Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012

By | October 3, 2011, 2:05am PDT

Summary: Chrome is catching up to second-place Firefox, and could overtake it by early 2012. Internet Explorer is losing ground, also.

As Internet Explorer remains the king of all web browsers, upcoming star Google Chrome could be set to take over Firefox as the long-running second place browser.

According to web tracking company StatCounter, Chrome could take over Firefox as early as the upcoming holiday season, but more realistically early 2012.

For September, Chrome’s global marketshare reached 23 percent, while Firefox had nearly 27 percent. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser still leads the way with just over 41 percent.

But as Internet Explorer and Firefox continue to lose share of the global browser share, Chrome is accelerating at a rate of nearly 10 percent a year.


(Source: StatCounter)

Chrome’s user base has climbed at an incredible rate, as one of the fastest growing browsers in history.

Google Chromebooks, however, have had little effect on the browser’s overall marketshare. Logically, should the web browser do so well, captivating the eyes of hundreds of millions worldwide, the hardware-driven extension to the web browser, Google’s Chrome OS would do well also. But sales have been slow, and enterprises and schools have been reluctant to adopt the new technology.

Firefox has dwindled in the past few months, particularly with its new versioning structure. While Chrome offers a rolling update service, seemingly without the end-user even noticing, Firefox users are asked to upgrade at near six week intervals in apparent major upgrades to the browser.

While Google users experience no break in service, end Firefox users are asked to upgrade each time — making it problematic for enterprises, which often requires administrator intervention.

Having said that, in Europe at least, Internet Explorer alternatives show impressive competition against Internet Explorer.

Last year, Microsoft was forced by European regulators to roll out a ‘browser ballot’ to Windows users, which affected users with Internet Explorer set as the default browser. A slap on the wrist for Microsoft, it allowed fair competition across the continent, giving Europeans the choice of an alternative browser, which alone negatively impacted Microsoft’s share in the European browser market.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from CNN, the Huffington Post, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

42
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

qtpplau 15 ehz
bdsfwrryd53-24378977388955723514029736134452 25th Nov
pxowmn,ctkefayq86, iwdft.
A happily diverse selection of browsers should keep developers honest to W3C standards.
Chrome has been increasing at a huge rate for many years now.

If you hop over to W3SCHOOLS and check what they have to say. They predict Chrome's behaviour by over 6 months!

Though Net Applications states that Chrome only has 14% in the same manner it states that IOs has more browser market share than Android. Bottom line is, Net Applications statistics are skewed and unreliable and not public either!

Statcounter has been doing a great job and service to all. Kudos Statcounter!
@Zogg Agreed. More option is better for all of us. I like chrome for this reason.
0 Votes
+ -
No bookmark sidebar, no sale (and don't give me the religious bull**** about why there's none.) Other than that it's a nice browser, from what I've seen anyway. No "Save Image to Folder" extension (last I checked) is also a no sale for me.
@Mike (not Cox) "No "Save Image to Folder" extension (last I checked) is also a no sale for me"

OMG! What about the embedded Save image as... right mouse button menu option?
0 Votes
+ -
@xpect That's not the same thing (Firefox has that too, just like any browser.) The "Save Image to Folder" extension allows you to configure a set of predefined folders where to save images. It's a bit too long to explain here, but I have a number of "deep" folders to which I save images depending on type (I have a music review web site, so it's for things like logos, album covers, flags, photos, etc..) The extension saves me a lot of extra clicking etc to navigate to the various folders (which Save Image As... requires.) You can't really appreciate its functionality until you need it, however. It's useless for someone who saves the odd images from time to time, or always saves them to the same folder, for example.
Some of the recent gains for Chrome is due to IE9 not supported in XP. But that gain may level out soon as XP slowly dies.

IE9/IE10 beats Chrome easily in security and performance. So Chrome is pointless for Windows users.
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome is Google spyware
ScorpioBlue 3rd Oct
Not to mention it doesn't have what the Adblock extension has in Firefox. It's become utterly painful to surf the internet without it.

I also don't like the GUI. It looks like it was developed by a child and has a tinker toy look to it. Not refined at all.
@ScorpioBlue

Adblock is present and well on Chrome. Works great.
0 Votes
+ -
@Shmeg No it doesn't work for shite and I removed chrome because of that.
0 Votes
+ -
@Shmeg No it doesn't work for shite and I removed chrome because of that.

I've heard many people say that. You're not the first.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012
MrElectrifyer Updated - 4th Oct
@Home Grown IT
Funny that an a home grown IT, if you really are one, couldn't figure out how to use the AdBlock extension for chrome.

I use it to block several ads, including those on ZDnet and have had barely any issues with it; frankly, except when I have the option to restore my previous tabs from my last session selected. In that situation, it doesn't work properly with the restored tabs but works perfectly with new tabs created during the browsing session.

Prefer it over the one in Firefox specially due to the fact that I can simply right-click an ad (or even a website element, eg. those ridiculous task bars that have started showing up on several sites, ZDnet being one of them silly ) and block it completely or parts of it just by sliding a little switch.
@ScorpioBlue virtually every website, every software, collects data. few are as easily prevented as Google, few do as little bad with it as Google - Google don't look at individual data, nether do they install programs you don't ask for, neither do they email you endlessly or sell your details. Unlike many other companies. Get a new tune wink
0 Votes
+ -
That's no excuse
ScorpioBlue Updated - 3rd Oct
@Heenan73
I don't need to have an open porthole to Google to allow them to browse all the websites I go to, and that's what Chrome does. It's a full blown pipe right into their servers.

Now if you want to be a sheep to all their tracking then that's up to you. Even I wouldn't accuse IE9 of that and I consider myself an ABMer.
0 Votes
+ -
@Heenan73

For me, it's not a matter of what Google does with my data after they collect it. It's a matter of NOT seeing all the inline ads, banner ads, etc., that are inevitable without the AdBlock extension. I have a much better experience with Firefox than Chrome (or Chromium) on Windows XP, Windows 7 and OpenSuse 11.4.
0 Votes
+ -
It's a matter of NOT seeing all the inline ads, banner ads, etc., that are inevitable without the AdBlock extension.

Same here. Pissing off your potential customers by doing this is no way to generate sales.
0 Votes
+ -
Until Chrome has NoScript (Which is never, due to the way it's coded), I'll stick with Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
@Aerowind
Google will not let you install anti ad-blocking software. It will not allow you to bite the hand that feeds it and in this particular case, it's website ad revenue.

If they have extensions that do this, then they are feeble at best and are there for dog & pony show purposes.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012
LoverockDavidson_-24231404894599612871915491754222 3rd Oct
Chrome can get as much market share as it wants but I'll never use it because the EULA states any data I pass through it becomes the property of Google. That and their extensions don't work as good as the same ones for Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
until then, it doesn't do what I need -- so I won't be using it. Since it is being developed by an advertising company, I doubt very much if it's privacy, security, and advertisement blocking features will ever be the equal of Firefox's.

Regards,
Jon

Post edited to fix some atrocious spelling errors; sorry!
0 Votes
+ -
@JonathonDoe You forgot "it's" (it's "its"). wink

I don't block ads. Ads pay to keep the web sites running.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't block ads. Ads pay to keep the web sites running.

I do, and I could really care less what keeps your websites running.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mike (not Cox)

Ads don't keep my website running. Nor do they keep the websites I frequent running.
0 Votes
+ -
@benched42

Even if they had to resort to paid subscription to view websites, you'd still have the ads in there. Only now you'd get a double whammy since you're now paying to look at the ads. It's a sleazy racket, no doubt.
I initially met Chrome with a weary sigh of "not another Web browser." But it's largely won me over. I was a dedicated Firefox user, but Chrome seems snappier... especially when I'm logging back on to my account and have open browser windows. Firefox often seems frozen, whereas I don't see the same problems with Chrome.

Opera remains my first choice on Android even though the most recent build broke cookies on my HTC Flyer.
0 Votes
+ -
A sad thought. As with all Google apps and sevices, Chrome is pure Google spyware. Just another way to monitor everything you do on the net, and update their profile of you.

It seems that most techies in the world have bought into Google in a big way. Privacy no longer matters. We'll see. Just wait until someone inside Google starts selling personal profiles of users. That will be big business. And all you Chrome users will have your identities stolen.

Firefox has gone through a rough patch, but it is coming back In the mean time, Opera is a better choice than Chrome if speed is all you want.
0 Votes
+ -
Google Chrome
Xyberion1K3 3rd Oct
If you need a great bookmarks extension, try Neat Bookmarks. Chrome really needs one extension that is found in Firefox; that is Tabs Mix Plus. I use both Firefox and Chrome. Both browsers have pluses and minuses. Chrome has an extension called NotScripts for Chrome OS, that is a good substitute for NoScripts in Firefox. I reiterate, Chrome needs a program like Tabs Mix Plus.
0 Votes
+ -
@Xyberion1K3
Tab Mix Plus is one of my favourites too.
Duplicating tabs is so handy.

Some others are:
Adblock
Bookmark Duplicate Detector
Context Search
Morning Coffee
NoScript
Personal Menu (I've edited it to restore its old functionality).
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting how the majority of comments don't really reflect on Chrome or IE, but on user's personal favourites.

BTW, I'm a Chrome fanboy! wink

But it isn't perfect, it does not (yet) do all the things others do, though the point about security is frankly silly - you couldn't put a razor blade between Chrome/IE on security issues. And even then, I'm not sure who'd win, And sensible users are unaffected by most such problems. And (finally) browser insecurities pale into insignificance when compared with other windows-based issues.

All that said, IE isn't the current issue, FF is - and its decline is as much responsible for Chrome overtaking as Chrome's achievement.

FF has ever-so-slightly lost the plot; while it has great developers, they don't see the big picture (which Chrome does best) and they don't have a mantra-worthy guiding mission to keep them on track (Which IE does best).

On current form (and if you look closely at the graph), Chrome is most unlikely to take the Top Spot any time soon. In fact, I'd wager that IE will dominate windows-based PCs as long as they exist; but IE will never have a strong role in the mobile-technology PCs that will supplant them. Chrome will.
it may but firefox don't spy on you chrome does it was on the news dumbs
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012
diegocr Updated - 3rd Oct
Erm.. "Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012"... What is obvious to all of us (your users/visitors/readers) is that you ZDNet guys (some of you, at least) are making all the possible to make this a reality.

I dunno what's up with you guys... how much is Google paying you to such promotion of Chrome each week?

Also, isn't there a more reliable source than "StatCounter? or at least don't base your words on a single company's graph...

Everything IMHO, of course...
For sure, Google will lead the 'Browser' market as well as he will do with OS Market.
IE is slowly dying. Google Chromebooks are the future, we think they are getting better as well as Android did.

You can read some articles about them here:
http://www.chromelaptop.org
0 Votes
+ -
Not by 2012.
spdragoo@... 4th Oct
@PPacie

So far, the *only* thing I've found "useful" in Chrome are the game apps -- i.e. their Atari Missile Command and Angry Birds.

Biggest gripe I have with Chrome: unlike Firefox *and IE*, it won't clear out my browsing history when I close it. I have both Firefox & IE set to automatically clear out the browsing history, cookies, & cache files when I close them out; with Chrome, I set it to do the same thing, but it still keeps the data in the browser until I manually clear it. That's a big minus in my book.
I have not had any problems with IE9 so no reason for me to change.
0 Votes
+ -
Firefox "jumped the shark" when it went to version 4. Its performance on my old computer was slow when I opened multiple tabs. Switched to Chrome, much happier now.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Chrome could overtake Firefox by 2012
Disgruntled M$ User Updated - 4th Oct
Until the "Nosier than your nosy next door neighbor issue is put to rest", it's FF, IE, and "NO WAY IN HADES" will Chrome reside on ANY machine under my roof!!!! Not to mention that Chrome is now tacked onto some downloads. If you don't uncheck the box you get Chrome along with whatever you "truly" wanted to download. I don't remember which ones so don't bother to ask. I saw it on one download for myself and I'm continually removing Chrome from my 8 year old daughter's machine. She doesn't go out of her way to download it!
Which now makes me wonder how much of this uptake in Chrome is by anyone actually installing it or is its number skewed by unintentional installations. Kind of reminds me of the Apple Quick Time push. You want to download XYZ but if your not careful what you really get is XYZ PLUS Quick Time because you didn't uncheck the box!
Also, even if you got Chrome via unintentional installation how many people truly use it.
Again I ask. If if's only based on the number of downloads, than Google is skewing the numbers by attaching it as a payload to the "true intended" download.
There's plenty enough "Spy Ware" out there without me purposely installing "one"! From the movie "ET", all he would have needed was Chrome to phone home!
0 Votes
+ -
@Disgruntled M$ User
" From the movie "ET", all he would have needed was Chrome to phone home!"

Google could then send ads to a new set of victims (err ... consumers).
0 Votes
+ -
Well, when it does ...
thx-1138_@... 5th Oct
" ... Chrome is catching up to second-place Firefox, and could overtake it by early 2012. "

... they'd better be sure to use the indicator.
0 Votes
+ -
hhrdxmm 09 yro
cmakrekdw45-24379028810453867344191691556755 25th Nov
yawoni,xbezijub90, vcjft.
0 Votes
+ -
qtpplau 15 ehz
bdsfwrryd53-24378977388955723514029736134452 25th Nov
pxowmn,ctkefayq86, iwdft.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix