Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
Summary: Apple doesn't have an enterprise sales force or support staff, yet it is killing the competition in enterprise adoption.
Apple doesn't have an enterprise sales force or support staff, yet it is killing the competition in enterprise adoption.
Apple outsold the competition five to one in 2010 and is expected to lock up 72 percent of the market in 2011, according to Barclay's Capital.
While Android, Palm, RIM and other tablet manufacturers court corporate IT buyers and support staff, the iPad has been winning over their users. Apple's tablet is walking in the front door of the Enterprise tucked under the arms and stuffed in their shoulder bags of employees, according to Barclay's Analyst Ben A. Reitzes and Forrester Research analyst Ted Schadler. Reitzes and Schadler shared their iPad research in a Feb. 10 conference call with Barclay's Capital -- "iPad in the Enterprise: Opportunities and Challenges."
See also:
- Next-gen iPad now in production; Tablet wars heating up
- Financial services leads iPad parade in enterprise
- Apple's enterprise mojo by the numbers
- 2011: The year Apple's iPad solidifies as an enterprise option
Apple doesn't have an enterprise sales staff and it may not have to, Schadler said. Apple is the clear winner of what the Barclay's calls the "Consumerization of IT," where employees adopt devices earlier than the Enterprise, then use them to log in to the corporate network and business applications. The tail wags the dog as IT departments catch up to support the devices.
"It is very hard to determine consumer from corporate units given more and more employees are buying devices and bringing them into work in the consumerization of IT era and more and more corporations are beginning to subsidize the purchase of these devices."
Apple hasn't put a single salesperson on a corporate account, but the company hasn't ignored the Enterprise. Apple has been listening and adapting to corporate users behind the scenes, Reitzes said.
"IT learned from being late supporting iPhones, and hence is way ahead on its support for iPads with help from MobileIron, Good Technology, Sybase, RIM, etc. (about 25 enabling companies in total)... Security has long been a concern about Apple penetrating the enterprise, but according to Schadler, Apple has been addressing security concerns for three years and iOS4 has API hooks for mobile device management companies to help control devices. Because of this, security concerns are fading very rapidly..."
The iPad is the king of the consumerization of IT, besting even the corporate uptake of the Mac, Barclay's said. Apple sold nearly 15 million devices in 2010, five times the competition and Reitzes said he expects the company to sell more than 30 million , or 72 percent of the expected market, in 2011.
Neither Schadler, nor Barclay's mentioned Apple's announcement last week that it began production of "thinner, lighter" and feature-rich a second-generation iPad, which could freeze sales of Android and competitor tablets as buyers await a better, cheaper iPad.
The iPad is winning business users because it is winning the app race, Schadler said. Apps improve the device's "stickiness," and "should enhance customer loyalty/retention over the long term as "apps" personalize devices to levels that competitive imitations cannot match," Schadler told the Barclay's audience. The iPad has more than 60,000 native apps, something no other tablet manufacturer can match.
Three's Company
The importance of apps to device sales will ultimately limit the market to just three platforms, Forrester forecasts. Android, with its Honeycomb tablet platform and RIM, which can use its lead in the corporate smartphone market to grab a toehold in IT departments, according to the report.
"There is no way the world would tolerate seven platforms either, given there isn't enough developer focus to go around."
But that hypothesis could be unwinding already. Schadler noted that Microsoft's partnership with Nokia, announced yesterday, could create a four-way race do dominate the app space and win the consumerization of IT.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
You should learn what the definition of an enterprise is before posting.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
I don't know if a 50 person law firm qualifies as an enterprise. Do they even have an IT person? Do they have to adhere to state / federal or international regulations?
We have over 25,000 employees and have piloted iPad with 10 people. The same 10 people have it and we have not moved beyond it. If you own your own iPad - keep it home. Connecting any non corporate device to our network is grounds for suspension and repeat offenses termination.
It's you again
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
[i]you assert that your likes, dislikes, and experiences are sufficient to govern a market that has millions of decision makers.[/i]
Thank you :) I'll take that as a compliment.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
Well considering I was just at Apple with many companies in our vertical to discuss iOS support at the enterprise level, out of 40 companies - 2 had an active iOS deployment and 5 had a pilot of iOS. The others had a long list of reasons they don't support it so Apple is serious about enterprise but taking it slow.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
I think it very much depends on the business.
The one I work in, iPhone is allowed only for a mobile link to Exchange Server for emails and Calendar.
iPad not allowed.
This has to do with the measure of security that can be applied, not the functionality, as most management level users want them for email anyway.
Another aspect is the extensive use of Flash for HR, Training, etc.... something iOS does not support.
Current direction? Android or Rim. There is a slim chance for Windows if they get their act together.....
When you say "Enterprise", I think you need to be a bit more definitive.
;)
pharma
beside the FACT you're in denial -as the article states clearly, ipads are being adopted in enterprise, big time;
I develop for pharma. Switching lately from developing XHTML to HTML5/Ajax solutions targeted to ipad. THE DEMAND is big. From a developer standpoint, ipad is THE device you must target, if you expect to win.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
How about visiting Salesforce.com? You'll find 20,000 engaged employees, each with a iPad and an iPhone, paid for and delivered by the company.
A $30mm expenditure is a spit in the bucket, but wait till news of the bottom line gains hits the street.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
According to the NY Times, 80 percent of Fortune 100 companies were using or testing the iPad. Enterprise baby.
RE: Apple's iPad is winning the enterprise tablet race without even trying
Tried to win? There was a race before Apple entered
the market? Huh!?! As for suing... I'm afraid it is a necessary evil. If Apple did not sue it's stock holders would have every legal right to sue Apple itself for not protecting their investment or some such thing. Change the structure of corporate American or not but don't blame Apple for playing by clearly defined and established rules.
Pagan jim
maybe they should be trying...
http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-recover-iphone-passwords-six-minutes-021011
Apple should be doing more to lock their devices down. Otherwise we will be reading in headlines "Stolen iPad/iPhone..." rather than "Stolen laptop..." which I would think Apple would like to avoid? as much a stink has been made over the years about Windows' security (and rightly so), I can't imagine Apple wants to see their devices being put in the same light.
If this 'consumerization of IT' phase that everyone is so gung ho about is to be not only allowed, but condoned, they should be doing something.
Of course, if Apple doesn't want to, can't nobody make 'em. Especially not a market they're not even actively targetting.
The iPad is also killing the crappy Android devices
The above article smacks of preferential and advocacy reporting...
Don't worry, is happening. Big time
You can put your head in the sand as much as you want, the tsunami will pass over you...
Maybe is time to reexamine your set of skills!
hint: is not silverlight...
Nonsense! Where is it happening?
@adornoe@...
<i>You can put your head in the sand as much as you want, the tsunami will pass over you...</i>
That's a lot of garbage.
One cannot be in denial about something that is a fantasy, or has not happened.
Is that too far over your head to understand?
<i>Maybe is time to reexamine your set of skills!
hint: is not silverlight...</i>
Hey, theo, what does this discussion have to do with my skills? Furthermore, I don't do "silverlight". So, if you don't like the situation, do you have to make things up? Like the author of the blog made up his own set of facts?
Still, you didn't even address any part of what I said, or what the blogger said in his piece.
So, do you have any real facts about the iPad making it in the enterprise? If the blogger couldn't produce any true facts, perhaps you do have them. So, let's hear them. I'll bet you can't.
Not quite accurate
I better contact my Apple enterprise sales guy and inform him he doesn't have a job according to this analyst.
While many, many companies are interested in how to make the iPad work for corporate like us they will all come to the conclusion it takes a lot of work and you will give up many security and control they presented have for other technology. Apple is making progress but to discount others in the market seems premature consider iPad is barely a year old.