In China, Apple enters crowded mobile market

Summary: Apple has nearly cleared the hurdles to begin selling its popular iPhone handset in China, one of the last major phone markets Apple has yet to enter, according to the Wall Street Journal.As many Americans know, the iPhone is Apple's fastest-growing product.

Apple has nearly cleared the hurdles to begin selling its popular iPhone handset in China, one of the last major phone markets Apple has yet to enter, according to the Wall Street Journal.

As many Americans know, the iPhone is Apple's fastest-growing product. But it's done remarkably better in the U.S. than overseas, where it has the home-court advantage and weaker competition.

Overseas, though, Apple's just one of the pack. The iPhone has struggled in overseas markets, where it has faces more competition from rivals such as Nokia, the world's largest mobile phone maker.

Will China extend Apple's reign as a mobile powerhouse?

Or will the venture prove that Apple's magic doesn't translate?

The potential for the iPhone's success in China is clear: the nation is the world's largest mobile market, with some 687 million subscribers. That compares to more than 270 million subscribers in the U.S.

While Apple clears legal hurdles, however, it has many more to come on the sales floor, where the company has an underdog position it's not used to in the U.S.

Apple may have succeeded in the U.S. thanks to a combination of brand popularity and being first on the market with a user-friendly smartphone, but now that the smartphone is ubiquitous, markets are much harder to crack.

The Journal reports:

The iPhone hasn't sold as well in some markets as in the U.S. In Japan, for example, the Apple brand isn't as strong, and regular mobile phones offer many of the same features.

In China, however, touch screens are hot, and there are already a number of popular models that have no keypads. The Apple name has value as a status symbol, and Internet usage through cellphones is increasing.

Apple faces several challenges, namely the rampant knockoff market that in many ways produces derivative products that are as good or better than the original. Now that those products are popular, Apple now must convince consumers that the premium on the original is worth the extra money.

Worse, the Apple brand doesn't quite carry in China the way it does in North America. According to the Journal, Apple has less than 1 percent market share in PC shipments in China, or about 36,000 units out of 11.7 million PCs, according to IDC figures.

A final hurdle is adjusting to the pre-pay market that's popular everywhere but in the U.S. Apple seems to have managed this fairly well in Europe, where 25 percent of iPhone sales originate, but it's not nearly as successful as the 49 percent of sales that come from the U.S.

Fascinatingly, the Chinese campaign will expose just how well Apple can navigate the difficulties of a more open marketplace that has more options and a telecom setup that offers more choice, in that it doesn't lock a customer down for two years with an exclusive, one-carrier-only deal (Apple plans to strike a deal with China Unicom, a state-owned carrier that's the second-largest in that nation.)

Meanwhile, it will also show how well Apple can leverage its closed, iPhone-to-iTunes-to-App Store system in a marketplace in which it doesn't have a sizeable head start versus phones based on Google's Android platform, expected to arrive at market around the same time as the iPhone, and a rumored Dell smartphone, also alleged to arrive to market in a year's time.

Make no mistake, the Chinese move by Apple is a smart one, and will provide ample revenue for the company thanks to the sheer breadth of subscribers in the country. But it remains to be seen whether Apple can achieve dominance in a mobile marketplace that is already quite crowded...at a time when the iPhone as a status symbol is fading.

Topics: Mobility, Apple, Hardware, iPhone, Smartphones, China

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

34 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Save Apple from what?

    All their industry leading profits when there is supposed to be a recession?
    Metronome49
    • yea, and I don't even like Apple

      but how can you justify a heading like this? Oh, I forgot, they have to be 'provocative', right? More and more these blogs have become running jokes and in the process they have for the most part lost all but entertainment value.
      eggmanbubbagee@...
      • Don't like the headline?

        I'm all ears.

        It's been changed.
        andrew.nusca
        • my hat is off to you sir

          The body of the story was good and deserved a 'straight' headline.
          eggmanbubbagee@...
          • If you've ever found an error or misleading title on ZDNet, read this.

            Find an error, or misleading title?

            Your best course of action is to use the "E-mail [author]" link within the short author bio at the bottom of each ZDNet post.

            It's the fastest way to grab our attention. (We <i>are</i> listening.)
            andrew.nusca
  • AT&T sucks, in other news

    Maybe if they get the iphone on a reliable carrier that might help 'save' Apple. Current PCworld study has ATT trailing the pack on data speed and reliability. Reliability, the ability to get a decent connection, was down around 60%! IIRC. Compared to Verizon which was near 90%! (don't hold me to the exact numbers)

    All these people with iphones and having such a hard time with their data connections - you have to wonder, are the 'apps' really that great? This is a fad really and the other smartphones have more or less caught up, so maybe Apple does need saving, from ATT.

    If Jobs had gone with Verizon from the start how many iPhones would be out there by now, I ask you. Hope the tighter 'control' and bigger piece of the pie was worth it to you Steve, now the other guys have caught up - same old story . .
    eggmanbubbagee@...
    • I'm not a huge fan of AT&T, but...

      Verizon is hardly an improvement. They're ahead this year, as AT&T was two years ago.

      As for iPhone and Verizon, if Apple had gone with Verizon, they would be going nowhere very fast. Qualcomm's implimentation of CDMA used by Verizon is barely used anywhere else in the world except Korea; and is mutually incompatible with the GSM based W-CDMA/UMTS used by the REST of the worlds leading telecoms.

      Although Verizon leads for now, CDMA is a dying technology - already UMTS is capable of speeds around 7mbs - compared to CDMA's 1.5. True, AT&T hasn't deployed it yet - but everywhere else in the world ? The choice is obvious.

      Moreover, if Verizon had bothered to use real tech, they could compete with AT&T without cowering behind a proprietary implementation of an already proprietary technology.

      As for more "control" - Apple, to my understanding, originally refused an iPhone contract with Verizon because Verizon wanted to nuder the phone, as they do with many of their handsets.

      At the time, Verizon had to approve every device on their network, which meant that it had to be reverse engineered and loaded with a VZ OS. That's why the razr launch failed a few years ago - the reverse engineering process actually made the phones more fragile and dysfunctional than Moto phones of the time already were.

      When VZ finally deploys GSM based LTE in 2012, we'll see who's best when they compete on a level playing field.

      Peace
      GolatHi
      • why is CDMA a problem?

        hasn't hurt Verizon here. Could you not simply put the GSM chip on another model iphone you sell to Vodaphone or some other international carrier?

        I'd wager Apple could have kept the phone from being neutered if they really wanted to but then again I'd be speculating, as it sounds you are too.
        eggmanbubbagee@...
      • CDMA is the leader

        CDMA was the standard developed by Qualcomm and continues to be faster and more efficient than GSM/WCDMA. UMTS or WCDMA was a variant adopted in Europe so they would not have to pay as high royalties to Qualcomm. But, it is more expensive to install and less efficient than CDMA.

        Unfortunately, the European standard got adopted by most of the world, so we are all stuck with paying more for less service (this is typical in Europe so they are used to it) except for the US, Korea, and China. It is a repeat of the old story where the inferior standard gets adopted because it gains more market share. Other examples include Windows and VHS.
        jorjitop
    • Awesome Comment! AT&T is Dying!

      They are still struggling with outdated equipment and they are a Dinosaur waiting to be inducted into the Smithsonian! haha ;)

      They are the largest Lobbyist in Washington DC spending all the money there and continuing to neglect their ancient equipment. Literally every other provider in America has FASTER data rates. Europe, Australia and Asia's data rates kick AT&T's teeth in! :D ....in fact even China has better wireless and their Broadband kicks our butts in general.

      Let's face it, we Americans have been sold out by a ever greedier Corporate America! ;)
      i2fun@...
    • No to Verizon

      If iPhone had agreed to Verizon's limitations, there would be no data
      plan, no app store, no google maps integration, no scrollable phone
      message selection, and many more NOs.

      I had a motorola phone 3 years ago that had more features and a
      better camera than my current iPhone. I paid extra for Web access, but
      seldom used it. Took me 15 minutes to get the weather. Could get the
      photos into my computer without using a Verizon Web site. Cost for
      plan for me and wife with similar phone was $120 per month.

      Now I pay $80 (wife has Nokia) per month, and I do everything I want
      to really fast. There are a few places I go were I could get Verizon and
      ATT is iffy or nonexistent. But that's less than 1 week out of the year.

      No real problem.
      roger that
  • Title does not match content

    I liked the content of the article, but the title does not make any sense.

    Interestingly enough, I am not into all-in-one products that include phones, camera, media player, etc.

    I understand it is convenient to browse the web or make/receive calls or play games or listen to music or watch movies in one single device. I can do that with a computer, so the only advantage of a mobile device is if you are in the road a lot, which I am not.

    I am looking forward to September when Apple will announce their holiday line up for the iPod.

    I still prefer having a phone separate from my media player.

    I'd rather spend the $400 it costs to get a high-capacity iPod instead of the $800+ that I would cost me to get the same iPod plus the ability to make/receive calls.

    The expansion of the iPhone market is a must for Apple if they are seriously considering getting into the mobile business. I just hope that the choices for 2010 are better in the USA regarding the device specs (multi-tasking, more GBs) and the ability to use other wireless services.

    Although the iPhone may not be as strong a status symbol it was when it came out, I still think it is a nice piece of engineering that can benefit with a better wireless service in the backend.
    fernande-zdnet
    • New title is better :-)

      nt
      fernande-zdnet
    • Yes, But

      Can you carry that computer in your pocket?
      roger that
  • the same rant over and over again

    "But it remains to be seen whether Apple can achieve dominance
    in a mobile marketplace that is already quite crowded..."

    yes it remains to be seen, as the marektplace was as crowded as
    it gets in the u.s. and europe and japan before the iphone
    arrived. and they conquered it, easily, within two years. so why
    are you assuming it shouldn't be the same in china? because of
    cheap knock-offs that have no memory, no battery life and an
    awful os? people have already brought in about more than one
    million devices into the chinese market (sold unsubsidized in
    hong kong by the way).

    your reasoning makes absolutely no sense (as if i was expecting
    that from a zdnet writer) as of now everything points to the
    iphone being a success in china. why not stating the obvious for
    a change instead of the usual pseudo-skeptic rant.
    bannedfromzdnetagain
    • That's just inconsistent reasoning.

      The mobile marketplace was crowded, yes, but with standard mobile phones.

      The smartphone market, up until the iPhone's introduction, had largely been restricted to BlackBerry-toting professionals.

      Apple's introduction of the iPhone -- a new device -- made the average person consider paying for a data plan.

      This time, Apple has neither a groundbreaking new device nor first-mover advantage.
      andrew.nusca
      • Agreed.

        Will be interesting to see how iPhone does without all the many advantages it has/had here - I'll wager it won't be the player it is here by a long shot.
        eggmanbubbagee@...
  • If in China, Why Would You Buy an iPhone? ;)

    iPhone isn't for the masses of people in China. A apple anything is a rare find in China and more Chinese Cell Phone Makers are already opting for Google's Android OS. In fact the People's choice for Search Engine's (despite their 2nd largest being created by a Chinese Google former employee) is of course Google! haha...... why do you think Google owns 70% of the Search Market? ;)

    Personally, you have one phone and one OS for Apple's iPhone. Oh.... yes and 1000's of worthless apps in their Ap store that don't sell, because everyone is jail breaking their iPhones and iPods! haha

    Competition in that store, is a misnomer, with Apple's insistence that NO COMPETING Aps to their own, are allowed to be sold! ........yep... still digging their own proprietary grave. In a World that is fast becoming more OPEN (source)! ;)
    i2fun@...
  • iphone best selling phone in japan

    "In Japan, for example, the Apple brand isn?t as strong, and
    regular mobile phones offer many of the same features."

    are they kidding?

    the iphone ist best selling phone in japan (of all phones
    sold, not only smartphones):

    http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/08/17/iphone.3gs
    .tops.in.japan/

    http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/08/17/survey-
    iphone-3gs-best-selling-cell-phone-in-japan-in-2008/
    bannedfromzdnetagain
    • Laughable, Typically Mis-construed Statistical Info! :D

      hmmm..... aaa........ for your information, iPod does not a iPhone or phone in any way make. So your info is heavily slanted in the good old Steve Jobs Mac Power Tradition! haha ;)

      What???? ...iPhone sold the most over ONE MONTH! ....hardly worth mentioning when compared to a full of sales and iPhone has been there for 1yr! :D haha.... compared to other year on sales of phones, it's a pittance. Because the truth is iPhone is still failing to take Japan! ;)

      In Apple's eyes they have the original computer (like Gore and Internet) invented the portable music player (false) and iPhone is the first Touch Screen portable phone (also false).

      Both stats are inflating iPhone numbers with iPod Touch sales. How ridiculous is that? haha ;)
      i2fun@...