Seven U.S. states band together against AT&T, T-Mobile merger

Summary: A small group of states are joining the Department of Justice to block the merger of what could become the largest mobile provider in the United States.

The battle for AT&T and T-Mobile is heating up by the day. The latest move comes from seven U.S. state attorney generals who have lent their support to the Department of Justice in an effort to block the proposed $39 billion merger of AT&T and T-Mobile.

Those states are California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Washington. Of course, AT&T retaliated by telling Reuters that it has "11 state attorneys general and hundreds of other local, state and federal officials" on its side already.

This move comes just a day after a collective of 15 House Democrats rallied with a letter to the White House asking for President Obama to ask the DOJ to settle the lawsuit so that it may be approved.

Naturally, Sprint chimed in to support this move. Vonya McCann, Sprint's senior vice president for government affairs, issued the following statement with a familiar argument:

After a comprehensive review of the facts related to AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile, seven state attorneys general have reached the same conclusion as the U.S. Department of Justice: This proposed takeover violates antitrust law and would harm consumers, competition and our nation’s economy. This is a strong stand for American consumers, and Sprint commends this bipartisan group of state attorneys general for joining with the U.S. Justice Department to protect consumers, competition and American jobs.

Opposition from some of the most heavily populated states in the nation could help out the DOJ and influence the Federal Communications Commission even more.

Related:

Topics: Mobility, Banking, AT&T

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Seven U.S. states band together against AT&T, T-Mobile merger

    Epic Battle ahead.
    tatiGmail
  • RE: Seven U.S. states band together against AT&T, T-Mobile merger

    AT&T retaliated by telling??Reuters that it has ???11 state attorneys general and hundreds of other local, state and federal officials??? on its side already.

    But they couldn't buy them all.
    kingcobra23
  • RE: Seven U.S. states band together against AT&T, T-Mobile merger

    http://www.menshoes2u.com
    Shoes are making delightful waves in the world of men's fashion. So maybe finally, we understand the satisfaction experienced by women or maybe we never will.
    emilylouboutin
  • No standing

    There are many arguments back and forth about what constitutes "interstate commerce," but I don't think this one is going to be controversial. Look for courts to tell the states to go home and leave this one to the fedrel gubment.
    Robert Hahn
  • We need one wireless transmission standard!

    If we just had one RF emission type for wireless phones, the way that the rest of the big nations have chosen, then we'd be able to have competition with no contracts. Fighting over spectrum is silly. There should be companies selling cell tower infrastructure access to the cell companies and that would create competition for quality of service! A long time ago, the US govt messed up by not breaking AT&T up along the lines of "equipment" (AT&T) and services (RBOCs) so that we could have competition at both levels. With these silly end to end services, we can not have any competition at all, which isn't detrimental to the consumer when someone leaves the market place.
    greggwon@...
  • rmyyvao 22 aoi

    glgmux,vgxoeiuq90, magfs.
    cdsfwrryd1301-24379050177225294201601075644329