Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
Summary: Apple's research and development spending as a percentage of revenue has been on the decline for years. Apple doubled down 2000 through 2005 and is harvesting the returns now.
Guess what Apple's research and development spending is as a percentage of revenue? Chances are your answers are so far off that Apple's R&D spending could be a drinking game.
If you ask a few friends you're likely to get guesses anywhere from 4 percent to maybe 10 percent or so. The real answer: R&D represents 2.2 percent of sales.
The point is worth pondering as Apple preps its fiscal fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday. For the nine months ended June 25, Apple's R&D spending was $1.78 billion, or 2.2 percent of sales.
And we scream that HP isn't innovative for spending 3 percent of sales on R&D spending. The figures, which were found doing some research, highlights how Apple's R&D spending has been sliding as a percentage of revenue for years. Granted, Apple's revenue has been growing so quickly that it would be nearly impossible to keep up its R&D spending as a percentage of revenue without just throwing money away, but the spending levels are notable.
Note that Apple's R&D spending is increasing, but not at a pace to keep up with revenue.
For comparison's sake:
- HTC spends 3.83 percent of revenue on R&D as of June 30, down from 5.23 percent for the same period a year ago.
- Microsoft spent 13 percent of revenue for fiscal 2011, down from 14 percent in fiscal 2010.
- Dell spent 1 percent of revenue on R&D for fiscal 2011.
- Google spent 14 percent of revenue on R&D for the nine months ended Sept. 30.
- IBM has spent 6 percent of revenue on R&D for years.
- For the nine months ended July 31, HP spent 2.5 percent of revenue on R&D.
Here's a look at Apple's trend:
- Today: R&D is 2.2 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2010 R&D spend: 2.7 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2009 R&D spend: 3.1 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2008 R&D spend: 3.4 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2007 R&D spend: 3.3 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2006 R&D spend: 3.7 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2005 R&D spend: 4 percent of revenue (restated).
- Fiscal 2004 R&D spend: 4 percent of revenue (restated).
- Fiscal 2003, 2002, 2001 R&D spend: 8 percent of revenue.
- Fiscal 2000 R&D spend: 5 percent of revenue.
The larger question here is what is Apple doing to wring so much return out of its R&D spending. A few thoughts:
- Apple may have a relatively small product team.
- Apple doesn't engage in fundamental research like an IBM would.
- The company is focused on software and industrial design where the innovation may not require a lot of R&D spending.
In any case, Apple's R&D spend as a percentage of revenue is worth watching going forward. The company obviously stepped up its R&D game in the early part of the last decade and is harvesting the returns in 2011.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
The worst thing you can do is think of R&D purely as project directed.
I'm not saying that Pfizer didn't waste money. I've been in their facilities.
But too many companies don't put aside a bit of the their R&D spending purely into the serendipity side of research. The discoveries that change our lives (or businesses) are very often not what we went searching for because we didn't recognize there was a problem or that we had a solution. Viagara and Post-It notes come to mind immediately as products that failed at their intended purpose. AT&T's development of the transistor didn't begin as a project to design a replacement for vacuum tubes but instead as general research. Today Google giving their researchers free time for pet projects come to mind.
If I had to guess from my limited experience with the company, Pfizer's problem wasn't spending on R&D; it's that they emphasized research trying to solely to hit new home runs and likely ignored many, many simpler problems to solve that could produce tidy profits for company with a lower cost structure then Pfizer.
Spend the money wisely, but also recognize that some portion of R&D money should be budgeted simply to general exploration that can't be traced to a specific budget code.
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
Focus groups?
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
Yes! That's it. Let it go, man.
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
take a day off
get some rest
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
$1.8 billion of R&D is gross *overestimation* of Apple's R&D spendings
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
There's a lot more to R&D than just salaries. Do you think Jony Ive's hardware designs go directly from paper to production line?
The cost of equipment and raw materials for model building are ridiculously
For example, Apple spent over $100 million to create huge multi-room antenna testing laboratory. This was years ago and now they only cover comparably small maintenance costs.
Don't argue with DeRSSS
He has a lot of inside information about Apple and he will dizzy you with specs that you couldn't make up if you tried.
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
If Apple reported $1.8 billion in R&D on their SEC forms, that's what they spent.
Beyond salaries, it is tricky accounting/balance matter
The only applicable way to compare different companies' R&D activity is to count how many people they actually engage in it, and this is more accurate way to estimate R&D expenses. However, this statistics does not go to SEC filing, which only is about financial and tax accounting.
This is why companies have management accounting, cost accounting and fund accounting, which show actual, commercial secret statistics of the company. This is why I said actual Apple's R&D are way smaller than listed for SEC.
DeRSSS just accused Apple of lying to the SEC
That is a very serious charge.
RE: Apple's R&D spending hits bottom as percentage of revenue
And what's it got them? A silly misfired hybrid called Windows 8?