Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax

By | July 2, 2010, 11:59am PDT

Summary: Google is adjusting paychecks of some of its gay employees to offset a federal benefits tax that same-sex domestic partners must pay.

Google has started footing the bill for a federal tax that gay and lesbian employees pay to have their domestic partners covered under their employee benefits. Straight employees with dependents covered under their benefits plans do not pay the tax.

It’s a nice gesture that not only puts gay and straight employees on equal footing but also creates an added perk that could either give Google a competitive edge over other companies competing for job candidates or prompt those other companies to follow suit. Google also is not the first to do this - but its size and the attention it generates could cause others to take note and react.

To make up for that tax, Google is “grossing up” the gay employee’s pay to offset the tax, with the increase retroactive back to the beginning of the year. Sure, it will cost the company a few bucks but nothing to cry over. A New York Times report explains further:

Under federal law, employer-provided health benefits for domestic partners are counted as taxable income, if the partner is not considered a dependent. The tax owed is based on the value of the partner’s coverage paid by the employer. On average, employees with domestic partners will pay about $1,069 more a year in taxes than a married employee with the same coverage, according to a 2007 report by M. V. Lee Badgett, director of the Williams Institute, a research group that studies sexual orientation policy issues.

Here’s an extra little twist: The pay raise will only apply to same-sex domestic partners because heterosexual domestic partners have the option of marrying into a union recognized by the federal government and therefore avoid the tax.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

Talkback Most Recent of 16 Talkback(s)

  • ZDNet Blogger

    Excellent news
    Nice to see a major US company doing good by its employees for once happy Plus, it's going to be an incentive to many LGBT prospective employees which frankly, many of the younger generation worry about.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    zwhittaker
    2nd Jul 2010
  • This shouldn't be necessary
    Corporations should not have to equalize an unequal situation caused by discrimination in the federal and state governments.

    All men are supposed to be created equal, according to the Declaration of Independence. We should all be treated equally in the eyes of the law, however today, modern discrimination is taking place against tax paying gay and lesbian citizens. The mere fact that benefits for a significant other of one sex is not taxable, and the other sex is taxable, is in itself discriminatory and a blatantly in violation of the Constitution..

    Bravo to Google for equalizing this hopefully temporary situation. But it really shouldn't be necessary if we just removed the illegal bias from the laws created by homophobes and the fanatical extremist Christian right lawmakers.

    Equal and civil rights belong to all. They cannot be voted away or legislated away by fallible biased people.

    The Supreme Court needs to step up here and right these wrongs-- not Google. But the effort is appreciated!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    chiarde
    2nd Jul 2010
  • Here we go again
    Pinch me in the ass, but another gay federal tax. So what's new!

    Power to all tax hating homophobes, non-homophobes and quasi-homophobes - and every endangered anti-federal cretin in between!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    klumper
    2nd Jul 2010
  • google promoting sexual immorality
    Sad times. Not surprised to see a S.F. based company like google go down this path.

    No one, including gays, really wants to 'be equal'. Thats a lark. They want special little rights, and they want to rub our noses in it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tepotaic
    2nd Jul 2010
  • People afraid of gays usually have something to hide themselves
    You can choose your sexuality, and whatever direction you want to take in life. Nobody is telling you to be either gay or straight. Why do you need to worry what other people are doing? Practice your own morals, but don't worry about others.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gjafg
    2nd Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    The only time someone should receive a tax break is if they support others. Its b.s. that any break is given to 2 people that are of a legal relationship and both working.

    I don't care if your gay or straight. Its discrimination against single people in how they are taxed.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DanLM
    2nd Jul 2010
  • Why???
    That person chose to support another person. Why should they pay less taxes when the addition of a person(s) means that they are using MORE services than single people?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    wackoae
    3rd Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    @wackoae
    My off the cuff reply is as follows. If someone is supporting another person, that is less that is required of government assistance programs.
    Care for others can be any of the following:
    . Support for children that can not support themselves.
    . Support for elderly that can not support themselves.
    . Support for spouse(don't care what type of union) that won't support themselves.
    . Support for the sick, injured, disabled, or invalids.

    *** I think if you would crunch the numbers on some of the examples I provided. It would cost the government much more then loss of taxes to support some of the support provided by individuals.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DanLM
    3rd Jul 2010
  • Would they apply the same rules to heterosexual singles?
    Everybody forgets that single people are constantly discriminated when it comes to taxes. Single people are forced to subsidize married couples and single parents with children. The fact that a person chose to get married or have a kid, should not mean that the people who don't should have to subsidize their extra expenses.

    We need a FLAT TAX, where everybody pays the same percentage (%) and ZERO deductions for anything. Everybody uses the same roads and services, so why should most of the responsibility be on the young working class??
    ZDNet Gravatar
    wackoae
    3rd Jul 2010
  • Proof that the US tax code is immoral
    This shows that the primary purpose of taxes is social engineering. You get rewarded if you do as you are told.

    Why should your taxes be determined by who you share your bed with?

    A casual read of the tax code and its assorted allowable deductions will give you a good idea of who really runs our government.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    otaddy
    3rd Jul 2010
  • Lately, taxes are to punish the successful while ...
    rewarding the lazy and unmotivated.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    wackoae
    3rd Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    That's why the day after Obama was elected, I laid off all my employees, and closed my business.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    bmobile40
    3rd Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    @wackoae

    The "successful" are punished alright! Let's give them a break for ruining the economy.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    peter02l
    11th Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    That's a new one on me. Never underestimate the stupidity of our elected representatives.

    Such a law is reprehensible and that's from someone who opposes gays in the military.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    shanedr
    5th Jul 2010
  • RE: Google adjusts payroll to offset federal same-sex benefits tax
    When i discover a website, odds are that I see the making is extremely very poor apart from the writting terrible. About your internet site,I've to say that you just have mulberry bags executed an outstanding profession appropriate right here.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812
    11th Oct

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources