Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Large Hadron Collider hits milestone: Smashes protons at highest energy level yet

By | March 30, 2010, 6:31am PDT

Summary: The Large Hadron Collider overcame some early electrical hurdles and operated at its highest energy level yet as it collected data from smashing protons together.

This post originally appeared on Smart Planet.

The Large Hadron Collider overcame some early electrical hurdles and operated at its highest energy level yet as it collected data from smashing protons together.

At an event Tuesday, the officials at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Geneva kicked off the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiments. LHC started at an energy three and a half times higher than previously achieved at a particle accelerator. The successful experiment culminated a 16-year, $10 billion quest to collide subatomic particles.

Gallery: LHC’s biggest collision yet

In September 2008, the proton beams were successfully circulated in the main ring of the LHC for the first time but 9 days later operations were halted due to a fault between two superconducting bending magnets. Repairs and safety features took more than a year to implement. In November 2009, proton beams were circulated again.

The LHC event put those hurdles in the rear view mirror. Beams collided at an energy level of 7 trillion electron volts (7 TeV), with two beams each operating at 3.5 TeV. CERN1 Director General Rolf Heuer said “it’s a great day to be a particle physicist.”

LHC is designed to look for dark matter, new dimensions and the Higgs Boson. The Higgs boson is a hypothetical massive scalar elementary particle predicted to exist by the Standard Model in particle physics. The LHC is a 27km ring deep beneath the French-Swiss border.

CERN’s business is fundamental physics, finding out what the Universe is made of and how it works. The LHC will give CERN more tools for its quest—especially as energy levels rise.

A few key images:

Here’s a computer representation of the collision.

Proton tracks from an LHC experiment called Atlas.

More collisions.

More reading on the topic:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

ha party breaker
Quebec-french 30th Mar 2010
we want our black hole ,

and experience the ride of our life
0 Votes
+ -
So am I ....
Economister 30th Mar 2010
writing this from inside a black hole? wink
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
You may be
Larry Dignan 30th Mar 2010
when this blows up and suck the whole earth into some bizarro proton world
now you got me looking over my shoulder every couple of minutes looking for an errent black hole happy
0 Votes
+ -
well one thing sure
Quebec-french 30th Mar 2010
It would be a hell of a ride ...

Snow board ,surf ,down hill ski is so last month ....

now its get suck by a black hole wipeeeee
And to think, we could have been doing this in Waxahachie Texas 20 years or so ago.
0 Votes
+ -
For shame
crazydanr@... 30th Mar 2010
Instead we watch the rest of the world pass us by as we bicker over trivial things and accomplish just about nothing.

If we put as much time and energy into fusion research as we do complaining and arguing, we'd have vast cheap energy, jobs, and a product the rest of the world would want.

Just a thought.
0 Votes
+ -
Lovely black hole!
Gradius2 30th Mar 2010
What a lovely black hole, let's speed up 2012 asap!

Not that I believe in such things. wink
0 Votes
+ -
They do know how NOT to make a black hole i hope.
Been_Done_Before 30th Mar 2010
Cause i would rather not get swallowed up in our own stupidity.
0 Votes
+ -
It might be ....
Economister 30th Mar 2010
a very brief but very exhilarating journey. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Worse ways to go
crazydanr@... 30th Mar 2010
A superbug, an asteroid, the sun going supernova, solar flares, nuclear winter, a local cosmic event, zombies...

I'll take a man made black hole, created out of our inquisitiveness, over destroying ourself any day. At least the next passerby would slow down and wonder what the heck happened.
0 Votes
+ -
Black holes silliness
DNSB Updated - 30th Mar 2010
I hate to toss a wet blanket over the doom and gloom vendors but the math indicates that even if they created a microscopic black hole, it would evaportate rather rapidly. Unlike the old science fiction image of a black hole starting off small and eating a world, current belief is that a black hole that small has the lifespan that makes those lovely elements in the 110 proton range seem like veritable Methuselahs. See Stephen Hawkings work for more information.

In the case of the CERN LHC, I've seen a couple of comments that the lifespan of a black hole created would be somewhere between 10 to the -43 and 10 to the -26 seconds.

Assuming the black hole is created travelling near the speed of light (~300,000Km/sec or 3 * (10 exp 17) nm/sec) so time dilation comes into play allowing the black hole to live for a longer period from our time frame. Hmmm... using a speed of .9999 light speed gives us a time dilation factor of about 70. Life span at 10 to -26 before evaporating, time dilation factor at 70 would give a maximum distance of approximately 70 * (3 x 10 exp 17) * (10 exp -26) or 2.1 x (10 exp -7) nm.

In comparison, the diameter of an atom is often stated in the .1 to .5 nm range.

You might also wish to consider that the black holes theoretically created would have the awesome mass of two protons. Care to guess what the gravitational effect of two protons is going to be? Not to mention the event horizon is so tiny that the black hole is incredibly unlikely to hit anything on it's way out of the collider and into space. Even it headed straight down towards the Earth'c core, it is less likely than a neutrino to interact with anything on it's way through.

As usual, any math errors are mine, all mine.

nm is nanometre BTW.
0 Votes
+ -
ha party breaker
Quebec-french 30th Mar 2010
we want our black hole ,

and experience the ride of our life

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix