China, the Web's Broken Link

China, the Web's Broken Link

Summary: The highlight of WWW2006 today was Danny Weitzner's talk entitled "China: a Broken Link on the Web." (See my notes or his slides.


www2006.jpg The highlight of WWW2006 today was Danny Weitzner's talk entitled "China: a Broken Link on the Web." (See my notes or his slides.) He started with the controversial observation that we like to say that on the Web everyone's a publisher, but it may also be true that every government is a filter and interceptor.

Noting the story of Yahoo! helping to jail a Chinese writer by cooperating with the Chinese government, Weitzner noted that Yahoo! chooses between obeying Chinese law (which they do everywhere else as well) or simply not doing business there. The role of provocateur, as Yahoo! claims, is better left to the governments of the US and European countries.

There are three strategies that we can take with respect to China's behavior on the Internet. The first is what I have labeled the "do nothing and hope things work out strategy." You may not think of this as a strategy, but it makes the point of respecting China's sovereignty, something we want other's to do for us.

Danny Weitzner, W3C, at WWW2006
Danny Weitzner, W3C, at WWW2006

The second strategy is what I'm calling the "hard line" strategy. This perhaps best characterized by the Reporters Without Borders principles. If you read them, these essentially say that companies shouldn't do business in ways that might compromise human rights.

Weitzner put forth a third strategy which is the "transparency" strategy. This is perhaps best characterized by Google's transparency principles which allow cooperation while also don't forgo working in countries like China, but say that what happens should be made public. This would force China to at least live up to their policies on the world stage. One problem: China makes transparency against the law as well giving companies practicing this strategy a fine line to tread. Other groups take this task on--publishing lists of what's been blocked.

I got the impression that Weitzner is an optimist, believing that domestic demands will eventually result in political reform. If that's true, then transparency is likely to put additional pressure in the right spots and help drive change.

Topic: China

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Ask John Caroll

    he'll tell you how strategy #1 will result in a win for government change in China.
    Roger Ramjet
  • The nature of government

    All governments are intrusive, vis. NSA and phone records. So you are right on in saying that companies should have a policy in place, since everybody knows that one will be needed. The China situation, where the government holds all the cards, is an important test, but so is our own, where actions can and do happen in secret. NSA is mad now about "leaks" that informed us all about secret monitoring of communications. We, I hope, have a government based on law that at least provides a basis for redress. So let China be a teaching lesson.
    • i agree

      i agree with what's been said by dhopp! there are a lot of human rights violation going on in china.

      but looking at the "anti-terrorist" propaganda and *laws* being introduced by the government to curb on the basic rights of human privacy is something that needs to be checked and looked into.