AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
Summary: AT&T has rolled out its new data plans with caps and the big question was whether rivals would follow suit. So far, it appears AT&T may be alone with its metered data plans.
AT&T has rolled out its new data plans with caps and the big question was whether rivals would follow suit. So far, it appears AT&T may be alone with its metered data plans.
As a refresher, AT&T now offers two data plans. The first is $15 a month for 200 MB and another $15 for 200 MB should you go over the cap. The other is $25 a month for 2 GB of data. Pass the cap and its $10 for an extra 1 GB.
Bernstein analyst Craig Moffett said in a research note that the most interesting thing since AT&T's data plan is what hasn't happened. Indeed, the U.S. wireless industry hasn't followed. Moffett cast this inaction as a prisoner's dilemma. The industry would be better off if it cooperated and followed AT&T's lead. But if no one follows AT&T is at a market disadvantage. Clearwire has already said it will keep all you can eat data plans.
Related: AT&T revamps data plan pricing, adds iPhone tethering
- AT&T's data plan pricing: Bringing confusion back to the game
- Welcome to AT&T's tiered pricing world: Will Verizon follow?
Moffett wrote:
From the outset, Clearwire was the least likely to follow. They have a boatload of spectrum… and no customers. Capacity constraints sound like a prince's problem when you're a startup. Verizon is at the other extreme. They have a better network than AT&T, but they clearly understand that they will have to ration access to it in order to keep it that way. And they have signaled six ways to Sunday that they like the idea of metering. Perhaps they feel they can gain some short term advantage by delaying, and that they can switch later. But that's a dicey game, since any customers they pick up as a consequence of their unlimited positioning would be more than a little disgruntled if Verizon surprises them with caps of their own. Their window to follow is a narrow one.
So where do we go from here?
Moffett outlined two scenarios. In one scenario, everyone but Clearwire follows AT&T's lead. Metered usage becomes the standard. If metering becomes the norm, mobile video and music are in jeopardy. Moffett reported:
An 'everyone meters' scenario would, among other things, very likely spell the end of mobile video. According to Neil Hunt, chief product officer at Netflix, their content is currently encoded at a minimum of 500 kilobits per second and a maximum of 3.4 megabits. At 500 kilobits, a 200 MB plan user would burn through their monthly data allotment in just 12 minutes per week… and that's assuming they didn't use their data plan for anything other than watching video. Their next generation Silverlight player will be encoded at a minimum of 375 kilobits per second and a maximum of 1.5 megabits. At 1.5 megabits, the intro plan would be tapped out in four minutes per week. And even the power users' DataPro plan would allow for less than an hour of video per week (just 41 minutes). Customers would pause before clicking on that link you just sent of the squirrel on water skis.
Aside from the mobile video problems, Moffett noted the following:
- Under metering, there would be no wireless broadband substitution for wired alternatives. Cable's market share and status would be ensured for go-to broadband delivery.
- App developers would compete on the efficiency of apps.
- Device demand could fall for high-end phones. Rich media consumption would be costly so why would you buy a fancy phone that encourages you to eat up your data plan.
In the second scenario, AT&T's data plan move fails.
"If their effort to lead the industry to a rationed future were to fail, all these applications would thrive. Except that network quality would degrade. Potentially dramatically so," said Moffett.
In addition price deflation would accelerate. That's bad news for carriers, but good news for consumers---at least for a while. Moffett wrote:
Uncapped, deflation would be far worse. Clearwire has indicated on conference calls that their average user consumes 7 Gigabytes per month. At $40, that's just $0.006 per megabyte. And that's only for their mobile users. We were told yesterday in Seattle that their Wireline broadband replacement subscribers use "roughly twice that." That's just $0.003 per megabyte, sports fans. Quite a drop from the $1 per megabyte that currently accounts for 85% of the industry's revenues. With radically (catastrophically?) lower prices would come lower investment returns… and therefore lower investment.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
They over charge the way it is.
I think it's too early to call
ATT puts the hurt on IPad...
It's clear that ATT intended this move all along, because their iPad data-plan didn't require a contract; they obviously wanted no legal obligations in thier way.
Says who???
No, no, and NO!!! For once the rest of the industry is looking out for the consumer. Let's hope ATT realizes this and reverts!
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
"Watch full HD movies all day, every day, on our network. On AT&T... you get one. Per month."
Hey, what's this in Sprint's Evo fineprint?
Interesting.
Now, I'm in Australia where we have always had these restrictions, I currently get 1 GB which I have only exceeded by tethering my iPhone.
Apparently the average usage for iPhones on my network is 120MB a month.
Is that a typo...?
200 MB for the first $15 and 200 [b]GB[/b] for $15 more..? Sounds like a pretty good deal, if you ask me. Especially if the other data plan only gives you 2 GB overall.
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
Wireless carriers have two options here, they can continue to lie to their customers by pretending that everyone has the right to 'unlimited' usage of a finite resource, and then deal with the inevitable complaints that arise when the bandwidth runs out, or they can admit that there never really was any such thing as an 'unlimited' plan in the first place, and stop promising what no one can possibly deliver.
Everyone knows that in the business world, 'unlimited' doesn't mean really 'unlimited' it means that the cap is set so high that they assume no one can possibly exceed it, but if you don't think these carriers promising 'unlimited' plans will cut you off for excess usage, you're in for disappointment.
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
200GB? zdnet is wrong again and again.
> for 200 GB
Like so much of zdnet... that is *NOT* supposed to say "200 GB".
Ugh.
ATT just put another nail into it's own coffin
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
<a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslisohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslichat</a>
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?
RE: AT&T: Is it alone on data cap island?