Foxconn reportedly begins pilot production of Apple TV set
Summary: Chinese news sources seem to back up earlier claims made by Foxconn chief executive that the iPhone and iPad maker was preparing the production of an Apple-branded a television set.
Foxconn, the China-based manufacturing partner of Apple, is in the "trial production stage" of producing the Cupertino company's long-awaited television set, according to China Business News.
No further details were released. It goes without saying: take this with a pinch of salt.
What makes this interesting is that it comes only a fortnight after Foxconn chief executive Terry Gou said the company was "making preparations" for the forthcoming television, which was followed by a stern denial a few days later claiming that any reports were "inaccurate".
What may sound like a backtrack is at very least a case of "he said, she said."
Local publication China Daily, who reported the original claims, said the product would be dubbed 'iTV', which has already had the Telegraph suggesting the U.K. broadcaster with the same name could sue over the trademark, despite ITV's chief executive refuting such claims. The report said the television set would include feature an aluminium body, with voice-activated assistant Siri and FaceTime video calling.
One J.P. Morgan analyst said the Cupertino-based technology giant would not release a television set until 2014. Mark Moskowitz said Apple would need a "major pull factor". He also said his firm’s research "does not indicated any looming TV-related product launch".
However, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster was confident to claim the television set would be announced this year.
Munster said Apple could unveil the slightly-differently-named 'iHub' television set as soon as December, with the product going on sale in early 2013. He estimates Apple could take more than 10 percent of the market within 1--3 years after the launch.
December is an odd time to launch a product, particularly if the launch was set for the following month in January or February.
Looking at the other major product launches, the early months of the year, usually around March--April is generally when we get our hands on the latest iPad tablet set for a summer launch. During the middle-months of the year, typically around June--July, we are presented with the next iPhone, which is due in time for the Christmas holiday season.
A launch in January 2013 would the Christmas holiday sales patch --- crucial for end-of-year sales --- but also chips into 'depressing' January where most people can barely pinch the pennies together. For a television set to cost in the region of $1,500--$2,000, according to Munster, it will likely prove to be an impossible time for a product launch.
Apple was not available for comment.
Related:
- ZDNet: Apple in TV streaming talks with Hollywood: report
- No Apple TV set until 2014, says analyst: What's next for Apple?
- CNET: Foxconn chief weighs in on Apple television
- Foxconn refutes claim it's making Apple TV sets
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
That's one heck of a hobby...
(A web search of "Apple TV Hobby" should spell out the results...)
Still not convinced this is going to happen.
Pagan jim
Apple plans to "retina" TV....
Not going to happen
That's a foolish comment
Where would the programming for such a high-def unit
Does anybody broadcast anything beyond 1080p? If the HD programming is not available to take advantage of the resolution you mentioned, then it would be overkill and foolish and easily predicted to fail.
Errrr
Here we go again...
Well.....
I wonder...
The TV has been around for decades and have progressively incorporated relevant technologies, gotten smaller in bulk while bigger in usable size. Samsung and others are implementing gesture/voice-control. You can hook up a Roku, AppleTV, XBox, PS3, Nintendo Wii, etc. and have access to apps. If Apple creates a touchscreen TV with DVR and apps built in, is that revolutionary? No. That's charging a premium for too many things that can break. Same reason people don't buy TVs with DVD/VCR/Bluray built in is the same reason an iTV or whatever is a joke.
Wrong name!
$1500-$2000 will be for the high-end users, and it will be
BTW, that Apple TV will be a super-sized iPad 3s, which already have better resolution than most TVs out now.
Programming and how one interacts with the device is where it might try to differentiate itself, but, other than that, the programming/content won't be any better than what's out there now.
even worse
The problem is that it may be true. I recall right before iPad showed up everybody was laughing at the Onion???s ???Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard??? skit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA
Apple should be smarter than that. It would be big blunder if they do.
Just think
More picture in picture support, immediate volume control instead of painfully stepping with the remote, better interfacing with internet services, Siri and FaceTime (or Skype) as mentioned, inbuilt PVR functionality, inbuilt tuning assistance, inbuilt DVD or Bluray drive, synchronised with other TVs in the house (if required), auto-sensing background volume (phone ringing, doorbell ringing, etc), low power usage, easier to clean, easier to connect to varying qualities of external speakers, wireless presentations from laptops (and mobile devices), enough pixel count to be a good computer screen, and on and on it goes. Some newer TVs are making inroads to these areas, but they are painting over the cracks rather than building a new wall.
It's called a TV but it will be a paradigm shift. It will lack features initially, because they will not be incorporated until they actually work really well, all the time. You know - "Just Work!"