Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Can the Man Who Re-Assembled AT&T Change His Tune For GM?

By | June 9, 2009, 2:25pm PDT

Ed Whitacre. The quintessential amalgator of companies. He’s going to save GM, as its new chairman?

Don’t get me wrong. He did a pretty amazing job with the hand he was played in telecommunications. He took the smallest of the Baby Bells, at the time AT&T was broken up a quarter-century ago. And turned it into … AT&T.

The Southwestern Bell Corporation was more profitable than its bigger brethren. Then, under Whitacre’s aggressive guidance, the company got growth by gobbling up Pacific Telesis, Ameritech, Southern New England Telephone and BellSouth. It took over Comcast’s wireless business and a host of other communications outfits. Eventually, it took over the remnants of Ma Bell (aka, AT&T), which had not competed effectively in long-distance or corporate services. And, then, Southwestern Bell, which had renamed itself SBC for a while, took over the name AT&T.

Now it’s hard to see a replay here, where Whitacre takes GM as a springboard and rolls up other automakers and recreates GM in its own image as global competitor to be feared.

With Southwestern Bell, he had a profitable company to build on, in a fairly protected field (regional telecommunications). He rolled up rivals, as competition increased (from cable and the Internet) and economics worsened.

At GM, there are no profits to build on. There are no rivals to buy. There’s more disgorgement of assets to come, like Opel, Hummer, etc.

What’s called for here is a whole new way of doing business with a whole new way of looking at the auto business. Somehow, former SAP heir apparent and now electric car innovator Shai Agassi would seem a more inspired choice. Or at least someone from the next generation of automaking, thinking and philosophy.

Not a fellow, as smart as he is, who basically is an M&A guy.

Can you name a single product or business process innovation wrung in by Southwestern Bell, SBC or AT&T under the Whitacre watch?

Didn’t think so.

Of course, this was the guy who appeared to be planning to put toll booths on the Internet, charging for premium levels of speedy access to content. But he changed his tune, once SBC acquired AT&T.

Now, he’ll have to change his tune at GM, as well. Growth through amalgamation is not an option.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld is editor-in-chief of Securities Industry News, as well as a long-time media, technology and business journalist.

Disclosure

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld has interests in two Web startups, which he cannot disclose until formally launched. They do not involve enterprise computing. He holds interests in technology companies only through mutual funds in which he has no say in their selection of investments. He has worked for Reed Elsevier PLC, Ziff Davis Media and the A.H. Belo Corporation.

Biography

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld is editor-in-chief of Securities Industry News, as well as a long-time media, technology and business journalist.

He experimented with online news delivery a quarter century ago, with a text-only online service called StarText at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram in Texas.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Can the Man Who Re-Assembled AT&T Change His Tune For GM?
cheap mp3 players 4th Sep
It is cell phone batteries all time to color your own cheap electronics days
By means of russian dating plus metal buildings since might link to that | here | this | this site
0 Votes
+ -
King Oboma
Christian_<>< 9th Jun 2009
Good luck, Obama and his printing presses....

0 Votes
+ -
WWJD?
HypnoToad72 9th Jun 2009
What Would John McCain Do?

Nothing by comparison... and, post-election, he and his VP choice have really shown to be nothing than plagiarizing burderns to their pathetic political party...

Party of Lincoln? No.
Party of family values? Hardly and certainly not with Newt's own personal family history...
Party of fiscal responsibility? 10+ trillion in debt, which started during Reagan's term and exacerbated by Bush - some necessary, some by choice. His choice. And his party's. Not the democrats'...
0 Votes
+ -
RE REGAN
GASGTO73@... 10th Jun 2009
At least when Regan left office, he rebuilt our military, reduced /eliminated our national debt, and rebuilt our economy thru infrastructure.

Bush JR kept the ragtops out of our homeland by taking the war to their homeland.
(you want the Talaban/Alkata here?).

Blame Clinton for laying down the groundworks for this failure we have now during his term in office and use a sex scam to cover it up.









It's not like he just put together a corporate unbrella/holding company with many largely independent but coexisting brand names underneath with redundant capabilities. He took a bunch of bits and pieces with diverse branding, reduced redundancies, consolidated process, re-built a singular brand identity and produced a solid successful company upon which Apple computer bet its future. Sounds an awful lot like what needs to be done with GM. No AT&T is not without problems but from a business perspective it is a whole lot better off than before Whitacre arrived.

Hence Whitacre is probably right in tune with what needs to be done at GM. His biggest stubling block may be the union and consumer percpetion of American cars. In short he needs to turn the black circles in Consumer Reports into Red Circles for all GM Brands and Models...good luck.
It is cell phone batteries all time to color your own cheap electronics days
By means of russian dating plus metal buildings since might link to that | here | this | this site
0 Votes
+ -
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
wargammer2005 10th Jun 2009
under no circumstances will I ever by a GM or Chrysler.

what is being done is called FACISM.

you fools have sold your souls to the goverment.
good luck with that!!!!'
(you'll need it, soon)
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe Lamar Burton can save us....
JonnyBlade 10th Jun 2009

Too many people talk about things they know very little about (obviously by what they say).
But even worse, they don't have enough integrity to at least learn the definitions of the words they use.

We need Lamar Burton to do a special Reading Rainbow to help Americans understand words like fascism, socialism and yes, most importantly capitalism!

Go ahead warhammer, live a pure capitalist life ... you can, it's possible ... shows us how it's done! (Don't forget, don't drive on public roads, use public utilities, send your kids to public schools, use the US currency or banks with FDIC, don't call the police or fire dept and definitely don't expect the military to fight your wars for you)
0 Votes
+ -
Take many things to extremes?
someitguy79 10th Jun 2009
Its amazing that Statists accuse folks of anarchy when they say the federal gov. should not be involved in running companies.

Most do not object to State or Local govt. running certain utilities, roads etc... That is different than the Feds.
0 Votes
+ -
GM: Some Assembly Required
progan01@... 10th Jun 2009
Whitacre does indeed have another integration job on his hands, but this time it's between the remnants of GM ("New GM"), the UAW through its Voluntary Employee Benefits Association (VEBA), and the taxpayers through the public members of the Board of Directors, not yet chosen. These entities will need to be given a common direction and theme for GM's success.

While other commenters on this thread are having their puerile tantrums, if you've read this far down then contemplate what exactly the "New GM" will consider 'success.' Is it return to profitability? Is it restructuring only to the point of solvency? Is it preservation of GM culture? If it's the latter, then GM in retrospect might have done less harm to the Republic if it had gone Chapter 7 and been dismembered. We don't know what that future looks like yet.

If Whitacre's past is any clue, then conglomeration will be the watchword, only this will be more a political than a technological or even a financial feat. GM and the UAW, ostensible foes, have been circling each other in closer and closer proximity since the oil crises of the 1970s. The abortive disgorgement of Delphi in the 1990s has shown how badly structured the entire supplier chain has become. I fully expect Whitacre to re-centralize GM on making cars and controlling the supply chain and the costs therein, possibly even to the point of bringing all suppliers under a single management structure. This would include Delco, Inland Guide, Delphi, and very likely Visteon as well.

The end result might be a semi-public corporation that in fact controls a significant part of the vertical manufacturing industries now supplying the auto market. This entity could have significant clout in determining public policy affecting its costs, which the 'old GM' had already indicated included such things as universal medical care and such things as safety and fuel-efficiency standards.

The "new GM" Whitacre puts together could in fact look to manufacturing as a means, not an end, to achieving social ends that serve GM, its employees and management, at the expense of other Americans. It doesn't matter if you call this 'socialist' or 'fascist,' not that anybody commenting prior has any understanding of these terms. What you are likely to end up with is a GM with more power and a considerably broader vision.

Whether that vision entails absorbing the remainder of the US auto industry or making the US taxpayer pick up its health-care and pension costs with minimal oversight remains to be seen. But Whitacre is not somebody who has the public's welfare in mind. You should consider that while you bicker over language.
This was the man (EEW) who tried to bring QOS to the internet, so we could use it for hd video, voice, real time applications, and other high tech services. A layer on top of the lower internet. Some called it black magic and demanded to "Burn the Witch". As some understood, google strangle it for purly selfish reason, how can you push your tools if the product doesnt need fixing. But this author still believes Al Gore invented the internet. Is Ed the right guy for GM? He certainly was the right guy to run a small company around all the requlations and politics to build the 9th largest company in the world. His track record speaks for itself. Ed is too much focused on the right things all the time. However good common sense doesnt always win. And he faces a culture thats been molded for over a 100 years, something like trying to reverse the rotation of the earth. Hope his ethics, honesty and integrity will prevail in this crisis.
It is cell phone batteries all time to color your own cheap electronics days
By means of russian dating plus metal buildings since might link to that | here | this | this site

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix