Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
Summary: Adobe's CTO argues that Apple is like a railroad company in the 1800s trying to wall off a key commerce route---mobile apps. The solution: Adobe is focusing on Android and everything that's not Apple controlled.
Adobe Systems CTO Kevin Lynch isn't mincing words about Apple. At the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco, Lynch compared Apple to the deployment of railroads in the 1800s and moves to restrict compatibility.
Lynch's volley, which occurred during a brief stage appearance, indicates that the rhetoric between the two companies is increasing. Lynch's talk comes as antitrust regulators are reportedly pondering an antitrust review of Apple. Adobe reportedly has requested the review since Apple won't use Adobe's Flash on the iPad or iPhone.
Also: Apple vs. Adobe on antitrust: Should regulators dictate what's in an SDK? The debate
- Apple in antitrust crosshairs? If so, Jobs' Flash rant makes more sense
- Robert Reich disses FTC on Apple competitive threat
Meanwhile, changes to Apple's iPhone SDK precludes developers from using Flash. Lynch said that it's not Apple's role to tell developers what to make. In a nutshell, Apple is trying to wall off the Web, said Lynch.
Here are the comments directly from Lynch:
Apple's response to Lynch is all in CEO Steve Jobs' Thoughts on Flash missive.
As I noted Tuesday, it's unclear whether Apple can be forced to alter its SDK in a way that would allow Flash. The debate may be decided by the Feds at some point. In the meantime, we can all just enjoy the verbal jousting.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
To me...
Apple does suck though with their tightly controlled lock down on who and what can be developed for their products. If you don't meet the status quo you must go.
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
"tightly controlled lock down"
Other companies have equally tight control over their products, eg Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft for their consoles. Do you believe these companies suck also? If not, why not?
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
some of us drive a little better car (parts are not interchangeable), better homes, because it's what WE want, and eat different food and choose different clothes ... all of that has, in the past, been considered the American way.
Start young (maybe poor), application and effort resulted in economic security that enables choice.
The idealogues of today want it all with no effort and sneer at those who succeed.
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
We'll see what the future holds.
Getting to the future will be exciting
The Steve Jobs vision of the future has no Flash. And it seems Google has buddied up with Adobe with the hopes of differentiating Android to being the smartphone that runs Flash. Android 2.2 and Flash 10.1 will be a defining moment it what the future holds.
It's interesting because both Apple and Google have been instrumental in promoting HTML5. The web (metaphorically) gets tangled here. Down the road it won't matter. If Flash dies, we move on. If Flash makes it, Adobe will have done much of the work Steve Jobs has been insinuating Adobe has dropped the ball on. I'll be curious how Flash is redesigned to handle multi-touch and the lack of a mouse hover feature.
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
You're confused
You are right that the issue transcends Flash. It is much bigger than Apple and Adobe. It has also been blown way out of proportion.
RE: RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
Because Cocoa has nothing to do with the web and everything to do with app development for OS X.
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
Apple started out with a phone that ONLY ran web apps, and made mobile Safari so powerful its started a revolution amongst all of its contemporaries around the Webkit engine. There's EVERY reason to encourage people away from Flash at this point. It took someone to stop the train and let accessibility back on.
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
I'm no Apple "fan-boy" and own a Windows 6.5 phone, Flash-Lite doesn't cut it on there either. And I agree completely with Jobs on this issue. (And wondering why the DOJ isn't looking at Adobe's practices.)
RE: Apple is not trying to wall off the web
Exactly! How is Apple walling off the web if it is pushing open standards that benefit everyone and Adobe is pushing for it's proprietary standards that benefit, well...Adobe?
Proprietary softward being pushed
RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?
Flash would LOVE to be in the same position h.264 is in. There is a logical reason for it... hardware acceleration footprint being a huge one. Adobe is racing to get Flash support amongst chip manufacturers, and an ARM VP recently called it "heavy lifting" and noted that Flash performance problems have delayed tablet offerings in 2010. Meanwhile, all of Apple's iPhone's and iPod touch devices have had H.264 hardware acceleration built in.
If Adobe open sourced its player, and gave any vendor the opportunity to implement Flash however they liked (as well as choosing what parts to support), Flash would be much similar to H.264. --But, that's not what we have here, is it?
Open Source....
Who told you there was anything open about H.264? It's proprietary and royalty-enriched. Why do you think Mozilla and Opera are going for the REAL OSS variant (Ogg Theora).
Flash 10.1 will have acceleration, iirc.
RE: RE: Adobe CTO: Apple trying to wall off the Web; Jobs as railroad baron?