Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Facebook: What happens to active users when jobs come back?

By | February 8, 2012, 2:18am PST

Summary: There may be an inverse relationship between jobs and Facebook growth. In other words, more jobs may mean less Facebook time.

Are Facebook fortunes tied to whether Americans are working? That question is worth asking given and improved jobs picture and mixed signals about what constitutes an active user on the social network.

Last week, the Labor Department reported that 243,000 Americans were added to the payrolls in January. That sum was about 100,000 more than expected. Facebook’s initial public offering documents landed a few days earlier than the jobs report and cited 845 million monthly active users. Do these figures have something to do with each other? Possibly.

Barron’s Randall Forsyth made the case over the weekend:

It can’t be a coincidence that its roster of users swelled to over 800 million worldwide during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, as joblessness swelled and with it, free time to spend on Facebook. And in the U.S., jobs are growing in manufacturing and construction, where few people sit in front of PCs, while shrinking in information, finance and government, where most everybody does.

So, as Facebook users go back to work, they will have less time to update their pages and peer at those of others. And fewer office jobs also means less time goofing off at work looking at Facebook (which is broken up by watching videos on You Tube.) And folks who are employed and have a few bucks in their pockets might actually get out and have what used to be called a social life, as opposed to social networking.

Simplistic argument? Perhaps. But I’d argue that Forsyth’s quips about Facebook may have some truth in them. We already know that LinkedIn is countercyclical. The professional networking site gains in a downturn as folks look for jobs. Is Facebook any different?

We all know someone who may be unemployed and spending an inordinate amount of time on Facebook when they probably should be on LinkedIn. Free time in many cases means more Facebook.

More Facebook IPO articles:

CNET:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

22
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Furthermore...
adornoe@... 9th Feb
The number of unemployed has gone up tremendously each month that Obama has been in office.

The BLS numbers are purposely excluding the entire picture regarding the unemployment issue.

In the last 2 months, the number of unemployed has actually gone up more than 1.2 million, and the BLS drop of .2% is nothing by a "Big Lying Statistic".

When the number of people dropping out of the workforce is a lot higher than the number of people finding "new" jobs, then the "real" number of unemployed is going higher.

If the number of people actively in the workforce has dropped about 5 million in the last 3 years, and the number of people who found work is around 2 million, that leaves over 3 million who can't find work and have dropped from the employed ranks.

So, the article above is silly and using stupid statistics, and the conclusions about Facebook are even more careless.

If the correlation about Facebook's number of users and the unemployed were to be correct, then the number of Facebook's users should have shot up in the last 2 months, because, more people actually became unemployed than found employment.

In the last 3 years, the percentage of people in the workforce that were employed dropped from about 67% to about 63%, which means somewhere between 5 and 7 million people have been dropped from the BLS statistics, and those millions who are not being counted are not even considered in the 8.4% unemployed.

So, phony figures are being used in any other calculations that use the BLS figures, and the silly Facebook conclusion in the article above, is one of the most careless and clueless that one can come up with.
Is it April 1st and the date time is off on my cell/computer? This is a joke of a blog post right?
I think your argument may have some merit however don't assume that the additional 243,000 back to work are all FB users and that this would have a significant impact on the activity of the world-wide 800million+ users.
I have always said that the only people I know that are active FB users are those who do not work full time jobs. In my case it's mostly kids and stay at home parents who spam all of us with incessant updates. To me FB is more like a video game than anything useful.
0 Votes
+ -
It's an interesting proposition
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 8th Feb
Those not employed have a disproportionate amount free time to while away on the Internet.

Working does have a tendency to curb such activity.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate -

You know what they say,

"work sets you free".

Actually, the phase is "the truth will set you free" but I wonder who changed it, and why...
time on facebook instead of looking for a job aren't going to stop being out of work any time soon.
@baggins_z
good one
Especially true if many of the newly employed work in offices like mine--the federal government--where Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other social media sites are blocked.
Simple. The popularity of iPads with cell Internet were caused by Sarbanes-Oxley, and the spying that companies had to do (then embraced, because, well that's what company security does!). Once people are back to work, they'll use their new iPads to Facebook while at work, and the boss can't spy on them!
People are human. Some 40% of network traffic at work is Pandora, FB and Netflix. Go figure. Of course there aren't a lot of water coolers anymore too.
Nothing, Steve Jobs will never come back, Thank God.
@mikroland2.0
The traditional waiting period is 3 days, but never say never.
0 Votes
+ -
Facebook will decline slightly
Michael Alan Goff 8th Feb
But people using mobile devices will Facebook from work whenever possible.
Slow news day, huh?
0 Votes
+ -
Is this article serious?
Jow_Blow 8th Feb
#1. The numbers from the BLS were cooked. #2. Any significant number of jobs won't be coming back. #3. Facebooking seems to be a past time for the actively employed, regardless.
Under the current administration why makes you think that jobs will come back? He is purposely hurting our economy. And don't come back with it's Bush's fault because he had 2 years where he had control of the House and Senate and still nothing was accomplished. Facebookers should just keep soaking up the 0s and 1s because it will be your only pastime for awhile!
I know Steve was gifted, but I don't think he is lazarus.
Agree with the main idea of the article but don't expect it to change anytime soon. Expect "Facebook fatigue" to play a part also.
FB has an international reach. Over 10% of users are from the US. The world population is currently 7 billion with a growth rate of 1%. That means an addition of 70 million individuals every year. Isn't this factor much more significant than job growth in the US.
I have also noticed a correlation between my height and the number of Facebook users for the past few years. Base on my hypothesis, I don't expect to stop growing taller any sooner. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Furthermore...
adornoe@... 9th Feb
The number of unemployed has gone up tremendously each month that Obama has been in office.

The BLS numbers are purposely excluding the entire picture regarding the unemployment issue.

In the last 2 months, the number of unemployed has actually gone up more than 1.2 million, and the BLS drop of .2% is nothing by a "Big Lying Statistic".

When the number of people dropping out of the workforce is a lot higher than the number of people finding "new" jobs, then the "real" number of unemployed is going higher.

If the number of people actively in the workforce has dropped about 5 million in the last 3 years, and the number of people who found work is around 2 million, that leaves over 3 million who can't find work and have dropped from the employed ranks.

So, the article above is silly and using stupid statistics, and the conclusions about Facebook are even more careless.

If the correlation about Facebook's number of users and the unemployed were to be correct, then the number of Facebook's users should have shot up in the last 2 months, because, more people actually became unemployed than found employment.

In the last 3 years, the percentage of people in the workforce that were employed dropped from about 67% to about 63%, which means somewhere between 5 and 7 million people have been dropped from the BLS statistics, and those millions who are not being counted are not even considered in the 8.4% unemployed.

So, phony figures are being used in any other calculations that use the BLS figures, and the silly Facebook conclusion in the article above, is one of the most careless and clueless that one can come up with.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix