Google goes after Windows with launch of Chrome OS

Summary: Google said late Tuesday that it will launch the Google Chrome operating system, a computer operating system that initially will target netbook computers by offering a faster, better and more secure way for users to access Web-based applications.The Chrome operating system should not be confused with the Android operating system that the company launched for mobile devices.

Google said late Tuesday that it will launch the Google Chrome operating system, a computer operating system that initially will target netbook computers by offering a faster, better and more secure way for users to access Web-based applications.

The Chrome operating system should not be confused with the Android operating system that the company launched for mobile devices. While there will be some overlap between the two systems, Android was designed to work across a number of devices, such as phones, set-top boxes and netbooks. The Chrome OS is being designed to power computers that range from small netbooks to full-size desktop machines.

The Chrome OS is a direct attack against Microsoft's lucrative - albeit vulnerable - Windows operating system. By now, it's no secret that Windows Vista was a nightmare and that Microsoft is eager to launch its Windows 7 operating system, which is scheduled for release in the fall. From the official blog post announcing Google Chrome OS:

We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear — computers need to get better. People want to get to their email instantly, without wasting time waiting for their computers to boot and browsers to start up. They want their computers to always run as fast as when they first bought them. They want their data to be accessible to them wherever they are and not have to worry about losing their computer or forgetting to back up files. Even more importantly, they don't want to spend hours configuring their computers to work with every new piece of hardware, or have to worry about constant software updates. And any time our users have a better computing experience, Google benefits as well by having happier users who are more likely to spend time on the Internet.

Google, which has long been singing the praises of cloud-based applications, is stepping up its game to bring the cloud to the mainstream. The operating system - a lightweight open source system that will run on both x86 as well ARM chips - is deigned to start up and have the user on the Web within seconds, as opposed to the long startup time on Windows. In addition, the company said that it's "going back to basics" - just as it did with the Chrome browser - to redesign the underlying security architecture "so that users don't have to worry about viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work."

For developers, the platform is the Web. All Web-based applications will automatically work on the Chrome OS and new applications can be written using any web technology, which means they will work on any standards based browser running on Windows, Mac or Linux.

Earlier in the day, Google ripped the Beta labels off of its Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Talk and Google Docs applications, presumably to make them more attractive to business customers who might have thought of them as unfinished, untested or unreliable because they still carried the Beta label.

Those apps also go directly at another of Microsoft's sweet spots, its software suite. Gmail and Google Calendar, for example, provide an alternative to Microsoft's Outlook while Google Docs is intended to challenge popular productivity tools such as Word, Excel and PowerPoint.

Later this year, the company plans to open-source its Chrome OS code and is already talking to partners about having the first round of netbooks available to consumers by the second half of 2010.

Also see: Dana Blankenhorn: Netbooks, Chrome and the future of computing

Topics: Windows, Browser, CXO, Google, Hardware, Mobility, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

179 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Poor old MS

    It was only a matter of time until Google went after the
    monopolist profits MS makes with their poor windows.
    Richard Flude
    • not so fast

      Do you think computers will suddenly move to web-only applications? Have you tried doing anything useful with Google apps? Do you think everyone wants to based his computing life on a permanent always on-line connection?

      So you are traveling by train with your laptop. We are about leave the train station, signal will fade, so harry up to access the "insert graph GUI"!

      I didn't think so either...
      patibulo
      • Indeed...

        Can't be connected all the time - not yet anyway.

        Also I had come to rely on Google Apps for some stuff, but their "upgrades" broke so much functionality that it ended up becoming useless for my purpose. So I switched back to Office 2007 (mostly word processing.) And if you dare complain, it's the usual "hey, it's free. What did you expect?"
        Mike (not Cox)
        • For the life of me I can't understand..

          ..why people still pay for MS Office when OpenOffice is every bit as good....and doesn't require you to pay hundreds of dollars. I've switched countless people to OpenOffice for this very reason and they see absolutely NO impact of difference whatsoever. Please people, if you need a good Office suite download, install and use OpenOffice....you'll never go back to paying for Microsoft Office. It's not that MS Office isn't good...it certainly is but with OpenOffice you can convert from every imaginable Office suite format as well as export your documents into PDF format.
          bcwise
          • Does Open Office come with a OneNote equivalent? Or does it come with a..

            ..Outlook equivalent? And the list goes on and on..Office is more than Word, you know.
            NeoGeneration
          • be very careful

            I tried Open Office, and it randomly corrupted some, not all, of my old word docs I tried to save to it. Maybe I did something wrong, but can't afford experimenting.

            Free is seldom free.
            steeliejim
          • Yes please do be careful....

            I had the exact opposite happen. I made a document in OpenOffice and saved it in office format and it worked fine everywhere...Google Docs other online doc parsing sites etc. I then opened it in Microsoft Office and made one simple change. From then on the document had problems being uploaded to Google Docs and other sites and editors didn't want to open it. I ended up having to do it all again from scratch.

            Software is seldom worth what you pay for it.
            storm14k
          • "Software is seldom worth what you pay for it"

            That means that all of google's [b]free[/b] apps are worth nothing? Or maybe, less than nothing?

            corlandogcrta.org
          • OO vs MS Office vs Linux vs Vista vs Photoshop vs GIMP

            if you had started out on OO, you'd be making this same claim about MS office. Its like listening to people complain about Photoshop vs GIMP. The learning curve is tough on all these apps. If you have spent alot of time on this one or that one, its easy to understand your frustration dealing with another. That does not mean it(the other whatever app)is bad. Just means (as you mentioned)you don't know the app well. OOOOh scary! Just using one company forever is scary.
            Prime Waverider
          • Question is....

            ..how may people use OneNote. I have rarely run into anyone using it. Thats not to say its not used but that there are many people not using it that could use OpenOffice. For many people Office is simply Word and Excel.

            What does Outlook have to do with Office? The fact that they are packaged together? If you're on Windows you have Outlook express and if you're on Linux you have Evolution. They just aren't packaged with the office tools.

            I'm sure the list CAN go on and on....deeper into stuff that the majority of people don't use but people love to drum up as some excuse as to why OpenOffice won't suffice. Open Office has become very useful around my place of employment.
            storm14k
          • The Question is.....

            You have very little idea of what you are talking about? I suspect you are a pontificate and an assumer? Of course people use One Note it is a unique piece of software and absolutely worth training all your staff in its use. Please before you make comment next time learn what software is about. Incidentally to an advanced Excel user Open Office has its limitations. I do agree that for Offices that do not do a lot it can be sufficient in its own way.
            Richard Turpin
          • There is

            but it wasn't bundled with openoffice. It is called thunderbird, it is free as a bird.
            adelacuesta
          • But why use Thunderbird when Outlook is much better?

            But why use Thunderbird when Outlook is much better?

            Outlook is no masterpiece by any means but it's still better than Thunderbird.

            Moreover Thunderbird's functionality is severely limited (especially its interoperability), also its development seems to proceed so slowly, that by comparison, a snail looks like a contender for the Indy 500.

            Give it 50 years to catch up, if ever.
            Irritated_User
          • @Irritated_User

            You made a claim and didn't back it up.

            You made the claim that Thunderbird is lacking in features. Which features would those be?

            You made the claim that Outlook is better. Please explain why.

            Without giving reasons, all you're doing is proving yourself a fool.
            tmsbrdrs
          • Stating the obvious

            "Office is more than Word, you know."

            Really now. I'm sure that even the most computer illiterate Office user realizes that MS Office is an office suite of applications.....as is OpenOffice.

            Outlook equivalent? Actually there are several full featued mail clients such as Evolution (which works as a Microsoft Exchange Client just like Outlook) and Thunderbird (which is more of a Outlook Express replacement...but much better than Outlook Express). As far as OneNote, if memory serves me correctly it does not come with Office...it has to be purchased separately unless that changed with Office 2007. In any event, I don't know a single person that uses OneNote....even I rarely used it when I had my tablet pc for 2 years.
            bcwise
          • RE: Does Open Office come with a OneNote equivalent? Or does it come with a

            No OpenOffice doesn't, but there are other programs that are equivalent to OneNote & Outlook, so no I don't think most people need to purchase MS Office.
            mrdt
          • Re: Open Office and OneNote

            Try Evernote--I like it a lot, especially if you don't spent all your time in MSFT world. If you use MS Office a lot, then OneNote integrates with it well.
            Tom in Raleigh
          • Does MS Office come with ...

            a pdf button that instantly converts the document to a form that can be read on any platform? Does MS PowerPoint come with a button that turns it into a flash presentation? Does exel come with a pdf button that allows you to do a single button pdf conversion? And most importantly, does Microsoft have a way that you can continue to get updated software versions legally without shelling out hundreds of dollars every few years?

            It's true. OpenOffice.org is not Microsoft Office. But I've never lost a document with OpenOffice.

            And the price tag means that I don't have to wory about shelling out $500+ for something I can download for free and then decide if I want to make a financial contribution.

            If you are happy with MS Office and it's price, I suggest that you continue using it. The rest of us will save our money for something more important.
            williamacole@...
          • Nope...

            OpenOffice has this bad habit of leaving "dormant" processes running after closing applications (mostly the word processor in my case) - and eventually they eat up all the CPU, slowing down the PC to a crawl. I know a good number of people having the same problem. I've reproduced it under XP and Vista, but have no idea what exactly triggers it (sometimes it doesn't do this.) So after using it for several years, I finally got rid of it 2-3 months ago.

            Also, Word 2007 has a pretty good grammar checker. I often have to deal with documents received from people with less than stellar grammar, and it helps for the first pass when reviewing their text prior to publication. The grammar checker available with OpenOffice (at least they finally have one) is severely deficient in comparison.

            I'll stick with what works for me, thanks. That's why we have choices, right?
            Mike (not Cox)
          • Interesting...

            Personally, I've NEVER experienced what you explain and I've been using OpenOffice since 2005. Actually, I find it to be MUCH more stable than MS Office. I can't think of a single instance when I've had problems with OpenOffice and I use it on a daily basis to convert Work and Excel documents and to create legal documents. I don't use the database much nor presentations application so I can't talk to those apps but I use the spreadsheet and document apps every single day without issue. I especially love being able to output my documents to pdf format without having to purchase Acrobat or some other third-party pdf creator. I even frequently use it to open/view and import Wordperfect documents which are common in the legal industry. I also have no problems with the spellchecker...though its dictionary may not be as extensive as MS Word's has become...but to me that is irrelevant...any word it does not recognize prompts me to change, ignore or add it to the dictionary which is what I do. You are correct though...we do have a choice which is why I choose OpenOffice and why I never said you had to as well. If you want to keep paying for MS Office then you are free to do so but my point is why pay for functionality you can get for no cost at well?
            bcwise