ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Nearly half of Americans favor ban on drivers using cell phones: poll

By | December 20, 2011, 9:36am PST

Summary: A recommended ban on all mobile devices while driving has sparked controversy, but many Americans actually support the idea, according to new research.

Last week, the National Transportation and Safety Board proposed a national ban on all cell phone usage by drivers. That means no texting or phone calls — even with hands-free devices — at all times while driving, except for in emergency situations.

The recommendation has sparked debate and controversy, but a new poll suggests that more Americans might be in favor of such a drastic measure than we would assume.

Poll Position reports
that Americans support the NTSB’s recommendation by a 49 percent to 44 percent margin.

When results are broken down by age, those aged 65 and older most favor the suggested ban, with 60 percent supporting it and 33 percent opposed. However, most other age groups were nearly divided with close results in favor and opposition.

The only age group that had a majority in opposition of the ban were those between the ages of 30 to 44, with 50.2 percent who opposed. Yet 46.8 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds favored the ban while 41.4 percent opposed it. (Approximately 11.7 percent abstained.)

Opinions on the proposed safety measure also didn’t vary much by political affiliation. Democrats supported the ban the most at 55 percent, followed by Republicans at 50 percent, and Independents at 48 percent.

The survey, conducted by telephone on December 15, is based on responses from 1,133 registered voters nationwide.

How do you feel about a nationwide ban on drivers using cell phones, even with hands-free devices?

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Nearly half of Americans favor ban on drivers using cell phones: poll
tonymcs@... Updated - 21st Dec
@Snooki_smoosh_smoosh

As Australians are always in the future (usually about 18 hours), we've been there and done that. Only hands-free is still legal and that may go to. Of course, the studies you refer to would indicate the same problem with radio and music as with handsfree. Let's hope 50 years in the future people will look at old videos of cars on freeways and shudder that we actually let people manually control them. Time for the smart car, as humans will always make a dumb choice occasionally.
.
But what about billable minutes? Whole law firms would go under with a ban. Oh, wait...
No to sound too harsh, but whenever I see somebody texting or answering a call while driving I feel like slapping them silly. I have been in numerous close-call situations where people that were driving and on their cell phones had no idea what they were doing, or that they were doing something wrong. In the past people lived fine without texting or calling someone every 3 minutes. Why is it so hard?
I must admit to having one non-insurance claim "accident" while trying to use a cell phone while driving.

It was at a red light and I was fooling around with a cell phone and somehow did not keep my foot fully on the brake.

I was surprised (to say the least) when my car bumped the car ahead of me. No material damage was done, thank goodness.) But that accident would have been completely avoidable had I kept my eyes focused ahead rather than at my cell phone.

I have been and continue to be a good driver with an excellent driving record to date but I understand the importance of keeping your eyes and senses focused while driving.

I believe a ban on cell phone use is a bit harsh (but understandable) but I would favor a total ban against texting by drivers of the vehicle. Texting, IMO, requires too much time away from the act of driving safely.
Driving while using a cell phone, handsfree or not, has been studied, and the results show that it is in fact more dangerous than driving while intoxicated. I do not use my cell when driving, if someone calls me while I am on the road, I pull over and take the call, if it is important, if not I call them back later.
@Snooki_smoosh_smoosh

As Australians are always in the future (usually about 18 hours), we've been there and done that. Only hands-free is still legal and that may go to. Of course, the studies you refer to would indicate the same problem with radio and music as with handsfree. Let's hope 50 years in the future people will look at old videos of cars on freeways and shudder that we actually let people manually control them. Time for the smart car, as humans will always make a dumb choice occasionally.
.
Just another excuse for the government to interfere in our daily lives
@kingcobra23 I would prefer a ban on male drivers in elderly pickups. Still, I think you are right about government interference. It all began with the mandated seat belt law, and now big government has its nose into every aspect of our daily lives. The Cure: Vote Out Incumbents!
I aways love stories like this since you could easly say that nearly half of Americans opposes this bill too.
As as bicyclist, I most definitely favor a ban on drivers using cell phones ... while driving. Better to safely pull out of traffic, stop the vehicle and make the call.
@Rabid Howler Monkey - While we're at it, maybe you cyclists could occasionally stop of stop signs and red lights? Perhaps you could stop getting angry at me when I don't see you at night when you're wearing a black jacket. A police officer I know told me that every single bicycle/auto accident he ever had to respond to was the fault of the cyclist - ignoring traffic laws.
@djlong
That same cop friend would have probably put me at fault also when I was hit in on a bike path because the driver didn't look before turning.
@djlong
Allthoses things will get HIM killed. YOU texting/cellphoneing/and above mentioned call can wipe out an entire family. But lets not fret over the little detailse hu?
@djlong I want them to ride on the correct side of the road.
There should be more offenses with penalties similar to DUI and using a cell phone should be one of them.
0 Votes
+ -
That includes texting and calling without hands-free contraptions and using non-mounted GPS devices. But I have yet to see a decent argument against the use of hands free devices, as long as the user knows how to use them properly.

I would be in favor of needing a special license classification in order to use these hands free devices to prove you know how to use them properly.
@Michael Kelly Actually, all the studies show that cell phone related accidents don't go down if using a handsfree model.
@Aerowind - the statistics also show that cell phone usage is increasing yet traffic accident rates are going down. All the while, drunk driving is still reponsible for some HALF the deaths on the roads.
@Michael Kelly I've seen a decent argument against cell phones, radios and PASSENGERS. There was a study about people not being able to react as quickly when processing human voices while in a driving simulator, and one radio host had the brains to ask the researcher if this also applied to talk radio as well as cell phones. The researcher told him yes, it did. That means that cell phone conversations are just as distracting, hands free or not, and so is listening to talk radio, and so is having a conversation with your passenger. No one talks about any of those distractions, just the cell phones.
I propose a law banning distracted driving, not just related to cellular devices. You shouldn't be drinking a coffee, eating a burger, or doing anything that takes your attention away from the road. Yes, that includes leaning back to try and pick up your toddler's toy that has fallen on the floor so they stop crying. Pull over to the side of the road if it is that important. Focusing on cellular products is picking on the technology, not fixing the problem.
0 Votes
+ -
That law already exists in Oklahoma.
linux for me 20th Dec
@Ididar

Based on several list that I have found, the number one cause of accidents based on distractions, is eating and drinking while driving. Among others, playing with the car's console controls (cd, tapes a/c, heat, etc...) shaving, make-up, etc... If they ban all the other distractions, then I will stop using my cell. Otherwise, this will be one law I will disobey.
@linux for me
A selfish freetard who woulda know!
I agree with the ban with regard to texting and holding a phone while driving. However, I don't see where using a hands-free device is any different than talking with someone who is sitting in the car next to you - both hands are still on the wheel (or at least they should be), and voice-activated dialing removes the need to physically dial numbers on the device.
@mbrello@...
I agree with that. At that point its no different than being under the distraction of a yappy person next to you or a crying child in the rear seat or tuning the radio or being distracted by something outside the car. There is so much that can take your attention away from the road. So the question is (as someone else stated above), why pick on the technology alone when there is so much? And I'm referring to hands-free. Anything activity that requires holding the phone is a no brainer and should be banned.
I'm required to answer the phone, but if driving will say "I'm driving, call you back in a couple minutes". Then I find an exit and park it to have the call. Its simple to be able to answer in that way without taking attention off the road. I would prefer a hands off one with a loud speaker though. If that stupid law passes then I won't have to answer the phone immediately any more. I will probably be additionally given a 2-way business radio to be mounted in the vehicle and the company will have incoming calls routed to a half duplex repeater. Essentially, the radio will ring.. I will pick up the mike, squeeze it, and say, "hello...", then let off to hear the caller.
We are finding that there are a lot of people who can't walk and chew gum at the same time. Division of attention is a learned trait, not a genetic hand-me-down. But, banning all cell phone usage including hands-free, would be akin to outlawing radios and even conversation in a moving vehicle. The ultimate government solution - Enclose the drivers' station in a sealed capsule devoid of all visual, audio, and thought distractions. Good Luck with that fellow humans!
We can all drive the "GoogleMobile" in the future and then text to our hearts content. But considering how glitchy Android releases have been lately, would you trust any automated auto driving software created by Google? (To be fair, I wouldn't trust Siri to drive my car either.)
I support a ban with the exception of using a hands free device such as a bluetooth headset or in car receiver to make and receive phone calls.
I am also in favor of hands-free use only. When people quote statistics that say the accident rate doesn't go down for hands-free, I wonder how those stats compare to OTHER distracted driving habits that are perfectly legal. Eating or drinking (all those cupholders!), yelling at your kids in the backseat, talking to a passenger, manipulating the stereo, and on and on.

And you will never get me to believe that using a cell phone hands-free and sober is more dangerous than driving while intoxicated. That's just crazy talk.
Why would a ban on all cell use, including hands-free, be any more successful than the current ban on non-hands-free use? I see people all the time using their cell phones in the car while driving. It's like the speed limit, or the seatbelt laws - people ignore it whenever they please. How about changing the law so that if someone causes an accident while talking on a cell phone they get a huge fine and six months in jail? That might scare people into being more careful...
I mean, people drive around with kids in the car all the time. And I guarantee, kids in the car are WAY more distracting than a phone conversation.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix