An afternoon at Yahoo Labs

An afternoon at Yahoo Labs

Summary: I spent part of the afternoon at one of Yahoo Lab's facilities, a nondescript building on University Ave. in Berkeley, CA.

TOPICS: Browser

I spent part of the afternoon at one of Yahoo Lab's facilities, a nondescript building on University Ave. inusamafayyed.jpg Berkeley, CA., for a press luncheon with the company’s research wonks. Prior to the presentations I talked to Usama Fayyad, Yahoo’s data chief and senior vice president who sits above the labs in the org chart, about staffing Yahoo Labs, which is currently about 60 people. “We have unrestricted head count for our labs. The issue is finding talent,” Fayyad said. Welcome to the search and social media talent arms race.

Fayyad told me that Yahoo Labs is about announce some major additions, what he called “big surprises” (this is change of direction based on my interview in August with newly appointed lab director Prabhakar Raghavan, who said that Yahoo would stay away from high-profile hires). Fayyad said that Yahoo will hire either well known, accomplished researchers and professors or the most talented students, and nothing in between. “We will maintain that standard—and we have no pressure to grow faster,” he added. I would guess a big surprise would be someone possibly from rival Google.

Marc Davis, who heads up Yahoo’s Berkeley Lab (a collaboration with the University of California, Berkeley), described his charter as enabling billions of consumers to become producers and to reshape culture. A professor in the School of Information Management and on leave from UC Berkeley to run the facility, Davis also wants to revolutionize the research space. Instead of 60 or 70 people in a study, he can tap into Yahoo’s 400 million users and 10 terabytes of data (with proper permission) that is spawned every day. “We are focused on socio-technical design. We have to think about how technology, media and people come together,” Davis said. Video, photos, audio, messaging and even tagging are becoming a part of the daily experience, and Davis said research will focus on how content connects with community and context.

“No one understands the phenomenon with millions of people interacting online, trust, rating systems that can’t be scammed and spam,” Fayyad told me.  “We want to understand what makes a community work, how do you measure what is working, what makes people stay or break apart in a community on a large scale. We are building a new science, a mixture of math and philosophy. It’s not going to be a fast process.” He doesn’t plan to hire any philosophers, but the best researchers are partly philosophers.

I'm not sure if it's a new science. Cynically, it's the science of getting people to use more of the services and stay as a loyal member of the Yahoo tribe and extended community as the online world evolves. But scientists do tend to be less business and more philosophically oriented, and want to create a better world, bridging the digital divide and inventing new models for richer online interaction across all kinds of boundaries. Yahoo says that the research will be made public and others can gain insight into how the virtual world will take shape, and in the spirit of collaboration develop new models for communities with dozens or millions of members. And, just like the real world, mutiple models for online communities will co-exist. 

It will be interesting to find out if the social dynamics of a small village in the Himalayas or even ant colonies is that much different from millions of people interacting within online communities. I sense that the notion of "human scale" will be debated and tested as collective input and output is harnessed and ad hoc communities dynamically coalese and break apart. Developing the tools and environments for large scale online communities, however, will be like transitioning from telegraph and to the cell phone. It will take time and lots of experimentation by many players.

raghavan.jpgRaghavan spoke at the luncheon, reprising what I wrote in the interview about research areas (information retrieval, computational linguistics, machine learning, matrix and graph algorithms, unsupervised clustering, data mining and related areas), turning research into products and engaging with the academic community. He also spoke about a focus on microeconomics. “We have the opportunity to address a billion consumers who are producing and consuming content. We want to figure out how to get in midst of all that and connect the two groups and provide them with incentives,” Raghavan said.

Jeff Weiner,, senior vice president for search and marketplace at Yahoo, categorized the incentives as personal (offering utilities for people, such as desktop search), social (blogging, for example, to share info and get recognition from the community) and economic (getting paid). Yahoo is clearly looking at incentives as a way to gain deeper engagement with its users and monetize far more than search pages, as Yahoo CEO Terry Semel implied during his Web 2.0 interview.
Weiner went on about democratizing information, pointing out that search today is not very democratic. Results are delivered by link structures isn't even representative democracy, he said. By his calculations, about three objects per person are available online (20 billion objects, 7 billion people). He is suggesting that in the future each individual will have thousands, if not tens of thousands of objects digitized and capable of being "fused" into the online world. That's for sure, and it's the kind of problem that researchers love to work on, and they will be for decades.

Weiner talks about finding, using, sharing and expanding all human knowledge as Yahoo's goal, andjeffweiner.jpg that the company "will amass the infrastructure and talent, and the only limit is our imagination."  Despite the unbridled evangelistic fervor, Yahoo is on to something (it's about people) and is systematically moving on multiple fronts. All of the major portal players have similar aspirations--to make a better online world and bring billions into their tribes.  Let's hope the tribes don't go to war with each other...

Topic: Browser

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Up-start companies

    Opportunity only strikes once and life can be unforgiving in the business world ~ especially in a heavily competitive marketing landscape. For some product manufacturers, service vendors, or even resellers success is only a matter of establishing an agreement or an affilation before the competitor does~ sometimes only a seconds difference... Look at a serious competitor of in the online store-front and auction arena. Ebay is constantly flooded with competitors and competition allowing it to charge larger and larger premiums to both its sellers and buyers accounts- severely shaving off the consumers' propensity. Odviously most of the major marketers and advertisers are driven toward the mass amount of traffic for media exposure but... is it really going to help you and your company's revenues? Just take a step back and look at all of the options a potential customer has before they commit to you! Profit margins can dwendal into deficits before a sale is made.
    Now if I were to make an effort in the etailor sector, for example, I would first look at the largest online commerce site such as After finding the most trafficated web-site, I would do a research and try to find its' rivals such as The objective here is find a web-site that offers the same or better service(s) and / or features (a better attraction) at lessor fees for both sellers and buyers. Also, I would want to be located on a web-site with fewer competitors. Even though has a grand amount of online traffic driven to it, I may not make the sales I would need to stay afloat. Driven toward my own successes, I would undouptably establish an account with - especially if it is mutually beneficial to sellors and buyers and I would promote traffic to it.
    This will, no doupt, allow me to establish a really good relationship with's management and severely limit competition at the same time.
    Then there is also the capitalist side of and its' success. Nobody in their right mind would pass up on the opportunity of investing in a company like Ebay auctions' when it first started up- especially with all of its' success and numerous stock splits: 3 :1, 2 : 1, 2 : 1, 2 : 1! Just 100 shares would have matured into 2,400 shares now trading at approximately $ 37.19 ! And because (BVLE) is a publicly traded company it, too, has every potential as Ebay. "" (BVLEE.OB) only needs the motivated interest and the rest would fall right in place such as economic stability and noterity. Noterity of success in the Wall Street Journal or BARRONS alone would futher drive you and BVLE into prosperity...
    Just ask yourself this question: would you want your sign to be tangle up in amongst many like signs, or would you want your sign to stand bouldly out alone. I, myself, would choose the place where I would really stand out, be somebody, and be greatly appreciated