37-second observation: how Samsung and Apple pitch products
Summary: A tale of two advertisements: Samsung's Galaxy S III and Apple's iPad. Both are designed for humans, but they go about telling you in different ways.
I find advertising campaigns fascinating because they indicate how companies want themselves to be seen. Done right, an ad campaign is a direct line into the corporate mind, for better or worse.
I was traveling in the Paris Metro (subway) system recently and spotted these two advertisements during my commute. Both are by major technology companies, both tout new flagship mobile products and both are plastered all over the place here in France's capital.
One is for Samsung's new Galaxy S III smartphone, an impressive, fully featured device (read CNET's review here; they gave it an editor's choice award) that the Korean company hopes will help eat into the lead of Apple's iPhone.
Here it is:

It's a part of a massive marketing campaign for the device, its biggest ever.
The other is for the latest model of Apple's iPad, adhering to the tried-and-true format the company has used for years:

As you can see, both spots feature the devices in vivid detail, no doubt to show off the resolution of each device's display.
But do you spot the incongruity? Samsung's tag-line for the Galaxy S III is that it's "designed for humans," yet features nary a fleshy digit. In contrast, Apple proclaims nothing of the sort, yet shows its device in use by a well-manicured hand model.
A criticism of Apple's rivals, whether for laptops or smartphones, has been that their stuffed-with-features devices fail to present a unified, intuitive, natural experience to the consumer. Retina display proclamations aside, Apple usually doesn't sell its products based on its components; it'd rather show you what you can do with it. Samsung, Motorola, HTC and others have often resisted humanizing their electronic products, taking a more geek-focused tack ("Droid," anyone?) that prioritize speeds and feeds.
Both sides offer cold electronic devices made of metal and glass, but one side emphasizes it in the name of cool, and the other deemphasizes it in the name of humanity.
While Samsung's device is quite capable of winning over consumers, and its new campaign clearly intended to humanize its product, there remain vestiges of this old mentality, as seen in the above ad spot. Its television advertisements for the same campaign are much more successful in being intimate in this way, but there's still a gap in the abstraction: there are humans, and there are devices, and there are even humans holding devices. But there aren't humans using the devices in a way that demonstrates their utility.
Apple wants you to hold its devices; Samsung wants you to behold its devices. It's an interesting difference in messaging.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
You cannot be serious!
An ad campaign is a direct line into an artificial (often false) reality which a corporation wants you to be seduced into believing.
Andrew - consider yourself seduced. :-(
"Both sides offer cold electronic devices made of metal and glass ..."
Ah, the cold light of day, the only objective way to view marketing propaganda.
The corporate mind, of shareholder value, business imperatives, lock-in, ... and the like ... is deliberately hidden from the hapless consumer (and reviewer) who would be horrified by the sight of the same :-(
Parent is right.
Come Down From the Ramparts
Here, with Apple and Samsung, we do not have such a campaign. This is a straight-up we have a product we want to show you. Neither of them are creating an artificial demand, e.g., is your dog getting enough cheese.
Now, one has the silly headline "Designed for Humans." Or is it? Maybe a company that thinks outside the box would design for wombats FTW. Maybe someone did just that and is found in that subway playing the saxophone for change dans le chapeau.
There are other fascinating things. Samsung puts its name in twice, Apple relies only on the logo. Underneath, Apple mentions the abstract "Retina Display" whereas Samsung is heavy on the specs, though the third point seems abstract, but my French isn't sufficient to translate meaning or sense. Samsung has the product oriented in an exotic way, but Apple is showing it as it would be seen in use.
One of my monkey-brain traits is that when someone is holding a doodad, I want to pick up it or one just like it. That Apple ad is set up as though one is seeing the next person over using an iPad. Of course, this completely sucks in a person like me.
Both ads are meant to make an impression, even if one only glances across the platform onboard an arriving and departing train. Apple does a diptych showing different uses: one creative and one recreational.
I'd say Apple's ads are better. Just an opinion. Both companies' ads are part of a series and it would not be prudent to judge on such a limited sample.
Have to say, it is fun to see these talk backs, typically filled with people dismissing Apple's success as nothing more than marketing, now filling with the same people disputing that Apple's marketing is better when given a pretty clear example.
Anorexic excuses?
Obviously for some watching a video and texting at the same time is very unnecessary.
Samsung's argument is that the limited iPhone is 'mutton dressed up as lamb'. So has the stale 'not bothered' now metamorphosed into 'unified appearance'?
Quick question...
Designed for Humans
I also noticed that the Galaxy ad is for a phone
Here's a picture of the Galaxy being used with a finger -
http://cdn2.ubergizmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-signup.jpg
Yeah, but notice it shows "eye candy" not functionality
It's actually somewhat chic
It is interesting...
Funny how Apple gets knocked for making pretty "toys" and the Apple fans get knocked for buying Apple just to be cool when Apple focuses on usability in their ads. Even more funny that all the Android OEMs focus seem to focus on is making their device look like something straight out of Star Wars, Tron, Transformers, etc.
Android "copied" the Surface videos.
If the Samsung is designed for humans...
hardly going to be designed for monkeys though is it...
Note a subtle detail in the Apple ad
This is a good point.
Wrong!
Showing the phone being held would obscure the product, while the tablet is large enough and NEEDS hands to give it scale. If the Galaxy ad was for a tablet, it would probably show it being held too.
Thanks for wasting people's time instead of writing about something real.
Don't be ridiculous.
Please, don't be silly.
Really, stop this nonsense.
Perhaps Samsung could use a disembodied finger on the their next phone add, just so everyone can see how to use a phone - with their fingers, or if that's too challenging they could use a sausage or a banana. The strap line would be
"Phone, use with pointy things".