ie8 fix
madison

Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?

By | July 19, 2010, 1:11pm PDT

Summary: The first wave of hands-on previews of Windows Phone 7 are out. If Microsoft is smart, they’re going through those first looks with a fine-tooth comb and planning a series of updates. But can they deliver those improvements fast enough?

I’m awaiting my Windows Phone 7 review unit, which I’m told is on a truck and should be here any time now. Meanwhile, I’ve been reading some detailed previews from some very sharp commentators, including ZDNet’s own Matt Miller and Engadget’s Joshua Topolsky, which stand out from the pack. Manan Kakkar has an excellent roundup of all these first looks. (It’s worth noting these are not reviews, because this is prototype hardware that will never ship.)

If Microsoft is smart, they’re doing the same thing I’ve just done, which is to go through all those previews with a fine-tooth comb. They need to identify what critics are pointing out as hits and misses and then prioritize those issues for the initial shipping release and preferably several updates.

And they need to iterate at a pace that would be unthinkably fast for the Windows or Office division. Microsoft is far behind when it comes to phones, so they have to get the hardware right on Day 1 and then ship improvements at a steady clip.

The first and most important missing piece is Clipboard support, a feature that every preview I read identified as a negative. According to Long Zheng, the Windows Phone 7 team “knows exactly how they will be implementing copy & paste … but did not believe it could be implemented without affecting the release schedule.” There’s no question is will be included in an update (Long says “soon after initial release”), but there’s no firm date, which leaves Microsoft open to accusations that it’s announcing vaporware.

The second flaw is a lack of multitasking support, where Microsft has to at least pass the Pandora test - allowing you to listen to music via Pandora while doing something (anything) else.

And the third is the lack of support for HTML5 or Flash or Silverlight in the mobile browser. As Engadget correctly notes, the inability to play back video in the browser is a serious shortfall: “There’s not even a YouTube app on the phone! Microsoft — you’ve got to step it up on the video front if you want to play this game.” (It’s worth noting that many of the WP7 previews include video clips that would be unwatchable on the device itself.)

The good news is that all of those issues can be fixed with software updates. The question is, when? I’ve heard several people (including my friend Dwight Silverman) suggest that Microsoft should delay shipping until that feature is in. Dwight argues that this is a must feature in this competitive climate.

Personally, I don’t mind if those features are not in the first release. Microsoft can and should ship in the fall with a polished product where every feature works and works well. That gives early adopters a chance to shake out issues in performance and functionality, which can be cleaned up in an update that also incrementally delivers those missing features. And it gives developers a chance to write apps and test them on shipping hardware, with the expectation that updates will be available soon.

The big question is, how soon? Dribbling out those fixes and improvements over a full year is unacceptable. Even six months is probably too long. If phones are on sale in October, that point-one update with cut/copy/paste support should appear within 90 days, and Microsoft should release a Windows Phone 7 version of IE with HTML5 support shortly after IE9 is released for desktop platforms.

The biggest missing piece of all is the value proposition: what is this phone going to deliver that makes it worth choosing over an iPhone or an Android device? I’ll have a better idea of how to answer that question after I’ve spent some hands-on time with the device.

Now pardon me while I go wait by the door for the FedEx guy.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

58
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
And do you think Microsoft can deliver at this pace?
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott
The good news is that all of those issues can be fixed with software updates.

Yeah, but as you raised yourself, will these software updates happen quickly? My personal guess is no, it will be at least a year before we see a WP7.x phone that is competitive with the iPhone 4. At that point, I'll be more than happy to switch but I don't see why I should have to put up with missing features in the mean time. It is why I've stuck with WM6.x while Apple figured out how to finally build a good phone. I could have switched to iPhone instead of getting my HTC Touch Diamond but I saw no reason to suffer with the ridiculously lousy iPhone 1, 2, or 3 when I could just get a better phone (HTC Touch Diamond) and then switch later on. Luckily for me, there are a lot of idiots who bought iPhone 1, 2, and 3, giving Apple time and money to finally come out with a good phone.

My biggest fear is that people who buy MS products are usually smarter than people who buy Apple products and we don't tolerate inferiority like Apple consumers do. If no one buys WP7, no one will write apps for WP7 and the platform will die. sad
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
ckeledjian Updated - 20th Jul 2010
@NonZealot The best thing currently to answer these questions is getting the emulator and play with it. I did a simple test that was revelatory. Most Fridays I go to the movies with friends. Since I'm the most IT literate, they ask me to look for movies. So in WP7 emulator I press search, put 'movies zipcode'. Shows me a quick list of movies, really fast because this first page was XML. Then I click to see more and I'm taken to the web browser. I select the movie, I select the theater. Then it comes the fun part. Before going to the movies, there is always the question where are we going to eat, and it needs to be a place near the selected theater. In Android, you would have to copy the theater address, and do another search for restaurants near that address. In WP7, just click in the smart sense detected theater address and it takes you to the maps app, then click on the theater and right there it shows nearby restaurants, parking, etc.along with reviews, hours of operation and you can SMS the address to your friend from that same page so you can meet them there. This is what I was looking for in a SMART phone. There are many other details like this that show MS has done their research, so I trust them, they listen to customer feedback, they research and respond. As for developers, everybody knows that IPhone is cumbersome to develop for with the archaic Objective C, while WP7 uses .net, C#, silverlight and XNA which are the easiest tools to develop apps. MS needs good marketing to break pass the bleak minds that will try to compare it to the iphone and android even though it doesn't look at all like it, and to break pass the initial shock at the apparent simplicity of the interface.
0 Votes
+ -
release-wise And with great quality and features leaps in each version. They went from nothing to light years ahead of flash in just a couple years. That MS chose SL as the foundation for WP7's dev platform gives me great hope for the pace of innovation for it.
0 Votes
+ -
@Johnny Vegas But nothing uses it. So it doesnt matter how good it is, if nobody uses it.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft can deliver a phone
HollywoodDog 20th Jul 2010
@Ed Bott ... that nobody will buy, just like Kin.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
ItsTheBottomLine 20th Jul 2010
@HollywoodDog WOW! at least your consistent.
0 Votes
+ -
And nobody buys your statements
John Zern 20th Jul 2010
so you and MS are exactlly the same, is that what you're saying?

LOL! happy
0 Votes
+ -
I do
ahh so 20th Jul 2010
@John Zern
Right now, we just see the usual M$ vaporware.

Where's the beef?
0 Votes
+ -
Let's assume Microsoft gets WP7 right with the final version. If that will happen, this will be a great day for all Microsoft competitors. Why? Microsoft lost with each sold Kin phone 68,000 USD. So how much Microsoft will loose with WP7? Where is the business model which will bring Ballmer & Co. profit? Microsoft doesn't control the whole product chain (like Apple) and is light-years away from earning money like Google. These are the bad news for all Microsoft shareholders. The cloud computing and the smart-phone battle-field are territories where Microsoft is burning billions without being able to show a satisfying business model. For sure Microsoft can still buy market-share. But for how long the shareholders will tolerate a never ending stream of subsidiaries for non-profitable adventures in market-places where Microsoft has zero clue and experience to make money? So if you like Microsoft don't buy a WP7 phone, if you are a Microsoft hater you should hail the arrival of WP7 ion the market-place.
0 Votes
+ -
@hengels I don't get it. Which part of the ecosystem do they not control with WP7? They have the App Store, the Zune Marketplace, and Zune Pass.

Tell me again?
0 Votes
+ -
There is the problem...
eldernorm 26th Jul 2010
@Ed Bott
"That gives early adopters a chance to shake out issues in performance and functionality, which can be cleaned up in an update that also incrementally delivers those missing features. " Isn't this exactly what Apple did on all 4 versions of its phone....??? Deliver great hardware and then give software updates as problems were fixed and new options became available.???

And with Microsoft starting 2-3 years late,,,, what is going to make WM 7 phone different, better, newer than the competition??

Now MS usually makes its products work better with MS Windows than its competition can.... but how is this going to work with a "PHONE"???

Sorry, MS missed the phone/mobile market. 10 years to develop a tablet and all they could do is make a small, less capable laptop... MS powered cell phones and they never exceeded what everyone else was offering.

Just a thought here, but the MS boat is pretty leaky and starting to lose the race with the rising water. They could not do any of the things you suggested in the last 10 years.... Why do you think they can do them now???

Hmmmm, maybe the wild success of the Zune??

en
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
henningp@... Updated - 6th Aug 2010
@eldernorm WM6 and WM6.5 have been "wildly successful" in the markets that MS specifically targets. Which means the business market.

WP7 is MS' first real attempt at capturing the consumer market, and IMHO, a very good attempt. I'm a previous iPhone user, and currrently an Android person (HTC Desire). If MS actually manages to create a compelling developer story for the WP7 stack, which it seems like they're well on their way to doing, my guess is that they will surpass at least Google's installed base in a couple of years.

And on a sidenote : the (un)success of Zune mainly depens on them not marketing it outside the U.S.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
beijing2008 Updated - 14th Sep
Thanks very much. replica chanel bags
0 Votes
+ -
Windows Phone 7 is starting off as a more advanced mobile device than any mobile system started from including their where they currently are, that by itself is a plus. Then if you happen to see the WP7 enterprise roadmap you MUST realize that all other mobile devices out there will have a problem because not only is it targeted at the consumer, it also has deep enterprise integration planned for release and thereafter. Here, watch this Microsoft presentation video mainly for the WP7 enterprise roadmap (fast forward to 34:50minute, 49:48minute also talks about new marketplace policies); http://www.msteched.com/2010/NorthAmerica/WPH201

Here is the Windows Phone 7 Enterprise Roadmap summary:
At Release (Fall 2010):
Exchange Server
SharePoint Server
Windows Azure
SQL Azure
MS Office
Microsoft Online Services - Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS)

Later (2011+):
System Center
Office Communications Server
Windows Server
SQL Server

Now, you need to think deeply about which mobile device brings both consumer-centric features and enterprise features of this sort together besides its more intuitive user interface, then further think about what threat WP7 and all this means for other mobile devices. And please save what you think you know or hear randomly and let it all play out starting this Fall.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Indeed
Ed Bott 19th Jul 2010
@techiegz@...

SharePoint and Exchange are very, very high on my list of things to test thoroughly.
0 Votes
+ -
The problem with Microsoft v.s. Apple
Rafale555 26th Jul 2010
@techiegz@...
The problem on Microsoft's part is the "you will see" syndrome.

When Apple comes out with a new product, there was never a promise that such and such a product would come out.

They launch, have good marketing (relative to the features offered), solve issues with time and offer the public a good product. They even change the landscape of how the rest of the industry will enter a market.

With Microsoft, they tell you months if not years ahead (remember how many years people have waited to finally get Vista... 6, 7 years... Longhorne anyone?... promised features still lacking today)

Microsoft does its marketing before a product is on the shelves, Apple, after.

Microsoft should shut its mouth, concoct a good product and have people judge them on merit.

The way they are doing it now leaves a lot of space for very harsh criticism if they fail, as was the case with the Kin phone and the Courrier tablet.

I think people are fed up with the "you will see" syndrome. "You will see, it will be superior to... it will trash so and so, it will put others behind for such and such number of yerars..."

Like the old hamburger commercial said... "Where's the beef?"

If they were a serious company, they would just produce good stuff and ride the wave of their succes. In the last ten years, they have awfully missed that goal.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Where's the roadmap for Windows Phone 7?
Loverock Davidson 19th Jul 2010
Seriously, you think a youtube app is a must have? My phone can go to youtube but I never have done it. Viewing streaming videos on a 3" screen isn't exactly ideal. You actually sound slightly angry because Microsoft isn't giving you all the information you want. Like you said they can fix these minor issues with software updates in due time. I believe Microsoft Windows Phone 7 is going to offer quite a bit over its competitors. Its UI is very slick as well as its integration with other Microsoft products. If they can get the gaming community on board they will have a winner. Put your mind at ease.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson that's like old school Linux people saying that the GUI isn't important because they can use the command line.Remeber that Moble 7 will have to now offer features that are so good a user will be willing to buy out their spanking new iPhone or Blackberry contract to use it. MS would have been better getting the features in there and then waiting one and a half years from the iPhone4's release date to catch all the new subscribers.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson

Use the YouTube app all the time. Usually at the gym when riding the bike I'll flip on some live concert footage.

My wife dances and they share a lot of their choreographs via YouTube and a smartphone is great way to practice and learn them.

I know Apple is getting gaming community going as well but don't we have enough opportunities to waste our lives playing video games. Do we need to do it now in front of a phone. How sad.
0 Votes
+ -
@maskman01 I don't really waste time playing games on my phone, but I do use youtube and other video viewing stuff, especially if I get emailed videos from people that find funny things.
@Loverock Davidson What will they offer over their competitors? Because at the moment they are behind on all fronts other than Integration with MS products.
0 Votes
+ -
@Loverock Davidson Win7 Phone is another lame attempt by MS to join the 21st century. As for success, (I define it as a decent market share and lots and lots of profits), I give MS about 5% chance... what a waste of time...
0 Votes
+ -
Anyone who thinks that a smartphone can ship without video support and not be dead in the water upon release doesn't understand the market.

It needs to ship with video support and a good browser.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
You can stream Zune content OTA
palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller) 19th Jul 2010
I am concerned a bit about multi-tasking too, but regarding the Pandora test you can stream Zune content OTA and I found it works pretty well even over an EDGE connection.

I am not sure if there will be some sort of multitasking or app freeze state at launch either, but it currently looks like things such as website loading get frozen when you leave and return right where you were before. I think what is needed first is a quick app switcher.
0 Votes
+ -
@palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller) they really need to just get full multitasking out there. Or they will come out behind Android already. And considering how fast everyone is adopting android, there will be no room left in the smartphone market for another useless "smartphone" OS.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm looking forward to Phone 7 and hopefully it will turn up in NZ about the same time my current plan ends (iPhone 3GS).
Proper over the air sync with Outlook and One Note will be welcome as will calendar items on the start screen (not having to actually open calendar which does my head in).
0 Votes
+ -
"That gives early adopters a chance to shake out issues in performance and functionality, which can be cleaned up in an update that also incrementally delivers those missing features."

So this Fall we're getting...a Beta release? And I should pay for this why?

This will take off like the Kin and Windows 1.0. Let me know if WP9 phones ship.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
You shouldn't pay for this...
Ed Bott 19th Jul 2010
No one's going to hold a gun to your head.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott True, that. happy

Thanks for the reply! I have a WinMo 6.5 phone which I think is great. It's just so frustrating to see what appears to me to be a huge step backwards.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott And I apologize to you for getting out of line like that.
0 Votes
+ -
@nightbirdsf Actually, if you understand the concept of this OS you will see its not a step backward at all, its actually a step that nobody have taken and nobody could take and if there's one company in the world of software that can come from behind with a fresh idea and attract developers thats microsoft. and from what i've seen so far they are pretty committed to this OS and OTA update are part of the scenario. i wasn't very positive about microsoft in the mobile space but when i see that ballmer killed KIN i get positive(i don't think anyone else could do that in a company like microsoft knowing the storm after that act). it shows they are so much serious about wp7, at a level that i haven't seen before(i'm too young:D). it seems developers are pretty hot on this platform too(just go to youtube search wp7 game or go and see 1800pocketpc.com). if apple have a problem with number of apps applied each week to get confirmed for the iphone then microsoft is in a very big trouble of confirmation process of apps for wp7. there's just too many .net developers(let alone xna) and i think thats why they limited number of free apps
0 Votes
+ -
@nightbirdsf @nightbirdsf Actually, if you understand the concept of this OS you will see its not a step backward at all, its actually a step that nobody have taken and nobody could take and if there's one company in the world of software that can come from behind with a fresh idea and attract developers thats microsoft. and from what i've seen so far they are pretty committed to this OS and OTA update are part of the scenario. i wasn't very positive about microsoft in the mobile space but when i see that ballmer killed KIN i get positive(i don't think anyone else could do that in a company like microsoft knowing the storm after that act). it shows they are so much serious about wp7, at a level that i haven't seen before(i'm too young:D). it seems developers are pretty hot on this platform too(just go to youtube search wp7 game or go and see 1800pocketpc.com). if apple have a problem with number of apps applied each week to get confirmed for the iphone then microsoft is in a very big trouble of confirmation process of apps for wp7. there's just too many .net developers(let alone xna) and i think thats why they limited number of free apps
0 Votes
+ -
HTML5 support? HTML5 isn't a completed spec yet. Why should Windows Phone 7 have it? Think you got a little caught up in the hype.
0 Votes
+ -
Two Words For Windows Phone 7
cyberslammer 20th Jul 2010
EPIC FAIL.
0 Votes
+ -
@cyberslammer Just a fool will think that
0 Votes
+ -
Why's that?
ahh so Updated - 20th Jul 2010
@arasheps
Right now it's just a bunch of talk with a few slick demos that can manipulated any which way it can.

M$ doesn't like to compete. It like's to take over and monopolize.

Just don't forget...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish
0 Votes
+ -
Sure they can add all these features, now or later, but will it slow down WinPhone7 like Windows Mobile making it painfully slow to use? I hope WinPhone7's speed is competitive with Droid or Symbian or ??? Is the code going to be as clean with small footprint, no crashes etc.
0 Votes
+ -
@bebohuey WM wasn't really slow. The hardware was pretty slow for what WM was doing on it. Todays hardware is much faster and WM phones are very snappy on new hardware (I've tried them out in Wireless stores).
0 Votes
+ -
No copy/paste?
LarsDennert 20th Jul 2010
HAHA what a joke. WM2002 all over? If they can't get the basics in there, they have no chance. Not until the Droid X have I seen a phone that can sync subfolder contacts in Exchange. Good luck MS. With no third party support to start with on apps it will be DOA unless it is a complete OS.
0 Votes
+ -
There is a lot here to love. But the general public can't really relate to all that stuff to love. The development platform will be very rich with .net, silverlight, azure etc etc. But the average person won't really understand any of this nor will they care. You're talking about a group of consumers who cares more about how shiny the casing of the phone will be vs the apps being built in c#. The challenge initially is really with the bling factor of the phone.

Like it or not, the general public does and will judge this book by its cover first and foremost. Everything else while brilliant will be secondary.
0 Votes
+ -
@rengek Well the thing is that .net sucks, C# sucks and Azure is useless. C/C++ is what the apps should be coded in. Because thats what all the big time developers use to write the most popular applications known to man (Office, Web Browsers, Operating systems, Games, the list goes on).
0 Votes
+ -
Video.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 Updated - 20th Jul 2010
They should not release until or unless web video can be played. They really have one shot left (and it is a long shot at that with the momentum Android has and the Apple base) to get into the mobile business. It appears they have conceded the tablet OS market (for now) and therefore can't be too far behind Android or Apple. Android will have full flash by then as well as pretty much every codec later this year, Apple, well, their users don't see to mind paying for YouTube but at least they can.

No Silverlight support is up there on the irony scale, however, video is a pure must in their browser.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
Windows Phone Vista?
Richard in Phoenix 20th Jul 2010
From what I've seen, there are 3 distinct advantages with WP7 that should be marketable:

1. XBox Live tie-in.
2. ZuneHD owners (or at least Zune.net subscribers).
3. Enterprise/business users.

From the previews, we haven't seen #1 yet, so we don't know how attractive that is. #2 seems pretty solid. And #3 is a complete mess (Excel not working in landscape mode!).

Office integration is what they must fix first. As in, before they release it. A windows phone with best-in-class office document support (not just reading, but also editing) and exchange support would be a strong device. But if they ship something this poor, WP7's reputation could be permanently damaged.

Please Microsoft, learn from your mistake with Vista. You didn't listen to early adopters and reviews and shipped it anyway. And by the time you released SP1, Vista's reputation was beyond salvage.

In fact, I suggest Windows Phone 7 should be renamed Windows Phone Vista. At least then it wouldn't seem like they are banking on the good name of their latest desktop OS to gloss over the phone OS shortcomings.
0 Votes
+ -
Waste of money. How did Microsoft start going backwards in technology?
not allowing mfgrs to include a memory card slot (i.e. microSD)?
When will they understand we're in 2010...
0 Votes
+ -
@pool7 Its fail apple tactics all over again. MS has just given up and resorted to copying everything that is wrong with Apple products and putting them in their products (other than Windows 7).
0 Votes
+ -
Its a joke from MS
Jimster480 20th Jul 2010
This OS is a joke. I used to be a WM guy, but after seeing what would be in WP7 I just bought a Android phone. Seriously, its worse than iOS. Infact its so inferior to iOS (which is inferior to Android already) that it borders on unuseable. Lets see where MS screwed this up;
1. App store with only MS Approved apps (C+P Apple Tactics)
2. No Open App Installing (Non-App store Apps Allowed)
3. No Multitasking (Seriously, this makes a phone useless, even WM had multitasking years ago.)
4. No Video support (No Mobile Youtube or any other video service? Again something that WM had years ago, and everything has today)
5. No HTML5 or Flash Support or Silverlight (Nobody cares about silverlight anyway, but seriously Flash powers the web and HTML5 is being adopted very quickly, this will make many websites unviewable or crippled)
6. No Developers on board (considering that WP7 has a $100 fee to develop on a platform that is years behind, most developers won't even waste their time)
7. Supposedly based around social networking (this is not the only thing that people want their phones to do MS, you already failed with this tactic 1 time with the KIN, now you are going to do it again).

Windows 7 is a great product. I have moved many people to Windows 7 and recommended it to countless others. All the machines in my house and many of the ones at friends houses are now running Windows 7 aswell. Thanks to MSDNAA copies, student pricing and other promotions.
But now they are going to release a useless OS that won't be able to do what even the lower end borderline dumbphone OS's can do.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm looking forward to it, and on paper it looks to give me what I want.

If MS is smart, they'll concentrate on the UI / simplicity and integration with their other products - a place where most others can't touch them. iPhone 4 is having some fun playing in enterprise environments (a few of my clients put them on ... then took them off their supported devices list), and if Microsoft can bring both worlds together, it'll be a winner.

I hate being locked into anything, and even more so hate being told what I am and aren't allowed to do with my property. I am one of those people that, for all intents and purposes, would choose an inferior product that I can customise to a superior product that doesn't allow it. I am just hoping that it doesn't come to that ...

Microsoft, look at what the reviewers are saying. They like your stuff, but most have agreed on the must have features that are currently missing. Fix those ... quickly ... and you'll have a decent offering.

As I said, I'm looking forward to the competition.
0 Votes
+ -
I actually attended a user group meeting last night, where a Silverlight developer (think he's actually an MS MVP) demonstrated the programming environment. Frankly he was stymied by the lack of multitasking. I don't think that the appealing apps will come until some better way to suspend an app while using system services like the "choosers." Shutting an appp down, and restarting it, to access data, like contacts and pictures, on the phone it self, is extremely clumsy. Inclusion of IE7(!?) is plainly a result of setting a low thresh-hold for the WP7 team, one that only a project manager (and NOT a marketing manager) could love.

That said, for a consumer phone, the OS-included stuff _may_ make it good enough. But I have my doubts about the marketing effort, and how it will materialize, when so many compromises were made to get the phone out the door.
0 Votes
+ -
I'd really like to see some sort of roadmap for WP7. I'm debating on whether I'm going to go with this OS on a new device or Android. I really like the WP7 concept and design, but I need to know that MS is going to actually make the devices usable because there appears to be a flaw in the implementation of their design strategy.

The thing that most concerns me at the moment isn't copy/paste or multitasking (though I would like both), but whether the application "silo" system for files and data is going to completely disable the entire OS concept of putting content front and center. If applications don't have a way to pass data or files between each other, or integrate content seamlessly into existing hubs, the user experience is going to be a series of frustrating "Why doesn't it do this very simple thing?"

For instance, the People hub social content updates, the smart tagging system, and the way that Bing works on the device all reinforce the idea that you can move smoothly between content types without having to manage applications. So, if I receive a PDF file via email - I want to view the PDF, but there is no native PDF reader at the moment. If Adobe releases one for the platform, they need to be able to integrate with both the Office hub, and the email system for a smooth user experience. If I click on the PDF attachment, and it doesn't open the PDF reader to view the document (because application content is silo'd for 3rd party apps currently), that's a disruptive user experience.

My understanding is that this capability is not possible with the current policy restrictions (not technical limitations) that MS is putting on developer apps with the OS. I can't save the attached PDF file somewhere (local storage/Skydrive/etc.) and then manually use the PDF app to open the document, because there is no local shared application space allowed, and non-specified document types are not allowed to sync to Skydrive. This is a very basic use case (and there are many others) in which applications need to pass data between themselves to create a useful user experience. I don't currently see a framework in WP7 that allows this sort of content-focused interaction to happen with new content types.

While I had thought that the whole concept of "hubs" was to allow extensible content within the same UI framework, it seems that the file and data restrictions in the OS are going to defeat that concept and undermine the entire experience that MS is trying to create for users.
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix