Microsoft, In Search Of Itself

Summary: Forget combining your search business with that of Yahoo, for now. Let investors agitate for a sale at Friday’s Yahoo shareholder meeting.

Forget combining your search business with that of Yahoo, for now. Let investors agitate for a sale at Friday’s Yahoo shareholder meeting. Microsoft: speed up your search for your self.

Microsoft makes more money than scores of nations in the world by selling that world on whatever the latest version of its Windows operating system is and the Office suite that runs on it.

But Microsoft still can’t make a compelling case for Vista. And when it comes to providing applications on the Web, the pieces of its Office suite remain conspicuously absent.

Sure, it’s getting aggressive in countering criticism, calling, for instance, Forrester Research ‘schizophrenic’ about its research on the acceptance of Vista in the corporate world.

And it’s trying to change the thinking among individual users, aka consumers, about Vista by (a) putting $500 million into advertising campaigns touting its benefits and (b) conducting the so-called Mojave Experiment, where users are shown an alleged new operating system from the company, get blown away by it, and then are told what they have seen is in fact Vista.

But can you see what they have seen to allegedly change their minds?

Not if you go to the Mojave Experiment video.

Try to find a clip among the 55 panels where you actually can see what the focus group user is shown. Instead, you get five carefully crafted clips at the bottom right of the screen showing, at a high level, some distinctive features, such as parental controls and the recording of TV shows.

You're not sure what they're seeing but you're pretty sure the average buyer is not going to get the kind of handholding and direct demonstrations that these users get (see clip 55 on “instant search.”) Maybe that'll happen, if PC retailers start setting up more demo stations, a la an Apple Store.

If the clips are enough to make you start thinking about checking out Vista, Microsoft takes you on your search over to its Windows Vista website.

There you can watch a semi-amusing commercial about “sharing memories as they happen” and you get to read how Microsoft defines whatever the leap forward is about Vista.

And you can get a few definitions of what is distinctive in Microsoft’s mind about Windows Vista:

You live life beyond your PC. So do we._We live a lot of life on our PCs — working, planning, playing, and connecting. But we live a whole lot more of life elsewhere. That's why Windows is on mobile phones and on the web. So the power and familiarity of Windows is available in more places and in more ways — closer to where you live your life.

Or:

You live life with your PC. So do we._We live a lot of life with our PCs. So it's important that using a PC is safe, easy, and enjoyable. That's what Windows Vista is about — increasing the security, ease, and pleasure of using a PC. It's Windows — closer to where you live your life.

There’s a decent checklist showing how you can “enjoy more, worry less” with Vista and the combination of Windows Vista, Windows Mobile and Windows Live.

But the striking thing – still – about Windows Live is what’s missing. After years of talking about “software as a service,’’ trying to create buzz about using Microsoft software everywhere and anywhere you go, you can’t create, pull up or share Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations or Word documents from a Windows Live menu. Don't make people think of going over to Google Docs. Make sure they stay with you, from whatever machine they happen to be using. Heck, even if you get them to use Office Live, you can store, share and download documents. Not create or modify them, using a Web browser alone.

If the aim of this campaign is really to “talk about things you can do with your PC that you could never do before,’’ it’d also be helpful to be able to do the things you’re used to doing on your own PC, without having to carry it around, for instance.

The best pitch for Vista can’t be to just enjoy more and worry less, than the last go-round.

If you’re Microsoft, you ought to be defining why your operating systems -- combined with your (Office) apps -- are better than anything else out there.

The Mojave Experiment -- which comes roughly a year and a half after the launch of Vista -- says to “stay tuned.” Okay, but you’d think if Microsoft was really on top of its core business, ahead of the game and knew what really sets the use of Vista apart, it would be able to articulate it to anyone at any time by now.

Topics: Windows, Hardware, Microsoft, Operating Systems, Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

21 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • To Microsoft, the future is yesterday

    With the addition of control by Microsoft..........
    Ole Man
  • I posted this on another talkback...

    but this just shows the lack of sincerity from MS. They can't even be straight forward with us. Their user want XP and not Vista. Until MS admits this and changes their stubborn streak of trying to shove what we don't want down our throat, they are going backward.

    http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50237&messageID=942325&start=0
    bjbrock
  • What Microsoft should really be in search of is...

    a new CEO. Steve Ballmer doesn't even come close to what's needed for Microsoft to move forward as a innovative and creative company embracing the 21st century. If the board of directors of Microsoft had an ounce of common sense, they would drop Ballmer like a bad habit. Not only is he inept and not up to the task, he is a total embarrassment and joke to the company. I've never read about a CEO who was the butt of more jokes then Steve Ballmer. Just do a YouTube.com search on the guy, and you'll find a whole slew of video's of the guy making a complete ass of himself. A company like Microsoft deserves much better. With Ballmer on board, they will remain a mediocre visionless software company that produces second rate products.

    Microsoft has become the Oldsmobile of the computer industry. While they wallow away in 20th century technology, others have embraced the 21st century with new technology and innovations that makes Microsoft look like a has been. Microsoft needs a CEO similar to Steve Jobs. Apple keeps pumping out one useful innovative product after another. What do we see form Microsoft? Big ass useless tables and spheres. Talk about pathetic.
    gtdworak
    • Instead of Microhoo...let's do a CEO swap!!

      ...and see which (if any) company comes out ahead!! ;)
      techboy_z
  • Let's try this again.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/07/29/vista-sales-really-windows-xp
    bjbrock
    • LOL

      They did that with XP as well:

      http://www.hp.com/workstations/white_papers/docs/windows2k_support_sept2004_v4.pdf

      Guess what the buyers did with those licences about a year later?
      Sleeper Service
  • Tom, Tom, Tom...

    I see what you're saying but that's hardly the point of Mojave, is it?
    Sleeper Service
    • How do you mean?

      The Mojave Experiment shows that Microsoft has not so far been particularly able at explaining what stands out about Vista and is searching for the best way to articulate what it hopes can produce a marketable "wow" factor.
      Tom Steinert-Threlkeld
      • I dsagree...

        Mojave is clearly just a PR exercise designed to alter public perception of a particular product.

        I don't think we should confuse the language of the ad agency with a literal statement.
        Sleeper Service
      • Bwahahahahahaha!!!

        "searching for the best way to articulate what it hopes can
        produce a marketable "wow" factor"....
        Thanks for the laugh and don't you see the preposterous
        in this? It's like saying Vista is crap but with a little
        marketing....

        Consumers are responding to Vista with a big yawn which
        is embarrassing to MS, and it should be. MS is scratching
        the hardware-vendors' backs by building ridiculously high
        requirements into Vista, and as cream on the mashed
        potatoes is it full of restrictions like DRM and is not fully
        backwards compatible.... etc.

        What I think is that MS deserve this and that it's a result of
        a greedy and lazy company, lazy because of its monopoly. Licenses are still expensive and it amazes me that people
        aren't switching to other platforms at an even higher rate.
        Mikael_z
        • Hi, Michael

          Did you have anything to add other than previously debunked nonsense?

          Because if not you can move along now.
          Sleeper Service
      • Mojave is..

        a crude exercise in consumer focus groups.

        MSDT still has no clue about what it should be
        marketing so it does some focus grouping with the
        least serious and sophisticated users - those who do
        not know anything about it.

        If this is part of the $500MM Crispin Porter + Bogusky
        marketing story, it is a failure.

        (Interesting note: Did you know that Crispin Porter is
        an exclusively Mac shop? Do a google news search on
        the name and you'll find a FastCompany article that
        details it. Alternately, go to the Apple website and
        search there. There are many more details about
        Crispin Porter there.

        Should the people who are telling you that Vista is so
        great not be using it? If it was so almighty great,
        would Crispin Porter not be using it?)
        Jeremy W
  • Accept the joke, then move on

    "Microsoft makes more money than scores of nations in
    the world by selling that world on whatever the latest
    version of its Windows operating system is and the Office
    suite that runs on it."

    This is MS: windows and office (period).

    Thanks to circumstances and the network effect these not
    very good products became a monopoly commodity. MS
    actual contribution to OSes and Productivity suites was negligible, like everything else they do.

    What surprising is the uninformed apologists and the
    expectation that MS will someday make something decent.
    Accept the joke for what it is and move on.
    Richard Flude
    • You're kidding, right?

      Because if you're not can you explain why no-one uses Visicalc anymore?

      As for apologists, it's not so much that, it's just debunking the sheer stupidity of some of the AMB which, since you guys rarely check your facts, isn't really that difficult. I've no huge love for MS but then I've even less love for morons.
      Sleeper Service
      • One Word explains it - "Monopoly"

        Tactics like getting the OEMS to install only their software and other stuff that got them convicted of anti-trust violations. But they managed to pay off the right people in time.
        Breetai
        • No it doesn't...

          ...because Office isn't installed on most people's machines as part of cost.

          So, again, why don't people run Visicalc and Lotus as much as Office?
          Sleeper Service
          • Possible reasons

            People use whatever they have easy access to and buy with
            the same reason. The PC guy selling PCs may be offering
            the Office suit when someone is buying a PC, maybe even
            with a rebate.

            Office has become an extremely complicated and
            userhostile environment for something as simple as
            documentproduction and I know no one who thinks it's
            easy to use.

            There are lots and lots of alternatives which would serve
            people much better, primarily the simplest ones with only
            simple text editing for close to 100% of the clueless Office
            users out there.

            There are Pages, Numbers and Keynote for Mac computers
            but even if the iWork bundle is in stark contrast very easy
            to use to produce stunningly beautiful presentations,
            calculations and text documents, is that too way too much
            for most people's needs.
            Mikael_z
  • Slow news day

    Dueling over advertisements = ZDNet Jumping the shark.

    No one has anything real to talk about, eh?

    Apples ads are biased and uninformative. MS ads are biased and uninformative. So what else is new under the Sun?
    ThePrairiePrankster
  • I love the Mojave

    Microsoft sure does have the best Snake Oil. Mmm Hmmm.
    Breetai
  • Rubbish!

    It's headquarted in Redmond Wa.
    USA
    EARTH
    Sol
    Milkyway

    There!
    MIKEC0X