ie8 fix
madison

When does Windows Phone 7 get its grand opening?

By | January 15, 2011, 10:27am PST

Summary: So far, Microsoft has treated Windows Phone 7 like a soft opening at a restaurant, where you open the doors quietly while you get the operation running smoothly. But you can’t stay below the radar forever and hope to build a business. So when does Windows Phone 7 get its grand opening?

If Windows Phone 7 was a restaurant, you’d be right to wonder just when the proprietor plans to have its grand opening. What Microsoft has done so far is more like a soft opening, where you put out an “open for business” sign and welcome customers but don’t go out of your way to pack the house.

As one authority in the bistro business defines the term: “The soft opening gives you a chance to work out all the logistical kinks, train the staff, tweak the menu, and really understand who you want to attract as a customer. This way you are in a position to hit a home run on the night of the grand opening.”

Ah, yes. The grand opening. The point of the soft opening is to ensure success in the grand opening. Note to Microsoft: You can’t stay below the radar forever and hope to build a business.

So when does Microsoft expect to have the grand opening for Windows Phone 7? The new platform has had a very low-key and very soft opening that has lasted for nearly a calendar quarter. It’s been so soft that at least one hardware partner has begun grumbling about it publicly. James Choi, marketing strategy and planning team director of LG Electronics global, told Pocket-lint, “[F]rom a consumer point of view the visibility is less than we expected” and “we strongly feel that it has a strong potential even though the first push wasn’t what everyone expected.”

Part of the point of the soft opening for Windows Phone 7 is to work out technical and performance issues in the real world (see the iPhone 4 experience for an example of what happens if you don’t do this). It gives the first wave of app developers a chance to fill the marketplace and work out bugs with early adopters, who are generally more technical and more forgiving of teething problems. There’s also a chance to expand onto CDMA networks (like Verizon and Sprint in the U.S.) and introduce some new handsets.

The first Windows Phone 7 update should appear within a few weeks, adding essential features (like copy-paste support) that were missing in the first release. The expansion to Verizon’s network is promised in the first half of this year. After those two milestones occur, will Microsoft ratchet up its Windows Phone 7 marketing and make a serious run at gaining some share?

I hope so, and they’ve already got a blueprint for how to do it, courtesy of the same hardware partners who are getting antsy now.

Most of the reactions I’ve read to the interview with LG’s Choi zeroed in on that “less than we expected” quote, but I was more intrigued by this later comment about Windows Phone 7:

What we feel is that is absolutely perfect for a huge segment out there. What we feel is that some people believe that some operating systems, mainly Google, are extremely complicated for them. But Windows Phone 7 is very intuitive and easy to use.

That, in shorthand, is how Microsoft should be marketing Windows Phone 7. Position it and demo it directly against Android. Contrast the complexity and confusion of Android with the simplicity of a Windows Phone. The Android platform is ripe for the same sort of pointed comparisons that Apple used to such devastating effect in its “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” series of ads. The humorous possibilities are endless. “Oh, sorry, you can’t do that because you’re stuck on last year’s flavor, Gingerbread. They’re up to Tiramisu now and I just saw the roadmap for Zabaglione.”

I think Choi is also correct that Windows Phone 7 is boring to the enthusiast community that has driven smartphone adoption so far. But the next big bump in the smartphone adoption curve will come as new waves of less technically savvy users arrive. Microsoft has actually designed a phone UI that is comforting for feature phone users, who don’t want to scroll though four screenfuls of apps and folders to do stuff. Making a head-to-head comparison with Android (and to a lesser extent with iPhone and BlackBerry) is the way to peel off these new arrivals to the smartphone world and guide them into your camp.

I don’t think Microsoft can afford the luxury of extending this soft opening until the end of the year. My colleague James Kendrick wonders aloud whether Microsoft can right this ship. I think there’s still time, thanks mostly to the lock-in from carrier contracts, which spread the pool of available buyers out over two years.

From personal experience, I can testify that you need to get up close and personal with Windows Phone 7 to really appreciate it. That’s especially true for the technically timid who have stuck with feature phones through the early years of the smartphone adoption curve. As those contracts expire, they bring a steady stream of curious people into stores to check out replacements. Microsoft needs to make sure they see Windows Phone products and get a convincing demo, especially if they’re considering an Android device instead.

Ironically, the strategy it takes to succeed with this segment of the market is likely to be off-putting to the enthusiast/early adopter crowd that covers mobile devices closely today. For them, it’s important for Microsoft to show momentum, with quarterly updates that show improvements in the technology.

Oh, and numbers. Microsoft needs to show steady increases in sales and share, especially in the quarter that ends the company’s fiscal 2010 on June 30. And they can only generate those numbers if they actually hold a grand opening for Windows Phone 7.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

118
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: When does Windows Phone 7 get its grand opening?
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
I would be more interested to see what Samsung's numbers are and if they are upset about consumer uptake. the 1 LG phone in the US does not compare to Samgung's and to a lesser extent the two HTC Devices out there.

If Samsung and HTC aren't happy with WP7 sales then this would be more of a valid point, however, LG also needs to look at its own house and see that their phone was designed poorly and nobody really cares about DLNA compatibility from their phone.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Some truth in that
Ed Bott 15th Jan 2011
@nyc2theworld

I think the LG form factor is more likely to appeal to the BlackBerry switcher, and when you put it side by side with a Samsung Focus the latter wins hands-down.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott

I'd take LG's comments and throw them in the trash. Why?....because compared to handsets from other manufacturers; LG's products look very cheap and thats why their sales are uninspiring.

This is my first smartphone and initially I thought I'd go with an LG device because my old cell was a very reliable LG that did its job well. However, the devices offered from HTC and Samsung just made LG's look pitiful. I setteld on the Dell Venue Pro. Its a very inspiring device that makes the LG devices look like KINS.
Was it a non-discloser agreement, or what is happening?? I could see carriers with a large inventory of unsold WP7 phones, wanting to keep things quiet and unload as many phones as possible before the bad news hits. If it were announced how few WP7 phones were actually sold, they might never be able to move the final inventory. Have heard zero about carriers ordering more WP7 phones.

And, sometimes it is what is NOT said that is the most telling.

What really is going on here? Why the silence? How is it enforced? Why did LG talk?
0 Votes
+ -
@DonnieBoy
Do you make it your business to troll every Microsoft article?
agree to not talk?? Samsung, HTC, the carriers, and finally Microsoft are not talking.

Thanks for participating and contributing in the talkbacks
so all he can do is troll these boards as for him, sadly, that is as close as he will be able to get in reference to a career in the technology sector.
plain
0 Votes
+ -
RE: When does Windows Phone 7 get its grand opening?
Habiloso Updated - 16th Jan 2011
I agree that DB can be something of an antagonist, but on this issue he is correct. It is somewhat infantile calling him a troll when, on this issue, all he is repeating is what many in the industry are saying, either directly or indirectly - including Ed Bott, James Kendrick and others. If DB is a troll, does that also make Ed Bott, James Kendrick and others trolls? I think not!

MS is well know for trumpeting every minor "achievement". If they bought a box of biscuits from a girl guide they'd try to make it front page news. So, how is it that all we hear is the sound of silence from MS on WP7 sales, income from WP7, number of apps sold and so forth? And why is it that manufacturers are also not providing sales figures etc? It does seem somewhat "conspiratorial". It was only three months or so ago that MS and WP7 staff/developers were walking down a main street somewhere in the USA with a coffin as a metaphor for the death of iOS and Android. Why is it now that MS has a publicity clamp on just about everything to do with WP7? I don't care whether WP7 succeeds or fails, but every piece of information at this point suggests that WP7 is a long way from a success.

Ed I would have thought that the coffin parade by developers WAS the grand opening!
0 Votes
+ -
@nyc2theworld

I selected a HTC Mozart over the LG offering, so I can see LG might be taking a hit.

I purchased 4 Wp7 phones for my business and gave 3 to colleagues that had not used smartphones before. They are all delighted with the phones and love the UI. With full integration with our office exchange server, sharepoint and office apps they are tools rather than toys (although the games, entertainment and social functions are excellent as well). While iPhones may attract the well-off fashion conscious and gadget geeks love Android, there is a huge majority of phone users struggling with their semi-smart phones and confusing UIs that would love WP7.

There's also other marketing occuring with WP7, by WP7 users and word of mouth. Every iPhone and Android user I know who's asked to try out the phone has been impressed by it's speed and ease of use and a number are starting to look at when their contracts are up.

However, having foiund the perfect restaurant, I'm wondering if I want it to become McDonalds wink
Wow amazing work, looks really good. rolex replica
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed...
GoodThings2Life Updated - 15th Jan 2011
Ed, I agree with you completely on this. This has been a nice opportunity to get feedback from the early adopters about which features are needed and which kinks need resolved to make a truly successful launch. Once it launches on CDMA carriers like Verizon and Sprint, however, Microsoft absolutely MUST do what it hasn't done well in over a decade... market the hell out of something. Go for the big, splashy launch party. Show off the more "magical" features... and don't be afraid to get down and dirty to compare it, functionally, with Android and Apple iOS.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed
Cylon Centurion 15th Jan 2011
@GoodThings2Life

They have a nice OS going here. Now they need to get it out there.
0 Votes
+ -
Who is WP7 supposed to be good for?
HollywoodDog 17th Jan 2011
@Cylon Centurion 0005 ... Bott writes: "Microsoft has actually designed a phone UI that is comforting for feature phone users, who don?t want to scroll though four screenfuls of apps and folders to do stuff."

In short, they've made a smartphone for people who don't want a smartphone.

Sound to me like instead of taking on a smartphone player, they should just try to be the default for people who aren't in the market for smartphones at all, and would rather quickly scan tiles on the front page to see how many calls and emails they have, and what time it is.
0 Votes
+ -
@GoodThings2Life The thing is MSFT doesn't market...they leave that to their partner PC Manufactuers.

That PC-marketing relationship is not going to work when you have the platform made by one person (who is the underdog), the device made by another (who is already selling tons of devices running other OSes), and another person providing the service (who is looking to sell devices that they know won't come back).

They are going to have to abandon their old ways of marketing and take a more direct to consumer role of advertising WP7...and get the manufactuers and carriers to follow their lead (rather than the carriers and lesser extent manufacturer leadind the advertising charge)
@nyc2theworld

For some reason I remember the Microsoft marketing Windows 7. The commercials that said Windows 7 was "My Idea".
0 Votes
+ -
RE: When does Windows Phone 7 get its grand opening?
OffsideInVancouver 16th Jan 2011
@GoodThings2Life

I've seen a few WP7 adverts from MS, but last night I saw one for it from AT&T, I assume they're now trying to balance their offering a bit better?
stale, and surely before any more bad news comes out. Not sure how much each phone cost them, or how many of the 1.5 million they got, but, the dollar value could be quite significant.
0 Votes
+ -
@GoodThings2Life.. this is damage control... so they don't have to say WP7's are selling like crap.. they had a huge marketing budget.. i saw a bunch of ads for the phones on TV myself and i don't watch much TV.. they tried, but they just didn't make a compelling value proposition to consumers..

their ads are funny, but what they really need to do is what Ed said, just make a straight up case.. 'our phones do everything that android phones do except they are WAY easier to use'.. DONE! end of comercial...!

don't try to be too artsy or funny just show consumers why your phone is better than an Android.. i don't think they have what it takes to go head to head with Apple yet, let google draw people away from Apple and you take they people away from android.. take a chunk out of the people considering android..
@doctorSpoc

Exactly, they have already had the Grand Opening with the billions of dollars worth of advertising spent, it just seems like next to no-one cared and Microsoft will have to keep on plugging away to try to make WP a success.
0 Votes
+ -
@GoodThings2Life
Though I wonder what that says about what they fell about AT&T, who was the first US carrier to get the WP7?
@AllKnowingAllSeeing
I think they are waiting for someone at Microsoft to come up with a vision and an original idea...
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Excellent analysis of Microsoft's situation with Windows Phone 7, Ed. It is going to require a big (and smart) marketing push to raise consumer awareness and push WP7 in front of people. It's a great first effort for a new platform. Unfortunately, market perception is reality, if the market is big enough.

I was recently asked by a friend at Microsoft why I'm so hard on Windows tablets and WP7. I admit I am, because I'm so frustrated at Microsoft's execution in both areas. More of the same is no longer good enough in the mobile space, it moves too fast.
waited way too long to react to iPhone and Android, and to finally focus on what they would use to compete against them. Microsoft has STILL not decided how to attack the mobile market that includes cell phones and tablets. We are still getting very mixed signals about tablet, and Windows Phone 7. Trotting out "full" Windows for Arm just made things worse.
0 Votes
+ -
@DonnieBoy
Go troll somewhere else.
comparison to Apple and Google??
0 Votes
+ -
Weren't you the one . . .
JLHenry 16th Jan 2011
@DonnieBoy

Who was whining that MS NEEDED to bring Windows out for ARM?

Hypocrite.
0 Votes
+ -
@DonnieBoy

Donnie, the day you buy a smartphone, get back to us. Otherwise back under the bridge.
only one of many. With all of the confusion over Microsoft's tablet strategy, and losing more ground in the smart phone market, and the fast update cycles, the last thing they needed to add to the confusion was a Windows port to Arm that is 2 years away. They need to tell us their strategy for the tablet market right here, right now, that they are executing to keep themselves in the game RIGHT now. Also having people now talking about "full" Windows on cell phones does not help.

So, maybe it is good that MS is working on Windows for Arm, but, announcing it at CES, instead of articulating how they would compete RIGHT NOW with tablets, was a big mistake.
focus vs Google and Apple. What is your take?
0 Votes
+ -
Thank you.
@JamesKendrick interesting you should mention being hard on wp7 and tablets. a co-worker and i were just venting the other day our frustration in both arenas and MS's lack of urgency in both. A tablet solution in 2012/2013? Seriously? a smartphone solution in 2010, that's not being marketed for as good as it really is, was released without *required* features like c/p and multitasking when all the competitors already have it? it's like coming out w/ a car right now that doesn't have air bags.

for us MS fans, their mobile strategy has been nothing but a disappointment.
0 Votes
+ -
I have a WP7 (HTC HD7) and a Nexus S
John Carroll Updated - 15th Jan 2011
...got them for development reasons, so I have had a chance to compare and contrast them to a degree most probably don't. I may make a blog post out of this at some point (I'm on a fairly "when I feel like it" schedule these days), but WP7 IS a heck of a lot more straightforward to configure and use than Android.

It is important, however, for Microsoft to get the phone story right...even to the point of excluding serious consideration of a tablet computer till Windows 8. Phones are the demonstrated fountainhead of good ideas related to portable devices, and they have stacks of them in WP7. Cultivate that, and work out a tablet strategy that is as unique as Kinect was to gaming consoles.
to Apple and Google another 2 years while we wait for Windows 8 on Arm. Microsoft can afford the resources for another team to work on Windows Phone 7 tablets independently. They need to go all out, focused like a laser beam on phones and tablets, but, the management is going back and forth, and can not make up their minds.
0 Votes
+ -
When perception becomes reality
Economister 16th Jan 2011
@John Carroll

MS already had one huge phone failure, and there are speculations that WP7 is in trouble also. MS may not be able to recover easily from a second failure.

I think the soft launch is simply a reflection of a product being launched before it is ready, and that can be dangerous, especially for MS.

They were caught between a rock and a hard place, because they are always late to the party. The new technologies are moving much too fast for that to be a viable strategy.
0 Votes
+ -
Economister, maybe it was much simpler then that?
AllKnowingAllSeeing 17th Jan 2011
@Economister
AT&T knew it was about to lose exclusivity of the iPhone and asked for an earlier then anticipated release of WP7 to them?

They are a large carrier with clout, no doubt about that, so maybe it's not anything that you mentioned, but all in who was doing the pushing?
@AllKnowingAllSeeing

I doubt AT&T had anything to do with it, WP7 was released in Europe much earlier than the US.
0 Votes
+ -
WP7 not ready?
John Carroll 21st Jan 2011
@Economister Seems pretty ready to me, and I use it every day. I think the problem is the same one that afflicted Android in its early days. Most people have contracts that haven't expired, and WP7 has little in the way of brand awareness yet.

They didn't help themselves by using a name that clearly linked WP7 to the Windows Mobile past (lots of people have had bad experience with older WinMO devices, myself included). But, I don't think it is because WP7 isn't ready.

Are there features to add, yes. But it is an awesome mobile platform right now.
0 Votes
+ -
What soft opening?
YukioCowboy 15th Jan 2011
I see tons of WP7 commercials on TV all the time.
0 Votes
+ -
yes, what soft opening?
zkiwi 16th Jan 2011
Or were the words about $500 million (or thereabouts) having been spent on advertising it at launch (or was this over a year or what?) not true?
0 Votes
+ -
@zkiwi
Just because some website "estimate" it to be $500 million BEFORE Windows Phone 7 even launched doesn't mean it's true.
0 Votes
+ -
day2die, that's a fair statement
AllKnowingAllSeeing Updated - 17th Jan 2011
@zkiwi
No one ever really knows, they just estimate. I have seen far more Apple commercials in the past 6 weeks then I have MS commercials, so wouldn't it be a safe bat to say that Apple spent more on advertising then MS has?
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds right, Ed is making excuses
dfolk2 17th Jan 2011
@JFDude

The grand opening has already occurred, and not many folks came.
0 Votes
+ -
@JFDude

I see WP7 commercials too. And the commercials are cute, but at the end I barely remember them as an advertisement for a phone. It's kind of like reading a magazine article with a little 2x2 ad at the bottom, brain just filters it out.

It's just like those commercials where the people were dancing weirdly as they "used" the phone. I remember the commercials, but couldn't tell you at all which phone they were for, or what the phone could do. Just dancing people.

It'l lack of advertising PROWESS, not lack of advertising funds that is killing them here.
@JFDude

Yes, Microsoft has also been blitz advertising the UK. They sponsor some tv shows and have ads before, during and after the program. It wasnt a soft launch at all.
0 Votes
+ -
The mimicking feature phone would make sense if you don't charge for data plan. Smartphones by definition are not only communication machines but entertainment machines and don't have a luxury being boring.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@John Oleg We got a good example of charging for a data plan with a limited phone with the Kin. That's widely believed to have killed it in consumer's eyes.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Really?
Ed Bott 16th Jan 2011
@JamesKendrick

Yes the monthly bill was high, but the Kin was stillborn.
on top of everything else.
0 Votes
+ -
The KIN was a dumb product
wackoae 16th Jan 2011
@JamesKendrick The data plan was actually OK because you are talking about a phone that eat a lot of bandwidth (ie: expected to be a social phone with lots of pictures and video transfers).

What really killed the KIN was the fact that it was an expensive toy (with a recurring monthly bill) marketed towards pre-teens but advertised as "sexting" (take a picture of your chest, send it to a friend) and "sexual predator" (use the GPS to visit that stranger who contacted you and turns out to be 20 years older than you) friendly.
0 Votes
+ -
DonnieBoy, who was it an image disaster to?
AllKnowingAllSeeing 17th Jan 2011
I don't know of anyone who knew what a KIN was.
It would be a disaster if people knew about it but hated it, but in truth it had no image, so it's image couldn't be a disaster.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix