Microsoft inks Linspire: Is Red Hat next?
Summary: Microsoft inked its third Linux interoperability deal as the third version of General Public License nears the finish line. Will Red Hat fall in line soon?
Microsoft inked its third Linux interoperability deal as the third version of General Public License nears the finish line. Will Red Hat fall in line soon?
Microsoft today announced an interoperability deal with Linspire and the pact reads roughly like the one it has with Xandros. As we all know Microsoft is tied up with Novell in a pact that has been advantageous to both companies.
In fact, Microsoft's Novell deal (not to mention GPLv3) is spurring many of these deals. Windows and Linux will play nice in the enterprise and open source providers are wary of being locked out as Novell and Red Hat run off with the market.
Under its Microsoft pact, Linspire will be involved with document sharing formats. Linspire will also license technology to make its digital media and instant messaging apps compatible with Microsoft's. Linspire also makes Live Search its default search engine.
And the big deal for Linspire is patent protection. In a statement Microsoft said:
Through the agreement, Microsoft and Linspire have developed a framework to provide patent covenants for Linspire customers. The patent covenants provide customers with confidence that the Linspire technologies they use come with rights to relevant Microsoft patents.
Now there are two ways to read these Microsoft-Linux pacts. Duncan Riley at TechCrunch writes that Microsoft is creating an anybody-but-Red-Hat club to outflank the Linux bellwether.
If that's Microsoft's strategy against Red Hat it doesn't seem to be working. The consensus seems to be that Microsoft isn't denting Red Hat at all by inking pacts with lesser Linux providers. In a research note dated June 7, Jeffries analyst Katherine Egbert reports that Red Hat likely landed JP Morgan in the May quarter. Meanwhile, Novell customer wins at Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Bear Stearns were largely because Red Hat held the line on pricing, says Egbert.
An alternate theory--and one detailed in Egbert's note--is that Red Hat could do a deal with Microsoft. Egbert writes:
Several industry sources have indicated that Red Hat has opened talks with Microsoft re: patents.
These talks are especially relevant in light of the recent, final release of GPLv3, which extends any two-party patent protection to all users of v3 licensed software (there is a grandfather clause that excludes the Novell-Microsoft agreement). Microsoft recently signed patent cross-license agreements with OSS provider Zimbra and with LG Electronics. While there has been only minor progress to date with Red Hat, we find the talks encouraging.
A Red Hat pact would be quite a coup for Microsoft and in theory could shelve future interoperability concerns for customers looking to mix and match Linux and Windows. The one major hang-up in talks will be virtualization technology. Don't hold your breath for a Microsoft-Red Hat partnership, but if it's going to happen it'll happen real soon.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Anybody notice a pattern here?
Like Larry said, don't hold your breath for a Red Hat-MS patent deal. I'm going to make a prediction: Red Hat is smart enough to simply wait it out to the end of the month. After that they can sign a deal, but it will be a pure interoperability deal, sans patents, unlest MS wants its' patents to be free to use by the whole F/OSS community.
Red Hat doesn't need to do a deal
Novell has always been second to Red Hat, i'm assuming they took the deal as a market differentiator so that they could say that they offered something other than not being Red Hat.
Nobody really cares what Xandros and Linspire do, i suspect we won't be hearing much from them in the coming years.
Red Hat should no that they don't need to do a deal of this sort - Microsoft could have improved interoperability if they wanted to do that. I don't think we'll ever see an Office for Linux or anything. By taking a deal, as the largest Linux company, they would validate Microsofts patent claims.. (a quick google of microsoft patent stuff reveals they have an apple tree patent and a patent for sudo so i really wouldn't worry).
So Linspire has shot themselves in the foot
Not prohibiting...
[i]Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. [b]To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all[/b].[/i]
You missed the point
You can not grant more rights than you already have.
I similar example, might be if you rented an apartment. Your lease might well have a no pets clause. Your lease might also have a clause allowing you to sublease. Despite that sublease clause, you could not legally engage in a sublease contract that allows pets in the apartment.
Bill
Then they'll be stuck in the mud
And your point is ... ?
That depends