ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Netflix's latest show: When creative destruction attacks

By | October 25, 2011, 2:49am PDT

Summary: Creative destruction looks great on the white board. Netflix CEO Reed Hastings dropped the creative and was left with destruction—lots of it.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings had it all figured out. He wasn’t going to be caught up in the innovator’s dilemma and planned to navigate the transition from DVDs to streaming better than anyone. The creative destruction just looked great on the white board.

Unfortunately, Hastings dropped the creative and was left with destruction—lots of it. Netflix has lost subscribers, market capitalization and its reputation for a series of botched moves.

Now all Hastings can do is apologize repeatedly. In Netflix’s third quarter investor letter, the company said “we’ve hurt our hard-earned reputation and stalled our domestic growth.” “Amazing service” would bring people back. In the meantime, Netflix’s bottom line will see some red in 2012 as it expands internationally.

On the surface, Hastings’ plan sounded almost reasonable. Hastings was going to bet the ranch on his streaming service and raise prices to boot. After all, Netflix was worth the money right? Who can argue with $7.99 for streaming and $7.99 for DVD service. The DVD-by-mail service would be segmented—even quarantined—and Netflix would ultimately be rewarded for being a streaming entertainment company. The plan: To manage the transition from DVDs to streaming gracefully and profitably.

The math could work too. Hastings would destroy a low margin business in DVDs and grow a high-margin global streaming service.

Netflix’s timeline resembles a horror movie script.

I messed up. I owe everyone an explanation.

It is clear from the feedback over the past two months that many members felt we lacked respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming, and the price changes. That was certainly not our intent, and I offer my sincere apology.

The fix: Launch Qwikster. Customers called it Qwikstupid. Customers were right.

  • On Oct. 10, Hastings said in a blog post: “It is clear that for many of our members two websites would make things more difficult, so we are going to keep Netflix as one place to go for streaming and DVDs.”
  • Fast forward to Oct. 24 and Netflix is cutting its fourth quarter outlook and indicates things will get worse before improvement. Netflix lost more than 800,000 domestic subscribers in the third quarter. Netflix delivered a domestic churn rate of 6.3 percent in the third quarter, up from 4.2 percent in the second quarter. Historically, Netflix churn has been between 3.8 percent and 4.5 percent.

The rub: The fourth quarter is when Netflix thought customers would be over the price changes.

Cheers to Hastings for attempting creative destruction. Jeers for botching the execution. Creative destruction has been a theme in recent weeks. Gartner analysts implored technology executives to blow up their infrastructure and start over. If it were that easy we’d all deploy creative destruction.

As Hastings is quickly learning creative destruction has a dark side and things get ugly once you drop the “creative” part of the equation.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
126
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Netflix's latest show: When creative destruction attacks
Bakabaka 9th Nov
@Sevrinus@...
Itunes never deilivered disk media and no one complains.
There are a multitude of streaming only services, no one bugs these services to deliver DVD's.
Increases in shipping costs make delivering DVDs and streaming movies too costly. Price of netflix has gone up for only those who have DVD shipping service.

Unlimited streaming shows for 8 bucks a month is still a great deal.
0 Votes
+ -
1st Principle
johnfenjackson@... Updated - 25th Oct
I've been trying for a while now to persuade ZDNET bloggers and readers of one key principle:

1. Corporations WILL NOT PASS ON COST BENEFITS from technology advances to customers.

Netflix has learnt the hard way ... because customers had a choice.

We have a choice too with the move to the cloud. If computing doesn't start getting significantly cheaper then the vendor has simply retained the cost benefits for himself.

But everyone appears to be rushing towards expensive public clouds from the usual suspects: just one example from private operations too - the outrage at VMWARE's pricing changes.

Unless there is a concerted effort to combat the major corporations ... they WILL NOT PASS ON COST BENEFITS ... and you will be locked in to their cloud as well as paying 30% tax on client application downloads.

MORE DESTRUCTION I say: the Internet should naturally destroy or marginalise certain industries.
@johnfenjackson@... That is not true. As long as people are willing to pay more a company will raise it prices. When people have another cheaper option they will jump ship. Amazon, Wal-Mart, even Netflix when it started all gave the same products at a cheaper price then the competition and ran many others out of business because of it.
Every company is trying to expand, raise capital, and be competitive at the same time. The customer votes with their pocket book, and even large corporations listen to that.
@Sevrinus@...
I'm still trying to figure out why there is so much negative press about Netflix. We stopped renting DVD's from them over a year ago...and kept one Netflix DVD on the shelf indefinetly until they made these price changes. We were then prompted to cancel the DVD side of things, since we never use it, and to promptly send back the Netflix DVD we have been holding hostage ever since we started streaming content on our living room entertainment center (and now on 2 PCs and an android as well).

$7.99 is a flipping steal to us. We'd gladly pay 2 to 3 times that for even more streaming content, especially if there were newer releases available. If Netflix could push out the movies at the same time they come out on Redbox, we would pay $25 per month and be quite happy doing it....because it was save us the hassle of going to Redbox and remembering to return that stupid (easy to RIP btw) DVD that the movie companies seem to have such a love affair with.
@VRSpock...
I'm glad you think paying 7.99 to do what you can do cheaper is a "steal". Its people like you who keep Netflix in business, people who think they are getting a great deal on something that costs next to nothing and can be found cheaper elsewhere.

For most of the rest of us, Netflix has outpriced themselves. When I first signed up it was a great deal for its time. It cut my having to reserve stuff at blockbuster or hollywood video (Notice that both of them barely exist anymore, blockbuster in mostly name only). It made things a lot easier for me. Then I made the move to streaming while retaining the DVD service. I found NetFlix's steaming to be quite shoddy at best, on some days totally inaccessable despite having FiOS that easily handles large data transfer rates than netflix should ever take.

Long story short when they decided to hike prices while providing less content I passed. To date I've gotten 3 offers from netflix for reduced rate plans to try and coax me back. I've moved on and found cheaper and better alternatives to the Netflix plans.
@Sevrinus@...You are talking truisms but aren't taking into consideration the rampant collusion that is taking place, the unspoken agreements and the price-fixing. Look at cell service, air fares, gas prices, virtually anything. If tacitly all companies producing X agree to charge within a certain price for X, give or take small fluctuations, they ALL will no matter what the real cost of the product. Look at coffee as an example. it costs less than 18 cents US in beans to make a coffee, but because Starbucks has made it ok to charge 3 bucks, every other coffee shop charges that regardless. This type of fixing goes on in every industry, once prices are established, there is little incentive to go much outside the "norm". Life isn't as simple as your opinion would require.
@VRSpock@... Honestly, this is the attitude why we keep seeing corporations raise their prices. Even if you feel this way, its better to keep it to yourself than allow the companies trolling these boards to feel justified in their actions. Recently, I heard my children confusing the term "need" for "want". We don't "need" Netflix or other streaming services. Somehow, entertainment companies such as Netflix along with ISPs, cable, satellite, etc continue to overcharge for services simply because we are spoiled. Amazing that in this economy, these companies have barely missed a beat. Are we choosing entertainment over important things?
Relorian@..

You are right. Netflix should be paying me so that my family and I can stream 300 to 500 hours of entertainment per month. Since they don't, I should be stealing all the content I can on bit torrent.

That seems to be the attitude of the people behind this negative press. It's called an entitlement mentality.

No, you should not be paying $200 per month for television....or even $100....but $25 is very reasonable and $7.99 is practically free. I mean, I can barely get a cheeseburger, coke and fries for a single meal for that....but people on here seem to be complaining that $7.99 is too much for a month's worth of entertainment.

Get REAL folks.
@Sevrinus@...The difference between NETFLIX raising there prices and things we need, no one needs NETFLIX, they want it, yes, but they don't need it. I am sure allot of streamer's was happy because they didn't want the DVD option anyway. Myself, I could care less about either product. I had the service because it was simple and cheap but when that greedy grab bag raised the price by 60% for both, well, that is when I got off the ride LOL... I don't need it, I have HBOGO, EPIXHD and MAXGO, with my cable provider I can stream all three from anywhere I am. Yes you have to subscribe to them but it is nice to be in the Airport and stream a movie on my smart phone while waiting on my plane. Corporate Greed cost him a ton on his stock. It seems like it is always someone at the top that thinks no one at the bottom will care if he gets deeper in your pocket. OOPS, that was a mistake a blind person could see coming.
@Sevrinus@...
Itunes never deilivered disk media and no one complains.
There are a multitude of streaming only services, no one bugs these services to deliver DVD's.
Increases in shipping costs make delivering DVDs and streaming movies too costly. Price of netflix has gone up for only those who have DVD shipping service.

Unlimited streaming shows for 8 bucks a month is still a great deal.
@johnfenjackson@...I totally agree with you. It is all-pervasive. Look at cell phone costs and wireless data as a prime example of what we all accept. They've all just collectively agreed to gouge the consumer, there's no incentive for new companies to lower prices when everyone else is buying the grotesque over charging (2g data for 25USD?!) We have GOT to question this as consumers. The only reason people reacted to Netflix so strongly is because the contrast was so clear between the two delivery methods and they got ahead of themselves with the over charging. They would have done better for themselves had they left the arrogance until after they had cornered the market that way no one would have noticed or complained.
@johnfenjackson@... Corporations ALWAYS charge the amounts they think will work best for them. This means making as much profit as possible, now and in the future.

So, perhaps they charge a bit less to prevent competition from taking away more. As their costs lower, they will make adjustments in response to what they think will work best for them. Charge too high a margin and people create competition because they see the money is there.

There is nothing intrinsically evil about wanting to make a good profit. What we need to watch for is when they take actions to have the state intervene on their behalf to either make their products mandatory or to stifle competition.
@richard233 I totally agree with you. Cartels only work by state/mob interventions.
@johnfenjackson@...

You seem to overlook the most important aspect of your one key principle:

Corporations CAN NOT PASS ON COST INCREASES to customers.

Netflix, for many years, was clever enough to negotiate extremely affordable content, especially the junk that constituted their streaming library. Now the studios have woken up, no longer giving away the store, and the public now has demand for multiple streams per household - Netflix's cost, especially for streaming, is going through the roof. Add to that the pending battle over bandwidth - Netflix will surely have to pay to assure delivery, and there was no way they could just give away streaming.

Reed Hastings is a tool, as are many CEOs. He definitely mishandled the delivery - but he wasn't off the mark. Consumers were given a choice.

If CableCo, TelcoTV, or even Dish/Blockbuster offer up a better value, we'll flock to it. Amazon/Roku/Redbox may make noise, but they'll face the same bandwidth issues, and they have no content. Microsoft has already folded, and Google is, as usual, clueless. Netflix has little to worry over.
@zdmo

That one statement glaringly shows your lack of knowledge regarding basic accounting & legal principles...
@johnfenjackson@... I agree, I'm still waiting for my savings by going with paperless billing. I keep seeing my bill get bigger, not smaller.
@trust2112@... that's because you are talking about low margin businesses, they have to cut down or they will lose money. Personally I don't do paperless unless forced to. You are owed nothing.
@johnfenjackson@... This is very ignorant, you realize that Amazon, Netflix and many others are not making a ton of money? They are vying for margin. Rare is the company like Apple that can command 25% profit margins in a cutthroat business.

Cell phones, gas and many other products and services are based on thin margins. Corporations have NO choice, most are banking on future savings! Companies that don't pass on the savings will be gone.
@johnfenjackson@... Netflix will continue to loose customers.
@johnfenjackson@...

The NetFlix fiasco doesn't really have much to do about passing on "cost benifits" to anyone.

It's simply a company that decided to think completely from the perspective of what might be good for themselves, without ANY consideration of how this might impact the desireability of their products to actual consumers.

Yes, it looked like a great idea from the balance sheet to raise prices 60% and cut the company into two separate business units.

But (and can you imagine the one guy at the meeting who dared raise his hand and tell the truth?): Customers DIDNT WANT to pay 60% more for the same product, and DIDNT WANT to have to use two completely different websites to perform activities which they had specifically liked handling from a single hub?

And then, as the marketing morons got the message in the one and only way they can (massive profit loss hammer to the forehead), the great "recovery" plan was to reverse half of the bad decisions...

Um... Wanna be sorry? Back the whole thing out, decide your company doesn't exist if you can't offer a product people want, and they DONT WANT what you're offering.

Netflix will be a textboook case stufy in taking a solid, well respected brand, and running it into the ground in the name of screwing around with a winning package without ANY thought about offering a great product as opposed to trying to force customers to dance in a manner that might yeild more profits if the marketing staff's completely imaginary projections hold true.

Here's a new idea: Make a GREAT product. OBSESS over improving it from the customer perspective. Price it aggressively. Make money.
0 Votes
+ -
OMG it's not rocket science!
Lackosleep Updated - 27th Oct
With the combination of DVD and streaming, Netflix offered a good assortment of movies... albeit not the newest releases due to backroom dealings between the content producers and other distributors (owned by the content producers). Independently, the DVD service had the newer and more desirable movies, but lacked the convenience; the streaming had the convenience, but severely lacked desirable (and sometimes reliable) content. So to ask customers to pay 100% more to keep the same value, or choose one service with it's lesser value is just ludicrous... unless you're the only game in town. Does Netflix know that Amazon offers streaming for it's Prime members (with other monetary benefits like free two day shipping from amazon.com) for about $9/mo... or less than $3/mo for students? OMG you'd have to be brain dead to not expect the poor outcome Netflix experienced!! All of this may have been necessary for their survival, but ultimately not enough without addressing the lack of "complete" value of their streaming service.
@Lackosleep .. I agree. The streaming was fair at best and lacked the newer titles to keep me hooked. The fact that I could rent a new title DVD (which I did about once a week) helped sweeten the deal so the combo for around $9 was a price I could live with. Paying nearly the same price for just one of those services was a deal killer and I promptly cancelled my account. With all the streaming of TV shows from the network websites and FREE streaming old movies from sites like HULU makes it hard to justify the expense for mediocre quality and content. I pass a number of Redbox kiosks on my way to and from work so it is neither a hardship nor a bother to pick up or return to them. Even their price hike of 20 cents has not deterred me. The fact that they send me occasional codes for free rentals makes me even more loyal to their product. Sometimes lessons are learned the hard way.
@johnfenjackson@... Two words: Valve Software. Your absolute statements are decidedly wrong. Been spending a little too much time under Comcast, Verizon, or AT&T Wireless?
0 Votes
+ -
Too many lost customers
NoAxToGrind 25th Oct
This morining CNN is reporting that 800,000 Netflix customers have walked out. That's gonna leave a mark.
@NoAxToGrind That's odd, as nothing changed for me. I mean really - my choice is to pay cable at $90 per month for the basics, or $160 to get their package without the movie channels, but with DVRs and all the stuff you used to get at a reasonable rate. OR... pay Netflix $8 for some older content. I guess it's a hard choice for some, but it wasn't for me... I got satellite and used Netflix as the replacement for the lacking "on-demand." - Total bill? $50 per month. I'm not pissed at Netflix yet, I'm pissed at Comcast. Why doesn't anyone point out the absolute butt raping Comcast is doing to their consumers? $17 per month per DVR??? $80+ for normal service? $80+ for decent speed internet?? There's no story in Netflix wanting an extra buck when everyone just let Comcast ride...
@thoiness I agree with you completely. I dropped the DVD package when the price went up, but I never used it anyway so it wasn't a big deal. Actually, this saved me money. With the 2 DVD + Streaming Package + BluRay, I was paying like $14 per month or something. Now it's down to $8. That's a huge savings for me as I only used the BluRay/DVD service about 4 times a year. I'm saving $6 per month which will pay for the few DVDs or BluRays I want to buy throughout the year. Not to mention the thousands I've saved because I didn't have to buy a movie or rent it (for $5+) or get a box set of a TV series.

Netflix is still a great deal. Qwikster or whatever the heck it was called was a really stupid idea considering the Netflix branding is already in place. I think Netflix should drop DVD and BluRay services completely and go to 100% streaming.

In addition to Netflix, I have an Amazon Prime membership that I've had for years and I get streaming through that for the cost of the membership I'm already paying for.

We've got more TV and movies than we could ever watch in 5 lifetimes. Give it a rest. Netflix changed some things. So what?
@thoiness

I suspect the 800,000 that walked away were not as happy with Netflix as you seem to be. As to cost, check out RedBox, I think you will like it.
@NoAxToGrind I've got no problem with RedBox, but I don't do the whole DVD thing. I use NetFlix like I used to use Comcast on-demand (the "free" portion), and I use Vudu to rent/buy most of my movies - great high quality service that seems reliable.
@heymatthew
"I think Netflix should drop DVD and BluRay services completely and go to 100% streaming. "

I absolutely agree with this. Distributing a bunch of discs through pony express is a stupid idea now. That's why we use Netflix streaming for our core entertainment and suppliment it with Redbox for our new release movie watching. Every once in awhile, Netflix will surprise us with a movie release that we were going to get at Redbox...and save us a $1.

They need to go 100% streaming and offer tiered service so those that think that $7.99 is a rip off can keep forking it out and those of us who want everything instantly, without resorting to pirating it, will pay a higher monthly fee for premium new content.
@NoAxToGrind

Redbox fills in the gap for the new releases, but for the number of movies & TV shows I watch in *one week*, Netflix is way cheaper than Redbox could be... & that's assuming Redbox even carries the show or movie. So Redbox won't be replacing Netflix for me, & most likely not for most Netflix streaming customers.
@NoAxToGrind They also said it in the article above. I personally cancelled mine as soon as I received the email from Hastings. Its a slap in the face. Lets just say, you wanted to make 2 payments to Netflix each month, from different accounts, while im sure you could do it, doesnt it complicate everything? How on earth did they think on the "Whiteboard" that this was the way to go? I drive by Redbox everyday, ill use it!
@tomfoster05 I can see how that would be frustrating ... I wasn't even aware anyone still used their DVD service. Seems to me that redbox or vudu has been the better alternatives for a while now...
@tomfoster05 Redbox... what a retro idea. DRIVE your dinosaur-burning car to the video store. Ok, you get to reserve the movie online, but you still have to fire up the gas guzzler and navigate through traffic to get the plastic disc. Woohoo! That's progress! Sorry, NOT an acceptable idea in 2011. How do you figure you're saving with Redbox when it costs you $2 in gas every time you drive over there? (Don't forget you have to return your little plastic disc too.) There are online alternatives, like Amazon, that don't require the expense of a road trip to get a movie.
@tomfoster05

I agree Tom, of course the fact their content selection is going down instead of up is part of it.
Right! How often do you rent from Redbox? I would be surprised if you rent 8 movies per week. $8/month is the same as 8 DVDs or 6 Blu-Rays from Redbox. $8 is too high.
@JoeFoerster I think you're over eggagerating just a bit. Let's say you are getting a dismal 10miles/gallon and gas is at $4/gallon. To be paying your $2 trip you would need to be 5 miles from a redbox. Most people I know actually walk to theirs. Personally I'd rather get them in the mail and not have to worry about forgetting to return them.
0 Votes
+ -
@NoAxToGrind
Those numbers may fall short of the real losses. How many customers are waiting to see if Netflix can continue to deliver content? They've already lost Starz.

At about the same time, AT&T U-verse customers had a cap (250 GB/month) placed on their previously unlimited accounts. Has a recent adverse net-neutrality ruling also had a chilling effect perhaps?

In spite of improvements in reliability due to more fiber and VDSL availability in my area, AT&T will probably lose my business eventually. They are not delivering a competitive product. Cable is cheaper, and by a considerable amount, at least when comparing introductory rates. So far the local cable provider has not imposed a cap, and has even faster speeds available.
screwball names for things?

How about "Scripted Nullification"? Maybe "Premeditated Obliteration"?

Maybe "Phased Out" would work too, who knows?
0 Votes
+ -
LOL!
William Farrell 25th Oct
@adornoe@...
grin
@adornoe@... It is not possible for Netflix to "stick it" to customers. They MUST satisfy customers or they will fail, they MUST make money (eventually) or they will not satisfy investors. There is no escaping those two in the long run. Is Apple sticking it to people with the iPad? How dare they charge the cost of a decent laptop for a tablet!!!!
@adornoe@... It's pretty amazing on how people ***** about how netflix up'd the price, wah,wah, seriously, figure the price of the computers and servers and networking all involved with streaming the content to us. figure the price of mailing the dvd's and blue ray disks and not to mention how many of hundred of thousands of each movie title netflix needed to purchase in order to get them out to the public.
now how much would you spend at the video store or better yet, pay-per-view, people still do pay anywhere from 5 to 7 dollars for ppv. so in all actuality, for netflix to increase rates a little like they did is really not that bad, it's still well worth the money. so eveyone bitching about the increase, stop bitching and do the math. if you dont like the price increase then dont use the service. go ahead and find it cheaper elsewhere, and when you cant, then you may cry like little girls.
@William Farrell - I'm fairly confident the author had a bet with someone as to how many times they could slip a made up phrase into a ZDNet article :]
@psdie they didn't make that up, it's a business concept that's been around for years. The archetype being IBM's change from the 90's.
that those customers would be accepting of their new business method without complaining too loudly. In essence, they were thinking that the customers were easy pickings and a captive audience. They thought they could "stick it to the customers", and they were wrong.
I just don't get why they didn't just stay with their original pricing, and just increase it a couple of bucks.

The clue that DVDs were not going to be easy to get out of, was their success. People subscribed to Netflix because of the combo.

It's like Apple deciding that hardware and interface design was old school, and they should just stop it. If DVDs were going to die, they would know because they would start losing subscribers to streaming only companies. Then, they could come out with a streaming only price (which I think they already had) and see how it goes.

I disagree that the creative was dropped from creative destruction. Creativity is by definition not mainstream. It is experimental, and therefore very risky. It's much smarter to keep your old business while trying the new thing.
0 Votes
+ -
DVDs eventually get damaged
djchandler 25th Oct
@Hameiri
I had repeated issues with unplayable or barely playable DVDs, in spite of having multiple devices on which to play them. Some were in worse condition than what I can get from the local public library for free. So I had already opted for streaming only.

Now they are losing attractive streaming content (Starz) as well.

This company grew very quickly. It doesn't surprise me to see them dip at considerable velocity.
0 Votes
+ -
The real problem is...
cornpie 25th Oct
@Hameiri ...limited content through the streaming service. If everything they have on DVD were available through the streaming service, there would be no need for DVD's. I was paying for the streaming + 2 DVD's at a time plan. had they said that I would pay the same proce but instead of getting DVD's, all that content would now be available through streaming, I wouldn't have had a problem with that. On the other hand, I was starting to have some discontent with what was available on DVD too.

So my comment is: Get everything I want on the streaming service and I would be willing to pay more for it because it would consolidate all the content I want in one place and make it convenient. When that happens no one will care about DVD's any more.
@Hameiri Actually Apple practiced creative destruction too. When they switched operating systems, chipsets and no backward compatibility. It probably saved the company (actually the iPod probably saved it, but this was an important step).
0 Votes
+ -
Another to take over
boameister@... 25th Oct
As soon as another biggee comes thru with what Netflix offered, I'm jumping over in a flash. I loved Netflix and now it's a Netfluster. At this point, I don't even care if the new company costs the same. That's how torqued I am at NF. I bought subscriptions as presents and 3/4 thru the year, last year's Christmas presents just about doubled in price and I'm still paying for it. They blew it and I don't trust them. Bad Company!!!
@boameister@...

They blew what exactly? They split the streaming and DVD service so you can pick and choose which service you want, hiked the rates (like the whole world is doing, remember when a song was $.99 on iTunes?) and thought about separately billing for the two segments of their service. Last I checked, besides media overhyping, the only thing that has happened to my Netflix subscription is a hike in fees for a service that is still a steal as compared to Comcast at home.
I remember the days of $5 rentals at Blockbuster with exorbitant late fees. Then Blockbuster offered their "Movie Pass"; at one point you could have 3 DVD's out for around $23, eventually they took it down to 2 DVD's and over $30. Now for around $38 I have 4 Blu-rays and unlimited streaming. Oh yeah, to all the Redbox fan boys... how many times have you driven five miles to find they don't have any good new releases in stock? Forget the fact that I have to fight to find parking at the WalMart where the box is stationed. The only reason the studios give RedBox first access to the new releases is because they reach less people. Their hope is you'll drive all the way to the retail store the box is located in front of, see they don't have the new release you're dying to watch and simply go inside and buy the Blu-ray.
Gripe all you want, but for less than the cost of 2 Blu-rays per month I have 4 rentals at home and unlimited streaming content. Netflix hasn't done anything that every company on earth is doing and that's raise prices to keep up the profits for their shareholders.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix