ie8 fix
Click Here

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Google doubles Bing in U.S. search share

By | August 11, 2011, 1:13pm PDT

Summary: Google accounted more than half of all online searches in the U.S. last month.

Google accounted for 66.05 percent of all U.S. searches in July, according to the latest survey from research firm Experian Hitwise.

That’s more than double of what Bing produced at 28.05 percent. However, Bing shouldn’t be slighted as Bing-powered searches (which are distinguished in this report from Bing.com) it saw an increase of one percent from June as Google decreased by two percent in the search engine share.

Here were some of the other search highlights in the four-week period ending on July 30, 2011:

  • One-word searches comprised the majority of searches, amounting to 25.32 percent of all queries
  • Longer search queries (averaging five to eight words or more) increased by three percent between June and July
  • Shorter search queries (averaging one to four words) decreased one percent in the same time span
  • The remaining 73 U.S. search engines included in the Hitwise Search Engine Analysis report accounted for 5.90 percent

Another big winner, if there is one besides Google, would surprisingly be Yahoo - at least when it comes to one major part of the search survey.

Not only did the beleaguered search engine see a four percent increase in its allotment of the U.S. search engine market share, but Yahoo! Search (along with Bing) achieved the highest success rates in July 2011.

Yahoo! Search saw 81.36 percent of searches executed resulted in a visit to a website, while Bing saw 80.04 percent. Google came in third with a success rate of 68 percent, which is still an increase of one percent from the previous month. But maybe Google will get some help from some of the new search products it launched in June, including Images and Voice Search.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Why?
jk_10 12th Aug
@ThePublicEye Because her boss wouldn't be happy if she didn't. If you pay attention to this blog site for a while, you will know.
Why do the percentages in the table add up to well over 100%?
0 Votes
+ -
@mcudmore I was also puzzled for a bit. The second row (Bing-powered search) is the total of the third and fourth rows. Experian is to blame for poor presentation of the data.
@ThePublicEye If you can't figure this out in 3 seconds, you are not qualified to read this article.
0 Votes
+ -
Bizarre title for this article?
ThePublicEye 11th Aug
Why does the article title ("... doubles Bing...") makes it sound like Google Search is now rocketing ahead of Bing at an increasing pace - whereas the converse is closer to reality (even without the Yahoo deal)? I'm not picking sides; I like and use both companies' offerings. However, the lede is oddly chosen.
0 Votes
+ -
Why?
jk_10 12th Aug
@ThePublicEye Because her boss wouldn't be happy if she didn't. If you pay attention to this blog site for a while, you will know.
0 Votes
+ -
Google always had more share than Bing but that's going to end soon.
Uh, the "visit to a site" statistic is super misleading. I search google for quick translations, conversions, and definitions all the time, and the result is on the search page, rather than having to click-through to a different site.
0 Votes
+ -
It also seems to imply that yahoo gives better search results while in fact they are identical to bing. Only the ads are different.
0 Votes
+ -
@Scrabbler
Well tuh mate ohs to toe mah toes. They are both in the end tomatos and everyone is happy! happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Droid101

I use startpage dot com for privacy if I really need to use Googles crap... Otherwise I Bing and decide.
acquiring hits is worth it.

They've tried this same strategy unsuccessfully in web hosting. We can see the results in the latest netcraft survey:

Apache 66%, IIS 16%
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2011/08/05/

Those numbers look strangely familiar;-)
0 Votes
+ -
@Richard Flude

Yeah sort of like the ratio of how often you take it in the... hahahha jk rite?
0 Votes
+ -
Ah, the postings of the MS fanboys
Richard Flude Updated - 12th Aug
They have a way with words;-)
"Google decreased by two percent in the search engine share"
Why don't the article title reflect that. The author should take a lesson or two in professionalism.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix