Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?

By | September 9, 2010, 11:44am PDT

A new version of Parallels Desktop software, which allows Mac owners to virtually run Windows on their computers, will be released Tuesday, according to the company.

Clearly, the company sees a demand for this sort of software, noting that “millions of people (are) moving to the Mac from Windows” and have a need to launch the Windows OS to run some apps. For those running business apps, the need for this type of software is even greater.

But for how long?

Increasingly, the tide is shifting toward the cloud, where browser-based computing is gaining popularity, and mobile, where apps center around iOS, Android and Blackberry platforms. That creates greater opportunities for the overall virtualization ecosystem - but not necessarily this type of software.

Of course, the need for it won’t go away overnight. Businesses have been slow to adopt the cloud or are taking baby steps into it and the ability to run both Mac and Windows simultaneously, without rebooting, is big.

There’s a review of the product available at CNET. The software will be sold online and in retail outlets and are priced between $40 and $80, depending on the version. More details are available at the Parallels home page.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

Talkback Most Recent of 57 Talkback(s)

  • Bootcamp is better
    There is simply no reason to use OS X to host the OS you actually wanted to run in the first place. All you are doing is doubling your maintenance effort since now you have 2 OSs you need to update.

    Far more productive to use Bootcamp to boot into Windows and only boot back into OS X when Apple releases firmware upgrades.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    NonZealot
    9th Sep 2010
  • They do NOT want to host Windows - it is junk. Just some old Win32 apps
    that they want to run for now. Win32 is dying, and, the most important Win32 application has a native Mac version - MS Office, so this software has a limited life.

    But of course MS Office is on the way out as well.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    9th Sep 2010
  • Office for Mac?
    @DonnieBoy -

    Sure, and we could run OpenOffice as well. After all, nobody in the business world uses Project, or Primavera, or Visio.

    And nobody uses Sharepoint integration with Outlook for delivering Reports or interfacing with their ERP system at all.

    And nobody at ALL uses third-party Excel add-ins.

    Yep, Mac Office is TOTALLY the same thing!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    daftkey
    9th Sep 2010
  • daftkey: Yes, there are a still a number using the duct tape and bailing
    wire MS garbage, but, it is dying out.

    Project, PSrimavera, Visio, Sharepoint, Outlook, MS Office, . . . , are the biggest productivity killers known to man.

    Oh, and no reason to use OpenOffice on Mac. For now, there is still a Mac native version of MS Office.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    9th Sep 2010
  • RE: Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?
    @DonnieBoy

    Yes Windows is going to die. Not! Do you seriously listen to yourself. Mac OS is nice and yes cloud computing is helping make the OS not as important as it once was but in the enterprise world or organizations that have medium to large networks of computers there is so much more you can do easier on the back end management with a Windows ecosystem. You have to jump through hoops to get a fraction of that to work with MacOS. Now if you are all Mac and use Mac specific tools then that is one thing but if you want to run mixed environment it becomes a small nightmare and costly. You think like an end user with only their personal computer or maybe a handful to manage and based on the article by Sam Diaz so does he.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    bobiroc
    9th Sep 2010
  • RE: Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?
    @DonnieBoy - using a Mac, Office 2008 lacks VB and the Equation Editor.

    I went back to the Windows version because of those features.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    HypnoToad72
    9th Sep 2010
  • RE: Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?
    @DonnieBoy

    Wrong. If you did your research you would know that Apple OS X is decreasing in market share at a pretty constant pace. You would also know Windows market share is still growing and is still over 90% of the market. You then would also know that Apple is the world leader in insecure software. You know about all that right? Apparently you need to catch up on research and stop reminiscing about old Apple commercials which were incorrect half the time and the other half the time were just as guilty.

    Why buy an Crapple to run windows? Pay 3 times as much just for a fancy case and make a fashion statement? Sounds like a tool to me.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    audidiablo
    9th Sep 2010
  • Donnie, knock it off
    @DonnieBoy

    Only problem is that the Windows and the Applications are held together
    duct tape and bailing wire. People want a safe system, free of viruses, stylish, and above all, a more intuitive interface.

    The Windows Koolaid is getting really raunchy.


    I'd like to challenge this statement.

    I think the only thing raunchy here is your "Windoze suxx0r" posts.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Cylon Centurion
    9th Sep 2010
  • Catching Up on Correspondence
    @daftkey, bobiroc, hypnotoad72

    Dear Microsoft:

    It has come to my attention that the Office for Mac ecosystem is lacking in certain features and certain key applications. This was such a disappointment. How I wish I could buy and use your awesome software on the shiny computer I've got, but without cracking open the manual or buying one of those virtually machine things.

    I ask your help and request that you join me in a letter-writing campaign to Apple demanding they fix this problem. Thank goodness, pal that you are, you have made it possible for me to buy Windows and Office at full retail so I have a Plan B while using my Mac.

    With friends like you...

    Ooops. Gotta go now. BFACF: Best Friends and Customer Forever.

    Danny.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DannyO_0x98
    9th Sep 2010
  • Most businesses I know of
    @NonZealot ... have need for Windows OS, mainly for their software product or just to get email or whatever, and it's better to be able to quick-open Windows in a window on the mac rather than have to reboot to get in to it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    HollywoodDog
    9th Sep 2010
  • Better to just run Windows as your primary OS
    @HollywoodDog
    I agree it would be silly to reboot back and forth. That is why I decided very early on that I would simply boot into Windows and use that. No rebooting back and forth, no requirement to maintain 2 OSs, simple, simple, simple!!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    NonZealot
    9th Sep 2010
  • Only problem is that the Windows and the Applications are held together
    duct tape and bailing wire. People want a safe system, free of viruses, stylish, and above all, a more intuitive interface.

    The Windows Koolaid is getting really raunchy.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    9th Sep 2010
  • RE: Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?
    @DonnieBoy People want a safe system, free of viruses, stylish, and above all, a more intuitive interface.

    Not for nothing, but I have been a windows user for going on 20 years and have never, to my knowledge, gotten a virus. And if you want stylish with an intuitive interface, I'd say that pretty much describes Windows 7.

    This is not meant as a slight on Macs, which are also nice in their own way, although decidedly not as "useful" in a business environment or as versatile as gaming systems, which I think is what most of the Windows defenders are talking about.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jdakula
    9th Sep 2010
  • What's foolish is using two operating systems when you have...
    @HollywoodDog: ...a dependency on one and that one meets your other requirements (in most cases).
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ye
    10th Sep 2010
  • RE: Parallels gets update but how long will Windows-on-Mac software be needed?
    Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to trade solutions with others, be sure to shoot me an email if interested. exchange student program
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tringo007
    27th Sep

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources