Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Apple gets Samsung Galaxy Tab banned in E.U. with moronic ruling

By | August 9, 2011, 1:38pm PDT

Summary: Just when you thought intellectual property law insanity couldn’t get any worse with the mobile patent wars, Apple gets an injunction in the European Union against Samsung Galaxy Tab because it looks like an Apple iPad.

The mobile world is locked up in one gigantic legal battle in which every smartphone company is suing every other company for patent violations. That’s dumb. What’s even dumber though is that Apple has just succeeded in getting a German court to grant a preliminary injunction against the distribution of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 throughout the entire European Union (EU) (with the exception of The Netherlands) on the grounds it infringes on Apple’s iPad design.

This decision has nothing to do with patents or copyrights. It has nothing to do with the lawsuits swirling around Android. This particular case was just about the design, the look of the Samsung Galaxy Tab, and that’s it. Now, I want you to click on this PDF copy of (European] Community design no. 000181607-000. Now, take a long hard look at it. What do you see?

I’ll tell you what I see, it’s a freaking tablet. Yes, it looks like an iPad. But, it looks just as much like every tablet that’s ever existed or ever will exist. It’s a tablet.

Where have I seen this before? Why, I remember! I recall my distant cousin Nichelle Nichols, that’s Lieutenant Uhura of Star Trek to you, “using” a tablet on the Enterprise back in 1966. I’m not the only one to have noticed the Star Trek/Apple iPad connection. Back when Apple introduced the iPad, actor Brent Spinner, aka Commander Data of Star Trek: The Next Generation, tweeted, “Didn’t Captain Picard used to play with a pad like that in his ready room? STAR TREK STRIKES AGAIN!!!” Yes, yes he did.

It’s not just Star Trek. For all the excitement about the iPad, real tablets existed for decades before iPad mania came along. Take a look on the left at the PoqetPad. I tested this tablet from Fujitsu in 1991. Except for a few more buttons it sure looks a lot like Apple’s protected design to me.

Thus, anyone who’s followed tablet computing for the last 20 years, or at least anyone who’s watched any Star Trek in the last forty-plus years, would know there’s nothing remotely original about Apple’s design. This design, which is really nothing more than a tablet with a window on one side, should never have been granted any kind of intellectual property protection.

Never-the-less, it was granted and the brain-dead Regional Court of Düsseldorf has granted Apple a preliminary injunction against Samsung (German link). As a result, if someone tries to sell the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the EU, Samsung will be hit with a 250,000 Euro fine and up to two years of prison time.

Yow!

Since common sense is in short supply in intellectual property (IP) legal circles, I’m afraid we’re going to see more equipment bans in the future. It was bad enough when the only sure thing about IP lawsuits was that we — the people who buy and use smartphones and tablets — would have to pay more. Now, thanks to Apple, we may not even have a chance to buy the equipment in the first place.

What is Apple’s problem anyway? Afraid of a little competition in the marketplace?

Related Stories:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system. Elsewhere on ZDNet, SJVN covers Networking and Open Source.

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

85
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple gets Samsung Galaxy Tab banned in E.U. with moronic ruling
Uncle Stoat 2nd Dec
It is a pity that if prior art can be proved, the company litigating on the basis of dodgy patents can't be hit with substantial damages/costs.
Since Apple essentially filed a copyright/trademark on the design of a shiny rectangle brick, I guess all tablets from now on should be in star shape.
@Samic

Nope, just one's that are obvious copies, as ruled by two jurisdictions now, including Europe where they apparently don't have software patents.

It must be really annoying to realise that all your years of whining about Apple is about to become irrelevant as they are poised to become the world's largest company by market cap.
@bannedagain

Right, and you know how successful a company is when they could spend millions of dollars in R&D that come up with a design a 6 years old can come up within 5 minutes:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/61944044/Community-Design-000181607-0001

How inspirational. I hope Apple doesn't draw circles or all wheels would be banned.

Edit: Sorry, I'm wrong. As it turns up not every 6 years olds can draw 3D perspective. /sarcasm

P.S. Seriously, EU doesn't have software patents, but they do have design patent (a.k.a. Community design) . And in this case, a stupid design is in question.
@bannedagain

I hope you realize, the feds will be breathing down Apple's neck for any type of anti-trust violations if they see Apple's market share encroaching on being a monopoly.

Look at what happened to At&t.
@bannedagain

How'd ya get that nym? Oh, right ...

*/* as ruled by two jurisdictions now, */*

Well, not even sort of. There was no injunction in Australia because Samsung agreed not to import the version of the Galaxy Tab that Apple was complaining about. That was a no-brainer for Samsung since they weren't going to import that model into Oz to begin with.

Secondly, this is a preliminary ruling. It will be followed up by two more hearings (that Samsung has received notice of, in this case, unlike the first one), which will determine if the preliminary injunction will be upheld.

Thirdly, at the hearing that is underway in The Netherlands at this very moment, Samsung has accused Apple of photoshopping the evidence to make the Galaxy Tab look more like the iPad than it really does.

Fourthly, this isn't a patent issue at all, neither hardware nor software. Apple got a hearing in Germany based on what is know as an EU Community Design Document which is based on Copyright and Trademark, not patents at all.

And lastly, I am glad I'm done responding to you because the popcorn is finished and it needs my attention.

Buh-bye!
0 Votes
+ -
Idiot.
Cayble 10th Aug
@bannedagain
Nuff said.
@bannedagain Well, Samsung includes buttons on its pad - the drawings in question show no buttons. Even the iPad has a button...
@Samic

This is proof that while Europe doesn't have software patents, they do have questionable non-software patents.
@DonRupertBitByte
Where does this duck some from: that Europe does not patent software? Apple has patented the iPhone top to bottom, hardware, software, gestures, the works, in the US, Europe, and Japan. Non-patentability of software was an issue in the US and Europe years ago, in decisions that, e.g., treated digital image processing as an "abstract process," and therefor not patentable.

Since the 1980s, such methods have been recognized as a "real world activity," fully patentable under rules shared by the US and EU.
@Lochias

Oh yeah, because its' a real world activity, it should be patentable.
Excuse me while I go patent breathing, hammering, the act of hanging picture frames on 'vertically aligned surfaces' and the use of a torx screwdriver at night or underwater.
@Samic
They should ban all rectangular mirrors.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed
Cayble 10th Aug
@aviamquepasa
What they should do is ban anything that bares some resemblance to anything that came before it, no matter how obvious the design is.
whispering to @Samic: trapezoid. so that when you lay the "TRAP-let" down (that's right-I said it: Traplet!!) it looks like its further away in the distance. look at google's images page for trapezoid youll see what I mean. happy
@DJ_JFX

you should really go ahead and get a Copyright on that. really. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Too Funny...
carlislj 11th Aug
@Samic Gee was not Microsoft doing the same thing 10 years ago, and everyone said look at them acting so childish trying to keep thier Market Position... Maybe Apple has realized that any type of Tablet that will let you install software that has not been apple approved will make them lose market share, so better not let anyone else make a tablet... I have an Android Tablet that looks exactly like an iPad from the front... bet they will not be able to make those for much longer either...
I have a TV that looks like another TV. Ban!
... My monitor looks like an iPad (It's an HP w2207). sad
@Cylon Centurion That's exactly what I was thinking.
@Cylon Centurion

Wanna buy a "Rolex" watch?

Look and feel, Samsung has lost in two jurisdictions withe their blatant copy.

Other manufacturers can come up with their own designs, why can't Samsung?
@bannedagain

Sorry, no permanent decisions have been made yet.
@bannedagain

Don is right. (See, Don, I don't always disagree with you.)

Wanna buy a photoshopped picture of a Galaxy Tab? You can use it in court. The judge will be really impressed. Just maybe not favorably ...
0 Votes
+ -
Have another booze.
Cayble 10th Aug
@banned again
"Other manufacturers can come up with their own designs, why can't Samsung"

Ya, lets ban everyone from using obvious best form factors for all products. Its the smart way to go because that way the first to the patent office wins and all others who want to produce a similar product will be relegated to using a design thats NOT the best most obvious design for the product.

All Apple did with the iPad was create a technological "White elephant" and promote it as "the next big thing". They have conned the human race in the most spectacular way to purchase whats practically a "read only" computing product thats a long long long way from what the vast majority of what people thought they were purchasing. Now the rest of the manufacturers want to hop on that disgraceful band wagon. Sure, maybe we should save the human race from this ghastly waste of money and completely ban all manufacturers form producing such crap and leave it to Apple to take the fall when reality about tablet computing finally sets in with the human race.
0 Votes
+ -
Just so you know that PoqetPad
James Quinn 9th Aug
Doesn't look anything like an iPad. So if they want to modernize the hardware and put a copy of Android on it (As long as they make sure to pay licensing fees) it should be good to go:)

Pagan jim
@James Quinn

think what he's hinting at, is that its a retangular design...
0 Votes
+ -
@5FingerDiscount have a rectangular design that does not infringe on Apple's patents:P

Pagan jim
@James Quinn
He-he.
Who do they pay licensing fees to? Oracle?
Or they can be sued for shipping copies of Java.
Uh, no. It doesn't look like an iPad in any way except form factor.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting.
People 9th Aug
All the anti-Apple rhetoric when it was a European court ruling.
@People Except it wasn't for any of the "anti-Apple" reasons. It was shut down because it was 10.1 inches and retangular.
@Aerowind Is this because Samsung makes the screens? If they made it 10.2 inches, would that be OK?
No big deal. All Samsung needs to do is to come up with their own original design. There are an infinite number of other possibilities out there. (triangle, pentagon, hexagon, etc) happy
0 Votes
+ -
There will not be a successful tablet in the iPad market other than the iPad for many many years to come. Samsung is about to be the first "major" tablet maker to drop out of the market.

Consumers are the first ones to lose.
0 Votes
+ -
Switch the names around...
Rick_Kl 9th Aug
Samsung gets Apple iPad banned in E.U. with moronic ruling. Would it be as moronic if it was the iPad that was banned? This is the question the blogger seems to forget. If it is moronic for one side, it is equally moronic for the other side.
@Rick_Kl It isn't the companies involved that is moronic, it's the fact that a rectangle with a screen on it is apparently an original design that can't be "copied." Pretty sure all laptops look the generally the same, and HDTVs and monitors too.
@Rick_Kl

You fail to see the bigger picture.

The author isnt taking the side with Samsung.

His issue is with the decision about a DESIGN and basing that design ONLY as the "trademark" means of a violation.
@Rick_Kl
We are dealing with fact. The fact is that the Galaxy is banned, and it was a course of action that the blogger feals is moronic.

He forgot nothing, he mearly pointed out a fact.

The fact that you wish to support said action on the basis of a course of action that has not be taken is illogical at best.
plain
@Rick_Kl The difference is Apple got the Samsung tablet banned (and is working on the Motorola) because they are RECTANGLES. The diagrams do not even have the HOME button that is on the iPad. The Galaxy and the Xoom both have multiple buttons. Maybe they can sue apple for putting a button on it's table because the patent only shows a rectangle w/o a button?
It is in the best interest of ANY company to try and get a competing company smacked down. All companies have tried it and some have gotten it to work at one time or another.

The point I am trying to make here is, Apple is not at fault. They did what many other companies before have done... The court is at fault for allowing it to be approved and beechslapping Samsung.

I love my iPad2... Not crazy about any other tablet on the market and I have used several for a few hours here and there.

This should not have been passed in the courts... HOWEVER put the blame where the blame is due, the court system F'ed up and allowed it. Apple asked for it... I am guessing their lawyers are still surprised as all hell that they got the injunction.
As far as I'm concerned this tells me only one thing: Galaxy Tab must be damn good ... I'll definitely be buying one ...
0 Votes
+ -
Apple's complaint included use of terms
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate! Updated - 9th Aug
relating to beveled edges, rounded corners which to me is utterly rehehediculous.

Do they now limit carpentars from applying lovely bevels and radiused woodwork? Apparently that is coming also.

And then it hits me that Microsoft, the company with great vision, saw fit to patent binary 1's and 0s.

Oi. Who knew?
Now we can't use binary arithmetic?
I am going to defenestrate.

We are all doomed.
Sometimes, to do the right thing, you have to use whatever method works. Yes, an archaic wrong mechanism. But it achieves what I think is the correct result - putting pressure on the Android business model. Which seems deserved due to the various shortcuts and expediencies taken by Google, and their resulting lack of intellectual property defences.
@Michael Whitehead

But it achieves what I think is the correct result - putting pressure on the Android business model. Which seems deserved due to the various shortcuts and expediencies taken by Google, and their resulting lack of intellectual property defences.

You may want to find out, if you are actually interested, what intellectual property defences Google has, as you have just declared your unawareness of them. (o;)

www.groklaw.net

I won't be so bold as to say that they are winning at this point it time. For one thing there is no clear indication that they are and for another it's way to early in the process to say either way. But at this point the judge has thrown out the original estimate of damages that was in the billions and has told them to start out with something closer to the licensing fee they discussed with Sun ($100 million) and adjust up or down from there based on more realistic assumptions. That, in and of itself, pressures Oracle to respond with something less pressing economically. And Oracle gets no additional time to come up with the new assessment.
Everybody here, including the author, needs to visit WikiPedia on the subject of Design Patents. This is not a frivolous case, no judge has ruled that Apple owns the rectangle... it's nothing like that.

Design patents cover the industrial design of a functional object. Wikipedia's example is the famous fluted Coca-Cola bottle, but other examples abound. Every automobile design is covered by a design patent... every appliance... half the items in Wal-Mart. You can't just make knock-offs of other people's stuff.

To say that this is "just about the design" misses the fact that this is a developed field of law in every civilized country. It exists because industrial design has value: pretty things sell better than ugly things. Why should I pay an industrial designer to make my electric drill look spiffy, only to have SVN build an identical-looking drill and say, "it's just the design."

Nice rant SVN, but totally misses the Real World. You really ought not write these things when they are going to leave you looking like somebody who can't use Google to make sure you're not stepping in it.
0 Votes
+ -
Uh...Robert...
UrNotPayingAttention Updated - 9th Aug
@Robert Hahn

Something that "Everybody here, including the author" (and the EU, and every other governing body) knows is... We don't need to "visit WikiPedia on the subject of Design Patents."

I hope you're aware that the "authorative body" that contributes to Wiki articles are people that don't know what they're talking about. Anyone can contribute to Wikipedia.

If what you say were true about "industrial design" (and what you say we all need to refer Wiki about)... then Flat Panel TV's wouldn't be differentiated by the brand name... each brand name would be required to produce their own unique size: Samsung - 56", Vizio - 54", Philips - 52", an so forth.

In fact, I can even add that last bit to the "Design Patent" page of Wikipedia... "That in a court ruling of Sony vs Samsung, et al, in 2010, it was declared that no other TV manufacturer could produce Flat Panel (LED, LCD, or otherwise) of 55 inches."

Now... would you accept that as fact?
@chmod 777
"it was declared that no other TV manufacturer could produce Flat Panel (LED, LCD, or otherwise) of 55 inches"

Doesn't change that fact that it was a stupid decision, does it?
@Robert Hahn @chmod 777 Am neither an expert on design patents nor Wikipedia, but the design patent Wikipedia page is rated as "Start Class" (see the "Discussion" tab) on it's quality scale, which is at the lower end. And as one might expect, there is great variation in quality among Wikipedia pages. They are not all uniformly good or bad.

Having said this, if there is one thing that Steve Jobs *really* cares about, it's the industrial design of Apples products. This interview with John Sculley On Steve Jobs does a great job of explaining this:

http://www.cultofmac.com/john-sculley-on-steve-jobs-the-full-interview-transcript/63295

Industrial design is Steve Jobs' shtick. It is a differentiator. One must, therefore, believe that Apple takes their design patents very, very seriously.
@Robert Hahn excellent post
That StarTrek thing doesn't look in anyway like the iPad. Come on admit it, the galaxy is a smaller version of the iPad. Then when you look at it, it also has those Icons etc.
@TheFilipinoFlash My old windows 95 pc had icons.
It is a pity that if prior art can be proved, the company litigating on the basis of dodgy patents can't be hit with substantial damages/costs.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix