Google to launch browser to battle IE; Is Firefox a target or tag-team partner?

Summary: Updated: Google will launch a Web browser called Chrome that will take on Microsoft's Internet Explorer and apparently Mozilla's Firefox, which the search giant essentially funds.In an odd leak, Google sent Google Blogoscoped a comic book outlining the technology in its Chrome browser.

Updated: Google will launch a Web browser called Chrome that will take on Microsoft's chrome.jpgInternet Explorer and apparently Mozilla's Firefox, which the search giant essentially funds.

In an odd leak, Google sent Google Blogoscoped a comic book outlining the technology in its Chrome browser. The leak was confirmed by Kara Swisher and the Wall Street Journal (see the full comic book via Swisher). Philipp Lenssen outlines the following technical details (Techmeme):

  • Google's browser will be open source;
  • Chrome will include a JavaScript Virtual Machine built from scratch;
  • Tabs will be moved around;
  • The browser has an address bar with auto-completion.
  • There's a privacy feature like IE has;
  • And Google aims to be proactive about fighting phishing and malware attacks.

Update: Google confirmed that Chrome will launch on Tuesday in a beta that will cover 100 countries. Google said on its blog:

All of us at Google spend much of our time working inside a browser. We search, chat, email and collaborate in a browser. And in our spare time, we shop, bank, read news and keep in touch with friends -- all using a browser. Because we spend so much time online, we began seriously thinking about what kind of browser could exist if we started from scratch and built on the best elements out there. We realized that the web had evolved from mainly simple text pages to rich, interactive applications and that we needed to completely rethink the browser. What we really needed was not just a browser, but also a modern platform for web pages and applications, and that's what we set out to build.

On the surface, we designed a browser window that is streamlined and simple. To most people, it isn't the browser that matters. It's only a tool to run the important stuff -- the pages, sites and applications that make up the web. Like the classic Google homepage, Google Chrome is clean and fast. It gets out of your way and gets you where you want to go.

So what does all of this mean and why is Google aiming to target a crowded browser market?

For starters, Google obviously thinks that it can grab share quickly and browser customers are valuable. Just look at the folks still using Netscape--some customers are lifers. If you buy the argument that the browser will ultimately serve as an operating system--or at least be the vehicle to tap into the OS--Google will have to be a player. Double bonus for Google if it connects Chrome, Desktop and Android.

Also see: IE 8 Beta 2 ready for download

Internet Explorer 8 gets a massive makeover

Meanwhile, it's really unclear what Google's move means for Mozilla. Google has reupped with Mozilla to occupy Firefox's search box through 2011. And Google practically bankrolls Mozilla and that won't change--for now. Now Google could be construed as going hostile. The reality may be different, however. Google may want to launch Chrome to see how much share it can grab in the browser market. Perhaps Google views Chrome and Firefox as a nice IE tag team combination.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes notes:

What this means is that when Google does release this new browser then it has the potential to have quite a sudden and dramatic effect on the other players. But who’s likely to be the main casualty of Google Chrome? Right now it’s probably too early to put bets down, but my guess would be that Google’s primary target will be Internet Explorer. After all, that’s the browser with the largest market share and it’s also the browser that’s likely to look the worst when compared to Chrome (IE is slow, cumbersome, shaky, poor at following standards and perceived by many to be a security vulnerability). When it comes to ranking the browsers, apart from “it comes pre-installed on your system,” IE has little else going for it.

Firefox currently has 19 percent market share according to Janco Partners and IE's market share has fallen to 58.5 percent. Meanwhile, Google Desktop has a 4 percent share.

Google's browser playbook could look something like this:

  • Google and Mozilla can grab collectively grab share from IE;
  • If Google is unsuccessful it will at least have a business unit to acquire Mozilla Corp.;
  • The Mozilla and Chrome code bases could ultimately merge;
  • The more browsers targeting IE is a win for Google.

In other words, Google is launching a browser, but the plan is open ended. The only thing that is certain is that Google wants IE's market share to fall further. If Google's browser grabs 10 percent market share in a year it's likely to take it from IE, which is finishing up its latest effort (right). And if Google's Chrome isn't a hit it could be a vehicle to acquire Mozilla. The Journal called Google's browser play risky, but that's debatable. Why not toss a browser out there and see what happens?

Update 2: After giving this Google browser move some thought I reckon that Opera is in for a world of hurt. The browsers on my desktop are getting crowded and after IE, Firefox and Google there won't be room for Opera, which is already a stretch as the third browser download for me. Another casualty: Safari for Windows. Safari will likely be fine for the Mac, but Google's Chrome will be a threat there too.

Topics: Browser, Google, Microsoft

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

105 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Internet Explorer and Standards

    I really hope the product is a success and is just as standards compliant as Opera.

    What would be ideal is that Internet Explorer becomes a minority. I would gladly give up writing IE hacks for CSS.

    In fact, I would probably post a warning that Internet Explorer is not standards compliant and offer a list of various standards compliant browsers.

    Being a pragmatist I would also include IE8, if it really is standards compliant.
    Bozzer
    • You don't need hacks for IE

      Umm, if you're still using hacks, you're far behind in the web development world. We threw those away and replaced them with more elegant methods a long time ago.

      These days, I basically have one long style sheet for IE6, *maybe* a short one for IE7, and one based on standards and that's about all I really need. I use conditional comments, and that's about as hackish as I get.

      IE7 is much better at standards compliance - not perfect, but it's close enough to standards that you don't need a lot of adjustments for it.

      Some web developers have been touting a new "capability sniffing" thing, but it can't detect all of the bugs and can't work when JavaScript is off.
      CobraA1
      • Yeah, but thanks to I.E. you have to design your website not once...

        Yeah, but thanks to I.E. you have to design your website not
        once, but three times. So to support the leading browser and
        all its quirks, Microsoft makes you work three times harder
        olePigeon
        • People just won't let go of IE6 :(

          Problem is, people just won't let go of IE6, which is the worst of the popular browsers. It would be so much easier if I didn't have to support it. I'd gladly drop support for it if so many people weren't still using it.

          I can deal with the issues with IE7 and the occasional difference with other browsers, but supporting IE6 is indeed practically a rewrite of the website :(.
          CobraA1
          • Not if you are using CSS..

            Use a little JS or server side code to determine browser, point to browser specific css, its done.

            The majority of things work.. my biggest issue with IE6 is lack of PNG support.. honestly though, thats about it.. I can get around the rest pretty easily. Much easier than I can the DIV complexity in FF.
            reclaim25
          • Well, I try not to rely on JavaScript.

            Well, I don't always assume JavaScript is going to be enabled, so I try not to rely on it. Unless it's an AJAX application, I usually assume that most people will have HTML and CSS.

            There are some tricks to force IE6 to use transparent PNGs, but yeah it's a pain.
            CobraA1
          • Why let go? It works...

            I'll drop IE6 whenever Firefox 3 stops crashing...
            Bill_SixPack
          • And a Ford Fairlane still works too, and is easier to fix. But, we still

            want modern cars. Also, the Chrome design, will limit crashes to a single tab . . . .
            DonnieBoy
          • Why not IE7 then?

            Yeah, it works, but it's hardly ideal. Both IE7 and Opera should work just as well, so why go all the way back to IE6?

            It's not as if there is a lack of browsers these days. Surely you can switch to something that doesn't make web developers pull their hair out.
            CobraA1
          • What about Google analytics?

            Right now it's only used if you go to a Google webpage, but if you're using their browser all the time, then they'll have your surfing habits piped in all the time.

            Not sure I'd like that...
            hasta la Vista, bah-bie
          • I would if I could

            When IE7 came out, Microsoft decided to only support XP. I remember the anger of users of Windows 2000 Professional who had to stay with IE6. At the time, there were still a lot of corporations using Windows 2000 Pro. It would have been easy to support both 2000 Pro and XP, but as usual, Microsoft wanted to push people to use their newer OS.

            The school I work at uses Windows 2000 Professional on all but their newer computers. We depend on donated computers and the computers have the horsepower to run 2000 Pro nicely but not XP (maybe crippled). Besides, I believe that Fresh Start (a program by Microsoft to provide a free OS for donated computers) does not support XP. Our money is tight, so we use what we have. To help modernize our browsers, we also have Firefox loaded on all our machines. I encourage students, and staff to use Firefox whenever possible. More and more do, but some are still programmed to click on the "e" for the internet.
            mystic100
      • Dev

        Easier to develop to FireFox, then retrofit to IE. IE has always fought compliance.
        Ronin69
  • Not in any hurry to use a beta browser from a new player

    Nobody wants to take exposure from a new browser in beta, from a company with no track record.

    Opera will continue to do just fine--a good product and company with a lot of 'know how' behind it.
    no_zd_user_name
    • Did you read the comic?

      I know that a comic isn't generally a technical document, but they use the comic medium to explain the technical features of the Chrome browser. Think of it as illustrated layman's terms, and actually a lot of what they're doing looks very good. I'm definately considering trying, if not switching to using it as my main browser, once it's released.
      Li1t
      • Why?

        What is your reason for wanting to switch? Give facts please.

        I have not seen the "comic" or read, seen, or heard any fact that makes Chrome anything other than just more more browser. Knowing a little about Google, I feel like they will want to give some real substance to their browser - but what is it or what is it going to be? Is being standards compliant and too new to be under heavy malware attack enough?

        May be the only real thing that makes Chrome exciting at the moment is that it is anti-Microsoft. I guess that is enough for many.

        KC4COP
        KC4COP
        • What is my reason for wanting to switch?

          Go to http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/ and read for yourself. Or would you rather someone go to the trouble of retyping it all for you?
          Galoot_z
  • RE: Google to launch browser to target IE; Is Firefox a target or tag-team

    September is going to be huge for Google with Chrome and Android on the horizon.

    http://kreuzer33.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-new-browser-coming-soon/
    Kreuzer33
  • Make it easy for addons

    I cannot imagine using a browser without a flash block addon if it's not built in already.
    LBiege
    • and the rest...

      Yep, I never leave home without FlashBlock and NoScript. I also, often, use AdBlock Plus as well...

      Having add-ons like those, plus LORI, Firebug and Developer Toolbar are pretty essential to my everyday work.

      I'm hoping that part of what they have "borrowed" from Firefox is the add-ons interface... :-S
      pico_D
  • RE: Google to launch browser to target IE; Is Firefox a target or tag-team partner?

    Use a browser from Google? Never happen! Lets see what kind of ideas Google stole for their "browser" and try to pass it off as if they created something new. You are a fool if you use this 'browser' considering all the spying Google does on you. You might as well just hand over your credit card and SSN to them directly and avoid the 20 minute download. Don't get to used to this browser because like other Google products and services this one will be cancelled in 6 months time. If there is one thing Google is good at its wasting time and money.
    Loverock Davidson