Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Google's Chrome OS for tablets: More confusion for Android army?

By | April 7, 2011, 9:27am PDT

Summary: Google’s source code indicates that the company is working on a tablet version of the Chrome OS and such a move could confuse the Android army, which has banked on Honeycomb.

Google’s source code indicates that the company is working on a tablet version of the Chrome OS and such a move could confuse the Android army.

CNET News’ Stephen Shankland dives into the code to find that the Chrome OS is including a touch interface, virtual keyboard and revamped tab page among other goodies.

As Shankland noted, the Chrome OS move isn’t all that surprising. After all, Google mocked up a tablet Chrome OS last year.

But what’s an Android tablet maker—Samsung, HTC, Motorola etc.—to make of this? Let’s ponder the options. A tablet maker today has the following tablet options:

And going forward we can add the Chrome OS to the mix.

Simply put, Google will quickly be catching up to Microsoft when it comes to multiple OS flavors.

At some point, Google will have to define its tablet OS strategy, show how the Chrome OS and Honeycomb go together (or merge) and allay concerns from partners.

The big unknown is whether consumers will notice the OS moving parts and let them influence their buying decisions. Perhaps consumers won’t care about the operating system, but Apple’s iPad has shown that the OS matters.

Add it up and the Chrome OS vs. Honeycomb adds another layer of uncertainty to the Android tablet equation. At low prices—$200 to $300—this potential fragmentation doesn’t matter. At higher price points, you want a more future proof tablet.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

78
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google's Chrome OS for tablets: More confusion for Android army?
kidneyy 9th Oct
Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thanks However I'm experiencing issue with ur rss . Don???t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss downside? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx pregnancy symptoms week by week
0 Votes
+ -
Hmmm...
Gr8Music 7th Apr 2011
Apple's strategy appears to be just the opposite...
@Gr8Music and how's that working out for Apple?
@dheady@... Based on sales pretty good...
@dheady@...

Well, there seem to be about $300 Billion reasons to say "pretty darn good".
@dheady@...
More than 16,000 apps optimised for iPad vs about 100 for Android honeycomb. Sales of 300,000 iPad2 on opening day. Millions of iPads sold world-wide. Seems to me that everything is going very well for Apple. Thankyou for asking :-)

Btw the way, how is Xoom with Android 3.0 doing? *snigger*
0 Votes
+ -
not everyone wants an ipad...
~doolittle~ 8th Apr 2011
They did get a nice head start, but some users actually want flash in their tablet browser. Chrome tablets will be a nice addition to the mix. I recall reading a headline yesterday, hmm can I find it... ah yes

"Android OS Market Share to Near 50% by 2012"
-Research projects Android to dominate the world of smartphones

I don't think I can post a link (will be deleted) but plug that into your search.

Competition is good...


cheers
@dheady@... For the moment its working out pretty well. But I dont see that happening for too long, as people are already starting to pick up cheap Android tablets, its only a matter of time until its a repeat of Androids vs iPhones.
0 Votes
+ -
Remember how it was hyped as the Web OS to retire the desktop OS? It was supposed to demonstrate the power of HTML5. It would be able to do this, that and then some, blah, blah, blah?

This thing was supposed to ship on holidays and it's nowhere to be seen while several months have gone past. What does it tell you about the viability of HTML5 as a platform when Google, the biggest H5 pumper, could not find their HTML5 butt with both hands?
0 Votes
+ -
@LBiege
the android army.
They're get it right in the future.
Just not sure what year, but the future non the less.
And, Google is doing very well with HTML5. HTML5 does not have anything to do with ChromeOS, that is built into the Chrome browser, and coming along VERY well.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow. You're totally scared of MS, DB
John Zern 8th Apr 2011
@DonnieBoy
I don't think you can make a post without dragging MS in to it, even if it's some really weird angle.

Change your diapers and go upstairs and eat dinner, your mom's calling you.
Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thanks However I'm experiencing issue with ur rss . Don???t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss downside? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx pregnancy symptoms week by week
@LBiege
After all, they even went so far as to say no flash on iOS, because HTML5 will do all the stuff that is wanted, and currently done by flash.
@shryko

Apple went out on a limb and openly opposed Adobe Flash to force movement to newer, more open standards.

Where was Google?

Bending over and lubing up for Adobe, embracing Flash as vital to it's "open" systems.
@alsobannedfromzdnet
Where was Google? Giving the consumer what they want rather than forcing crap on them. Google actually realizes that I know what I want better than they do! Yes they embraced flash. So? Flash does not hurt anything. They are pushing open standards and HTML5, but realize that a better product also has flash.
@LBiege Chrome OS isnt going anywhere. Thats a fact.
@LBiege You're right about the delays, but it really doesn't matter to me and many others. I won't ever use an OS which virtually requires constant Internet access. I want local apps which operate on local data. Sitting on an airplane for 5 hours with no access to my applications, documents, or data would drive me crazy. In this regard, Android beats Chrome hands down. I stopped caring about Chrome OS 15 minutes after playing with a test version.
@BillDem Some airplanes have internet access now. I agree with you. Google should leave all your data and applications intact on the ChromeOS computer. I think they should have a copy both there and on the web. This would give the best of both worlds. Then I would alway have access. I would only need my computer or any computer with internet.
@LBiege Lol, it took me a while to even realize what ChokemOS was. You should probably use words that make what you are talking about more clear. Seriously, you can't come up with anything better than ChokemOS?
0 Votes
+ -
Don't see the problem here
Quiet_Type 7th Apr 2011
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see a problem with Google building strong support for tablets into Chrome OS. Android was developed for the smartphone first, and Honeycomb is more or less an adaptation of that for the tablet. Eventually, Chrome may provide the sort of multi-device support that will actually reduce confusion in the long run.
0 Votes
+ -
Is this that terrible Chrome Browser?
camcost@... 7th Apr 2011
Don't know anything about Chrome OS, but if it's anything like that horrendous Chrome browser being bundled on new computers!
That things a bad joke... can't believe it's even considered.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
DonnieBoy Updated - 7th Apr 2011
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Donnieboy, Honeycomb and ChromeOS
Will Farrell Updated - 7th Apr 2011
@camcost@...
are the 1! 2! punch of - Oops sorry that should have been the 1-2 punch- LINE of the computing world.

Only you Linux Propellerheads would be interested in those. The Joke is Android tablets as everybody wants an iPad!
@willfarrell

Do you feel better after your bit of flame-bating?

iPad is a great piece of technology. I own one and thoroughly recommend it. However, unlike you, I would never be so stupid as to suggest that everyone wants one, nor would I stupidly suggest that it suits everyone's needs. There nothing wrong with people choosing different equipment to suit their differing needs.
0 Votes
+ -
well gee ptorning
Will Farrell 8th Apr 2011
@ptorning

whats wrong with doing the exact same thing you do? why is it that you fell only you can flamebait, that nobody else is allowed??
on ChromeOS, so no problem whatsoever.
0 Votes
+ -
Choices? Google hates choices
Will Farrell Updated - 7th Apr 2011
@DonnieBoy

The Europeans hate Google and want choices so what does Google do? They get themselves investigated for abusing their monopoly in search trying to stifle choice!
0 Votes
+ -
Very True, Mr. Farrell
Mister Spock 7th Apr 2011
@DonnieBoy
It appears the Europeans do not like Google so much that they would willing give away their privacy for Google to exploit.
0 Votes
+ -
But what if Apps really do matter?
danson@... 7th Apr 2011
So far, Google hasn't convinced us that you can do everything in the cloud. One of the driving forces in the tablet market, we are told, is the size of the App store. A Chrome Tablet, by not storing anything locally is a completely new mindset for a tablet (really just a window into your cloud-space), and I'm not convinced that they can sell the idea.
0 Votes
+ -
Apps do matter unfortunately...
maxohkc 7th Apr 2011
@danson@... Unfortunately APPS matter a ton and I can't see android or chrome being top dog at least for another 4 years. I keep telling myself apps don't matter, but when I had a chose between WebOS and Android I picked android only because it had more apps! I know to a lot more technical users they don't care much for apps but the average consumer I would think likes them a lot.
0 Votes
+ -
RE:Apps do matter unfortunately...
richdave 7th Apr 2011
@maxohkc
>>>I can't see android or chrome being top dog at least for another 4 years.

Given the aggregate sales figures for Android, it kinda looks like Android is top dog now, or getting very close to it.
@richdave.. market share numbers are for number of new sales and even then, when you look at ALL iOS devices.. not just phones are just tablets etc..like people like to do, iOS still has a larger marketshare than android..
0 Votes
+ -
No. Applications matter. Different to 'apps'.
peter_erskine@... 7th Apr 2011
@maxohkc People who like computers and computing are going to want a proper OS and full software potential.
@peter_erskine@...

Is that like "true multi-tasking"? Something people write when they can not express what they really want or mean?
@danson@...
Show me something that you can't do in the cloud and I'll show you something that that's inappropriate for the intended form factor.
@30otnix 2. to 100,000+ ..how about do ANYTHING without a persistent internet connection..
@danson@... When you live in Europe are in Luxembourg in the morning, Belgium in the afternoon, and in a hotel in Germany in the evening, you don't want to be connected at the horrendous roaming prices they charge, so apps on my ipad is a must... so I agree that idea is a bit nebulous at best.

But to reply to another comment ... futureproof is humbug. who will be using a 5-year old ipad? We'll be buying new ipads, and new apps when they become available, leaving the old ipads for our grandchildren to dissect.
native client, so that you can write C/C++ apps for ChromeOS as well.
The whole Android experience is turning into a nightmare for the end user and the hardware folks. Google, having little to no control over what iron is used and the ironmonger racing to the bottom and skimping on user experience in the OS means Android will stumble, fragment, and leave the user with a horrible experience. Wait, did I say soon? It's already happening.
Apple, much like Mussolini, may be a dictator but at least the trains run on time.
@dheady@... But at least the trains run where you want. Windows has the same fragmentation issue, if you will, have to support many hardware configurations. Competition is good. Maybe the tablets will run either Android or Chrome. Fundamentally Unix/linux based OS's are a better system IMO. routers, ipods, Macs, PCs, enormous servers all run it. It scales well and can be secured more easily. Windows is a joke. Every app needs admin access to install and run. Talk about a security hole. The DOS based OS is still a nightmare.
@LarsDennert Tell that to a more than a billion folks.
@LarsDennert Actually, it's OS/2 based (IBM/Microsoft).

Remember? OS/2 to Windows NT, to Windows NT 4.0, to Windows 2000, to Windows XP, to (ugh) Windows Vista, to Windows 7.

Windows 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 95, 98, and Me are DOS based.
@LarsDennert It's kind of funny hearing IOS advocates talk about apps. They now see the advantage of having alot. But, if you talk about OS X, then Windows having so many more applications is no advantage at all.
@dheady@...

I have no problem with my Android Phone. Perhaps you could elaborate on where the nightmare is? I can get apps from Google, from Verizon, or from Amazon right now. but, I really don't need more than a few apps. I am satisfied with the apps I have. How is this a nightmare? My phone is my book reader, my GPS, my PIM, my IM client, my email reader, my alarm clock, a news reader and Oh, by the way, it works well as a phone. I don't even have to be careful how I hold it.

There is one problem though, I have trouble getting it back from my grandkids. They seem to love the games.

If I wanted it to, it would also function as an MP3 player.
0 Votes
+ -
It's a nightmare!

I don't normally give Gates any credit for anything, his actual innovational output isn't worth reporting. But one part of his anatomy has proven to be very productive over the years - his mouth.

He predicted the touch screen revolution, the mobile phone revolution, and the tablet revolution before anyone else. His solution to the first was a coffee table! His solution to the second was Project Pink/Kin, and his solution to the last a series of announcements that included the tease: "...many interesting products in the pipeline." - a ridiculous, hollow refrain taken up and often repeated by his hapless successor, the Al Bundy of tech: Ballmer.

To Gates' credit is the fact he got the prediction right. We all could have done that. Not to his credit is the fact he made the prediction and then did nothing constructive about it.

But his old time rival in Cupertino was listening, and recognised yet another opportunity. He was also planning. That's something Microsoft weren't doing. And Google was still a search engine and probably years away from their IPO when Jobs started planning Apple mobile devices - again.

So it's possibly not surprising neither MS nor Google have an answer to iPad. The former started talking about it too soon, and the latter started thinking about it too late.
@Graham Ellison
I think everyone predicted that to happen. It was a matter of time for the hardware to catch up and be affordable. If he had faithe in his own prodiction you would think Microsoft would have been ahead of the game.
0 Votes
+ -
c'mon gates had no vision at all..
doctorSpoc Updated - 7th Apr 2011
@Graham Ellison.. gates was just parroting what many others had said before him..

he and many, many others didn't even recognize the iPad for what it was when he saw it.. he said he wasn't impressed and that it needed a stylus.. it's one thing to know something is coming but not be able to conceive it.. it takes a special kind of idiocy to see it and not recognize it..

Gates: "You know, I'm a big believer in touch and digital reading, but I still think that some mixture of voice, the pen, and a real keyboard--in other words, a Netbook--will be the mainstream on that,"

"So, it's not like I sit there and feel the same way I did with iPhone where I say, 'Oh my God, Microsoft didn't aim high enough.' It's a nice reader, but there's nothing on the iPad I look at and say, 'Oh, I wish Microsoft had done it.'"

15 million in sales, 95% marketshare, more tablets sold in a few months than have been sold by all tablets that came before.. Gates is in no way, shape or form a visionary.. he has not clue.. just like Ballmer has no clue..
@doctorSpoc
but they all have more of a clue then any of us here, you included.
I understand you speaking out of jealosy, and thats fine - they'll be renebered in the future for good things and you and I - we won't be remembered at all.

Sure you can sit here and claim you saw the future coming (hindsite is 20/20) but we know that's not true.

And look at Jobs, he made a PDA (Newton) that never sold, The Lisa (fiasco) AppleTV (where is it now) and OS X (6% of the market?) so I can say that he Jobs is in no way, shape or form a visionary.. he has not clue..

So I guess if you disregard all the things MS makes that people do buy to the tune of millions, and disregard all the failures that Apple lost money on, sure you'll tell yourself that Jobs is a visionary.

But in the end they sell MP3 players, cell Phones and a tablet.
happy
@doctorSpoc Did you even read my post?

I think Gates is far too much of a geek to recognise ANY real value in innovation.

He's where he is because of his birth - time, place and circumstance. The business he formed is successful due entirely to two deals and serial copying. One deal was little better than a theft, the other was based on the passivity, ignorance and total lack of vision of IBM. We don't need to revisit the MS photocopier malady.

So you're not disagreeing with me, we are actually entirely of an accord here. All I was doing was pointing out how useful Gates' mouth is, albeit in a small way, and highlight the total lack of planning by MS AND Google. And let's not forget that planning is probably one of Apple's business model's greatest strengths.

I run a business that's almost 100% Apple equipped.
@doctorSpoc

Don't forget iPads are cannibalising netbook sales, netbooks that predominantly ran Windows.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix