Intel rolls out new server, high-end PC chip lineup; Green arms race heats up

Summary: Intel has rolled out a new lineup of 16 server and high-end PC processors that sport a new transistor design that saves energy, eliminates lead and halogen materials.These chips were expected and Intel delivered right on schedule.

Intel has rolled out a new lineup of 16 server and high-end PC processors that sport a new transistor design that saves energy, eliminates lead and halogen materials.

These chips were expected and Intel delivered right on schedule. The chips, known as Penryn, is Intel's first to be designed on 45-nanometer manufacturing processes. Intel has positioned the chips as an "eco-friendly" lineup by saving energy, eliminating harmful materials and boosting performance.

In a statement, Intel called its transistor tweaks the biggest advancement in 40 years. It uses a formula called "Hafnium-based high-k metal gate" to cram hundreds of millions of processors--820 million or so--on a chip. The semiconductors are sold under the Intel Core 2 Extreme and Xeon brands.

Intel is hoping its new designs will clear the path for smaller chips that can lead more features in consumer and mobile electronics.

Here's a look at Intel's new lineup:

  • Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 quad core processor (just rolls off the tongue doesn't it?): This chip is designed for hardcore gamers. It features a larger L2 cache and support for Intel's SSE4 media instructions.
  • A family of server processors that Intel claims sets world record speeds. These 12 quad-core chips have clock speeds that range from 2GHz to 3.2 GHz. The chips are sold under the Xeon brand.

Also see Tom Krazit's take on the Penryn rollout.

As for the world speed record claim, Intel gives the following explanation (see Intel's summary):

 

The 45nm Hi-k Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor 5400 series sets a number of world records** on key industry-standard benchmarks. A HP Proliant DL380 G5 Server sets a new TPC-C* mark with a score of 273,666 tpmC and an SAP-SD* record with a score of 2449 SD-Users. A Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server running BEA JRockit* JVM delivered a record-breaking SPECjbb*2005 result of 303130** BOPS. Dell also sets a new virtualization performance record on VMmark benchmark running VMWare ESX Server with a score of 8.47 at 6 tiles. Using a PRIMERGY RX300 S4 Server, Fujitsu-Siemens set a new SPECint*_rate2006 record with a score of 138.

However, it's usually best to go right to the footnotes.

** World Record and other claims based on performance comparison of DP Server platforms based on x86 architecture. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third-party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. Here's Intel's performance summary.

I'll leave the benchmark bickering to others--like David Berlind and George Ou--because there's a bigger picture here.

We are beginning to see an eco-friendly arms race in IT. AMD kicked it off with its energy per watt sales pitch and pushed power consumption to the forefront. Now technology firms are racing to be greener than the other guy. Notice how Intel notes lead removal and a greener--and faster--chip.

This development is promising as PC makers are pushing new form factors and most technology companies are on the green bandwagon. The upside for you: These green technologies can save you power. Yeah, the environment is swell, but your CFO will be more interested in the ROI. The CIO will soon exist to save money on energy.

In the long-run, the real game will be determining what you get as this arms race escalates. But it will take a careful eye to discern the ROI and the marketing spiel.

Topics: Intel, CXO, Hardware, Networking, Processors, Servers, IT Employment

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Green Contest???

    Regarding the "green" one upmanship mentioned in the article, one historical method of reducing power consumption is simply to avoid using it; you know, like Ebenezer Scrooge rationing coal, i.e., turn off the lights, install fewer and dimmer lights in your office space, limit the A/C, etc.

    So computer-wise, installing less memory, smaller displays, ink-jets over laser, fewer systems, and things like that, all save power and might be used during marketing to claim being "green".

    That kind of thinking is pure deception plain and simple.

    Therefore all advertising and company information should accurately compare power consumption to the immediately previous power requirements (not 3 yrs ago) having the exact same set of capabilities.
    lmenningen
    • i agree what saving

      in the grand scheem of power (aussie based dollars)
      to save any noticible ammount you will need to average the whole year running 24/7
      1w /hour on 240v system =24w/day
      =7344w /year @ 15c kw
      = less than 10.00 year cpu saving but spend what to upgrade
      how much power used to produce new chip
      as i started ... what saving is there realy
      highjacker@...
  • RE: Intel rolls out new server, high-end PC chip lineup; Green arms race heats up

    What's a penryn?
    Could intel make more confusion with naming?
    Try deciphering their cpu charts!
    Their Marketing people need to be taken out & shot. my $0.02 worth
    don@...
  • RE: Intel rolls out new server, high-end PC chip lineup; Green arms race heats up

    I once sent an email to Intel asking them to explain to me why their 1.6 ghx dual core chip was better than the old 3.2chip which boasted dual processing power... The 1.6 chip cost 4 times as much as the 3.2... Of course, I never got an answer.. It seems the name of game is just to give chips strange names so nobody really knows how the hell fast they are anymore. Just another way to continue selling processors I think.
    StargazerBBS@...
    • intell confusion

      they are more confusing in chip nombers than amd now i dont undrestand why they needso many chips the same speed just diferent fsb and core multipliers ... all us dumb people trying to fathom what is better gets us so confused we can be led by what the seller wants to sell eg duel core core 2 core2duo all same ?
      quad core slower than core2 ?
      highjacker@...
  • Now to wait for consumer Penryn's

    The wait continues for the Penryn affordable by the average American consumer....

    - John Musbach
    John Musbach