Palm: 823,000 smartphone units shipped; Outlook lumpy

Summary: Palm's first quarter had multiple moving parts. The company shipped 823,000 smartphones, announced plans to raise capital, beat estimates, delivered a mixed outlook and said the company's fortunes will be tied to product launches.

Palm's first quarter had multiple moving parts. The company shipped 823,000 smartphones, announced plans to raise capital, beat estimates, delivered a mixed outlook and said the company's fortunes will be tied to product launches.

Got all that?

The big question, however, remains. Can the Palm Pre smartphone turn things around for the troubled company? Investors, looking beyond today's earnings release, are certainly hoping so.

In its release of first quarter results, the company noted that it shipped 823,000 smartphone units during the quarter, a 134 percent increase over last quarter but a year-over-year decrease of 30 percent. Smartphone sell-through for the quarter was 810,000 units, up 76 percent from the most recent quarter but down 21 percent year-over-year. (Statement)

In addition, Palm said it will offer 16 million shares to raise more cash. Elevation Partners will buy $35 million worth of Palm shares at the offering price.

For its first quarter, Palm reported a Non-GAAP net loss of $13.6 million, or 10 cents per share, on revenue of $360.7 million. Wall Street analysts had been expecting a loss of 24 cents on $306.5 million in revenue.

But the numbers aren't so black-and-white (see Palm's 5-page PDF on the non-GAAP reconciliation). Palm's financials were muddled with the GAAP comparisons as the company moves to subscription accounting related to the Pre. On a GAAP basis, the company reported a loss of $2.8 million on revenue of $68 million. Palm explains its accounting methodology like this:

These results include the effects of subscription accounting applied to Palm webOS products as required by GAAP. In accordance with this methodology, revenues and direct cost of revenues for Palm webOS products (currently Palm Pre smartphone) are deferred and recognized over the product’s estimated economic life.

On a conference call with analysts, company chairman and CEO Jon Rubenstein played up launch of the WebOS mobile operating system and the launch of the Pre, noting that the company can now shift from rollout of the OS and focus on expanding it to additional devices and more carriers. Rubenstein called it a "landmark quarter" and said that the launch of Pre and WebOS showcased Palm's vision and potential.

Moving forward, the company will focus all efforts on the new operating system and the rollout of new devices among multiple carriers and pointed to the second half of fiscal year 2010 for news on that front. In addition, executives also have their sights set on the enterprise market, noting that enhancement for compatibility with Microsoft Exchange positions them to compete on that front.

The company also announced a new marketing strategy, noting that it's split efforts into two - one focused on promoting devices, with another emphasizing brand.

Still, Palm's outlook also was lumpy. The company projected non-GAAP revenue for the second quarter of $240 million to $270 million. Wall Street was looking for $346 million. For the year, Palm projected non-GAAP revenue of $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion. Wall Street was projecting $1.57 billion.

In other words, Palm is expecting a strong year with lumpy quarters due "the timing and scale of expected product launches in Palm’s second fiscal quarter compared to those which took place in Palm’s first fiscal quarter, and due to lower anticipated demand for legacy products."

Add it up and the reaction to Palm's quarter was predictable---folks weren't sure what to make of it.

Topics: Banking, Enterprise Software, Hardware, Mobility, Smartphones

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

13 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • a loss of 161 million

    don't let the creative accounting fool you: the company just lost 161
    million in one quarter (and that's the quarter they launched their jesus
    phone to great fanfare) and it has a market cap of 2 bn? wtf. how is that
    possible? shouldn't palm be a pennystock by now? if i would find any
    tradeable puts here on the german market i would go all in now.
    bannedfromzdnetagain
  • RE: Palm: 823,000 smartphone units shipped; Outlook lumpy

    Palm needs more devices in the marketplace and more software.. like 10 minutes ago. Also... PUT SOME STORAGE CAPACITY IN YOUR PHONE! They need to release a 200GB version with webOS so people can store content ON THE PHONE. Networks slow the process, store the music and videos on the phone! In order to do this..8GB is utterly worthless.
    Techdelirios
    • Palm jumped into the cloud...

      and now the sun came out and the clouds are fading away.

      When accountants and executives alike are spewing this much gibberish - the writing is on the wall.

      So long, Palm.
      oldbaritone
  • Wasting $ on the webos fiasco

    once was bad enough, dumping wm and throwing good money after bad will be the end of PALM.

    anyone who would invest more now that the sr management has made these horrible decisions gets what they deserve. i feel sorry for their employees that know better...
    Johnny Vegas
    • Uh, what??

      [i]once was bad enough, dumping wm and throwing good money after bad will be the end of PALM.[/i]

      Why, because using WM on their phones (in essence, promoting another company's product, when they should've been promoting their own) was working out so well for them?

      Certainly, there are things that Palm didn't get right with the current version of WebOS (storage capacity and the Notes app being two that come immediately to mind), but make no mistake: If WebOS was really a waste of resources for Palm, there'd [i]be[/i] no Palm right now. Another Garnet (PalmOS) device wasn't going to do it for them, and another WM device would [i]certainly[/i] be like throwing money down a black hole.

      It remains to be seen how things will turn out long-term, but WebOS has given Palm its best chance at a comeback. At the very least, it's pulled them back from the brink of collapse to where they can think about more than how they pay the electric bill.
      bhartman36
    • Windows Mobile - get real

      Windows Mobile hurt Palm more than it helped. Palm went from a good user interface that was a little tired, to an inefficient, ugly, unfriendly OS, with a battery life that was now you see it, now you don't. I've tried Windows phones a couple of times, they are OK PDAs and lousy phones. With a phone you need long talk and standby time, and to be able to make calls easily - no Windows phone I've seen has ever done all that.
      fireyouritguys
  • iPhone in comma mode

    Palm will certainly get a bump in earnings due to the buggy 3.1 upgrade to the Jesus Phone.

    Which strangely is not reported here, but is the lead article over on The Register.
    Neil422
    • What? I have an iPhone and upgraded to 3.1...

      I haven't noticed any problems yet? So what are you talking about?

      Pagan jim
      James Quinn
  • Yeah. So?

    Frankly, I am surprised Palm is still around.

    I used to be a "dye-in-the-wool" Palm handheld user. I loved my Palm enough to upgrade - not once but three times! Still, between poor customer service and the company's missteps, and failure to innovate, they were surpassed by BlackBerry (and the iPhone) over the last few years.

    I just don't see them coming back into prominence.
    M Wagner
  • First one to Verizon wins!

    If Palm is able to get the Pre sold through Verizon, they have a good chance of doing well. Apple seems to be staying with ATT for the long haul so that gives Palm the opening that they need. Verizon has the best coverage and service in the US and that's what smart phone buyers are looking for.
    WiredGuy
    • amen

      For sure, for sure. I have to wonder how much of the "lumpiness" is the result of Palm's belief that it needed to tie the phone to an exclusive carrier, a la iPhone and ATT. It's really hard to imagine that Verizon wasn't interested - but Sprint might have offered better incentives... I wish this stuff was more transparent.
      GDF
      • Pre for Verizon?

        There are two schools of thought on phones, buy the phone and put up with the network, or buy the network and put up with the phones. I'm one of the latter, the phones will eventually improve, but with Sprint and ATT, I don't believe the networks ever will.

        Still, I owned Palms for 5 years before giving up when my 755p rebooted 5-10 times a day, every day. I offered to throw it under a bus if they wouldn't replace it.

        Given that it doesn't look like Verizon will ever get the iPhone, and the Blackberry OS is from the stone age, I can only hope the Pre will come to Verizon soon.
        fireyouritguys
  • Pre GSM Availability

    I would love to replace my E65 with a Pre but they seem to be a long way off a release date for New Zealand.
    TKR1