Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Google jumps into the classroom with Chromebooks

By | August 26, 2011, 12:15pm PDT

Summary: Google is going back to school via new Chromebooks as they make their way into select schools in time for the new year.

Google has proven its commitment to promoting education at every grade level, whether it be hosting an international science fair or National Geographic’s geography bee.

Here’s another way that Google is getting more involved in schools: Chromebooks.

Google boasts on its official enterprise blog the following reasons as to why Chromebooks are preferable to other computers in the classroom:

  • Decrease wait times with a faster boot-up time (as quick as eight seconds)
  • Protect against viruses with enhanced security
  • Regular software updates from Google, lowering maintenance and other software upgrade costs

So far, at least a handful of schools are showing interest in these features and functions. Here’s a snapshot of the three schools that Google has highlighted and how they will utilize Chromebooks for their education plans:

  • Merton Community School District, Merton, Wis. (6th grade): 110 sixth graders will each receive a Chromebook to keep and use until they finish 8th grade. The goal is to “increase critical thinking, communication, collaboration and creativity among students.” Educators also want to steer students away from using cell phones for research purposes because of network security reasons.
  • Grace Lutheran School, Oshkosh, Wis. (7th & 8th grades): 17 Chromebooks will be shared among 5th through 8th grade students. Chromebooks were seen as the economical choice, and students can use them to do peer reviews in real-time on Google Docs. Google Maps and Earth can be used for real-world math problems.
  • The Fessenden School, West Newton, Mass. (K-9): The school has bought “two carts full” of Chromebooks that teachers can reserve using Google Calendar for their lessons. Students can also students can rent a Chromebook from the school library, and the eventual goal is to entrust all students in 5th through 9th grades with their own Chromebooks.

For educators and businesses interested in Chromebooks, visit Google’s Chrome Sales page.

In another effort to promote Chromebooks, Google partnered with Virgin America once again. Those laptops are available for rent on select flights across the country.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

46
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google jumps into the classroom with Chromebooks
tmsbrdrs 29th Aug
@HypnoToad72
When I was a student, I never made anything worth selling to my own knowledge.
Pretty sure these students would have a similar experience. The students won't be losing out on "a LOT of money", they will simply be gaining another educational tool while the schools save money by lowering IT costs.
0 Votes
+ -
Heh
Hasam1991 26th Aug
TOO FUNNY, basically no one is really buying them so we have to give them away. Hey Google, I'll take one! but not for 500! iPad is much better at that price....
@Hasam1991

I think you are confusing this product with Windows Phone 7.

Chromebooks are selling well on Amazon since they have been consistently in the best sellers list, despite Google not promoting it very much to the general public and despite not being available from retail outlets where customers can try them out.

Windows Phone 7 on the other hand has been promoted with a 1/2 billion ad campaign, has been stocked heavily in retail outlets and, Microsoft has paid to promote good reviews. Basically customers don't want it and aren't buying.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Google jumps into the classroom with Chromebooks
Cylon Centurion Updated - 28th Aug
@Mah

I call BS. Chromebooks aren't exactly flying off the shelf either. There's very little market for them, and even the reviewers on Amazon are saying as such.
@Cylon Centurion
Google are not announcing sales figures yet because Chromebooks are targeting early adopters, and in particular schools and businesses only at this stage. The reason for this is that there were a lot of things still to be added to Chromebooks to make them suitable for general release. Some of these were added in the most recent update, but many things remain.

Basically Google isn't Microsoft and Chromebooks aren't Windows Phone 7. Google does things differently from Microsoft. They release early and update frequently, and end up with something which is very solid. If you look at Google Docs, they kept that on beta long after others would have declared it a stable release. Chromebooks seem to be followeing that release strategy - first Cr48, then the initial low key Chromebook release targeting early adopters who are likely top provide user feedback, then they will step up to more general marketing.
0 Votes
+ -
@Hasam1991 I have both, and they do not serve the same purpose. Right now I can get a lot more done on the iPad, but do love certain things about the Chromebook.

It's still very early in its lifecycle.
0 Votes
+ -
Decrease wait times with a faster boot-up time (as quick as eight seconds)

- Windows has that.

Protect against viruses with enhanced security

- Again, Windows 7 has the security

Regular software updates from Google, lowering maintenance and other software upgrade costs

- Microsoft issues updates once or twice a month, again Windows has that.

So, why should I pay more for less in the classroom?
@Cylon Centurion
I am not about to get a Chromebook, but I'm pretty sure there are zero Chromebook viruses.
@jdakula you get one more guess

dvdtoxoom.tk/web-os/google-chrome-os-critical-significant-vulnerabilities/
0 Votes
+ -
@jdakula

Chromebooks have also been hacked already.
@jdakula
Even if there were no viruses for the Chromebook you better bet your arse that there are plenty coming! wink
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion
You know nothing about Chromebooks dude. Windows has viruses and how many? Chromebooks have none. It's more secure than Windows and yes you don't have to restart your computer each and every time to install updates unlike Windoze
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder Havent seen a virus since XP sp2, and reboots for updates are rare too. And when I do have to reboot, Win7 boots quite fast...

Sorry, but you M$ haters have to update your rhetoric.
0 Votes
+ -
Bang! -10!
Cylon Centurion 27th Aug
@shellcodes_coder

"Windoze"? Sorry, you loose! grin
0 Votes
+ -
@shellcodes_coder
Windows 7 boots fast lol, that's the biggest joke. Lion and Snow Leopard boots much faster than Windows 7. Just google for Snow Leopard vs Windows 7 reviews where Snow Leopard beats Windows 7 in all the reviews...
0 Votes
+ -
chuckle
rhonin 27th Aug
@shellcodes_coder
Who cares.
In most cases my Win7 laptop is in sleep and comes on in seconds. So what.
GO back to your lame little world and try to stay on topic.

As a note, my son's school put in a comp lab using chrome notebooks. They have better control, quick access and dependent on the school server/wifi.
Looks like less overhead and maintenance for the IT staff.

Not bad.

btw: mine is not bad but has been predominately replaced with a tablet. grin
@shellcodes_coder - security via obscurity. Just like Macs. Nothing is impenetrable, and phishing is often more effective than looking for holes in code to begin with.
@shellcodes_coder
You obviously haven't used Windows in many years, probably XP or older. I own a Mac and a number of Windows machines. My primary Windows machine has only been rebooted a few times by Windows Update in several years of 24/7 operation. My Mac reboots every time it updates. Also, I haven't had a single virus or blue screen of death on Windows since the days of Windows Millennium. In contrast, my Mac has actually crashed to "black screen of death" half a dozen times in the past 12 months. Kernel panics are the dirty secret of Mac owners. I've also had a bunch of "infinite twirling beach balls of doom." It's entirely possible that it's because I don't know nearly as much about running OS X as I do Windows. Or more likely it is old equipment drivers for my keyboard, mouse, or midi devices. The point is, any system can be compromised and the user is the weakest link. Windows now does as much or more to protect users from themselves as any OS out there. Maybe you should use a version from this century before commenting.

One final note. Just because a virus exists, doesn't mean it actually infects anyone. It also doesn't mean it has infected anyone using a version of Windows from this century. Sadly, a lot of folks are still using archeologically ancient versions of Windows out there and then complaining when they click on a bouncing bunny video that takes control of their computer.
@shellcodes_coder
Windows has gotten better at restarting, not perfect but better.
@otaddy
Lucky you. I've had to remove viruses from quite a few machines running Vista and yes, even W7. It's part of why I'm still running Ubuntu.
When you see most Linux users ridicule Windows, it's from experience. Thing is, Linux users are the 'once bitten, twice shy' kind of people. We stop our windows using as soon as we possibly can and go back to our own much more stable and free-er world
@whoever reported my message as spam.

perhaps you could explain what exactly was spam about my replies? Or were you simply acting like an ignorant fool who couldn't make his own argument?
@Cylon Centurion
- Windows takes a minute + to boot compared with Chromebooks which do it in 6 seconds now after the latest update.
- Windows takes about 8s+ to sleep and 8s+ to resume.
Chromebooks do this instantly.
- Windows 7 is insecure 100,000 viruses and counting. Worm attacks and spam trojans are frequent in Windows - about 80% of the worlds spam was found to come from infected Windows PCs whose owners were blissfully unaware.
Unlike Windows Chromebooks themselves are pretty well immune from viruses because they don't allow installation of applications. Like Windows, they are vulnerable to privacy circumvention by malware posing as browser extensions which the user CHOOSES to install. If the user chooses not to install extensions or only to install extensions from reputable sources, then this vulnerability disappears.

- Chromebooks are zero maintenance devices. All updates to the device happen automatically, and all updates to apps happen in the cloud server. Unlike Windows, or other fat client OSes, hardware updates are not required in Chromebooks because dealing with application bloat is dealt with by the cloud application provider upgrading his server farm rather than by the end user. The only thing that runs on a Chromebook is a browser, which does not change a great deal in size (confirmed if you go on past history of browser download size). This is only possible without breaking applications on a thin client OS like Chrome OS, where no third party applications or drivers are allowed to be installed on the device.

On Windows on the other hand although a few security updates can be done automatically, you will need to manually: download and update service packs, applications, drivers and driver updates, find missing dlls, install OS options from the install DVD that weren't installed initially, troubleshoot device drivers, defrag the hard drive, and occasionally reinstall the OS from DVD when it becomes corrupted or unstable (note: Chromebooks check for a corrupted OS automatically every time you boot up, and automatically installs a clean OS image from Google HQ if this is detected) etc. etc. and you have to learn how to do this or pay someone else to do it for you. Basically Chromebooks are zero maintenance devices as far as the end user is concerned, while Windows PCs are very maintenance intensive devices and the maintenance burden for the Windows desktop falls on the end user.

You are probably a computer hobbyist, so you probably don't realise this, but the form of license subscription that most schools and businesses pay for OS software to be kept continuously updated require a (fairly expensive) subscription to be paid to Microsoft, and anti-virus software also require subscriptions for non-personal use.

- Why should you pay more for less indeed.
With Chromebooks, you do get more for less - more time to use your computer for work, learning or leisure, for less time spent on configuring, maintaining and updating your PC, and learning how to do this.

If you want to talk about pure monetary value, then you still get much more for much less with Chromebooks. If you are a cash strapped computer hobbyist who finds it difficult to cough up the initial extra $100 or so for a Chromebook over a Windows 7 netbook, then a Windows 7 netbook may be the right choice for you. As a hobbyist, you will put up with the painfull slowness that comes from trying to cram a fat OS like Windows 7 onto underspecified hardware for the purpose, and put up with the low build quality of the hardware. You may also be willing to put up with the cramped keyboard and low screen resolution, and do the configuration, maintenance and upgrades yourself for free and learn how to do this in your own time. On the other hand, if you are a school or business, you have to pay somebody to do all that. Computer hardware is very cheap, but unfortunately IT labour costs are not, and for the $100 you saved by opting for a Windows 7 netbook, you will have to pay at least ten times that amount per year ($1000) for provisioning, and maintaining a Windows PC. From a practical point of view, the robustness of Chromebooks in terms of being tamperproof is also a huge plus in a typical school. In schools using Windows desktops - particularly without tight centrally managed server based lockdown, typically 20% of the desktops are inoperable at any time, and most of the remainder have been tampered with and are dysfunctional to some degree.

Chromebooks are a huge plus for schools moneywise, timewise and in terms of productivity. Course management software like Moodle or Blackboard are web based and can be outsourced to cloud located servers. If Windows applications are required for certain courses, then that can be provided on Chromebooks via Citrix Receiver running virtualized on a server for easier management and lockdown. You can also outsource virtual Windows desktops - eg. http://www.nextdesktop.com/cloud-desktop-how-it-works.html.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mah
agree with you. Windows is just not worth comparing to OS X and Linux
0 Votes
+ -
So what
rhonin 27th Aug
@Mah
See my comment to shellcoder above.
You folks really have attention span and "stay on topic" issues.

Perceived Win7 issues - who cares.
Topic is Chromebooks.

wow shocked
0 Votes
+ -
@Mah

Dude, you're stuck in the 90's

"On Windows on the other hand although a few security updates can be done automatically, you will need to manually: download and update service packs, applications, drivers and driver updates..."

Stop right there. Windows when on a home network, can *does* download and install automatically. No user action required. On Windows 7, this is the default. However, when Windows is on a corporate or education network, updates are better off pushed out by system admins. This can be automated as well, and is done en masse.

"find missing dlls..."

Uh, what? Missing DLLs? I haven't come across missing DLLs since the Windows 9x days.

"install OS options from the install DVD that weren't installed initially..."

See above, again this can be automated, and is usually done via the network.

"defrag the hard drive"

Hard drive defragmentation is an automatic process in both Vista and Windows 7 (By default). Again, no user interaction is required anymore for this.

"and occasionally reinstall the OS from DVD when it becomes corrupted or unstable..."

Windows can be installed and also backed up to the network. A smart system admin will have a system image handy that can be applied to each machine without hassle should something go wrong. Also, the machine can be set up to default back to a predetermined state each time the machine is rebooted or shuts down. Smart education admins will make sure that their "public" systems are set up this way. The only reason Windows 7 will become corrupt or unstable is from bad hardware. Should that happen, and the hardware is easily replaceable, all you would need to do after that is redeploy the system image to the machine. A completely automated process.


"Windows 7 is insecure 100,000 viruses and counting. Worm attacks and spam trojans are frequent in Windows - about 80% of the worlds spam was found to come from infected Windows PCs whose owners were blissfully unaware.
Unlike Windows Chromebooks themselves are pretty well immune from viruses because they don't allow installation of applications."

Windows 7 isn't as "insecure" as you think. Again, time to get with the times. By default Windows 7 is set up in a way that makes it damn hard for your ordinary "viruses" malware to infect the system. And if you have your systems set up as I described above, any malware lingering won't be around for long to do any damage. Same with the Chromebook, a simple restart and the malware is gone. As for installing applications, again Windows 7 can be prevented from doing so. Give the user a default account and they will be unable to install anything without admin credentials. Also having a client/server setup can further lock down the machine.
@rhonin

I am staying on topic. This was a reply to Cylon Centurion who was comparing his beloved Windows OS with the new Chromebooks with some completely bogus stuff on boot time, updates, more for less etc. and if you take the trouble to read, my response is a point for point rebuttal.
@Mah - so do Macs, but Apple doesn't take a royalty-free copy of everything you work so hard to do in the first place.

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71841&messageID=1388017&tag=content;col1

Nothing is zero-maintenance. Cleaning a browser cache is maintenance. Now, you might be trusting in Google, but the one link I posted is good enough reason to say why they can't be trusted. It's all about their profit and making it good for suckers, I mean customers, to use.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion Your assertions are easily proven false, and some are what people would easily call a red herring.

Overall, the Chromebooks provide a number of huge advantages over Windows or even Linux. It has inherently better security than Windows, the startup time is better than any Windows computer, and there is nearly no ability for the user to damage the OS. The battery life and hardware quality compare favorably to much more expensive machines running Windows (or any other standard OS).
0 Votes
+ -
Google is a parasite, they have made some ad money and pushing useless products and webservices to consumers. The one and only reason for google existance is because there are so many idoits out there who can't read the writings on the wall.
@owlnet

+1
@owlnet
Really? I though Google's existance was because people needed a better way to search the web. Also, if their products were useless nobody would use them thus depriving them of ad money.
0 Votes
+ -
@anono Nothing wrong with that. I dont love or hate google but most of what they put out is half baked, in perpetual beta and then eventually killed off.

Their chrome browser and perhaps gmail are the only exceptions, but again the money comes from the ads.
@owlnet

Us "idoits" using using Chrome browser tend to get the spelling right with its inbuilt checker. (has IE got one yet ?)

Google is one of the most innovative, forward thinking, companies on
the planet.

There are many novel concepts with the Chromebook that should appeal to those with unbiased eyes and an open mind.
0 Votes
+ -
@Chipesh

If by "innovative" you mean, stealing your WiFi data, violating your privacy (http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-20016451-265.html), violating your privacy some more (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Buzz#Privacy), violates your privacy yet again by crawling your e-mails, and knowingly engaging in illegal activities (http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20098130-245/report-justice-dept-says-page-knew-about-rogue-drug-ads/). If that's what you call innovative, then yes, Google is the most innovative tech company around. grin
0 Votes
+ -
@Chipesh

I get my spelling correct because I care and don't leave it to the computer to check and adjust it (apart from docs that is). In fact, I hate it when I make a post with a spelling error and it makes me more carefull next time. Maybe that is why kids are starting to fail in comprehension and spelling?
0 Votes
+ -
Innovation
Chipesh Updated - 27th Aug
@Cylon Centurion

Even if you believe that Google intrudes your privacy, what an earth has that to do with innovation?

"introduction of something new, in customs, rites, commercial products"

Being optimised as an Internet device and security features like verified boot it certainly is different and new.

Your slavish support for Microsoft is apparent.
0 Votes
+ -
@Chipesh

Google doesn't "innovate" they're a "me too" company that buys their services or steals them.

Android? An iOS wannabe, bought in 2005.
Apps? An Office wannabe, that could hardly be called "innovative".
Chrome? Features nothing new over Firefox or IE, and even 3 years after being released, is still missing many.
Earth? Bought.


Need I say more?
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion

"Me too" Microsoft

CP/M = MSDOS

Apple's Macintosh = Windows

Google = Bing

Playstaion= Xbox

Netscape = Internet Explorer

Wordperfect = Word

Streetview= Streetside

Google Earth = Virtual earth

MP3 = WMA

Need I go on ?

You really haven't got a clue, have you ?
0 Votes
+ -
@Chipesh

So, you're defending your statement that Google is innovative by pointing out that Microsoft has "Me too" products? That only adds one more to Google's "Me too" list, as they even stole that idea from Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
@FuzzyBunnySlippers

What I'm pointing out is that you could write Microsoft's innovations on the back of a postage stamp.

They are a company that thrives by stagnating development. Their God is profit, not progress.

It truly saddens me to come on here and listen to to the Microsoft shills spout their paid for offerings.

Is there no integrity within the USA ?

Don't answer, the US patent farce tells me there isn't.
0 Votes
+ -
to the employees at Google that invested so much into this, that out of the vast quantities of businesses and schools that ths was aimed at, an insignificant amount actually purchased only a handful.

plain
@Mister Spock
You do realize that the software behind Chromebooks is just a modified version of the Chrome browser. Considering that your statement "employees at Google that invested so much into this" is rather hilarious.
0 Votes
+ -
@mah
serendipity24 28th Aug
"On Windows on the other hand although a few security updates can be done automatically, you will need to manually: download and update service packs, applications, drivers and driver updates, find missing dlls, install OS options from the install DVD that weren't installed initially, troubleshoot device drivers, defrag the hard drive, and occasionally reinstall the OS from DVD when it becomes corrupted or unstable "

Man, when did you last use Windows? Was it Windows 95?!!
I'm writing this on a PC running Vista Ultimate that I built myself. It originally ran XP but I swapped over to Vista 3 years a go and its been rock solid ever since and all the MS updates since then have been applied automatically via Windows Update.
@serendipity24
They've expanded to other software made by themselves. If you run anything not included in that very tiny list of software, you still have to update it outside of the windows update utility.
0 Votes
+ -
Reasons:

1. A netbook for what students need costs $200 and isn't a lease

2. http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71841&messageID=1388017&tag=content;col1 says it all. Google will take a copy of anything made by the student and will use it for THEIR ability to profit. The student could be losing out on a LOT of money.

But, that's what people want. Don't expect me to interfere.
@HypnoToad72
When I was a student, I never made anything worth selling to my own knowledge.
Pretty sure these students would have a similar experience. The students won't be losing out on "a LOT of money", they will simply be gaining another educational tool while the schools save money by lowering IT costs.
If you are considering Chromebooks for your institution but still need access to Windows apps, you should look at Ericom AccessNow, a pure HTML5 RDP client that enables students and staff to connect to any RDP host, including Terminal Server (RDS Session Host), physical desktops or VDI virtual desktops ? and run their applications and desktops in a browser.

Running entirely within a browser, AccessNow works natively with Chrome, Safari, Internet Explorer (with Chrome Frame plug-in), Firefox and any other browser with HTML5 and WebSockets support. Ericom?s AccessNow does not require Java, Flash, Silverlight, ActiveX, or any other underlying technology to be installed on end-user devices.

Ericom is offering special pricing for education customers.

For more information on Ericom's AccessNow solution for education, please visit:
http://www.ericom.com/pr/pr_110609.asp?URL_ID=708

To download the eval, visit:
http://www.ericom.com/html5_rdp_client.asp?URL_ID=708
0 Votes
+ -
and it's doomed to be just as huge a failure as webOS and the TouchPad, except that, Google will drag it out as much as they can, in the hope that, there will be enough dummies out there to make the useless devices worthwhile.

If Google wants to create a user base that makes it worthwhile supporting, then they'll have to give it away for free (not just in schools), or they need to price it at a level that reflects its real usefulness, and that's somewhere between $99 and $150. Anything higher and it's doomed.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix