Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

AT&T files T-Mobile merger statement with FCC; Sprint still hates the deal

By | April 21, 2011, 1:21pm PDT

Summary: AT&T filed its public interest statement with the Federal Communications Commission for the T-Mobile acquisition. Sprint reiterated that it was against the deal.

AT&T said Thursday that it has filed its public interest statement with the Federal Communications Commission for the T-Mobile acquisition. Sprint reiterated that it was against the deal.

The public interest statement by AT&T covers familiar territory. AT&T argues that the deal will:

  • Expand mobile broadband to the U.S. population;
  • Ease a wireless spectrum crunch;
  • Bolster network performance for consumers.

Sprint in a statement said:

Today’s filing only reinforces the significant risks presented by AT&T’s proposed acquisition on the U.S. consumer and wireless industry overall. It is indisputable fact that this takeover would create an entrenched duopoly with control of approximately 80 percent of wireless industry revenues. This kind of leverage could strangle competition…”

Also see: AT&T makes its T-Mobile case: Patriotism, spectrum crunch, mobile broadband

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Good or Bad
rhonin 21st Apr 2011
While I know as a consumer I would benefit from this (AT&T) I feel it would be detrimental to Sprint.
Then again I could be wrong....

I think it should be allowed, let it play.
If it turns into a stranglehold, the government can always do another AT&T breakup - again.....

plain
0 Votes
+ -
Spring will be fine.
youngmaester@... 21st Apr 2011
Am I the only one that thinks Sprint will end up benefiting from this? With this merger Sprint becomes the chippy agile little carrier that T-Mobile was.

They will become the defacto alternative carrier that previously shared that title with T-Mobile. I don't see how they don't benefit from that. Network quality is not the issue it was 5 years ago. People can make and receive calls just fine in most places with any of the big 4 (soon to be three).

Also, Sprint will likely be the first of the big 4 that will be able to move the voice network over to pure IP. They already have the integration moving forward. Verizon hasn't even started. Sprint will be fine, IMO.
Sprint = CDMA
T-Mobile: GSM

I can't get a SIM card from Sprint and put that in an HSPA+ tablet.

So if Sprint is fine, then Sprint will need to be converted to a GSM network.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
xiaojiektii Updated - 22nd Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
beibei41 Updated - 22nd Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Good or Bad
rhonin 21st Apr 2011
While I know as a consumer I would benefit from this (AT&T) I feel it would be detrimental to Sprint.
Then again I could be wrong....

I think it should be allowed, let it play.
If it turns into a stranglehold, the government can always do another AT&T breakup - again.....

plain

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix