ie8 fix
Click Here

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Q2 proves to be big for Google products, especially Android

By | July 15, 2011, 4:00am PDT

The second quarter of 2011 was big and busy for Google, with stellar earnings and a record number of new products rolled out. But Android proved to be the most solid.

Speaking during the company’s quarterly webcast for investors on Thursday, CEO Larry Page was excited about many things, especially Google+. But he certainly did not forget to address Android, especially given these incredible numbers:

We have tremendous new businesses being viewed as crazy — Android. And actually have a new metric to report in Android of 550,000 phones activated a day. That is a huge number, even by Google’s standards.

That’s up from estimates reported just a few weeks ago that pegged the average at 500,000 per day.

Google’s other operating system, Chrome, was also a key point during the webcast. After all, Chromebooks by Samsung and Acer started shipping during the second quarter after playing a major role at Google I/O in San Francisco this past May.

Although he didn’t divulge any sales figures, Page did note that “Chrome is the fastest growing browser” with over 160 million users.

Google did shutter a few of its products during Q2 - namely Google Health and Google PowerMeter. However, Google execs did not address the expected rebranding of Picasa and Blogger to align with the growth and all-encompassing Google+.

As a general reflection (and likely the direction he plans to keep taking as CEO), Page said he wants Google “to create services that people in the world use twice a day, just like a toothbrush.”

Now people rightly ask, how will we monetize these businesses? Of course, I understand the need to balance the short-term with the longer-term needs, because our revenues and growth serve as the engine that funds our innovation. But our emerging high usage products can generate huge new businesses for Google in the long run, just like search. And we have tons of experience monetizing successful products over time. Well-run technology businesses with tremendous consumer usage make a lot of money over the long term.

There are few such products that fit that toothbrush-like category for millions of people, even those without Android phones and tablets as well as Chromebooks. Just look at Gmail and Google Apps. Even Google+ is on the way to reaching that kind of potential (or rather, addiction on the part of its users).

Of course, many other projects are going to take considerably longer to attract that kind of attention - if they ever do. Examples are Google Wallet and Offers, both of which were also introduced in May. Offers is now live in Portland, San Francisco, Oakland and New York City.

Unfortunately, even though it was mentioned just once, Page did not go into detail about Google’s driverless cars.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

19
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Q2 proves to be big for Google products, especially Android
non-biased 20th Jul
@frankieh Sorry, but you come across as the whiny weeny here. Take a look at any pro Apple or MS story and it is packed with all the Google/FOSS/Android fanboys bashing anything an everything they can. If you want to dish it out you sure the hell had better learn how to take it.

As far as Apple patent infringement case this year with Nokia, if you are going to bring it up how about you put the facts. Apple settle on a figure that they have ALWAYS been willing to pay. Nokia created the situation because they were illegally trying to charge Apple more than the were charging anybody else.
0 Votes
+ -
A product is something created and sold to produce revenue. Google has only one revenue-producing product--ads. All products require raw material, and Google's raw material is user data. Without it, they can't produce their product--targeted ads. Android, Google+, search, maps, etc. are all tools Google uses to collect the raw material necessary for creating their real products.
@Userama So by your logic the free Apps / Games aren't "products", right?
Tip of the Day: "Think before you post"
@Lanhoj What Userama is trying to say is that what google sells, is not the product in the real sense. The users of search, mail, android etc are the products that google sells to its customers.
The point is debatable, but I am just clarifying what I think he meant.
0 Votes
+ -
Free apps/games are usually "enticements" that companies use as demos, hoping it will lead to the user later purchasing their products. Few companies, and NO publicly-held companies, give away freebies out of the goodness of their heart. They expect to get something in return. That includes Google.
@xeptf4: ... what company sells for money to generate revenue and profits.

Hence, the only major product of Google is advertisements service (selling users information to advertisers). Google does not issue bills for Android or for Maps or for Google plus.

However, if product's definition is beyond purely business/legal/SEC definitions, then Android, Maps, et cetera can be very well considered as products, at least as "by-pass" ones.
@Userama

Actually, completely wrong. Google sells ad capacity. Think of it just like programming for television stations. You think the TV stations don't make every effort to track viewership? Two words. Sweeps week.
How were the sales of Chromebooks?
@mm71

Nobody may ever know the exact cost as long as lawsuits dog Android products...
Copying and stealing..Thats google's breadth, life, soul & heart ...If anybody can copy like can create 100 great products too.! Search & advertising are the only things which belong to Google..GOOGLE SUCKS.!
... these activations are not HTCs, Motorolas and Samsungs, but countless no-name manufactures, which install Androids on cheap dumphones/featurephones -- which will be never really used to run apps, let alone have bank card accounts (and many of these models do not have access to Android Market anyway). Most of these buyers do not even have WiFi networks at home, and certainly are not subscribed to cell networks data plan.

More and more people buy these cheap phones in Asia even not knowing/caring which OS it has and how it can be used; they never intend to. They just bought what was on sale, they liked bigger screen to look at photos (even done with poor sensors), and that is it.
@DeRSSS I love how any device with Android is included in the numbers when compared to iOS but god forbid you include the iPod Touch or iPad. As an OS the number may very well be correct but when making the comparisons I think equivalent devices should be used. Compare the higher end Android devices to the iPhone, not the cheap crap that isn't in the same class of the high end devices of either OS.
0 Votes
+ -
And how does Android help the bottom line?
The Nasty Old Troll 15th Jul
That's one I still don't understand. They give it away hoping that people will search using Google, driving advertising revenues. It's a stretch for any business model I've ever seen.

Best part is that Microsoft does make money on every Android device sold, but how does Google even calculate the revenue?
@The Nasty Old Troll But do we know what info they are getting. You mention that they are hoping people will search but do we know if the user has to do any searching for Google to collect info? For all we know they are collecting data on everything you do with the device to better sell advertising.
So, how much $ did Google make from Android??
Show me the benjamins!
0 Votes
+ -
yay... more anti google weenies to the party.
frankieh Updated - 16th Jul
Once again we gets loads of anti google weenies sprouting off.. but consider this.
1. Microsoft have a long history of illegal and monopolisic behaviour.
2. Facebook just recently got caught paying lobbyists to slag off Google and to keep facebook out of it.
3. Apple has taken to suing every man and his dog for patent infringement so as to make extra revenue stream, the are not as bad as Microsoft, but they will get there. And before all the anti google lobbyists pipe up so say what theiving folks google are, both Microsoft AND apple have had to pay up to settle their own patent infringement this year.. to the tune of many millions. (think I4I and Nokia for M$ and Apple respectively).

Oracles case against Google is getting smaller by the day as most of their patents get disallowed or narrowed significantly.. and they've not proven any infringement yet.

I can't wait for the day where it's illegal for companies to pay other companies and people to make it seem like real home consumers like them or their products.. and with big punishments for companies that get caught out astro turfing.. we know Facebook got caught paying a company to slag off Google.. what about Apple and MS? i don't doubt the later personally at all, not sure about Apple though.
@frankieh Sorry, but you come across as the whiny weeny here. Take a look at any pro Apple or MS story and it is packed with all the Google/FOSS/Android fanboys bashing anything an everything they can. If you want to dish it out you sure the hell had better learn how to take it.

As far as Apple patent infringement case this year with Nokia, if you are going to bring it up how about you put the facts. Apple settle on a figure that they have ALWAYS been willing to pay. Nokia created the situation because they were illegally trying to charge Apple more than the were charging anybody else.
0 Votes
+ -
double post sorry.
frankieh Updated - 16th Jul
double post.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix