Lotus Notes to get ODF, but SuSE desktop version needs work

Lotus Notes to get ODF, but SuSE desktop version needs work

Summary: Rodney Gedda of ComputerWorld Australia:The release of Notes 7.0.


Rodney Gedda of ComputerWorld Australia:

The release of Notes 7.0.1 for [Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop] 10 makes it more cross-platform, with Windows, Mac OS X, and Fedora Linux already supported, and removes a significant barrier to Linux on the enterprise desktop....

....The next generation of Notes, codenamed Hanover, is in beta testing and will support the Open Document Format (ODF) and also be cross platform...

But according to the same story, at least one user that has tried Notes on SLED had a hard time getting it working:

"I can't image a large Notes install base migrating 500 desktops over while it is this complex to setup. A single RPM [RPM Package Manager] package file would be much easier."

The story has more comment from the user who sounds like he knows what he's doing. In the bigger picture, IBM is showing a willingness to use the presence of Notes in the messaging and collaboration space to give the OpenDocument Format and desktop Linux a ride on its coattails. My question is whether or not Notes has enough clout in the market to give either a boost. On the flipside, perhaps the lackluster support of ODF from Microsoft (which is how I'd still characterize the way Microsoft is "supporting" ODF) vs. the more robust support of it in both IBM's Lotus Notes and its Managed Workplace Client (IBM's competition to Microsoft's Office, but  it's only for organizations) could result in an improved appetite for IBM's solutions given the way some organizations and governments (like the City of Munich whose migration to desktop Linux appears to be going well) have an interest in desktop Linux as well as ODF. 

Topic: Linux

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Odd Microsoft is not enthusiastic...

    ... about supporting ODF. It is, as you say, part of a move from Office and even Windows, something Microsoft intends to encourage.

    It also reduces use of the new (and newly discovered) features that Microsoft expects will help sell upgrades. And Microsoft does want to save money for potential customers by lessening the likelihood they will purchase Microsoft products.

    Microsoft is a generous company, with plans to reduce reduce its revenues in a consistent manner from year to year until they finally disapppear.

    Okay, okay. But the reference to Microsoft and ODF in the article was faux naif.
    Anton Philidor
  • Is Microsoft arranging the Munich tours?

    With full training in all the difficulties and expense and time required for an effort still in progress and still vulnerable. And still, per another artricle, unlikely ever to be xcomplete because Microsoft products proved essential (so far at least) to some mandatory processes.

    Is it possible that consideration of Munich's travails tends to produce an attitude toward Windows and Office similar to that of Mike Cox?
    Anton Philidor