Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Microsoft offers to buy FAST for $1.2 billion; Likely to trigger enterprise search consolidation

By | January 8, 2008, 2:35am PST

Microsoft said Tuesday that it will offer $1.2 billion in cash for Fast Search and Transfer (FAST), a big player in the enterprise search market.

The move is sure to shake up the enterprise search market, which thus far has been dominated by a series of smaller players like FAST, Autonomy and Vivisimo. Google has made some inroads, but for the most part the market is the realm of niche players. Microsoft is about to change that with FAST. You can expect Google to make a purchase in enterprise search along with traditional enterprise players like HP, IBM and the usual suspects.

In a statement, Microsoft said its offer is a 42 percent premium to where FAST shares trade in Norway. FAST’s board of directors has recommended that shareholders take the offer and the company’s two largest shareholders–Orkla ASA and Hermes Focus Asset Management Europe–are on board with the deal. The transaction should be completed in the second quarter.

FAST counts Comcast, Disney, Microsoft, Pfizer, UBS and others as customers. In its most recent third quarter, FAST had revenue of $35.6 million, up 4 percent from the second quarter. Third quarter recurring revenue was up 65 percent from a year ago. Fiscal 2006 revenue topped $162 million, according to FAST’s annual report. The company is profitable and had $137.9 million in cash at the end of its third quarter.

Microsoft is likely to raise a ruckus in enterprise search and force consolidation among FAST’s rivals. Microsoft can bundle FAST with its Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and probably poach some features for its consumer search if warranted. And Microsoft will gladly take FAST’s search engineering talent. I did an overview of enterprise search last year and highlighted how long it takes to deploy. In a nutshell, enterprise search is more complicated than slapping in a search appliance because you have unstructured data.

In a statement, Jeff Raikes, president of Microsoft’s Business Division, said:

“Until now organizations have been forced to choose between powerful, high-end search technologies or more mainstream, infrastructure solutions. The combination of Microsoft and FAST gives customers a new choice: a single vendor with solutions that span the full range of customer needs.”

Translation: The rest of this industry is going to consolidate fast.

Update: The area to watch going forward is how FAST integrates with SharePoint Server. Mary Jo Foley has more on that angle and it’s one we’ll be following throughout the day.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

26
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Rounding error? According to most recent financial statements...
xuniL_z Updated - 26th Jan 2009
1.2 billion is almost 5% of Microsoft's available cash.

0 Votes
+ -
Could be a prudent purchase...
BanjoPaterson 8th Jan 2008
... or could be money down the tubes. This is a drop in the ocean for their finances, so it will be interesting to see how this pans out.
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
i think it makes sense
Larry Dignan 8th Jan 2008
From the Sharepoint perspective. Mary Jo has more details on that here;

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1085

And besides FAST is a rounding error to Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
1.2 billion is almost 5% of Microsoft's available cash.

0 Votes
+ -
a futile move
Linux Geek 8th Jan 2008
FAST is not going to add anything new to M$ when compared to the google offering. It's just 1.2 billions wasted that whould sped M$ demise at the hands of OSS.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow....
K Anderson 8th Jan 2008
so you really have no understanding of the difference between what FAST brings to the table vs. Google. The GSA doesn't hold a candle to FAST's capabilities in enterprise search.
0 Votes
+ -
Didn't they laugh at me...
fbraski@... 8th Jan 2008
Didn't they laugh at me when I asked them when Bill or Larry were going to make them an offer?

Excellent move by MS. Now a SharePoint search that won't suck. That'll be fantastic!
0 Votes
+ -
Haha...who's laughing at who?!
techboy_z 8th Jan 2008
A Sharepoint search that won't suck? Don't bet on it. M$ will find a way to ruin FAST. They've had their own internal group working on search for several years now...and then they went out to buy one? As soon as they get their hands on it...downhill, my friend...downhill it goes....
0 Votes
+ -
FAST >> Google Appliance
mxyzplk 8th Jan 2008
Yeah - the google appliance is good only for the most simplistic of internal search applications where you don't need customizability, your own taxonomy, et cetera. FAST is arguable the best (Autonomy etc give it a run for its money) but anyone mentioning Google in this space doesn't know what they're talking about.
0 Votes
+ -
FAST Google Appliance
NefariousWheel 8th Jan 2008
I disagree. I've made a study for the large international SI I work for and our appraisal is that a Google search appliance is better for unstructured data, particularly in third party stores such as Documentum etc. The other side is that taxonomies are an artifact of the days before relevancy algorithms and are no longer needed to locate data. Where mandated by law they'll need to be supported, and FAST will have an advantage there, I agree -- but people don't think of the taxonomy when they're storing a file and rarely when they're looking something up.
0 Votes
+ -
Errata
NefariousWheel 8th Jan 2008
Read further and was reminded Documentum uses FAST internally. No matter, the list of strange and wonderful stores that the GSA (and I'm talking the Enterprise GSA's, not the little blue entry-level one) is still much better with Google. It's far more flexible, easier to implement and it scales very well.
0 Votes
+ -
so what?
Linux Geek 8th Jan 2008
M$ bought a company that was nearly bankrupt with a lot of debt and few customers...in other words with no market.
There is no wonder that FAST shareholders are happy that somebody bought their wortless stock at a premium.
revenue for 2006 was $160 million. I think they still have a way to go before bankrupt.
0 Votes
+ -
norway enron
rmf04br@... 10th Jan 2008
..."Over the past couple of years, though, Fast has suffered a number of other blows, including issues raised by Goldman Sachs around lack of customer payment; the loss of Norwegian newspaper company Schibsted as a major customer; questions around the legitimacy of a deal with Walt Disney; and layoffs -- announced last June -- of 20 percent of its staff.

In addition, several board members have recently resigned from Fast."
Gives microsoft search tools that actually work.
Shuts Oracle out from buying them
Bugs EMC who use fast as part of Documentum.
0 Votes
+ -
Good Move
edsley 8th Jan 2008
In a recent interview, BG said that Microsoft was looking at search with a strong eye!!! And here comes the first signs of that.
For its size Microsoft is still one awesome ambitious company and also constantly evolving something..
Awesome.
www.danielsrepublic.com
Oh... poo. We're big FAST customers, we leverage their search extensively and it's a great product. We're a Linux/Java/open source shop, so I don't anticipate this being a good thing for us.
0 Votes
+ -
Chicken Bitty, The Sky Is Falling!!
itanalyst 8th Jan 2008
DRM is not going to make it through 2008!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Makes sense? Not!
techboy_z 8th Jan 2008
Didn't M$ bring in a couple big names within the last few years, to work on some of these things? They've had their own team working on "search" for at least a few years...and "visionaries" like the Lotus dude...and others. And then they go and make a purchase? hahaha Wow. Small wonder Vista can barely get off the ground, even with OEM lock-in and Windows being the de-facto OS for PCs...M$ just can't seem to do much in the way of actual internal development anymore! I'd really, really love to be a fly on the wall in the exec suites these days...I'm betting there's a whole lotta chaos going on!
0 Votes
+ -
Fast performance
benjob@... 8th Jan 2008
THIS IS LAUGHABLE

In its most recent third quarter, FAST had revenue of $35.6 million, up 4 percent from the second quarter. Third quarter recurring revenue was up 65 percent from a year ago. Fiscal 2006 revenue topped $162 million, according to FAST???s annual report. The company is ???profitable??? and had $137.9 million in cash at the end of its third quarter.

Its been loosing money and customers hand over fist for some years now it posted losses of over $100 million in the last quarter. Microsoft saved the technology, but unfortunately the technology is a lame duck in enterprise search.
0 Votes
+ -
it must be amazing software
pcguy777 8th Jan 2008
to have developers look at the code and go... there's no way man.. how'd you do that? thats why its 1.2 billion.

thats it.. im going to migrate from networking to networking+programming... more cash... way more cash.
I think tyBit will revolutionize the entire industry.
0 Votes
+ -
tyBit
jhorton@... 8th Jan 2008
I honestly think tyBit will revolutionize the entire Search Industry.
0 Votes
+ -
Sell on Merger News
Jeremy W 8th Jan 2008
Nothing shows the utter incapability of the Bloatfarm in Search than this announcement.

It has spent decades defending its fortresses of Office and Windows and is incapable of a market leading response. So, it must now trudge to Sweden to buy a 4th level competitor.

How the Bloated have fallen.

Sell MSFT. [The stock is off 2% on the news.]
0 Votes
+ -
hunt for new search technologies is on
yegor.kuznetsov@... 9th Jan 2008
We???ll probably see other acquisitions because all big players are afraid to miss the ???next big search thing.???

In most cases, though, they???ll be buying technology based on the same principle ??? keyword recognition.

Yes, you can add arcane semantic or linguistic algorithms, yes you can invest in taxonomies, but you will still have to give a system an exact definition.

But what if the keyword is misspelled? Will the engine work in this case? Or if you do not know exactly what you are looking for, just have a vague notion?

There are other solutions out there that deal with this problem imitating the work of human brain (we don???t look for keywords, we look for patterns). For example, Brainware possesses a unique, patent-protected technology that sets it apart from other data capture and enterprise search solutions providers.
Its products are powered by the world's only engine that does not rely on exact definitions to rapidly sift through mountains of unstructured data.

Brainware's technology allows it to recognize and find data through inexact definitions, patterns and context, mimicking the way the human brain processes and sorts information.
No need for dictionaries that list most common misspellings, no need for inverted indexes, Boolean operators, and taxonomies. Just type in a stream of misspelled consciousness, and the system will find the match.

Such queries will make other search engines go catatonic with confusion, but Brainware just loves them.

Here???s a case study showing Brainware in action:
Fulbright & Jaworski: Leading Law Firm Searches And Shares Knowledge Base Smarter, More Accurately
http://www.brainware.com/brain_case_lawfirm.php
0 Votes
+ -
We humans do, however,
Louis.Ross@... 9th Jan 2008
have a difficult time reading your crappy cut/paste. An intelligent being such as yourself should preview and proofread anything you hope to have understood clearly and with credibility.

Thanks
0 Votes
+ -
Enron from Norway
rmf04br@... 10th Jan 2008
fast lost 85M$ in one quarter and is called the Enron from Norway.....just do a "slow search" and you will find this info...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix