RIM considers split, handset unit sell-off: Palm 'Groundhog Day?'
Summary: A Sunday newspaper claims the struggling BlackBerry maker could split in two and sell off its smartphone-making division -- in what is reminiscent of how Palm met its demise.
Research in Motion is considering splitting the company in two, according to a paywalled story by London's The Sunday Times.
The BlackBerry maker could see its struggling smartphone hardware sold off, and its data network retained or licensed to others.
RIM is expected in the coming days to announce an operating loss for its first-quarter. Since then, its stock price has dropped significantly and for a short while dipped below the $10 a share mark.
The newspaper cited Amazon and Facebook as possible buyers of the hardware business at a knocked-down price.
Interestingly, Facebook has repeatedly denied it has a smartphone in development. Amazon has fringed on the tablet scene with its range of e-readers and its Android-powered Kindle Fire, but has shown no apparent interest in engaging with the smartphone market for now.
Without citing sources, the data network and BlackBerry Messenger software would likely see it opened up to smartphone rivals, such as Apple or Google. It's also possible for the company to retain hold of its data-offering infrastructure and license it out to others, such as Android vendor Samsung.
RIM chief executive Thorsten Heins said in May, announcing the likelihood of an operating loss on deck, that the company will "evaluate the relative merits and feasibility of various financial strategies, including opportunities to leverage the BlackBerry platform through partnerships, licensing opportunities and strategic business model alternatives."
Or failing that, the company could remain as one and sold in its entirety, such as to Microsoft, the newspaper added.
In a nutshell, RIM isn't looking for an all-out buyout and would rather separate, split, and sell off sections as and when it needs to. It should come as no surprise in fact as the Sunday Times has effectively laid out all of RIM's cards on the table.
The newspaper said RIM could announce such plans at some point during this summer.
Splitting the company into two divisions could be dangerous for the other. Blackberry smartphones require the data network for email and browsing, while RIM's data network is all but completely worthless without BlackBerry phones.
RIM's acquisition of Ubitexx in May 2011 could open up the data network to other smartphone makers, in what now appears in hindsight to be a strategic move in case all else failed.
BlackBerry Mobile Fusion allows enterprise-like secure email for iPhones and Android devices. However, the software would likely be sold to enterprises that already have their own BlackBerry enterprise (BES) infrastructure, and it is unlikely that OEMs like Samsung or HTC would pay licensing fees for the privilege of operating on its network.
But those thinking back not so long ago will no doubt remember that smartphone maker Palm met an eerily similar set of circumstances.
In the mid-2000's, Palm Computing voluntarily split into two, which then became PalmOne, which created Palm-related hardware, while PalmSource developed operating system software. PalmOne changed its name back to Palm Inc. in 2005, while later that year PalmSource was acquired by ACCESS.
HP bought Palm in 2010 for $1.2 billion in cash following dwindling sales. After a series of failed CEO transitions and poorly executed management strategy, HP as a whole company suffered financially. A year later, the PC maker said it would cease production on anything Palm related.
Had Palm carried on as a separate company without HP's buyout bid, the current duopoly of smartphone behemoths notwithstanding, the company may have had a shot had it continued to compete in the market share race.
If history is to be our guide, RIM could be facing a similar downfall to that of Palm.
If RIM splits into a data network and a hardware company, the hardware side under a different owner could eventually run Android or even Windows Phone software, and would not have to be limited to BlackBerry 10.
Where that leaves RIM's forthcoming operating system --- which the company has invested so much into, even as much as laying off employees not involved in the software effort --- it remains unclear.
Related:
- RIM's impending collapse: By the numbers
- Can RIM survive until BlackBerry 10?
- RIM’s Q1 unravels, operating loss on deck
- CNET: Is this the beginning of the end for RIM?
- ZDNet: RIM layoffs: BlackBerry 10 all in, or get out?
- Who falls first: RIM or Nokia?
- UK government keeps RIM in play with BlackBerry 7 security rating
- RIM targets India, Indonesia in short-term revenue hit
- BlackBerry maker denies consumer market retreat
- Yahoo lays off 2,000: Promises ’smaller, nimbler’ company
- CNET: HP plans to cut 27,000 jobs, plow savings into R&D
- ZDNet Great Debate: RIM or Nokia: Which has the better turnaround prospects?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Beggars can't be choosers
Beggars can't be choosers. Good luck. Here's hoping you can fetch some multiple higher than an image sharing services whose primary technology is allowing a user to apply a dozen or so colored filters to their pictures.
A more timely article
RIMM was still trading over $50 at that point.
What is with Hartung astroturfing his articles here?
Hmm
You are right
If they make the switch and continue to sit in their fat azzes expecting to survive with the brand name alone, they will still die a horrible death. They will have to innovate, and constantly improve the service to make it more appealing than the competition. They will have to step up the game and stay ahead of the competition. They can't afford to be a me-too company always late to the game.
Go for the money
This entire post is a logical fallacy
How about comparing RIM to GOOD. Good was a direct competitor to RIM. They now find themselves as a successful mobile management software company.
Let's not write RIM off, no matter how gleefully you wish them to fail.
Yep and
It's a RIMPocalypse
What can save RIM from death?
Don't feel confortable in a doctor's office in future
I mean Blackberry bought QNX in a bid to save themselves. QNX makes firmwares for various medical devices.
Too late...
As for BES/Fusion, some here imply that Fusion is basically running non-BB phones through the BES infrastructure. I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that Fusion is just an ActiveSync wrapper bolted onto the traditional BES and the main benefit of Fusion is a centralized, platform independent admin console and that being an ActiveSync wrapper, iPhone and Android devices aren't going through the BES infrastructure (e.g. RIM's NOC) the way BBs do. Anyone know for sure?
One thing I do know...
Android is free and open
I Call BS
RIM doesn't exactly need help...
RIM will be worth money, in the IP purchasing market,
No matter what, RIM won't be lasting much longer, and the vultures are circling.
One interesting fact
Anyways, If this split is true then its sad that RIM's messaging network could then be separated from its struggling handset business.
- Sara
http://www.hireamobileappdeveloper.com/
What a dumb blog....
Even the title is full of doggy do. There has always been rumours [once again started usually by dumb bloggers or even dumber analysts who said that either [or both] Microsoft or Facebook want to get into the smartphone business.
One article came out claimed that Microsoft is even in production of a smasrtphone - which was news to a manager of the Windows Phone division and everyone else.
See also http://ebraiter.wordpress.com/2012/06/26/why-not-to-believe-in-rumours-electronics-industry/ for more dumb stuff from analysts.