Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
Summary: Yes, Steve Jobs is still Apple's chairman, but as he retires from being Apple's CEO, everything in technology will change. My question for today: "Who will win and who will lose?"
Some people are still in denial. They think that Steve Jobs retiring as Apple's CEO won't change Apple much. I beg to differ. I think it changes everything. Further, I think it changes far, far more than just Apple's role in the world.
Complete Coverage: Steve Jobs resigns
First, while Apple's new CEO Tim Cook looks to be a fine choice, he's no Steve Jobs. No, I don't think the sky will fall on Apple now that Jobs is no longer CEO, but for almost 20 years now Apple has been Jobs' company. Ever since he came back from exile in NeXT, Jobs, and no one else, has led innovation at Apple.
You don't replace a Steve Jobs easily. Actually, you can't replace him at all. Love him or hate him, he's a genius and you can't just go out on the street and hire genius. So, in the short run, Apple will be fine. They'll still dominate smartphones and tablets. Two, three years down the road, it will be a different story.
As I said, though, Jobs moving out of the spotlight will affect far more than Apple. Here are my quick thoughts on what his departure will mean for the other technology players.
Android manufacturers and developers:
Break out the champagne, get the party started, sure the iPhone 5 is coming. Yes, the iPad 2 is still the tablet of choice. But, and this is a big but, Jobs will no longer be regularly appearing to say the magic words "One more thing" and have everyone with a credit card ordering a new iOS device
This is Android manufacturers and developers' big chance. Don't blow it. As my buddy David Gewirtz points out, there are a lot of reasons not to buy Android devices. Make him, and everyone else who might buy an Android smartphone or tablet, happy and fix these problems.
Dell:
Michael Dell must be one happy CEO. Not only does HP give up on the PC market, but now Apple won't be quite as aggressive as it has been for the last few years. The PC market's margins are still as razor thin as ever, but it seems certain now that Dell will get a bigger share of the PC pie. Life is good.
Google:
Google bought Motorola Mobility for its patents, but now that Apple no longer has Jobs at the helm, I wonder if they'd be tempted to really add being a serious smartphone manufacturer to the company's ever increasing to-do list. I doubt it, but still, I wonder...
Hewlett-Packard:
HP is looking even dumber than before. Bad enough that HP's CEO Leo Apotheker had already blundered by killing off its tablet business and announcing that HP was spinning off its PC business, but now HP has surrendered to Apple on PCs and tablets... just before Apple's general retired from the field of battle. I don't think Apotheker cares at all. He want to recreate his old company, SAP, or become a cut-rate version of IBM, but anyone who ever cared about HP's orphaned business lines should really be asking themselves what the heck is going on here.
IBM:
You know what? IBM won't be effected one darn bit by Jobs' retirement. I mention Big Blue only because there was a time when they really were mortal enemies. How things change! Today, IBM has transformed itself into a services giant, much to HP's envy, and Apple owns the hearts and minds of the consumer market.
Microsoft:
Too little, too late. Yes, Windows Phone 7.5 Mango looks promising; yes Windows 8 looks interesting too. So what? I can't find anyone, except the most die-hard Windows fanboys, who is interested in Windows phones. Windows tablets? They're still out there but they've never sold well.
As for the PC, I think it's very telling that XP has only now fell beneath the 50% market share mark. It's pretty darn clear to me that PCs are indeed becoming legacy devices. At the same time, it clear that people are buying Macs, iPhones, and iPads in greater quantities than ever. Windows-based hardware just isn't moving the way it used to be. I don't see Jobs leaving changing this trend.
I could be wrong about the details here. My crystal ball has had cracks in it before. The one thing I do know for certain, though, is that Jobs leaving the CEO office changes everything in technology, and not just what's been happening with Apple.
Related Stories:
- When does Apple's Tim Cook era really begin?
- Jobs' departure won't diminish Apple's brand
- Analysts react to Steve Jobs resignation: Apple move expected, Cook a star, buy
- Twitterverse responds to Jobs resignation as Apple CEO
- The Steve Jobs impact on the mobile space
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Eh?
There is nothing, absolutely nothing in Jobs resigning as CEO that will aid, assist, propel, induce, affirm or change Apple's competition. They will be the same inept copyists tomorrow as they are today. This is emerging as a common refrain that it's time for the competition to shine because Jobs is no longer running Apple day to day. How can this be supported by anything other than wishful thinking? The secret sauce that Apple's competition lacks will now not become evident because of a change in management at Apple. It won't even make a difference for the next two, probably three years. The competition won't fix their problems any faster because Jobs is not in direct charge of Apple.
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
Apple doesn't have to convince people their competitors
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
Without Steve Jobs
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
Let's take the company I work, for instance. We have approx. 300 employees in our offices. Every one of them has a Windows PC/Laptop. Do you REALLY think we are going to switch to Apple Macs or (even more ridiculous) iPads? Seriously? Not for the forseeable future at the very, very least.
About 1/3 of us have Blackberry devices. Do you think we'll be getting iPhones to replace them? No way. No interconnectivity. We will be switching to a future, well interfaced, well-supported Windows Phone before an iPhone.
My point... Apple is a CONSUMER device company... just like they were in the 80's and 90's. Just because people are buying tons of iPhones for home use and a few buying iPads (I know of only 3 people who own one), it will NOT translate into corporate dollars being spent on Apple. CORPORATE (whether you like corporations or not) is where the dollars are, and will continue.
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
Anyways, the point here is that there is a shift that Steve Jobs has brought about with the iPad, but it is more gradual. I wonder if Apple would have sold these many iPads if Tim Cook was on stage propagating the Post-PC era...
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
You really shouldn't think that the enterprise isn't influenced by the consumer space. It most certainly is.
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
This is company that reads people's email and buys and sells personal user info for Christ's sake. This is company that steals patented technology to build their crappy mobile OS, and then they dump it on the market for free. This is company that is engaging in uncompetitive practices with their search engines and in other areas. They already far beyond evil.
Google is a one-trick pony. The day someone makes
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
"Windows-based hardware just isn?t moving the way it used to be."
LOL! Yeah, 400+ million Windows 7 licenses sold means nobody is buying Windows at all. What a complete tool.
"As for the PC, I think it?s very telling that XP has only now fell beneath the 50% market share mark."
ROTLMAO! I don't know Steven, could it be that XP is 10 years old? Could it be that Windows 7 has sold 400 million copies. I mean for Christ's sake, how does this clown even have a job.
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
<i>Dude it is 400 million copies sold to OEMs. </i>
Dude, the way manufacturing operations run the difference in "Sold to OEM" vs "Sold to customer" is in the single digit percent at most for an established OS.
ie it is virtually irrelevant to talk about the distinction unless you are looking at first quarter launch numbers.
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
I'm a Linux user and I'M interested in Windows phones, especially with Nokia behind them and WebOS gone. So now you can delete that sentence. ;-)
Don't forget the positive experience Scott Adams of Dilbert fame had when he was challenged by Microsoft to try a WP7 phone.
Positive experience?
RE: Apple without Jobs: Winners and losers
"The Windows phone has the best user interface experience, although the onscreen keyboard is problematic just as it is with the other phones I used. The Windows interface is intuitive, simple, and has a liveliness that I find appealing. Voice call quality was good, and battery life seemed good too. I declare it the winner compared to my iPhone 3GS with AT&T and my HTC EVO 3D with Android on the Sprint network.
However, the intangible coolness factor is impossible to ignore. Even the names Microsoft and Windows feel dated. And the home screen of the Windows phone is great from a usability standpoint, but lacks sizzle. I?d be lying if I said that didn?t matter to me."
No twisting necessary... by one of us, at any rate.