Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

2012 Olympics: Give Us Webcams On the Wall

By | August 22, 2008, 4:13am PDT

The organizers of the Olympics really blew it this time. Not showing the unbelievable comeback of Michael Phelps in the 100-meter butterfly race, which he won by one-hundredth of a second, is evidence of cowardice. And a total lack of commercial savvy, in the digital age.

Can you imagine how many views that finish would have gotten on NBCOlympics and any other site sanctioned to replay the stunning conclusion of that race?

Don’t know about you. But I watched the replays on the NBC TV channel, repeatedly. It still looked to me like the “other guy” won. Every time. Let me see the closeup, please, as each touched the wall, from under the water and above the water.

If Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA) or whomever is the keeper of official video cares not to release its video, so be it. Give me Webcams on the wall. What’s wrong with a little controversy? Call me crazy, but I have enough faith in my fellow human beings that wars are not going to break out over a matter of one-hundredth of a second. Or the loss of a gold medal.

Release the tension. Let people blow off steam. Reap as many views on the Internet as you can. And engender as much bar room and living room intensity as you can. This is what competition and sports are about.

Sure, there were 2,200 hours of streamed video this time. But only one stream from each sport, in three versions (regular res, high res and picture-in-picture). Here is what I am expecting from online coverage of the next Summer Olympics in 2012 in London:

Webcams (sanctioned) at every finish line. Whether it’s a track or a swimming pool or the Westminster Abbey, if they choose that as the endpoint for a cycling race, I want to see for myself how a race I’m interested in ends. By 2012, I expect the streaming site I use to offer HD-quality video capture and playback. And the ability to slow down the feed to a speed I choose so I can see what is going on, frame by frame or pixel by pixel, if I so desire.

Loads of (sanctioned) camera angles. This is something interactive (cable) TV was supposed to deliver, a quarter-century ago. Remember Qube? Never came to my living room. This is something online video streaming can deliver. In that 200-meter dash that the Bolt from Jamaica won, it’s easy to see how he performed. The fun is seeing how everybody else performs – or doesn’t. Train a camera on every lane. And let the “experts” in the audience spot the fouls that rob other runners of their medals. Talk about engagement.

Athlete isolation. A corollary. Put enough cameras out there that you or I can watch the athlete of our choice. Let us look for our own stories. We know not everyone is going to win. But, hey, I might just be interested in how well a team from Iceland does in beach volleyball. Let me see the game from their perspective, only. Okay, I know everyone just wants to watch Misty Treanor and NBC had that covered, like a blanket. But there are other athletes at these and future games.

User-generated commentary. A new version of user-generated content (UGC). Most all of the feeds online this year from NBCOlympics.com were raw. If you know the sport, fine. That makes it better. No nattering. You make your own judgments on what is going on. Works great in basketball and soccer. Less so in diving, cycling or other sports with little-known nuances. Every sport has its expert, waiting to be unleashed. NBC and its foreign equivalents need to give them mikes. Not just keypads. Text commentary takes the eyes off the game. Spoken commentary keeps eyes on the game.

Crowd computing. I want to see how the crowd is reacting. Give me close-ups of fanatics doing nutty stuff. Give me a crowd meter that shows just how loud the reaction is to a gymnast’s maneuver on and off the parallel bars. Show me how they rate a performance, compared to the official judges. They may be there, but I am with them, even in the chair in my den.

Personal Olympics. Let me pick the events (and camera angles and athletes) I’m interested in and figure out how to send HD streams to my X-Box, Sony Playstation, TiVo or other storage device that can give me a personalized view of the Olympics when I get home at night or have spare time in a day to watch.

Tons of data. There can never be enough stats on competitors, their performances and the history of the events they take part in. Give me as much as you can. And let me set up my own scoreboard. So what if Ethiopia happens to win in the medal count in the sports I am interested in? That is how I care to look at it.

Official video, out the wazoo. Like the NBA has started to do, give me the digits. Let me have official feeds to mash up into my own highlight reel for the games. Let me distribute that reel and promote it. Let me be your marketing arm.

Everyone wants to be part of the Olympics. Most of us will never take part as athletes.

Open the games. Stream everything. Share everything. Embrace controversy. You still get to make the official (and final) calls.

But hide nothing. Viewership and interest will go through the roof.

What will you expect (or crave) from live video online at the 2012 Olympics?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld is editor-in-chief of Securities Industry News, as well as a long-time media, technology and business journalist.

Disclosure

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld has interests in two Web startups, which he cannot disclose until formally launched. They do not involve enterprise computing. He holds interests in technology companies only through mutual funds in which he has no say in their selection of investments. He has worked for Reed Elsevier PLC, Ziff Davis Media and the A.H. Belo Corporation.

Biography

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld is editor-in-chief of Securities Industry News, as well as a long-time media, technology and business journalist.

He experimented with online news delivery a quarter century ago, with a text-only online service called StarText at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram in Texas.
15
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I'm in too ...
Ron_007 2nd Jul 2009
Your idea is great, I hope the IOC picks up on it.

Actually this is an old idea. About 10 years back I had a satellite dish. NASCAR broadcasted a bunch of races that way. One channel had the "official" network broadcast. On 4 or 5 others they had a selection of other views, mostly in-car cameras. So you set up you picture in picture with 2 channels and flip between them when things got interesting. Or you could set up a favorites list and surf through those channels at will (ok, that was a feature of the decoder not broadcast). Now NASCAR has similar deal on the internet for a couple of hundred bucks a season. Pick your online feeds, including a lot of stuff that is not on TV broadcast.

Yup, there is a huge bundle of cash if they got to "Pay-Per-View Olympics", like "Wrestlemania umpteen-hundred". The network could recover the huge fees the pay for the broadcast rights.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes! Sign me up NOW ...
johnfenjackson@... 22nd Aug 2008
... I mean what is technology for? To do what I want!

I'll have a word with Lord Coe wink

+1
0 Votes
+ -
Web cams? User-generated commentary?

How about getting rid of journalists altogether because if you are any indication, they seem very insecure about their jobs.

But I guess that's probably because journalism has sold out to special interests over the past two decades and now it's a about trash-reporting instead of about impartial documenting.
0 Votes
+ -
Somebody needs a hug..
Prognosticator 22nd Aug 2008
Thanks goodness it's friday, huh?
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting proposal
mtgarden 22nd Aug 2008
I like your idea. some thoughts:

First: two separate approaches 1) a media center PC to output to the TV & 2) use consoles

Second: Allow for user created chat rooms (audio/text) like IRC channels with audio. That allows the end user to pick non-offensive channel or build their own rooms with just their friends. Allowing the room creator to secure the room could allow for a single audio stream for the "arm-chair expert" to discuss the events. (Some of the technological foundations of this can be seen in the console's online technologies.)

Third: each event should be bundled like a Wii Channel. Open the channel and watch the stream how you choose (or let your bandwidth determine like NetFlicks). You can cycle through the cameras and such while staying in the channel for that event.

Fourth: still broadcast the official "doctored" presentations. They do a pretty good job of making the player "come to life" and humanizing and dramatizing the events.

That's the most I have at the moment, but this could be really cool.

Oh yeah, and someone needs to rent/borrow Google's data centers to localize the distribution to increase transmission efficiency.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 2012 Olympics: Give Us Webcams On the Wall
StephenInScotland 22nd Aug 2008
Ahh so you want the London Olympic committee to spend all their money on giving you fly on the wall multiple angles of the finishes. It's a great idea but would be too costly to do. Lets face it, it could have been done today and if China can't afford it.... By the way, how do you propose to get all the ISPs and carriers in the world to upgrade to a hyper net in the next 4 years so all this extra traffic can be carried?
0 Votes
+ -
I saw the replays on NBC after it happened.
Been_Done_Before 22nd Aug 2008
It looks to me that he won with his extra effort and nothing more. BTW: someone tell that guy who runs that website that you have to activate the touchpad in order for it to count as touching. By activating it, i mean actually depress it. Phelps did that and thats how he won. Just like jeporady, you click the button first.. you get to answer or in this case, win.


Yes, i want him to have 8 gold medals, but if he didnt win that one, then he shouldnt of recieved it. Better luck next time.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know you, in the USA, but I, in Argentina, saw a photo from below the swimmers showing Phelps clearly touching the wall first ("by an inch" first!). I also watched the TV images (again and again, and from at least two angles) showing Phelps winning due to his brilliant last seconds move.
0 Votes
+ -
Phelps confided to CBC that..
yschoo1@... 22nd Aug 2008
he didn't know at the time that it was a right move and it just happened that it was. Forget about NBC, go to CBC (Canada). They showed that clip so many times that I thought I was watching an American TV broadcast.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 2012 Olympics: Give Us Webcams On the Wall
RichPletcher@... Updated - 22nd Aug 2008
The timer pad is the official "arbiter" of who won. What did the time pad say? Phelps won. Get a grip.
0 Votes
+ -
fantastic article, really, well done!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 2012 Olympics: Give Us Webcams On the Wall
donaldsonkd@... 22nd Aug 2008
1. I was kind of surprised that the replays were not sharper--maybe because I don't have HD...?

2. Seems the simplest and best view would be to have isolated cameras on each swimmer (insert runner, etc.) and OVERLAY the two--that should make it very clear to anyone/everyone who "touched" first...
0 Votes
+ -
Not camera trouble...
techboy_z 22nd Aug 2008
Don't be surprised that the replays weren't sharper - remember, this wasn't action in the air...nor just filming in still water...that water was churning!
0 Votes
+ -
I heard there were over 100 cameras on the pool recording events. From one camera I see something, from another angle I see something else. That's why the pad was the official timer.

Let's face it, if the other guy had taken a a final stroke he would have won. But he didn't so the computer said Phelps won. I don't know about you, but I almost always loose when I start to yell at my computer. It just sits there and looks at me like I'm stupid.

I also heard there was about 1,000 cameras on gymnastics. I don't know about you, but I don't want to see the same routine a thousand times from a thousand angles just because the technology is there.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm in too ...
Ron_007 2nd Jul 2009
Your idea is great, I hope the IOC picks up on it.

Actually this is an old idea. About 10 years back I had a satellite dish. NASCAR broadcasted a bunch of races that way. One channel had the "official" network broadcast. On 4 or 5 others they had a selection of other views, mostly in-car cameras. So you set up you picture in picture with 2 channels and flip between them when things got interesting. Or you could set up a favorites list and surf through those channels at will (ok, that was a feature of the decoder not broadcast). Now NASCAR has similar deal on the internet for a couple of hundred bucks a season. Pick your online feeds, including a lot of stuff that is not on TV broadcast.

Yup, there is a huge bundle of cash if they got to "Pay-Per-View Olympics", like "Wrestlemania umpteen-hundred". The network could recover the huge fees the pay for the broadcast rights.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix