Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Have the mobile OS wars really been decided already?

By | November 22, 2010, 3:01am PST

Summary: A research report concludes that the mobile OS war has been decided and Apple’s iOS and Android are the big winners. In the long run will that really be the case?

Apple’s iOS and Android will be the dominant platforms for mobile operating systems and rivals can just pack it in. It’s over. Kaput. Why should competitors bother? And why would developers pick anything other than Android and iOS?

That argument comes from Stifel Nicolaus analyst Doug Reid. In a research report last week, Reid said that the mobile OS war has been decided and future growth will come from the connected home.

There are hedges here, but Reid said the following in a research note:

iOS and Android are on track to dominate mobile device markets In the near term (3-12 months), we expect the rapid pace of innovation in mobile operating systems and related ecosystem content to: (1) drive industry unit growth for smartphones at levels above investor expectations (CY11E growth of 27% y/y versus 23%-24% consensus); and (2) cause unprecedented disruption to OEM market share as consumers and business users migrate to the leading mobile OS platforms—iOS and Android. Within our coverage Apple and Motorola appear best leveraged to industry trends while Research in Motion and Nokia appear vulnerable to continued market share losses and potential earnings misses.

There aren’t many folks that would argue with that. Reid’s other argument is that the iOS vs. Android scrum will bleed over to consumer electronics is also true. Reid argues that mobile operating systems will dominate converged platforms across smartphones and PCs—and potentially consumer electronics.

But the real thing to ponder comes in Reid’s headline: Are the mobile OS wars really decided?

Consider the following:

  • Android barely existed a year ago.
  • Apple’s iPhone didn’t even appear until 2007.
  • Companies with vast resources—Microsoft and HP—will push their own mobile operating systems.
  • And incumbents like Nokia and RIM aren’t going to roll over and die.

Simply put, anything could happen. Four years ago, you’d say the mobile OS wars were decided—and Nokia was the champ. No one would say that today. How could things change? Here are a few ideas:

  • Microsoft’s persistence could make Windows Phone 7 a popular platform.
  • Fragmentation could knock Android off of its perch.
  • Nokia’s developer efforts could pay off.
  • RIM QNX platform, the successor to the BlackBerry OS, could be a game changer.

A more proper argument is that the mobile OS war has been decided—for now. In the long run, this mobile OS fragmentation will be boiled down to two or maybe three winners. Today, it looks like iOS and Android are the favorites. Two years from now that may not be the case.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

39
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Have the mobile OS wars really been decided already?
tringo007 27th Sep
Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to safeguard against hackers? I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on. Any recommendations? gout diet foods to eat
0 Votes
+ -
And then there was Meego.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate Updated - 22nd Nov 2010
It has legs. Seriously Lawrence, follow this effort closely. Its a sleeper!
0 Votes
+ -
Meego FTW
Olderdan 30th Nov 2010
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate says "Its [sic] a sleeper!"

I believe that the weight of Java will eventually slow the horse that is Android. Lack of vision and leadership will cripple WebOS. Boredom will stymie iOS (although I'm hopeful that Facetime will take off). WP7's message is simply not clear, "it's a phone to save us from phones." Huh?

So if MeeGo can get solid in the next 6 - 12 months, I'm looking forward to flashing it onto a phone, a tablet & a netbook. Whoo hoo!
0 Votes
+ -
Makes sense
itguy08 22nd Nov 2010
People want iPhones and Droids.
People don't want Microsoft and WP7 will be a dud.
Blackberry will sty the business platform.

So, yes it has been decided.
@itguy08 Nobody wants WP7? I've dropped my iPhone for an htc 7 Mozart...
@wright_is Nobody except for you and some other 39,999 clueless people. wink
@wright_is
40k on launch weekend is pathetic. I'm sure there are lots that dropped their xxx for yyy.

I dropped my iPhone 3G for a Droid X. Your point is?
@itguy08 If you want to say something, get things through your head for a while: "40k on launch weekend... ", did I tell you that, or you made it up? the original source of this kind of information came from thestreet.com, which states from some unnamed source that WP7 sold 40K on the launch Monday. 40K ~= 18% market share! I can teach you the math if you don't understand it. If that is pathetic, Android launch day was like 4K? What do you call that?
@itguy08

I've used iPhones, Blackberries and Droids. I now have a HTC Mozart. Why not try one and see what research and design can do? If you live in a Windows world, it makes sense to have a phone that synchronises seamlessly with your business and social life and has a much better UI than any current mobile phone.

But then I'm using one and liking it and you're just hoping it' s a nightmare and you'll wake up soon wink
@tonymcs@... I assume MSFT knows where to send the check?
@tonymcs@...
'it makes sense to have a phone that synchronises seamlessly with your business and social life and has a much better UI than any current mobile phone.'
Well since winpho7 won't even sync with Outlook that would make the iPhone a better choice which has no such problems.
I call fail
0 Votes
+ -
@itguy08 - look lost ball in tall weeds...get out of the parents basement dude.
Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to safeguard against hackers? I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on. Any recommendations? gout diet foods to eat
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft has lost the mobile game
gjafg Updated - 22nd Nov 2010
Microsoft will be forced to exit the phone business next year (2011).

Android and iOS now have an insurmountable lead, which Microsoft cannot catch up with. Microsoft says there are plenty of people who don't yet have a smartphone, but that is not what matters. What matters is that the competition has too much of a head start to catch up.

Windows Phone 7 is lacking apps, and missing features. Microsoft needs another 2 years to catch up, but by that time Android and iPhone will be even further ahead.

Android has already won the phone wars, with Apple's iOS in second place. Windows Phone is now doomed.
0 Votes
+ -
Yup
Economister 22nd Nov 2010
@gyepera

I think I have been saying essentially the same thing for a while now. MS does not have the advantages it did when the PC revolution started. I agree fully with Mr. Reid, including the spillover into other platforms. Once you are comfortable with a platform and its applications, AND that platform can meet all your needs (which it will in not too long), why would you even consider anything else?

Geeks and power users (myself included) will still use "old fashioned" personal computers, but most folks will not.
0 Votes
+ -
@Economister To agree with that statement is just silly. I find it humorous, in 2 years it will be same die hards saying something else.
@gyepera Are you employed? Do you have friends or a family? I seriously doubt that.
@gyepera

I'll take the bait.

The writer of this article seems to actually have a perspective that looks at a broader history of mobile phones, not simply the last year and a half.

People were saying similar things when the iPhone debuted. They were coming up against incumbents like RIM who had the business market essentially cornered, and the Blackberry Curve was able to do...pretty much everything, as did the Nokia N95. Windows Mobile might not have had the prettiest UI in existence, but they and Palm had an entrenched software ecosystem that made them popular in business settings. Apple was also going up against the fact that Verizon has traditionally been a carrier favorite for many, many businesses, and the iPhone wasn't going to be available on anything but AT&T. Apple also had a failure (or niche product) for every success. Android was a niche OS on a single phone on the smallest US carrier for nearly a year before Verizon pumped a billion marketing dollars into the Motorola Droid. Finally, both iPhone and Android were missing features in their initial releases. Over the years, many have been addressed.

After watching the mobile space for the past decade, only a fool would declare a winner in perpetuity. The market expands, evolves, and mutates. Don't be a fool.

Joey
0 Votes
+ -
Most of the past decade is irrelevant
Economister 22nd Nov 2010
@voyager529

Try looking to the future instead
@gyepera?
Actually, Apple is still winning the Mobile OS wars (the phone segment is only part of the far more important Mobile OS Wars)

More iOS devices ship each day (275,000 -300,000) than Android devices (200,000 - 250,000) and the iOS installed base is far larger (125 million) versus low tens of millions for Android and with the enormous growth in sales of the iPad and the newly re-designed iPod Touch, that the jury is still well and truly out on what the market will be like 12 months from now.?

-Mart
0 Votes
+ -
Goofy conclusion
Techdelirios 22nd Nov 2010
As long as we keep having subsidized hardware, therevwill be a 2 Year life cycle and continued opportunity for a new player to snag a large marketshare. People want the latest and greatest and this category has a built in replacement timeline. Nothing is over when people have no indenting to keep the devices longer.
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly.
Bruizer 1st Dec 2010
@Techdelirios

Thanks for logic.
There is still time for things to change and for another competitor to come in and grab a large portion of the market, but the window of opportunity is closing. I don't expect to see the same kind of quick turnarounds in the smartphone market as we've seen in the last two years.
The reason is that the whole smartphone market got a recent reboot with consumer driven, web/appstore, touchscreen focused smartphones. And all the newcomers (WP7, WebOS, MeGoo) are merely variations on that theme. They do not reset the market in the same way iOS and Android did. So they cannot be forgiven for having small ecosystems or lacking features.

They will have to wait for the next reboot, and for the current crop of mobile operating systems to become old and obsolete (like Blackberry OS, Windows Mobile, Symbian are now).
0 Votes
+ -
I can't see how fragmentation hurts anyone. In fact, it's THE reason why Android is winning this "war".

What Google is doing here is not enforcing any restrictions and letting the market, i.e. the smartphone buyers, decide.

In the long run, everyone benefits from that - except for Google's competitors.
@drphysx

"I can't see how fragmentation hurts anyone."

Are you sure about that?

http://www.pcworld.com/article/211152/angry_birds_devs_angry_at_android_fragmentation.html
0 Votes
+ -
@dvm Err... I hope you realize that this has nothing to do with fragmentation.

Windows hasn't died just because there are PCs with slow graphics cards that can't run certain games.

As for the real "fragmentation": Windows also hasn't died just because some Win95 applications couldn't run on WinXP - and Android even is much more compatible than Windows.

What you call fragmentation, is actually choice, and it's the reason why Windows won the "PC war". Some people like 3D games, some don't care. Some want a fast processor, some want a cheap machine.

WP7 could succeed if they made it at least as open as Windows. Being open does not mean giving things away or even giving the source code away.
It simply means offering choice. Choice between browsers, choice between app markets, choice between desktop clients for syncing, file system access, not locking out competing search engines etc.

Microsoft shot themselves in the foot by locking WP7 down. If they open it up soon, they have a chance.

If they don't, Android has already won the "war".
@drphysx,
You were right regarding the link I posted. Still, Netflix is having issues with it regarding the lacks of a universal DRM solution in the Android platform.
http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/11/13/netflix.says.android.fragmentation.hurting.support/

My point is that being open is a nice thing, but it has it problems too.
@dvm

Yep MS locked WP7 down and then provided the world's best development tools to the vast majority of developers on the planet (you know the ones who develop on Windows). I don't want a fragmented mess, but a stable sophisticated environment to create anything from games to business tools. I have enough trouble with multiple browsers on Windows for testing and development, WP7 looks great to me.
0 Votes
+ -
THE reason...not
frogspaw Updated - 22nd Nov 2010
@drphysx
'I can't see how fragmentation hurts anyone. In fact, it's THE reason why Android is winning this "war".'
Lets just ponder your assertion. I can't personally see any advantage in a system that allows the carriers to tinker with the base OS to their hearts content to such a degree that the imposed default settings differ from other carrier's default settings/UI as not 'hurting' the user. How is not knowing whether a particular app you bought, will work on other Android phones/carrier not hurting anyone? How is not knowing how long your battery will last because you can't easily quit apps without a process killer - the most popular app downloaded to Android phones, helping the user and thus 'winning the war'? How is increasing fragmentation of makers/screen sizes/UIs/buttons/graphics capability a help to developers who can't target a broad enough segment of phones without a huge extra workload, going to bring quality apps to Android to the benefit of users?
Seems to me that Android 'open-ness' is sowing the seeds of self destruction by alienating the average user's interests whilst pandering to the carriers whose only concern is carving out their own walled garden with embedded services you can't opt out of without financial penalty and that this 'war' you refer to, is nothing less than 'war' on users interests.
Can we say 'Pyrrhic victory'? in the race for numbers rather than quality
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft Phone 7 will always have a market because there are Microsoft zealots that will buy it no matter how stupid it is. To suggest otherwise is naive....and in their defense, Microsoft will continue to make it just good enough that Windows users can pretend it's as good as other phones. Those that advocate other devices forget that there is a huge following of people that call themselves tech people but in actuality grew up with Windows, got Windows certified, then made careers supporting Windows. Those people are never going to support something else no matter how good that in essence could make them obsolete.
@Socratesfoot

Ding, Ding, we have a Winner.

I was lucky I got lots of experience to non-MS OS's (grew up before Windows) and realized what a POS Windows is.
@itguy08

You have no clue what you are talking about. wp7 was not launched on a weekend and it was launched on monday..the sales number which you quote are for a single day which no one has ever confirmed...so you lost your credibility instantly....try harder...might get lucky someday...

On an another note..please shed some light on your non-mS os's??? will you
0 Votes
+ -
@itguy08 "(grew up before Windows) and realized what a POS Windows is." what a bunch of garbage...you are still living in your mothers basement.
@Socratesfoot Are there really that many Microsoft zealots?

Only 40,000 WP7 phones sold suggest otherwise.
0 Votes
+ -
@Socratesfoot - You sound jealous...wow.
0 Votes
+ -
Looks Like My Predictions Are Coming True
cyberslammer2 22nd Nov 2010
I called it people...Windows Phone 7 is a DUD...have you seen any awesome reports yet about it other than the scattered commercials with the "REALLY?" tagline?

Windows Phone 7: Next of Kin...coming soon to a bargain bin near you.
0 Votes
+ -
Years of domination ahead
bmgoodman 22nd Nov 2010
RIM and Nokia dominated for years based on what mobile phones were for years. That is, they were PHONES. People lived with crappy user interfaces because the "gee whiz" factor was simply that they were MOBILE phones. Then Apple came along and showed people that they could have mobile phones with an elegant interface. They changed the paradigm such that the "gee whiz" factor became WHAT ELSE a mobile phone could do. Now Android and iOS get to dominate for years to come. That is, until the new "gee whiz" comes along. And nobody yet knows what that will be.

In the meantime, "apps" seem to be the closest thing to "gee whiz" and those may well begin locking people into an OS, much like Office locked us into Windows.

Bottom line, look for Android and iOS to dominate most of this decade.
I think there are several reasons why the Smartphone story has unfolded the way it has and why its still not over:

Obviously, when the first iPhone was released, it changed everything. Never mind there was no "App Store", it cost $700, and you couldn't even remove the battery. It made people who didn't even need a smartphone, want a smartphone. In the US, the iPhone is available on one carrier. That certainly left room for competition for the millions of users on the OTHER networks. Symbian, Windows Mobile, and Blackberry were obviously aging and Android was just maturing. Backed by heavy hitters such as Samsung, HTC, LG, and Motorola, Android had the hardware and (with frequent updating) the software to pose a serious threat to iPhone. For anyone not on AT&T or not willing to switch carriers, the choice was clear.

But that's also kind of the point, Android is successful because, other than the iPhone (still locked to 1 carrier), there is no alternative. And Android does have it's flaws: fragmentation, inconsistent updates to non-stock devices, a confusing app market, and apps that aren't making their developers a whole lot of money because expectation in Android is that 99% of apps should be free.

Anyone who can offer a better alternative has a chance to compete. With all the things Microsoft "didn't do" in version 1.0, they did leverage many of their other services (Skydrive, Office, Xbox, Zune, Zune-pass) and eliminated some of Android's shortcomings (fragmentation, return on developer investment/limiting free apps, direct-to-consumer updates). Couple that with the fact that there are still people who DO NOT own a smartphone, and, yeah, the market still has room for growth.
0 Votes
+ -
Hi Larry,

Alex from RIM here. Great discussion you've got going. On our end, we?re seeing our new BlackBerry Tablet OS as a definite game changer and we couldn't be more excited. By utilizing the reliable and secure QNX architecture, we're aiming to redefine the possibilities of mobile computing by providing users with true multitasking capabilities and a highly responsive and fluid touch screen experience for apps and content services. Along with its 1GHz dual-core processor, it all comes together for an unmatched web experience. Cheers!

Cheers!
0 Votes
+ -
Great!! ! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix