ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

NTP: Why its patent suit vs. Apple, Google, Microsoft, HTC etc stands a chance

By | July 12, 2010, 2:00am PDT

Summary: NTP may have some precedent on its side to force the likes of Apple, Google, HTC, LG, Microsoft and Motorola to pay up for patents.

It’s easy to dismiss NTP Inc. as a patent troll especially after the company—holder of patents for wireless email technology—sued all of the major players of the smartphone industry last week. But NTP may have some precedent on its side to force the likes of Apple, Google, HTC, LG, Microsoft and Motorola to pay up.

In a statement Friday, NTP announced its latest effort to enforce its patents. If you recall, NTP and Research in Motion had a long-running patent spat that was finally settled in March 2006. RIM paid NTP $612.5 million to make NTP go away. Enterprise customers were wary of RIM’s products in light of the NTP lawsuit.

Download: NTP’s complaint against Apple

At the time, RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie said a broad patent deal with NTP was worth it even if the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office eventually overturned NTP’s patents. Balsillie said in a CNet News report from 2006:

“The scope relates to all of NTP’s patents and relates to all of RIM’s products. We really did this to give certainty, and calmness and comfort to our ecosystem.”

RIM’s comfort appears to be a real pain in the backside of the wireless industry now. The RIM case gave NTP some mojo to sue other wireless players. What took NTP so long to sue the others? Turns out NTP was waiting to make sure it had a favorable USPTO ruling for its patents. NTP said in its statement:

In December 2009, in spite of the massive effort by the USPTO to overturn NTP’s patents, the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals (USPTO Board) ruled that 67 of NTP’s patent claims in four patents are valid, including three claims that RIM was found to have infringed.  Infringement of a single claim is all that is needed for a patent to be deemed violated. NTP has also filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to overturn the USPTO’s remaining rejections of NTP’s patent claims.

Simply put, NTP now has all the ammo it needs to go after the industry. NTP’s complaint against Apple reads like the others against HTC, Motorola and the rest of the gang.

In a nutshell:

  • NTP outlines its patents which revolve around e-mail systems for wireless communications. These patents were awarded to Thomas Campana, the inventor of wireless email.
  • NTP says that the same patents in its complaints against the wireless industry are the ones RIM paid for. An excerpt from the NTP complaint against Apple:

  • The USPTO has upheld NTP’s patents.

Now NTP has other civil lawsuits against Palm, T-Mobile, Verizon, AT&T and Sprint and none of those have turned out as well as the RIM settlement. However, those lawsuits are still ongoing.

The big question here is whether NTP has the firepower to take on the likes of Google, Apple, Microsoft and others. Here are a few reasons why NTP can’t be counted out:

  • Home court judge. NTP’s complaints are going to Judge James Spencer, who ruled against RIM repeatedly.
  • NTP has a lot of precedent with its long war with RIM over its patents.
  • The strategy of waiting out NTP for the USPTO to re-examine patents won’t work because that evaluation is already history.

For RIM, paying off NTP was a good business move. RIM eased enterprise concerns and locked up the corporate market after paying off NTP.

Here’s a RIM stock chart with the NTP settlement highlighted:

The calculus will be different for the wireless giants recently named in latest NTP lawsuit. Meanwhile, the patent lawsuits are likely to go on for a while. You can argue that NTP is a patent troll, but there’s little doubt that it’s a pesky one that can win a few of these skirmishes.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: NTP: Why its patent suit vs. Apple, Google, Microsoft, HTC etc stands a chance
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Hi there, Would it be probably to make use of nfl jerseys usa this marvelous write-up on my world wide web page? I might the truth is hyperlink back again all over again for you personally. Enable me fully understand that which you opt for to complete.
0 Votes
+ -
hold up...
condelirios 12th Jul 2010
We granted a patent for "wireless email"? SERIOUSLY? This had to be an overly obvious patent. Give a me a break. From the moment email was invented, I am thinking sending them via wireless was a no-brainer.
@condelirios: It wasn't one patent, it was multiple patents. And no, it wasn't patently obvious. The patents cover issues involved in encoding the information, broadcasting over an existing network and other technical advances.

While I generally have a tremendous dislike for software patents (and user interface patents in specific), NTP's patents are pretty legit (as compared to the ******** patents Apple is using to go after HTC). Trying to group all of them together is simply wrong. Patents (even some software patents) are important ways of protecting your intellectual investment, especially for individual inventors. There are far too many examples of large corporations stealing the work of others (Apple and Microsoft spring to mind) and then claiming that they own it. While our hideously broken patent system can't protect from all of this, it is better than nothing.

I have absolutely no idea how to "fix" the issue, but I do know that throwing baby out with bath water isn't the way to do it. Perhaps we might decrease the time of protection for software/business method patents to a more reasonable period (maybe three to five years)? They're talking about doing this to drug patents, and that seems to make sense. Within the five year time period, the original inventor is able to establish a competitive advantage, after which the technology can be used by others.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: NTP: Why its patent suit vs. Apple, Google, Microsoft, HTC etc stands a chance
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
I comparable to this website. I nfl football shop am going to certainly be peeping into it normally.
0 Votes
+ -
Hi there, Would it be probably to make use of nfl jerseys usa this marvelous write-up on my world wide web page? I might the truth is hyperlink back again all over again for you personally. Enable me fully understand that which you opt for to complete.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix