Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

AT&T punts on T-Mobile purchase

By | December 19, 2011, 1:42pm PST

Summary: AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson maintained that the rationale for the deal made sense, but regulator opposition was too much.

AT&T waved the white flag of surrender to regulators and dropped its plans to acquire T-Mobile.

In a statement, AT&T said it agreed with Deutsche Telekom to drop plans to buy T-Mobile. The Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice were against the deal.

AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson maintained that the rationale for the deal made sense. AT&T had argued that it needed T-Mobile to boost its network. Regulators, however, panned the deal. Stephenson said:

To meet the needs of our customers, we will continue to invest. However, adding capacity to meet these needs will require policymakers to do two things. First, in the near term, they should allow the free markets to work so that additional spectrum is available to meet the immediate needs of the U.S. wireless industry, including expeditiously approving our acquisition of unused Qualcomm spectrum currently pending before the FCC. Second, policymakers should enact legislation to meet our nation’s longer-term spectrum needs.

As a consolation prize, Deutsche Telekom will get a $4 billion breakup fee. Deutsche Telekom and AT&T also entered a roaming agreement.

The end of the T-Mobile deal presents a spectrum conundrum for AT&T. The company argued that the T-Mobile deal would give it more network coverage. While regulators were jousting with AT&T, Verizon picked up spectrum from a bevy of cable companies. Verizon’s move was designed to squeeze AT&T should the T-Mobile deal fall apart.

Without a deal, AT&T and T-Mobile are the weakest of the field in terms of wireless spectrum.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: AT&T punts on T-Mobile purchase
podstolom 20th Dec
I'm so sick of "free markets" where everything is anything but "free".
0 Votes
+ -
Geriatric clueless political grazers who have no clue on how this all works making decisions for the rest of us.

Washington needs an upgrade...
0 Votes
+ -
@rhonin
You actually thought this was a good idea?
DK wanted to sell because T-mobile is losing them money. Perhaps you'd prefer it if they went bankrupt?
0 Votes
+ -
Not exactly but
rhonin 19th Dec
@hoaxoner
It is better than the alternative.
0 Votes
+ -
@hoaxoner

The whole fight is because some felt that AT&T acquiring T-Mobile would hurt them despite that there are other cell carriers. T-Mobile America is not doing well and while it would absorb a competitor and use its equipment to expand their network I thought it was better than letting T-Mobile going bankrupt and the equipment being useless. No other cell carrier is in the position to use that equipment because both the other big players used a different technology. So yes I thought it was a good idea if it could bring better cell service to the customers. There are still two other big players and several other smaller players to keep competition alive.

Now if T-Mobile america falls then what happens then. Can AT&T purchase the remains? Or does it die out completely. Maybe we should give them a bailout at the expense of the tax payers so we can pay more and get less.
0 Votes
+ -
@biobiroc
Of course they can purchase equipment. It will be a part of the bankruptcy procedure.
So let the free market do its job and finish off Tmobile.
If ATT bought T this is the end of the free market- monopoly and free market do not go well together.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm so sick of "free markets" where everything is anything but "free".

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix