Samsung spills the beans on Apple's 'mini iPad' plans?
Summary: As Samsung and Apple continue its "bipolar" relationship of parts supply amid patent disputes, Apple could encroach Samsung's safe haven by attacking the 7-inch tablet market.
Less than a week since Apple announced its latest iPad, an unnamed Samsung official has told the Korea Times that Apple is "planning to release a smaller iPad", a device that could wipe rival tablets off the face of the market.
It comes following a Bloomberg report that Apple used Samsung's QXGA technology in the latest iPad iteration for its Retina display, ditching LG's technology due to lack of quality.
It seems that while Apple and Samsung squabble over patents and intellectual property, the two companies can still work together on a component supplying level. As sister site CNET puts it so bluntly: "Go figure."

The unnamed source --- who asked not to be identified --- said that the current contract between Apple and Samsung stands at "above $9.7 billion", but could "go up to $11 billion" depending on the demand for the new iPad.
The source went on to say that Apple's products "lines the pockets of Samsung". It's certainly a strange state of affairs when a technology super-giant sues a rival firm, yet in doing so effectively pays the company through other means to defend itself.
But Samsung is keen to separate legal tussles with its component supplying business. Jun Dong-soo, Samsung's memory unit chief, recently said: "We don’t see any negative impact on the partnership with Apple because of the legal issues."
Apple bought parts and components worth $7.8 billion from Samsung in 2011, the report said.
The death of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, who famously rejected the idea of 7-inch tablets, allowed for the Cupertino-based giant to pursue a competitive edge in the smaller-sized tablet space.
It's not the first we have heard on rumblings of rumours that Apple could be developing a 'mini iPad' to compete with the likes of Amazon and Barnes & Noble in the tablet space. In the past year, the two companies sidelined its e-reader venture to build Android-running tablets for the consumer market.
The iPad is indeed in a league of its own in the tablet market. While Amazon dominates the e-reader space with the Kindle range of devices, and Samsung retains the 7-inch tablet space, the iPad reigns as the 'ultimate' post-PC device. If Apple cracks the 7-inch tablet space, we can safely say that Samsung will longer keeps its crown within the sub-category of post-PC devices.
Apple's new iPad features a 10-inch Retina display with over 350 260 pixels per inch, a high-resolution camera, and 4G LTE capabilities. Priced at $499, it is available for pre-order and shipping begins this week.
Related:
- With Apple’s new iPad, supply chain is the hero
- iSuppli: iPad expected to drive NAND memory sales through 2015
- The ‘next iPad’: Is Apple running out of ideas?
- iSuppli: Apple will regain lost tablet market share
- The iPad success story — giving us what we want, again
- Latest iPad may boost Apple’s app, music revenue
More from the new iPad launch:
- Meet Apple’s new iPad, now with a Retina Display
- New Apple TV announced at iPad event
- Apple ‘does an iPhone 4S’ with new iPad: Disappointed?
- Apple’s new iPad announcement: The numbers to know
- All ZDNet coverage of Apple’s iPad
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Doesn't seem likely
Agree; "iPad mini" is just fantasy unless Apple will implement its patent
This technology is very difficult, so it is doubtful that it will be ready this year.
You sued me! I hate you!
"wipe rival tablets off the face of the market "
Blown up iPhone??
As far as "Just a blown up iPhone". Have you used one outside of the standard apps?? I do many things on the iPad which are down right difficult(but not impossible) to do on my iPhone. Things like editing documents, note taking, rdp and ssh to servers, switches, etc. Apps like syncspace, remarks(awesome), good reader, docstogo(I know it's all over), etc stretch what the iPad can do. Then you have all of the readers, and streaming which work so great on iPad vs the iPhone.
However, the true challenge for tablets coming up will be with capabities in the software and not necessarily with the hardware. We already are getting very fast cpu's, and unbelievable screens. Things can only get incremental for that stuff from here on out. The big deal will be, will there be a new shift based off of a "Why didn't I think of that change in the OS or maybe a app".
I welcome the competition because it should hopefully raise all of the competitors and we get to benefit(again I agree with you about 2013).
This will also be a 3 horse race where eventually one will drop out, or be force into a niche category. I just wonder which one it will happen to.
Hyperbole much?
Microsoft apparently thinks that if they can just put the right UI on the Windows Work Computer, and shrink it down to the size of a tablet, they can sell 50 million units too. Maybe they can.
I doubt that one or the other will loose[sic]. The Softies don't want to admit this, but it's apparent in the sales numbers that a whole bunch of people don't want their tablet to be a big, complicated, work-related device. That said, some people will want that, and I won't be surprised if they gravitate toward Windows. What will surprise me is if they gravitate toward Windows [i]tablets[/i]. My hunch is that those who want a "little computer" on which to do RealWork(tm) will ultimately decide to go with a laptop or Ultrabook. I think the whole idea of pitching a keyboardless device -- "docking station" or not -- as a tool for office workers is, erm, stupid.
Fuzzy memory
But I thought Microsoft was already in the tablet market? For 10+ years as a matter of fact. Are we supposed to forget the awesome "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition" and the Slates/Tablet PCs/UMPCs/and Swivel-Screen PCs that followed, and failed in the market?
What will be significantly different this time around? Metro-style lipstick? Cause as I recall, metro did nothing to help Microsoft in the mp3 player market, and is doing nothing to help sales in the phone market. How will things be different with the tablet market?
You'd think they have work to do
To be fair to them...
Metro has never existed in the MP3 player market
Okay, this is wrong...
It is 264 Pixels per inch and not the same as the phone so again, I maintain this is not a retina display.
What are you, the walking dictionary?
'Retina' is by angular resolution, not linear
Move the iPad closer than that, and it is no longer 'Retina'.
It is a bit fuzzy and 'mileage will vary'!