ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

How AT&T and T-Mobile conjured 4G networks out of thin air

By | January 13, 2011, 3:30am PST

Summary: One of the biggest surprises of CES 2011 was AT&T and T-Mobile magically pulling 4G networks out their hats. The real story isn’t quite as magical.

The biggest surprise at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show was how AT&T and T-Mobile showed off their 4G networks. If that sounds confusing to you because you didn’t know that either them were in the 4G game, then you had the same reaction I did. Unlike Sprint/Clearwire (with WiMAX) and Verizon (with LTE), neither AT&T nor T-Mobile has been building out 4G networks in the US. So how did they make 4G networks appear out of thin air? Well, the short answer is that they didn’t.

What AT&T and T-Mobile did was to re-brand their enhanced 3G networks (sometimes called 3.5G) by simply renaming them “4G” networks. Voila! In other words, this is mostly a marketing ploy.

However, to be fair, both T-Mobile and AT&T have been making legitimate upgrades to their 3G networks that actually approach 4G speeds — at least the same kinds of 4G speeds that Sprint/Clearwire sees on its WiMAX network. Verizon’s LTE has even higher speeds.

The problem is that the enhanced 3G networks of both T-Mobile and AT&T are based on GSM technology, so they are still voice networks that are essentially retrofitted to handle data. On the other hand, WiMAX and LTE are both IP-based networks that use OFDM technology and are designed to natively handle data traffic. That’s what makes them “4G” or next generation networks, even more than the raw bandwidth numbers. This shows up when you look at the latency of these networks, which is typically 50-100ms (milliseconds) vs. 200-500ms for the enhanced 3G networks.

Nevertheless, International Telecommunications Union (ITU) recently relaxed its standards to allow for LTE, WiMAX, and HSPA+ to all fall under the label of 4G. For the reasons mentioned above, I agree with LTE and WiMAX getting the 4G label, but not HSPA+.

Based on what we learned at CES, here are the plans that T-Mobile and AT&T outlined for their next generation networks.

T-Mobile’s 4G approach

T-Mobile talked a really big game at CES, saying it “delivered the fastest wireless data performance in the top 100 U.S. markets during the second half of 2010″ based on a Nielsen study (done before Verizon rolled out its LTE network). However, PC Magazine’s 2010 report on the fastest mobile networks showed T-Mobile consistently trailing AT&T and Sprint’s WiMAX network in average speeds (and that study was done before Verizon zoomed ahead of them all with LTE in December 2010). In other words, T-Mobile is actually fourth among the big four in the US when it comes to maximum network speeds.

T-Mobile’s “4G” is based on a 3G standard called HSPA+ that T-Mobile has been deploying in roughly the 100 largest metro areas in the US. At CES, the company said it plans to double its network speeds in 25 US metro areas covering 140 million Americans by mid-2011. T-Mobile claims that its peak downloads speeds in those areas will be 42 Mbps, but those are theoretical speeds. Verizon’s LTE is capable of theoretical peak speeds of up to 100 Mbps, but in the real world the upper limits are 10-20 Mbps. I’ll be impressed if T-Mobile’s HSPA+ can get up to 5-8 Mbps in the real world.

To make matters worse, T-Mobile is about to start running an ad campaign saying that it has “America’s Largest 4G Network.” That is a misleading claim that I hope won’t fool too many people.

AT&T’s 4G approach

While T-Mobile had actually been fudging its 4G story for a several months leading up to CES (and before the ITU’s 4G standards change), AT&T unveiled its re-branded “4G” network at the show. And, honestly, AT&T actually had a better story to tell than T-Mobile. The company has already rolled out HSPA+ to nearly 100% of its US network and it has some real speed numbers to show for it. The AT&T 3G network is capable of 4-5 Mbps downloads and 1.5 Mbps uploads, which rival WiMAX speeds, although it still has much higher latency than both WiMAX and LTE.

So, like T-Mobile, AT&T is now labeling its 3G HSPA+ network as “4G,” but its network does actually have more 4G-like qualities to brag about. On the other hand, unlike T-Mobile, AT&T has plans to upgrade its network to LTE. At CES, AT&T said it plans to begin its LTE rollout in mid-2011 and have nearly its entire network upgraded to LTE by the end of 2013 (the same time period Verizon plans to have its LTE rollout finished). But, it’s important to remember that Verizon owns more 700MHz spectrum than AT&T for LTE, which will allow it to build a more widespread and more robust network. AT&T could catch up by buying additional spectrum, as it did last year when it bought Qualcomm’s chunk of 700Mhz.

AT&T looks more likely than T-Mobile to challenge Verizon’s 4G dominance, but it still has to prove that it can effectively build wireless networks to handle modern data loads. Its reputation has been severely tarnished by its perpetual inability to deal with the load put on its network by millions of iPhone users. Despite its HSPA+ upgrade in 2010, all of the iPhones at CES last week brought the Las Vegas AT&T network to its knees once again. That doesn’t inspire much confidence that AT&T is ready to become a 4G powerhouse.

This article was originally published on TechRepublic.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic. He writes about the products, people, and ideas that are revolutionizing business with technology.

Disclosure

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic, an online trade publication and peer-to-peer community for IT leaders. He is an award-winning journalist who examines the latest trends and asks the big questions about the technology industry. He previously worked as an IT manager in the health care industry.

You can also find him on Twitter, , Facebook, and at JasonHiner.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
94
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: How AT&T and T-Mobile conjured 4G networks out of thin air
marco5811 5th Sep
If you want a change towards "truth in advertising", then your beef is with federal regulators who set the standards. free bets
Companies should not be able to outright lie like that. If you dont really have 4g then stop advertising that you do! I see the commercials from T Mobile with the video chat thing. I used to be with T mobile but I would hit stretches of areas where there was no coverage. And I move around my state a lot all day, as a technician I need to have a good signal that I can make a call quickly if needed. So I switched to Verizon. I never have a signal problem. Time will tell how this whole 4g landscape develops. But right now Verizon has the most area to implement the technology
0 Votes
+ -
@spikey289

The thing is, Sprint was advertising 4G BUT they were no faster than 3G HSDPA in real world speed test results especially on upload speeds.

What's in a name when you are consistently hitting 3-5Mbps down and 2Mbps up?
0 Votes
+ -
Today I tried ATT in Houston Texas
Uralbas 13th Jan 2011
Using a Captivate and an 4G, neither reached 1Mbps. Right beside it where a G2, a MyTouch4G and a Vibrant. All exceeded 4Mbps download and 1Mbps upload with the G2 reaching 8Mbps.

So you state that ATT has revamped its network nation wide. Within the Beltway in Houston thats a no go. So I think you are just pure ATT hype.

Regarding speeds. For the Money, no one beats T Mobile in Speed. Even Verizon. As their network does not really work on any phone available to customers.

Latency, T Mobiles is under 50ms constant 3+mbps Clearwire is next under 80ms, but never delivers over 2mpbs (like Verizon). Next comes Verizon averaging 1.8mbps and Finally ATT 1Mbps

I have all speedtest available and can post them. Can you do the same and prove that ATT has the speeds you claim, cause its not my experience today with them.
@spikey289 No one "really has" 4G. Verizon included.
No one has met the official spec - there's a standard out there for what 4G actually is, and none (zero) meet that.

It's marketing - in otherwords, the counter argument would be "well, how do we tell consumers that we've invested billions of dollars in upgrading our networks, and we've achieved the speed increases that were the goal of our investment? All consumers know is this weird "G" thing..."
@geolemon You are correct... Or at least you were. Read carefully: "International Telecommunications Union (ITU) recently relaxed its standards to allow for LTE, WiMAX, and HSPA+ to all fall under the label of 4G."

The ITU sets up what "4G" means and if they relax the standard, however silly it may seem, it's still the new standard.
0 Votes
+ -
@geolemon

In fact, the ITU is still referring to the future tense in reference to a formal standardization of 4G. They've published papers about what the other major players are doing with their definition of the word, but they themselves haven't set anything in stone yet. Hence, the ITU considers 4G ot be a future technology that has no current formal definition at all.

Since 4G is not officially defined, it does not formally exist. And it would be impossible for any technology to be officially 4G compliant, no matter what its specs or implementation details.
Companies should not be able to outright lie like that.

You seem pretty upset. Maybe this is the wrong time to mention the food supplement and diet industry.
@WarhavenSC

Ain't that the truth!
0 Votes
+ -
Or just food in general.
@WarhavenSC
This is true. I know they are not the only companies that do it. I dislike any company being dishonest. Good call sir.
0 Votes
+ -
"However, to be fair, both T-Mobile and AT&T have been making legitimate upgrades to their 3G networks that actually approach 4G speeds at least the same kinds of 4G speeds that Sprint/Clearwire sees on its WiMAX network. Verizons LTE has even higher speeds."

There's nothing fair about it... Both of these companies are actively engaged in FALSE advertising and someone (like the Department of Justice) should force them to stop!

Enhanced 3G or 3.5G is NOT 4G, seeps approaching 4G is NOT 4G. They should not be allowed to continue this deception.
@Masari.Jones
Agree with you 100%!!!
@Masari.Jones If there are no standards, then they are allowed to say wherever they want. Sucks, but that's legal principle. If you want a change towards "truth in advertising", then your beef is with federal regulators who set the standards. Guess what? Once AGAIN, they're behind the times.

Your points are very valid -- and this comes from a longtime T-Mobile subscriber, very happy with their superb customer service -- but don't blame the carrier in a free-market situation without any proper monitoring. T-Mobile (as is every other carrier trying to react to negative publicity) is merely trying to get a competitive edge.

"They should not be allowed to continue this deception." Amen. But the problem lies with those who are regulating. Unless they understand how the market has changed, THEY are irrelevant.

Welcome to a business-driven democracy.
0 Votes
+ -
T-Mobile coverage is pathetic.
Bruizer 13th Jan 2011
@spikey289

I would go days at times and never see a cell. If you stay within big major metros, it is petty good. Go outside of this areas and TMob is horrid.
@spikey, not sure where you live, but I use TMO and I travel extensively across the country. I've had exceptional service over the years, coast to coast. And on the few occasions that I have an issue with coverage in a building, I can use WiFi to make calls with my regular number. NO OTHER CARRIER has gotten that done.
@spikey289 I have TMob and there's tons of times where it just doesn't work inside of metro areas, let alone the country. Their network isn't that great when it comes down to it, and they know it.

I still remember the first time I saw the TMob 4G commercial. Then I tried a G2 at the TMob store. It couldn't hit speeds that I saw on an iPhone or a Droid 2 earlier in the day.
@spikey289 The problem is, the ITU doesn't call it "4G"... they have some way more complicated name ("IMT-Advanced"), which everyone KNOWS is simply "4G". They didn't specify a protocol.. they specified a performance metric. The next generation of LTE meets that original spec entirely, probably the next generation WiMax (the next LTE is just a software upgrade to the cells, but it may require new handsets).


So you could get away with calling anything 4G. Now sure, if someone started calling their EDGE (2G) network 4G, they wouldn't get away with it. But when they can offer "faster than last year's tech", it's hard for the average consumer to tell the difference.

The true original definition of 4G was new radio tech, new frequencies, and 100Mb/s download (peak) for mobile, 1Gb/s download (peak) for stationary units. LTE can technically meet most of this, though Verizon will put a network speed cap on it well below 100Mb/s, just as Sprint does on WiMax, and everyone has on the their various 3G protocols.
in May of 2011 instead of January 2012?
I love "marketing"!
wink
@kd5auq happy Even the name "marketing" is marketing. If it were properly called "lies told to enhance sales", then at least we'd know that THEY know that we know. You know?
0 Votes
+ -
@Trep Ford NOW thats the most accurate comment I have seen in a long time
@kd5auq

No, because the car manufacturers run on a "model year" designation. A 2012 model may be announced in May of 2011, but it won't begin to be manufactured until July or August, and won't be sold until the 4th quarter of 2011.
Nice writeup Jason. The term 4G is becoming too ubiquitous and this is an excellent article to get us through the market speak and illuminate the facts.
@tech_monster ... Agreed. Nicely done.
Agreed with the above - well done, informative, succinct
maybe i read this or understand it wrong... but if they basically are rebranding their 3g as 4g because they've done upgrades, then why am i having to buy, or are they releasing, "4g" phones? shouldn't my 3g phone get the same speed as their 4g ones, then?
0 Votes
+ -
@bc3tech
Unfortunately, no; the phone would need to support HSPA+, which I believe most do not, to support the higher speeds.
@FlyingsCool Ah.. that explains it- thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
This explains Apple's slow embrace of LTE. Apple might have a real 4G phone waiting in the wings, the have the big bucks to grab towers if they want to.
0 Votes
+ -
@jeff.fostermedia@... Apple is supposedly waiting for the newer 4G chips, the current ones use too much power for a phone where you cant change the battery (stupid) thats pretty important...
0 Votes
+ -
@bc3tech

Your current phone should work with the HSPA+ (now called 4G). It's only when the true 4G comes out, (e.g. LTE) that you'll need to upgrage phones.
@tgarner well now this is just getting silly.
@bc3tech

Nope, just any other technologies, the newer standard can be backwards compatible with the older standard of that technology, however, the older hardware can only max out at its limitations. Example, if you have a 1gb Ethernet port on your computer and its plugged in to a switch that only supports up to 100mb/s then your computers nic will negotiate at 100mb/s. Both, sets of hardware has to have a compatibility in order to communicate at 1gb/s. In this case, you'd have to purchase a 1gb/s switch, or with the change in communication on your phone, you need a new one to communicate at the higher speeds.
0 Votes
+ -
@mgaul unless you run windows and it renegotiates to 10Mbps half duplex and never tries to renegotiate to a 100 full.. happy thats why we have to manually set the nic speeds where I work, that and apparently the cisco devices catch a bunch of errors when the ports are set to run at 100/full and the machine decided to run at 10/half
@nickdangerthirdi

Sounds like a duplex error. If the line protocol is down on the switch, you have a layer 2 issue, and usually is a duplex issue. One side half (Cisco 10/100mb switches are notorious for half being default,) and the other side is full, then it will not work. Considering half duplex transmits then receive and full does both at the same time.
I have the MyTouch 4G and I have gotten speeds as high as 8.27 down and 1.68 up. This was measured using the SpeedTest app. Jason, you come across in this article as biased against T-Mobile. It hurts your credibility. Also, IIRC Verizon only has LTE active in a few markets. Part of the T-Mobile story is the number of markets they cover with 4G.
@david@...
You actually expected him to test T-Mobiles network?. Why do that when you can just take the word of someone at Verizon?
@Turd Furgeson I'm sorry, but if the answer is affirmative you must get this often enough that it's lost its sting. Is your name really "Turd," or is that a typo? "G-d darn you autocorrect!"
@caburlingame...

It's an SNL reference.
@Turd Furgeson Thank you Mr. Reynolds.
@Turd Furgeson & david@
The key point that you're missing here is that T-Mobile's "4G" isn't actually 4G. It's sped up 3G technology. HSPA+ falls into a 3.5G category...dumbass. The standards for 4G (4th Generation) were relaxed to permit WiMAX and LTE...not HSPA+...it's not about the carrier, it's the technology and whether or not what's being used is actually 4th Generation. Educate yourself before you speak.
  • Flagged
@david@...

@hparch@...

I think we need to be looking more at the credibility of the companies not the person writing this article. Regardless of the speed you may be getting on your HSPA+ network it's still not a genuine 4G network as advertised(despite what a sold out ITU might say). I think what everyone here is complaining about is how misleading these companies are being about their representation of their own product.

Lets say I sold you a computer and told you it was a Pentium 4, but when you got it home and checked it it was a cheap Celeron instead. Wouldn't you be pissed when I told you it's the same thing because the speeds are ABOUT the same? Get the idea?

False advertising needs to be nipped in the bud, companies are getting far too willing to bend the truth to the public to sell their product.
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
@david@... My work phone is T-Mobile (using the SIM in an Android device). I've used T-Mobile in a lot of locations throughout the US and have never seen the speeds you're mentioning, but there are a few pockets of the US where I've heard similar reports. Still, that's a long way from the claim of "America's largest 4G network."
@Jason Hiner What's your phone? If it's not a phone that's HSPA+ capable, you won't see the 5Mbps range of speed, in general. That said, I do see speed improvements with a non-HSPA+ phone when I'm in a region with HSPA+, going from the ~850Kbps range on non-HSPA+ up to 2.1Mbps on HSPA+. I even saw 6.1Mbps down in Portland...all on T-Mobile's network.

If you're going to compare 4G networks (or those that claim they are), then you need to run the technical comparison of speeds, which T-Mobile has done...not just use your personal experience, right?
@david@...

But you have to remember, he's not arguing over speeds but the marketing of saying that their network is 4g even-though it is not. HSPA+, WiMAX, and LTE, are all pre-4g tech. (3.5-3.9g pending on which tech.) 4g standard states you have to be able to have a 100mb/s when moving and 1gb/s while stationary. LTE and WiMAX has been accepted as 4g, however, not in its current state, but based off of LTE Advance and WiMAX IEEE 802.16m standards.
@mgaul If Verizon and Sprint, who have textbook '4G' don't deliver the bandwidth that you mention and that is the defining feature of 4G then I guess that you could call Verizon LTE/Sprint WiMax 3.5G for the same reason that you say that T-Mobile is not 4G.

My point is that labels mean nothing (most customers are not able to understand the difference), bandwidth does and if T-Mobile delivers the same sort of bandwidth that as far as I am concerned they have the right to call themselves 4G.
If I was an ATT marketing person getting hit with T-Mobile's ads that said 'were 4G and ATT isn't' (even though ATT's network is faster than t-Mobiles) I might have said if they can claim to be 4G than so can we. Don't get me wrong, its plain wrong to mislead customers that don't know better but like my 4 yo says "He started it"
@pllamonica@...
when TMo first started rolling this out last summer, they were completely honest about what they were doing. Problem was they found people were just getting confused (more likely people were saying so what) so marketing changed their tune around October.
@FlyingsCool

You are 100% correct about this - they intially talked about a theoretical 21mbs download, with realistic speeds in trials of 8 - 14 mps, but antciipated lower speeds with greater usage. They never mentioned 4G, until now, when, lets face it, everyone else is doing it.

This isn't the same as labelling a piece of hardware incorrectly - we are talking about network speed potentials here - hspa+ is definitely performing well, and is now techincally 4G, so they can say as much, just like Verizon says they have LTE when in fact, that network is minsiscule compared to thier CDMA network.

In the end, its all about speed, and TMObile has it, is growing it, and isnt making anyone pay "up" for it - THAT is consumer friendly.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm staying with Sprint because they are the most honest.
I agree with David above.. T-Mobile was way ahead of the curve here, and plans on staying there with thier near term upgrades - I have seen similar results on hspa+ to the poster above. Its VERY fast.
If you want a change towards "truth in advertising", then your beef is with federal regulators who set the standards. free bets

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix