Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
Summary: I read the New York Times' take on how the stress of blogging and how it can kill you with great interest: I was interviewed for it. But I pretty much knew I wouldn't make the final story as my take was different than Matt Richtel's.
I read the New York Times' take on how the stress of blogging and how it can kill you with great interest: I was interviewed for it. But I pretty much knew I wouldn't make the final story as my take was different than Matt Richtel's.
Now this isn't Matt's fault by any means: He was up front about the premise of his story: The stress of blogging can kill you. The story was straightforward "three makes a trend" journalism. Journalists joke that three of anything makes a trend. If you get three examples of anything you instantly have a story and a premise for an analysis. That's what the editors want. And oh yeah it has to fit in a designated space. Double bonus if it tops Techmeme.
I was having the conversation with Matt to talk about Russell Shaw and put him in touch with Ellen, Russell's girlfriend, and Dana Blankenhorn, a ZDNet blogger and long-time friend of Russell's.
When I talked to Matt the theme of the story was clear, but I had doubts about the premise. I played devil's advocate and outlined my day, which didn't exactly dovetail with the primary example of the guy who is in his Brooklyn studio blogging until he passes out at his computer. If that person weren't blogging my guess is he'd pass out playing Xbox or something else.
And that brings me to my point with Matt. Yes, blogging is stressful. Yes, it can be insane. But is it any worse than being a corporate lawyer? How many of those folks dropped in the last six months? How about mortgage brokers? Hedge fund traders? FBI agents? Any job where you gnash your teeth together? We write for a living, yap all day and don't have to wear suits. You could do worse than blogging.
Let's put a little perspective on this blogging thing. You could be getting shot at in Iraq. You could be a single mom working three jobs to stay afloat (Happy Birthday mom). You could work in a coal mine. You could be in a life and death battle with Leukemia. You could be doing any one of thousands of high-stress jobs. Sure, the Web has a lot of stress but let's get real: If you're stressed out over 5,000 RSS feeds chances are good you'd be stressed by any profession you chose.
The point I was trying to make was that nothing (certainly the deaths of Russell and Marc Orchant and Om's heart attack) exist in a vacuum. You have to take care of yourself.
Matt's money question was this: Give me the anatomy of your day? I told him it varies, but I said the first thing I do in the morning is work out. To do this gig you need stamina and that means you need to be in some sort of shape. I'd like to think I could still play a half of rugby although the reality is very different (I retired a few years ago when I ran out of neoprene braces to hold me together). But that's only part of the reason I work out. The other parts: I think better. It's my Prozac. And working out literally holds me together (I have a screw in my shoulder, two screws in my knee, a reconstructed ACL on its last legs and a neck that would have been fused if it weren't for acupuncture). That's what I get for playing collision sports. I'm in perpetual physical therapy.
After a workout, I may get a blog in before feeding my daughter (assuming I'm working at home). Most days all of this occurs before 7 a.m. EDT. Then I blog and blog and work in management stuff in the middle.
Clearly, this answer wasn't going to work for Matt's story--there was a smidge of balance even if I have to get up at 4:30 a.m. for it. The correct answer would have been: "I can't sleep at night because I'm worried that another blog will have a story first. I keep my eyes open with toothpicks so I can keep blogging through weekends even though no one other than the other 300 psycho bloggers are reading me (check your weekend traffic logs folks). I did admit to checking headlines when I get up to pee at night.
I had pointed out that blogging is similar to being a wire service writer--it's not for everybody but it uniquely suits some people. Am I balanced? Not quite, but I do acknowledge the goal. Like any job there are plusses and minuses. I noted that I happened to like the pace and said it's not the stress per se as much as how you handle it. Bottom line: You can't pin two deaths and a heart attack solely on blogging.
Of course all of those points would have exceeded the Times' word count.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
That about....
Great Story. Great Blogging. Take Care of yourselves.
Keep up the good work, but please, take care of yourselves.
[b]Exercise, adequate sleep and healthy diet are key to well being.[/b]
Marc Orchant, Russell Shaw, rest in peace.
It's just the NYTImes hoping bloggers will go away
I tend to agree with the good Mr. Harris
While finding three of something might indicate a trend is forming, one has to consider if the three events that have been gathered are related in any way to one another.
Dan K
exactly
http://www.blogcontentprovider.com
conspiracy
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
This is the pain of liberty and it is a good pain
Being actively engaged in the world only makes you stronger and live longer. Keeping fit is essential for very committed bloggers or commentators in general. The New York times cannot afford what really committed writers have to say and they settle for very mediocre writers instead. The web has increased the number of committed writers by the dozens of millions and proof that the web is a useful media replacement. Freedom of the press is only good for those who own a press but the web has made it possible for everyone to have their own press. But those presses do come with stresses for those using the freedom of speech and that is a very good thing in spite of how moot it makes classic, editor driven, written press.
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
David
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
Message has been deleted.
Message has been deleted.
Russell Shaw
It's at
http://www.danablankenhorn.com/2008/04/not-die-in-vain.html
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
How about less drool and more relevant IT substance.
I doubt it will kill you, but it will sure waste your time
RE: Anatomy of a 'Blogging will kill you' story: Why I didn't make the cut
blog, and for many people, that may be enough.
I hate journalists writng stories about themselves
C'mon guys. If you want to see stress, go visit a hugely overwaight BBW who has 15 chat windows open on a dating sight and is trying to keep straight what lies she told what hormone-charged lad.
If you want to see stress, check in on Microsoft's QA labs on the day before a patch goes out to millions of computers automatically. Or for that matter, check in on any software company's QA labs the day before a deadline.
Good god, the ole guys herding sheep up in the mountains of Switzerland don't even know you people exist. It's cyberspace. If you don't perform, we'll just find another virtual person to replace your rants.
Absolutely right!
I disagreed at all.
I will prefer to enroll to Iraq rather to write a blog.
-End of sarcasm-