iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
Summary: With the debut of the Kindle Fire, Amazon went from having zero percent of the market share in Q3 2011 to garnering 14 percent of the share by the end of Q4.
A new report from IHS iSuppli finds (once again) that Apple controls well over the majority of the tablet market share worldwide as of the fourth quarter of 2011.
But the real story is the how, within three months, Amazon surged past the competition and left all but Apple in the dust.
With the debut of the Kindle Fire, Amazon went from having zero percent of the market share in Q3 2011 (obviously, as they didn't have any tablets -- just e-book readers) to garnering 14 percent of the share by the end of Q4.
That's nearly double than what Samsung posted, which has had several Galaxy Tab models out on the market for some time now. Both Samsung and Asus experienced losses at the hands of Amazon, and the only other brand in the top five to see and increase in share was Barnes & Noble.
B&N was helped largely by a new release of its own. However, Q1 2012 numbers will give us a better idea of where the Nook Tablet stands in the face of its direct competitor, the Kindle Fire, as it won't have the energy of being a new release nor the holiday season to help it.
Interestingly, Rhoda Alexander, senior manager, tablet and monitor research for IHS, explained in the report that Apple's biggest competition wasn't really the Kindle Fire, but another product of its own making:
Shipments of the iPad line fell short of IHS estimates in the fourth quarter as many loyal Apple customers devoted their dollars to shiny new alternatives.
However, the primary alternative wasn’t the Kindle Fire—which debuted to solid sales in the fourth quarter—but Apple’s own iPhone 4S smartphone. The rollout of the iPhone 4S in October generated intense competition for Apple purchasers’ disposable income, doing more to limit iPad shipment growth than competition from the Kindle Fire and other media tablets.
Although Apple lost only a relatively little chunk of its market share, it definitely goes to show that this market is getting more competitive and no one can get relaxed.
Chart via IHS iSuppli
Related:
- Nielsen: Kids like actually like tablets for educational activities
- Amazon pulls iPad 2 tablets from Chinese site
- FTC voices concerns about mobile apps for children
- Apple: Apps using contact data are in "violation"; fix coming soon
- Nvidia's Tegra 3 plan: Superphones, Android tablets soon, Windows 8 later
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
kindle schwindle
Keep telling yourself that.
On a personal note, I see Fire's everywhere. It seems like everyday at work I run into someone new that has a Fire, with some having bought multiples. One lady down the hall bought four, one for herself and one each for her daughters. She was looking at iPads, but could not justify the price. Another person in my office bought 2, one for himself and one for his wife. He was also looking at getting an iPad, but decided he would rather have two Fire's than one iPad. This story has repeated many times just in the group of people that I interact with.
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
I have yet to see a Fire. All I see are iPads. On the train, on the bus, in the doctor's office and in meetings in the office. I have yet to see a Kindle fire. I did actually see something I thought was a Fire and it turned out to be a Nook.
Surprisingly
Traveling a lot, I make an effort to look at wht people are using.
I will say I am seeing a surge in KFires to the point that pc's, iPads and KFires are the top three in the last couple of weeks at airports....
yep
i just keep repeating the obvious: no data available other than the sales numbers of the ipad. the rest is just random estimates based on no methodology whatsoever. all the other companies chose not to disclose their real sales numbers, neither samsung, amazon or anyone else. why is that? because they sell their tablets by the truck load?
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
Wp7 is dead as KIN. To low specs
I love my Iphone Dual Core.
The Perfect Price Point (PPP)
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
It still only has 8Gb storage, no volume rocker, poor resolution and cluncky plastic design. Other than that I hope you enjoy it.
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
At least it doesn't wheight 2 tons like my iPad2. Long live plastic. We are talking about handheld electronic devices here, not jewelry.
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
What's currently happening with open-sourced Android being used by Amazon and Barnes & Noble is somewhat similar to what Apple faced when Psystar attempted to ship Mac OS X on it's cheap desktop systems. With Mac OS X being closed-source and having licensing restrictions with regard to its use on non-Apple hardware, Apple was able to vanquish Psystar. While Amazon's apps may be of benefit to you with your ASUS Transformer Prime tablet, how, exactly, does Amazon's and B & N's subversion of Android benefit Google and its OHA partners? Remember, the Fire and Nook do not ship with Google's services pre-installed, access to Google's Android Market is blocked and OHA hardware manufacturers are experiencing reduced device sales.
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
Who cares if it's not OHA?
From user perspective: They don't care where it's from, just as long as they have media like videos and music, all the major "apps", and a reasonable browser (check, check, and check). As a side bonus, smart users who know it runs Android like Mrxxxman know they can sideload a large number of Android Market or free GetJar apps from other tablet manufacturers.
From Google's perspective: They sell ads. They still make money off of the ads on the Kindle Fire. Google "loses" just a touch of money from Gapps (maps, navigation, etc). Oh wait, they would have never had the licensing money at all if Amazon chose, say, Meego. So no difference here.
From Developer perspective: Another source of income and I don't have to do much? BRING IT! Much like the BB10 Playbook patch: almost nothing to lose and bam, your app reached another platform!
Bottom line: The only reason Psystar was shut down was to maintain a monopoly. Think about it: Psystar was offering cheaper devices because they were charging a significantly smaller margin. If there's only one source of an OS, then the controlling company can charge whatever if the market has a demand for it. i.e. HP could have charged a lot of money if WebOS was in demand (before they open sourced it anyway). Where else would you get a WebOS device?
Oh, and to answer your question? After the developer completes any exclusivity agreements they have on Amazon, Android as a whole benefits from having another app inside it's ecosystem. If you were a developer and only had to pay $15 one-time, wouldn't you list it on the Android Market? I know I would.
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
Sure. It's easy when Apple is the only one who provides actual sales numbers. By this time next year, Apple will have sold another 60m tablets, their share will fall to 50% and no one will ever actually see another tablet but the iPad in the wild.
Eh?
data
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
RE: iSuppli: Kindle Fire jumps from zero to 14 percent of market share
I love my Iphone Dual Core.
We lose money on every device