Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
Summary: Cisco will shutter and realign its consumer businesses toward its enterprise customers, including its Flip pocket videocamera line and its Eos media solutions business.
Cisco on Tuesday announced that it will shutter some of its consumer businesses and realign what's left to support its core networking infrastructure businesses.
That means that the company will:
- Close down its popular Flip business, acquired for $590 million in March 2009;
- Refocus its home networking business for "greater profitability and connection to the company's core networking infrastructure" as Cisco expands it into a home video platform;
- Integrate its umi consumer videoconferencing product into the company's Business TelePresence product line, transitioning the product to an enterprise and service provider go-to-market model;
- Take the core video technology integration of Cisco's Eos media solutions business and use it elsewhere in the company.
Cisco says its four key company priorities remain core routing, switching and services; collaboration; architectures; and video.
"We are making key, targeted moves as we align operations in support of our network-centric platform strategy," CEO John Chambers said in a statement.
Related:
- Cisco Linksys: The Makeover
- Cisco rolls out family of Linksys E-Series routers; starts at $59.95
- Cisco's Chambers: 'We have lost some of the credibility'
The decision appears to have been made rather quickly -- still, Chambers hinted back in April that "tough decisions" were going to be made -- or at least didn't trickle down to key stakeholders until recently. Through 10 days ago, I had a scheduled meeting with Cisco representatives to preview a new addition to the company's Flip consumer video line -- but the meeting was canceled (not rescheduled) without reason and the launch delayed.
It may also signal a drop in the popularity (and thus revenues) of these pocket camcorders in response to the ubiquity of HD video-capable smartphones. The Flip acquisition was a little bit fringe for Cisco, and a possible drop in sales could have opened the door for Cisco to take the intellectual property and shutter the product.
The company's umi product is in a similar situation, though didn't come with a built-in audience. When Cisco announced the product in October 2010, it said the product would bring healthcare, education and financial services to the home. While that may still be the goal, it's clearly better served by Cisco's enterprise group.
Its Eos social and cloud-based content platform is in a similar boat.
While it's clear that Cisco isn't punting on video as a core competency, it appears that the company has realized that its resources are better marshaled through its enterprise customer base. Simply: if it can't win in these spaces, it wants out.
One last note: Cisco was clearly enamored with the former Pure Digital team's ability to connect with consumers. That's why the team was given a crack at its consumer router business, with the Valet and Valet Plus as the result. Whether some of those skilled employees will be integrated within traditional Cisco strengths or let go is the burning question.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
I really liked Flips. Better get the most recent one while I can. It should be a good price.
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
"Small, cheap camera with fall off a log simplicity - and no cables to lose"
Now while I think it was a great product, I don't see much technology worth having for 590 million. Do I think they over spent on this? Yeah. Is it likely to be useful in their core business? No.
It's one of those moments when you realise that companies like Cisco can be pretty clueless, and make decisions that are obviously flawed. You do have to wonder about the people at the top.
Egos and dollars
When you mix the two, you often get VERY stupid decisions.
Better buy something like iPod touch since if records HD (not really much
Flip was doomed since HD came to smartphones and mediaplayers.
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
What were they thinking !!
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
Thing is, that was also the segment far more concerned with "always have camera" than any measure of quality. Most of the Flip clones, like Kodak's, produced much higher quality video. Most smartphones don't, but that segment was Flip's base.
And under Cisco, they didn't do anything signficant to evolve beyond "people whoreally don't care anout quality". I have more cash in camcorders that I did my first two cars, so its easy for serious videoheads to look down on Flip.
But I saw the real death of this market nearly two years ago when I bought my Motorola Droid smatphone. From an enthusiast's point of view, the video with this phone is terrible. On the other hand, in bright enough lights, it's actually better than many consumer DV camcorders were. Smartphones and now some iPod type devices use the same 1/4" camera chips and lenses you found in the Flip. So no chance that phones wouldn't catch up, and make that $200 Flip just another feature of the pocket computer folks still call "phone".
The phone also beats the Flip on easy in a way Flip could never follow... the can upload directly to YouTube or FaceBook or even Vimeo if you know what you're doing.
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
What were they thinking...
I'd like to think of myself as an average user...but cannot deal with the poor quality from my iPod Touch/iPhone...if I'm going to waste the time to record something, it might as well be good quality video. My compact VHS palmcorder got better video than anything I've seen on a smartphone - despite the issues of using an interlaced sensor and having to run it through a comb filter or reduce the resolution thru line doubling.
Oh well. As a hobyist photographer, I guess I'm spoiled by teh DSLRs to get excited by lackluster video, be it smartphone, flip, or table. Unfortunately, even many of today's digital camcorders leave a lot to be desired.
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
Flip VS Kodak Playsport
RE: Cisco shutters Flip business, takes consumer mulligan
Another good company/good product killed by mergers