Adobe's Acrobat.com could be an Office killer; Will interface matter?
Summary: Adobe has tied together its online office suite with the beta of Acrobat.com and the user interface is the big differentiator.
Adobe has tied together its online office suite w
ith the beta of Acrobat.com and the user interface is the big differentiator. What remains to be seen is whether online office users care about aesthetics.
On Monday, Adobe unveiled Acrobat.com, a suite that allows you to create word processing documents, share files, convert PDFs and hold Web conferences.
Simply put, Acrobat.com is the best looking online office suite on the block (Techmeme). Google Docs, Zoho and other entrants look fine, but don't exactly stretch the imagination with the interface. Using Flash, Adobe's suite, which includes Buzzword word processor, PDF converter and Web conferencing applications, is slick. Adobe's online applications easily pass--and often top--what you'd find on the desktop. In fact, Adobe's ConnectNow seems to be the killer app in the suite and could be a threat to WebEx.
Here's Buzzword:
And the collaboration tool:
And PDF converter:
The big question: How much will the interface matter? Adobe's online office suite would clearly win a beauty contest, but it's unclear whether users care. There's something about Google Docs that just works. Ditto for Zoho. What's the lock-in factor here? If I'm using one online office suite I may not try another just because swapping platforms can get confusing if you create a bunch of documents.
We'll see how the answers to those questions turn out, but Adobe has another clear motive here. The online suite is a nice way to show off Flash. In addition, Adobe Acrobat 9, which was announced Monday, includes support for Flash. The goal: Create a defensible software and services strategy that will lead to a virtuous sales cycle among various Adobe products.
Acrobat.com is designed to give Acrobat 9 customers a "personal workspace in the clouds," according to Adobe's statement. You can see where this is headed: For Acrobat 9 customers Acrobat.com (statement) is a hybrid software model to keep them in the fold. Meanwhile, Adobe hopes that Acrobat.com will get a few folks to buy its software.
Acrobat 9 offers native support for Flash, touts document sharing and allows users to manage portfolios of PDFs. All of these features work with Acrobat.com in what Adobe hopes will be a nice sales cycle.
Adobe's Acrobat 9 combined with Acrobat.com seems to hit on multiple goals for the company. All it needs now is the user traction. Adobe's suite certainly has the looks.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.



Talkback
PDF is no good for documents with images
re: PDF is no good for documents with images
This article discusses the Adobe user interface and says it's beautiful and slick, but ease of use is a major part of user interface too, and PDF documents are not good for ease of use.
PDF is fine for ease of use
as content.
PDF Built for Graphics and Images
PDF no good for embedded images?
actually
Obviously...
Trolling 101
Back to pdf, do you know it has become the vehicle of choice for graphic artists to share, display & sending files to printing, transparently retaining all specs of original (CYMK, fonts, antialasing, etc)? And you think graphic artists uses pdf because it handle poorly images?
Now back to your cave and try again...
PF
What in the world are you talking about ?
They even have a web site that might help you understand how to do that;
http://www.direct2.time.com/
PDF is not an editing vehicle!
The publishing & legal industries use PDFs because they cannot be altered & preserve the appearance of the original for sharing without allowing any further changes.
If you want to edit a document, go to the software you originally created it in. If it is someone else's document, get a copy of the file from them.
PDF is not an editing vehicle!
No Doubt!
Learn to use it!
PDF is no good for documents with images
Sure... once you make it into a PDF users would need Adobe Acrobat (with plug-ins) to manipulate it etc, but how else can you guarantee what you send is exactly what the user's will see? Platform and font independent.
Illustrator imports PDF with images
Do you mean if settings are allowed to downsample
Sorry, Your Opinion does not Agree with Industry
Buzzword has Linux Support!!!
Oh dear .... shame
Never mind maybe Adobe could write a SCIFI flash movie that turns into a $ prompt at the end ?
I suppose you'd be happier if...
ttfn
John