tools under the heavens, run on what? Linux!!!

Your cars are powered by versions of Linux. Your cell phones are increasingly running on some form of Linux or Unix derivative. Open Source is being taken up by even the competition in the way of Nokia's Symbian going Open as well in the Cell Phone Market!

Need I add that for the most part, Stock Exchanges Worldwide run on Linux. The number of Banks that actually use Linux has increased at a phenominal rate. But no wonder, you have the NSA writing a Secure Kernel for Linux ONLY!!!

So selling Windows as the Utimate OS will certainly get harder for you and M$. Not easier as you make it out to be! My Grandma can operate Linux today and she is totally freaked out by Vista and the 7ista I showed her last week!!! wink
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Ditto
FXEF 7th Dec 2009
I agree 100% with i2fun. If you think i2fun is on
mark, just reply to his post with the subject
"Ditto".
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
You're wrong
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
I'm running both Ubuntu and OpenSUSE here.

But thanks for that sales pitch.
0 Votes
+ -
Goodbye
martin.77084@... 8th Dec 2009
MS does not want to keep you.
0 Votes
+ -
nt
0 Votes
+ -
They DID say it was for a limited time
Michael Kelly 7th Dec 2009
Of course one would expect it would have lasted at least through the holiday shopping season. CNet reports that it simply sold out.

I'm sure that if enough of a stink is made another offering will be made.
0 Votes
+ -
How do you "sell out"?
Hallowed are the Ori 7th Dec 2009
How is a "non-material" product ever out of supply?
0 Votes
+ -
The "pretty" packaging might be (nt)
Economister 7th Dec 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
They go to press
Michael Kelly 7th Dec 2009
They have X number of copies in that pressing and they say "This is all we are selling". As far as I know this was not available as a download.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Correct
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
This was sold as a retail packaged product only.

I think someone underestimated demand and also underestimated the potential for PR blowback when it runs out three weeks before Christmas in the U.S.

The larger mistake, IMO, is not making a family pack a permanent SKU. Microsoft has done that with Office Home and Student, and it should do with Windows as well.
0 Votes
+ -
Well to top it off
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh Updated - 7th Dec 2009
For some the holidays beginning in October is a hard time to shell out $150. I think that most would agree that 6 weeks is too short. It should have been 6 months for a limited release, if not a permanent addition to the MS Windows retail sku line. I have said it before, ignoring the fact that Apple limits it software to one machine type, they have always had a family pack allowing their users upgrade their existing machines up to 5 machines for one price.

I think that MS is still laboring under the delusion that the average household only has one PC when I would say the average is at least 2 if not 3. Family pack should be a permanent sku.
0 Votes
+ -
That's quite a pricey fact to ignore...
mgp3 Updated - 7th Dec 2009
...ignoring the fact that Apple limits it software to one machine type, they have always had a family pack allowing their users upgrade their existing machines up to 5 machines for one price.

OK, so if I spend between $6000 and $7500 on five units of Apple hardware, I can upgrade on the cheap for $129.

On the other hand, I can go out and get five units of Windows hardware for $2500 - $3000, and upgrade for $600-$750 (some are saying 7 is only $120 retail). I'm sorry, I don't see the logic of that type of "savings".
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks to you guys I knew about it ahead of time...
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 7th Dec 2009
and order mine right away - it was great and I found a 30$ off coupon for 100$ or more for Stables. The thing only cost me ~$110 before tax s&h. It was great 3 Home Pro for 110 bucks.
0 Votes
+ -
That's what I figured...
Hallowed are the Ori 7th Dec 2009
It's kinda related to "It cost millions to sell the first DVD with 7 on it, but nothing to sell the second one."
0 Votes
+ -
Simple...
Wolfie2K3 7th Dec 2009
You make a decision that you're only going to sell say, 1,000,000 units. When you sold the last one, it's sold out. Kaput. Finito.

Of course, you have to stick to it.
0 Votes
+ -
Goes to show you
Cylon Centurion 7th Dec 2009
That no matter what the fanbois say, there is no perfect operating system.
0 Votes
+ -
An important distinction:
Economister Updated - 7th Dec 2009
A BSOD (black) caused by a failure to even POST is VERY different from a BSOD post-POST. The former is always a HW/BIOS issue, while the latter is most likely a SW issue. In a post-POST BSOD, you always have the option of booting into safe mode or from some kind of live CD etc. to start trouble shooting. In a (pre-)POST BSOD you have to start removing/replacing/re-seating HW.

You can have spontaneous reboots from chip failures post-POST, but most HW issues post-POST give some kind of error message or visual clues in my experience.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Please don't call them BSODs
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
That just confuses things.

And yes, you're right about the distinction. That's the major point of this post. When I went and looked at the forums posts from people complaining about black screens, I found the causes were completely across the board.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree...
Economister 7th Dec 2009
I deliberately put "black" in brackets when I first used it, but in any other context, it would be very confusing. Rest assured I will not do that.
0 Votes
+ -
How about KSOD's?
Adam S 7th Dec 2009
:P
0 Votes
+ -
KSOD?
Economister 7th Dec 2009
Kiss?
0 Votes
+ -
K = Black
Adam S 7th Dec 2009
As in CMYK, Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black- the
colors for printing. K is used for the exact
reason of distinguishing black from abbreviation
of the primary color blue. This was my poor
attempt at old school technology humor.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
My serious response
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
The reason why I don't agree with this (although I tip my hat to the geek humor) is that it implied there is a single phenomenon at work here, a la the BSOD. There isn't, and in fact my point in this post is that a black screen at startup can be from any of a number of causes.

Giving it a name like this sends a message to nontechnical users that they should start trying random "solutions" that have nothing to do with their problem.
0 Votes
+ -
Understood
Adam S 7th Dec 2009
It really could go either way. Whether an
unskilled user is faced with a BSOD or KSOD,
they are going to try "random" solutions, by
nature of being unskilled. Does it matter what
you call it? Most of my customers can't
differentiate between the computer as a whole
and the hard drive, referring to the former as
the latter. When they get into a bind, they
call someone who is (hopefully) skilled enough
to determine the difference between a software
and a hardware problem without mucking things up
too much more.

Yes, labeling these recent problems Black Screen
of DEATH, conjures up images of doom and alludes
to Windows-only problems. In that regard, it
falls into the FUD column. So, kudos to you for
doing your part to educate. Shame on the
majority of tech journalists that take the easy
route and stir the pot for the sake of driving
clicks. Your article is actually the only one
I've read on the topic, because I figured right
away that the subject was a red herring of
sorts, based on headlines.
0 Votes
+ -
How about KSODSD?
RationalGuy 7th Dec 2009
Black Screen Of Death Spectrum Disorder?
0 Votes
+ -
Too little too late, Ed
Wintel BSOD 8th Dec 2009
Damage is already been done.

Whether the patches caused it or not, seems to be pretty irrelevant to the mainstream press.

However if it forces M$ to give a Firefox-like response to the issue of the day instead of sitting around like a bunch of slugs for the next 6 months, then that's probably a good thing.
0 Votes
+ -
K? Que? Que SOD? Quesodilla? (NT)
mgp3 Updated - 7th Dec 2009
.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks for clearing this up Ed. Its amazing how far people will go to make this seem like a Microsoft Windows only issue. When the news of black screen of death first broke out I knew it was nothing more than FUD. A few people with a few odd configurations experienced it and that was the only time you heard about it. The rest of the world was fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Don't minimize
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
To say this issue is only experienced by "a few people with a few odd configurations" is not accurate. If you were unlucky enough to experience disk or event log corruption in Vista, the effect was drastic and the cure was unpleasant, and it had nothing to do with an "odd configuration."

The problem does appear to be relatively rare, but not related to configuration.
0 Votes
+ -
Just goes to show how much LD
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 7th Dec 2009
really knows about computers, which is nothing.

We had one machine in our organization last week that ran into this Black screen. And no it was not an odd config, it was and IBM T60 series laptop, running a pretty standard image. Not a wide spread issue in fact the first one we ran into on a Vista image. Reimaged the machine, and it was back up and running.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
I have run into similar problems...
Economister 7th Dec 2009
on laptops, where a power button hard reset does not always work. Disconnecting ALL power including the battery for about 10 seconds has always solved the problems, but clearly, that may not work in all cases. Vista (fully patched) can lock up very hard from time to time. If the installation is not corrupted, a REALLY hard reset may work.
0 Votes
+ -
Had that
gnesterenko 7th Dec 2009
If you are failing to power, but succeed after unplugging/replugging power source, this is classic symptom of either A) Dying power supply or B) dying motherboard. In my case it was the later, which I only was able to fully diagnose by using a known good PSU. As its a laptop, good luck. In my situation, I was planning on upgrading anyway, but didn't want to do it too soon, so instead I stopped turning my machine off. Been 24/7 stable for a few months now... hopefully it will keep going until either A) we get some RD890 SB850 motherboards for the AM3 platform or B) ASRock makes their 939 Sockter, 785G chipset mobo available in the states. Either way, windows had zero to do with it. Much more likely culprit are the frequent black/brown outs in my apt complex.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
In my case...
Economister 7th Dec 2009
I do not believe it is the mother board nor the PS (it is a notebook). I have only had to do it a few times over a two+ year period. It does not seem to get worse and the remedy always works. It is Vista Ultimate and Core2 Duo with 2GB and ATI graphics. I assume it is OS/SW related. Since it happens SO infrequently, I have not concerned myself with it at all. It would be pretty difficult to trouble shoot - could take several years wink
0 Votes
+ -
Thermal issues
A.Sinic 8th Dec 2009
I've got two laptops that do this sometimes, and both of them are thermal issues. If the machine is allowed to cool, it will always boot OK, and run for days if need be. One of them will usually black-screen if booted while hot, but always runs OK. The other sometimes shuts down from overheat, depending on room temp and what surface it is sitting on.

It can be worth vacuuming the vents on a laptop, and checking that the fans are working right. Thermal issues are inherently variable.
0 Votes
+ -
I had a black screen issue last week too.
ye Updated - 7th Dec 2009
Turned on my laptop and received the following error (OK, technically it's a black screen with white lettering):

The following file is missing or corrupt:

\Windows\system32\config\system

Yep...that's the system hive of the registry. The OS is unable to start. So can I claim I got hit with the black screen of death too (even though it was a failing hard drive which caused this problem)?
0 Votes
+ -
You can claim it
Michael Kelly 7th Dec 2009
You just can't blame the OS.

And unfortunately that's part of the reason why the Blue Screen of Death has such a bad rep. People always blame the OS, when usually it's either a hardware issue or someone swapping an old hard drive (with Windows installed) into a new PC (which is a software issue, but a designed one).
0 Votes
+ -
I can't claim it.
ye 7th Dec 2009
The black screen of death, as reported this past week, was allegedly the result of bad patches. A hard drive failure doesn't qualify.

And unfortunately that's part of the reason why the Blue Screen of Death has such a bad rep. People always blame the OS, when usually it's either a hardware issue or someone swapping an old hard drive (with Windows installed) into a new PC (which is a software issue, but a designed one).

I agree completely. Too many times I've seen people fault Windows for non-Windows problems.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Allegedly, and then retracted
Ed Bott 7th Dec 2009
The allegation that November's WU patches were related to black screen issues was made by Prevx and then retracted. Based on the Microsoft analysis and third-party testing, there's no relationship whatsoever.
I clearly said:

"The black screen of death, as reported this past week, was allegedly the result of bad patches. A hard drive failure doesn't qualify."

You're saying the same thing as I.
0 Votes
+ -
slight correction
gnesterenko Updated - 11th Jan 2010
"You can say it's the hardware, but the purpose of the OS is to handle the hardware, [when the proper drivers are installed]"

there. fixed.

Also, the OS can only do so much if your BIOS isn't able to handle low-level control of the hardware. A BIOS update from the mobo makers website will, at the least, eliminate that as a source of problems.

Finally, if you've installed once and had to restore twice, its possible that your first install went astray, and thus restoring to a bad install won't really fix any issues. Something to consider.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix